whatever, its frustrating dealing with all the non company reps, and we all know that jacked wuz reformulated. A few reps even disclosed that yes a few things were switched around. But then theres people like you, just ridinng the bandwagon, and denying thing that you didnt even know had been disclosed.
There are several threads that i have read with this same arguement in it and they said that jacked had been reformulated for the meet general publics requests.
I.E.
reduction in the beta alanine
reduction in geranium oil
and there wuz one other ingredient
OH and didnt JAcked used to fizz, or am i wrong again, bcuz they didnt change the formula.
And we wont get into why all the products were held up in customs in 2008-2009
It really doesn't matter to me I had to get a new pre werkout, and just went with my own mix. I just dont like it when companies lieto the the public, even if its omitting the truth.
We all know the USP crowd stands behind USP, till they try other products, I started out the same way. Loved the asteroid stack, till all the changes.
Lyfespan, while you are either unwilling or incapable of reading my comments prior in the thread, I addressed all those issues. And indeed, I advised on the "reformulation," so your commentary as to "riding the bandwagon" is both ignorant and ill-informed. It did give me a chuckle, though.
I am a Vice President with the company, not part of the "USP crowd," so your comments here are certainly misplaced. I have seen a multitude of batch records and COAs for JACK3D's finished product specifications and raw materials since its inception, though based on your confidence, I will assume you have as well. Despite clarifying earlier in the thread, I will review again here:
There was an
increase, not a decrease, in the Beta Alanine, Creatine, and AAKG matrix - this would not produce any difference to the subjective experience of stimulation. And there was, in turn, a reduction in the sodium bicarbonate content due to copyright issues - again, not producing even a nominal alteration in the feeling of stimulation. Finally, theophylline was replaced with theomobrine. If you are capable of perceiving the replacement of one xanthine with another, than kudos to you.
Now, as I have said, I addressed these concerns prior in the thread, and also discussed the time-line of the changes, and how they do not cohere with reports. What I mean by, "the same formula" being on the shelves on NP, is this: these changes occurred quite some time ago - and the most recent reports of "non-response" have cropped up within the last month. The chronology of events does not fit, and that stands true for almost every report in this thread.
If you will excuse me, though, the bandwagon is pulling away. :usa:
