bigmark1972
Board Supporter
Well?
I think they ditched some of the bills the bill that is active now is H.R.3866 which was active last week. There are two versions of the bill. The are calling it the anobolic steriod controll act of 2004. I heard from someone I trust that they will be voting on it soon. As in June 7 or 8th.S. 1780, the senate version of the bill hasnt moved since October. So I think we may still have some time. I dont think that they would pass the house bill and have it get enacted and then do the senates. They meet for a commitee. And lord knows the senate is not know for its speed (unless passing amazing laws like the patroit act).
I have a feeling that it isn't going to take to long. Both D and R's are pretty much in agreement on this issue. They will prob. take DHEA out because of the elderly lobby but that's about it.yea i HR 3866 is going down soon. I just thought maybe we had hope in a competing senate version. That way they have ot hammer out the differences
Great post.bigmark1972 said:Gonna catch some crap for the law enforcement line, but per population cops, law enforcement and firemen, use more gear than any of us. Not that I care that they do but it pisses me off anyways.
Too bad the Govenment has nothing better to do than spend taxpayer dollars busting PH users. It's not like we have a war going on or that it costs 75 dollars to fill the tank on my pickup truck. At least they have their priorities in check God forbid someone else breaks the home run record next year.
This whole thing saddens me greatly, I served for 5 years in the military, they sent me to Somalia where I almost died many times and accomplished nothing AKA "jack ****". Yet they are so concerned with my health they will arrest me for using a pro-hormone.
I love this country, but our rights as citizens are dwindling away and our tax burden is ever increasing. If things keep going like this I am going to ship out, as in c ya later USA.
As a person who is a Libertarian, it's a waste to join the party. They're very inneffective at even getting their message out, much less fielding national level candidates. They have a lot more success with local level candidates, and also have at least made it mathematically possible for them to win a national election by being on the ballot in all the states.Jeff said:Already home brewing for the last year. Damn, every day I think more and more about supporting the libertarian party.
The drug laws in this country are asinine, but hey why change the pattern now.Bennett said:The messed up thing about the legal system is ,at least in my state,that you get the same amount of time for a 10$ crack rock as a sick ass f#&ker would get for molesting his own kid.
I know, but I feel it's less of a risk.Matthew D said:IW, converting them is just as illegal as getting gear from a source.. FYI
Well, I've been in law enforcement for over 17 years and I have only personally known and/or suspected about five people using aas's who are employed in these fields. Most won't put their career's at risk by using. Especially with yearly drug testing/physicals, and random drug testing. And yes, most agencies will go the extra yard, draw blood and run the tests if they suspect use. People at larger agencies may get away with it more often due to sheer numbers of employees and the agencies overlooking the possible use. If you want to talk per population, look more towards college and professional athletes.bigmark1972 said:Gonna catch some crap for the law enforcement line, but per population cops, law enforcement and firemen, use more gear than any of us. Not that I care that they do but it pisses me off anyways.
Well yeah I guess, Bodybuilders would of course be the highest percentage, I meant non atheletes. As far as other jobs I stand by my statementIf you want to talk per population, look more towards college and professional athletes
bigmark1972 said:OK, I fail to see why this got moved to "off topic" as the topic is about as related to pro-hormones as it could possibly be but your the boss. I thought it would be nice if any important "people" would see the results I expect to see (as in it will simply force most to use real gear) it could do our position some good. No one will see it here so there goes that idea.
MaDmaN said:Natural for me,but not a puppet....
I think Pro-hormones are overated anyway..I tried them and nothing to write home about...Plus at my age natural is the only way to go....
I just do not like the idea of the goverment telling me what I can have and what I cannot.....
Alcohol kill's alot of peeps and no ban there....It's all about the Benjamin's know what I mean...!!!!
I hear you on that one.milwood said:I don't always follow my own good advice, however (unfortunately).
Rogue Drone said:Come on , Jergo, it's not like at 40 you'll be chemically wasted or unresponsive. I may be some kind of a freak , but I respond like a mofo to prohormones at 42, with or without them I'm much faster and more powerful, with greater energy, than most people half my age. I do also take a lot of protective, antiaging supplements and have had an lifelong athletic lifestyle.
Course, I could be lying, maybe I'm really a teenager with aspirations of Modhood and a psuedo doctoral dissertation of my opinions on the latest methyls, never know, hehehehe...
Me, I just have a few more cycles to run to hit some twentysomething physical levels, then it's more maintence oriented anti-aging protocols for me. Then I'll transfer my conciousness into a droid around 2040 and live forever, F the dying thing. Only thing I look forward to in dying is the possibility of seeing my dead pets again, like to think my fur babies are waiting for me.
I hear ya there. It's sad when most of the year everyone mistakes you as a powerlifter.T-Bone said:Its just loosing fat that I have a problem with!.
I LOVE this quote!milwood said:I don't always follow my own good advice