Top Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

[AE14]

Nothing I post necessarily reflects my views or opinions. I prefer to remain flexible. What I posted today imo was very interesting though.

In what way interesting? They denied it as they entered a fire fight with police? Not surprising. Even though there is a witness that specifically stated they told him they did it.

Please realize that posting this does nothing but discredit you IMO. I know you don't believe all, but most is quite suspect.

 

[ax1]

In what way interesting? They denied it as they entered a fire fight with police? Not surprising. Even though there is a witness that specifically stated they told him they did it.

Please realize that posting this does nothing but discredit you IMO. I know you don't believe all, but most is quite suspect.

First...its the only confession from "them" we have on record. You do only hear bullets coming from one direction, although its short clip. Doesnt mean much, but the mainstream news isnt covering this (just like countless 9-11 clips) so I will.

Do I think that they said "we didnt do it" and I should feel sorry for them and believe them? Of course not. Its still interesting that we have that and should be accounted for. Its a piece of the puzzle to add to the entire equation, all small pieces of evidence need to be accounted for. I wish I can see the whole event of the shootout on film if it exists, wonder if they tried to have them arrested alive, thats whats more important we need to find out.

Im more interested in why they killed Tamerlan although he was alive and well in custody (if true according to a witness,) yet they say he was killed in a crossfire. Why did they shoot up his brother in the boat when they could have taken him out practically unharmed? There are many other issues that are covered in several different posts that are interesting.

Anyways, that "we didnt do it" video was such a tiny thing I even posted a Wayne Madsen article underneath it which normally I dont double article in a post. I think people generally try to cling to small, easy parts or evidence to try to discredit all the information I post as a whole.

This thread isnt about my "credit" and gaining any type of status.

 

[texastea]

There are around 2 million Americans in prison. Virtually every one of them readily proclaim they "didn't do it" when they discuss their cases.


Sent from my iPhone, slacking at work, using Tapatalk

 

[rugger48]

There are around 2 million Americans in prison. Virtually every one of them readily proclaim they "didn't do it" when they discuss their cases.

Sent from my iPhone, slacking at work, using Tapatalk

Weird, wonder why that is?

 

[Johal604]

Who the F are you to come on here and spew this filth and then not even have the balls to give your opinion on the matter in which you repudiate?!

You are filthy waste of a human being with no value to the race! Sit in your hole and scavenge the webz for with your little truther friends and stay the F out of my way because if I was ever aproched by a jackhole like you spewing your venom I would smash your little fkn head!

You disgust me! I gave you three chances to provide your opinion on the matter and you cowardly backed down every time that's because deep down you people realize that your theroy's are rubbish and you have nothing but a couple frigging fruit loop youtube video's to back your rediculous claims!

The saddest part of the whole thing is how much credit you give the U.S. Government for hiding such atrocities! Pa-lease!!!!!

Your a clown man open your eyes you blind ****in fool lol. Use your brain as well if you got one.

 

[texastea]

Weird, wonder why that is?

Either the government has been running its false flag conspiracy program at a higher level than thought or, and this is where it gets complicated, thieves, murderers and rapists also lie.


Sent from my iPhone, slacking at work, using Tapatalk

 

[Johal604]

Everyone needs to watch "Loose Change 9/11" a documentry available on NetFlix as well as YouTube. Excellent facts. Will blow your minds. Open your eyes and watch plz!

 

[ax1]

Everyone needs to watch "Loose Change 9/11" a documentry available on NetFlix as well as YouTube. Excellent facts. Will blow your minds. Open your eyes and watch plz!

I think thats the one when New York City's Deputy director for Emergency Services Dept. gave his explosive testimony to the film about his experience inside building 7. He died shortly after the filming.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[Johal604]

I think thats the one when New York City's Deputy director for Emergency Services Dept. gave his explosive testimony to the film about his experience inside building 7. He died shortly after the film.

Yah man. Very sad. Barry seemed like a good guy. 2 days before the official report is released by the feds he admits himself Into hospital and is later pronounced dead. No known health issues...nothing. very odd. My father is a private investigator as well as me. I am very tempted to dig into Berry Jennings...clearly the Private Investigator in the documentry had no sack.

 

[ax1]

Yah man. Very sad. Barry seemed like a good guy. 2 days before the official report is released by the feds he admits himself Into hospital and is later pronounced dead. No known health issues...nothing. very odd. My father is a private investigator as well as me. I am very tempted to dig into Berry Jennings...clearly the Private Investigator in the documentry had no sack.

Its easy to take someone out and have it untraceable.

 

[ax1]

Obama Urges Grad Students to “Reject” Warnings About “Government Tyranny”

President tries to align big government agenda with vision of founders

Paul Joseph Watson
May 6, 2013

President Barack Obama gave a speech to Ohio State University graduates yesterday during which he urged them to “reject” warnings about government “tyranny” and to place more trust in the state.

“Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems,” Obama told the audience at the Ohio State commencement ceremony. “They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.”

​

Calling on the students to dispense with “individual ambition,” Obama attempted to align his big government agenda with the vision of the founding fathers, lamenting the fact that less and less Americans trust the state.

​

“We have never been a people who place all our faith in government to solve our problems. We shouldn’t want to. But we don’t think the government is the source of all our problems, either,” added Obama.

​

Obama’s remarks strike a somewhat different tone that those of his predecessor Ronald Reagan, who repeatedly gave speeches warning that “government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.”



​

Although Obama invokes the intention of the founding fathers in his bizarre statist rhetoric, their views on government were also decidedly different.

“Those are governed best who are governed least.”
– Thomas Jefferson

“Government is not reason, nor eloquence. It is force. And like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearsome master.”
– George Washington

“The sheep are happier of themselves, than under the care of wolves.”
– Thomas Jefferson

“I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.”
–Thomas Jefferson

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”
– Benjamin Franklin

​

 

[ax1]

Eyewitnesses: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Did Not Shoot Boston Cop

Friendly fire incident heaps more skepticism on official narrative behind raid

Paul Joseph Watson
May 7, 2013

Invalid Link RemovedDzhokhar Tsarnaev. Image: FBI

Eyewitnesses to the shootout involving the alleged Boston bombers have thrown up another contradiction to the official narrative, asserting that MBTA Transit Police Officer Richard H. Donohue Jr. was not shot by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev but by other cops in a friendly fire incident.

​

Invalid Link Removed had blamed the Tsarnaev brothers for the shootings of both MIT campus police officer Sean Collier and Donohue, feeding the narrative that the suspects were engaged in a desperate attempt to flee police by returning fire and throwing improvised bombs.

​

However, as Invalid Link Removed, footage from the raid suggests the brothers may have been trying to surrender as they came under a barrage of gunfire. Audio from the scene captures the suspects yelling, “chill out” and “we didn’t do it,” as bullets seem to fly in one direction only.

Boston Bombers During Shootout: “Chill Out....We Didn’t Do It!”


​

Add this to Invalid Link Removed, that the footage which emerged of police arresting a naked uninjured man was her nephew, contradicting the official narrative that Tsarnaev was critically injured in a shootout and suggesting he may have been killed while in custody, and it’s easy to see why some are questioning whether the raid unfolded exactly as authorities claimed.

Invalid Link Removed

​

Eyewitnesses to the shootout Invalid Link Removed by police that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ran over his own brother in a car, stating instead that he was run over by police.

​

“Eyewitness accounts strongly suggest that MBTA Transit Police Officer Richard H. Donohue Jr. was shot and nearly killed by a fellow officer in Watertown April 19 during the hail of gunfire unleashed on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as the suspected terrorist made a getaway in a carjacked sport utility vehicle,” Invalid Link Removed.

​

Witnesses who lived close to the scene of the shootout said they clearly remember Donohue falling to the ground while Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was speeding away in an SUV.

​

“A black SUV appeared, and rapid gun fire was focused on the vehicle,” Jane Dyson wrote in a statement provided to the Globe. “It appeared to me that an individual at the corner [of the street] fell to the ground and had probably been hit in the gunfire,” adding that the officer appeared to be a victim of “friendly fire.”

​

The report notes how the suspects were no longer armed at this point, “suggesting that the shot that wounded (Donohue) came from police.”

​

In addition, when cops apprehended Dzhokhar Tsarnaev the next evening he did not have a gun and only one other gun was found at the scene of the shootout, again confounding claims that the brothers could have returned anything near the 300 rounds ammo police fired at them.

​

The fact that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed before he was caught also Invalid Link Removed that he had engaged in a “shootout” with cops while hiding in a boat.

​

Donohue almost bled to death at the scene and was in critical condition when taken to hospital but is now expected to make a full recovery.

​

Skeptics of the official story suggest that the brothers could have been just two members of a wider plot or that they could have been convenient patsies, having Invalid Link Removed before the bombings.

​

The suspects’ mother Zubeidat Tsarnaeva continues to insist that her sons are innocent, telling the Associated Press last week, “It’s all lies and hypocrisy.”
​

 

[ax1]

Breaking News!!

Sources: Seal Team 6 Was Murdered

TheAlexJonesChannel
August 7, 2011

The SEALs team has reportedly been extremely angry about the fabricated OBL raid and ready to talk. Alex Jones to bring sources on air tomorrow LIVE at 11 AM CST



More to come tomorrow on this latest breaking news!

SEAL Team 6 Families to Blame Government For Deaths

“Never before revealed information” to be aired at press conference

Paul Joseph Watson
May 8, 2013

Families of the SEAL Team 6 members who were killed when their helicopter crashed in Afghanistan in August 2011 are set to give a press conference tomorrow during which they will hold the Obama administration partially responsible for the deaths of their sons.

​

With the administration already reeling over today’s Benghazi revelations, Invalid Link Removed on the ‘Tea Party Command Center’ website promises “never before revealed information” about the circumstances behind the incident.

​

“Accompanying the families of these dead Navy SEAL Team VI special operations servicemen will be retired military experts verifying their accounts of how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban,” states the press release.

​

30 Americans were killed on August 6, 2011 when insurgents shot down a U.S. military helicopter during fighting in eastern Afghanistan. Most of the victims belonged to the same unit as the Navy SEALS involved in the Bin Laden operation, although US military officials said that none of the individuals involved directly in the Bin Laden mission were killed in the crash.

​

Issues set to be raised include how the Obama administration’s handling of the death of Osama Bin Laden made retaliatory attacks against SEAL Team 6 more likely, as well as how SEALS were sent into battle “without special operations aviation and proper air support.”

​

Perhaps even more controversially, the family members are set to reveal how a Muslim cleric attended the funerals of the servicemembers and disparaged them by “damning them as infidels to Allah.” The press release states that a video documenting this will be played to members of the press tomorrow.

​

Other revelations include “How and why the denial of requested pre-assault fire may have contributed to the shoot down of the Navy SEAL Team VI helicopter,” and, “How Afghani forces accompanying the Navy SEAL Team VI servicemen on the helicopter were not properly vetted and how they possibly disclosed classified information to the Taliban about the mission, resulting in the shoot down of the helicopter.”

================================================================

Press Conference: NAVY SEAL TEAM VI FAMILIES TO REVEAL GOVERNMENT’S CULPABILITY IN DEATH OF THEIR SONS IN FATAL HELICOPTER CRASH IN AFGHANISTAN FOLLOWING SUCCESSFUL RAID ON BIN LADEN’S COMPOUND

(Washington, D.C.). Three families of Navy SEAL Team VI special forces servicemen, along with one family of an Army National Guardsman, will appear at a press conference on May 9, 2013, to disclose never before revealed information about how and why their sons along with 26 others died in a fatal helicopter crash in Afghanistan on August 6, 2011, just a few months after the successful raid on the compound of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in the master terrorist's death.

Accompanying the families of these dead Navy SEAL Team VI special operations servicemen will be retired military experts verifying their accounts of how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban.

Full Story on Press Conferance: Invalid Link Removed


​

 

[ax1]

SEAL Team 6 Families to Blame Government For Deaths

“Never before revealed information” to be aired at press conference

Press conference of families of Navy SEAL Team 6 killed in Afghanistan (Part 1)

(For better readablity you can see this article in its original link here: Invalid Link Removed)

Thursday, May 9, 2013 14:41
Before Its News

It was the elites-of-elites Navy SEAL Team 6 who, on May 2, 2011, broke into Osama bin Laden’s secret compound in Abbotabad, Pakistan, and assassinated the Al Qaeda leader. Team 6′s exploits greatly boosted Obama’s then-sagging ratings. The shameless POS also took personal credit for the achievement of Team 6.

Three months later, on August 6, 2011, 22 members of Navy SEAL Team 6 were among the 30 American servicemen and 8 Afghans who were killed when their Chinook helicopter (call sign Extortion 17) reportedly was shot down by Taliban rebels in Afghanistan. Invalid Link Removed, military officials said none of the crash victims had been on the Bin Laden mission.

This morning (May 9, 2013), the families of three SEALs (Aaron Vaughn, Michael Strange, John Faas) and a National Guardsman (Patrick Hamburger) who were killed in the Chinook crash, gave a press conference in the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. Also present were retired U.S. military officers and politicians (Michele Bachmann and Allen West).

Here’s the video of the press conference, which is nearly 3 hours long.


In this post, I will report on the first part of the press conference. Part Two will be posted tomorrow.

The press conference began with Larry Klayman, president of Freedom Watch and founder of the citizen watchdog group, Judicial Watch, delivering the introductory remarks. Klayman summarized the families’ grievances as follows:

• Obama and Joe Biden improperly revealed the identities of the Navy SEALs who were on the mission to assassinate Osama bin Laden, thereby putting “a target” on the backs of the SEALs.
• The Chinook helicopter was “inadequate,” as was its pilot.
• When the Chinook was attacked by the Taliban, our side “couldn’t return fire” and was “handcuffed.”
• At the funeral in Bagram Airfield in Kabul, Afghanistan, for our servicemen, Jesus’ name couldn’t be mentioned but instead an imam prayed.

Next, a video of the funeral was shown (beginning at 0:14:50):
Invalid Link Removed

At the 0:17:37 mark, a priest or minister wearing a black stole said: “We will begin this … [inaudible] military …[inaudible] commend the souls of the departed into your loving care. Amen.”

Invalid Link Removed

The minister immediately is followed by an imam reciting a prayer in Arabic. His face is partially obscured in this screen shot, but you can see he’s a Middle-Easterner:

Invalid Link Removed

Here’s the imam’s “prayer,” which the video translated into English. Words between brackets are the video-maker’s explanatory comments on the prayer:

“Amen. I shelter in Allah from the devil who has been cast with stones. In the name of Allah the merciful forgiver. The companions of the “fire” (the sinners and infidels who are fodder for hell fire) are not equal with the companions of heaven. The companions of heaven (Muslims) are the winners. Had we sent this Koran to a mountain, you would have seen the mountain prostrated in fear of Allah (mocking the God of Moses). Such examples are what we present to the people, so that they would think (repent and convert to Islam). Blessings are to your God (Allah), the God of glory of what they describe. And peace be upon the messengers (prophets) and thanks be to Allah the lord of both universes (mankind and Jinn).”

The video ends with a composite of the photos of the servicemen who were killed in the crash, and still shots of the downed Chinook:

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed

The next speaker is Billy Vaughn, the impassioned father of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn.

Invalid Link Removed

Vaughn began by saying his son was not on the “right chopper” that fateful day, August 6, 2011, because Obama had increased the number of special op missions from a monthly average of 56 in 2009, to 186/month in 2010, to as many as 334 a month between August 2010 and July 2011, a month before his son died in the Chinook crash. A direct result of the radical increase in the number of special op missions was the scarcity of available MH-47 copters. Vaughn maintains that if his son had gone on a MH-47 that night, he would have had a better chance of surviving the fire fight.

Vaughn continues:

“But according to a 3-star Invalid Link Removed‘s statement to the grieving families that day, ‘We want to win the hearts and minds of the enemy.’ Aaron Vaughn did not become a Navy SEAL Team Six to win the hearts and minds of jihadists. He became a Navy SEAL to fight for this [American] Republic and defeat the enemy.

Any American flag officer who does not want to defeat the enemy needs to find another job. Any man who sits in that White House who does not want to defeat … ….

I have two questions: Why did they [Aaron and the other servicemen] not ride in the right chopper? Why did they not shoot down the enemy? …

The record will show that the Islamists are responsible for the deaths of the Americans. But I submit to you today that the U.S. government and many high-ranking military people own more credit for the shoot down than the Taliban. Political correctness, building the esteem of the Afghans, leveling of the playing field, and failure by the Obama Administration to name the enemy and to accurately identify the savage ideology our warriors are up against have made possible … [inaudible]. This administration apparently went to extreme efforts to make sure that the enemy Osama bin Laden had a proper burial. Our president was outraged when the Koran was burnt.

But then those who die for the Republic (pointing his finger at the video screen behind him, referring to the funeral at Bagram), this is allowed to go on. To steal their First Amendment rights, to steal their religious rights, to be violated by Islam.

Invalid Link Removed, it is sad that our troops are under your command. It is sad, General, after the imam damned our warriors, you stood and talked about how we’re one, about how we’re brothers.

Mr. Obama, President Obama, you need to step up or step down. You must step up and defend our warriors. You must step up and show the outrage that you have shown when the religion of Islam is disrespected….

I tell you today, we have sheep and wolves in high places, and they are getting our sheepdogs killed unnecessarily. But I will also tell you today, that no plan of Hell or scheme of man can separate Aaron Vaughn from the love of God that is Jesus Christ, our Lord. Not the imam or Washington, DC. Aaron’s God is the God of the Bible.”

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed, Navy Chief Special Warfare Operator (SEAL), 30, left behind a wife, 2-year-old son, and a 2-month-old daughter.
​

If you don’t tear up at the anguished cries of Aaron Vaughn’s dad, then your heart must be as black and stony as President Lucifer’s — assuming he actually has one.

Tomorrow, Part Two of “Press conference of families of Navy SEAL Team 6 killed in Afghanistan.”

~Eowyn

 

[Geoforce]

Wait I thought the thread said Bin Laden died in 2001

 

[ax1]

Wait I thought the thread said Bin Laden died in 2001

Take what I say with a grain of salt (like you dont already do, lol)...but I do believe the raid happened, but I dont believe it was Bin Laden that they took out. Im very suspicious as to why Seal Team 6 were in the situation they were in with that helicopter. Its one of those things Ill probably never know for sure, but Id be shocked if Bin Laden was really still alive in 2011 or anything close to that.

 

[southpaw23]

Wait I thought the thread said Bin Laden died in 2001

Lol. I was so tempted, then I remembered what Downey Jr. had said "never" to do in Tropic Thunder.

 

[braco1]

Lol. I was so tempted, then I remembered what Downey Jr. had said "never" to do in Tropic Thunder.

SP23 - clear out your inbox!

 

[ax1]

Lt Gen Mclnemey Is Ashamed Our Military Responded Benghazi Libya & Blames Obama Admin - Lou Dobbs

"There is only one person who can say "stand down...and thats the President of the United States""



Rep. Ann Wagner states that the President of the United States is the one to give the command to stand down

Wagner was asked by talk show host Dana Loesch, “Because you have been an ambassador, you have been overseas with similar responsibilities and similar missions – who gives such an order to stand down? Where does that come from?”

​

“The President of the United States,” responded Wagner.

​

Benghazi Memo Edits Show State, White House Involvement

Tory Hargro and Janet Loehrke
Invalid Link Removed
May 10, 2013

A top State Department official pressed the CIA and the White House to delete any mention of terrorism in public statements on the Benghazi terror attack to prevent critics from blaming lax security at the consulate, according to documents obtained by ABC News.

The information “goes right to the heart of what the White House continues to deny,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told USA TODAY. “For eight months they denied there’s any manipulation, but this continues to shed light on something that was never true.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement to USA TODAY on Friday that the changes were made to prevent members of Congress from “providing more guidance to the public than the administration.”

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

[TABLE="class: contentpaneopen"]
[TR]
[TD="class: contentheading"][/TD]
[TD="class: buttonheading"] Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed[/TD]
[TD="class: buttonheading, align: right"] Invalid Link Removed[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="class: contentpaneopen"]
[TR]
[TD]
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Written by Chris Sarns
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: createdate"] Wednesday, 08 May 2013 18:51

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD] Invalid Link Removed

Chris Sarns​

Editor’s note: To this day most people, including many architects and engineers, are not aware that a third skyscraper, World Trade Center Building 7, mysteriously collapsed along with the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The official report on this building’s collapse by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been challenged by many reputable and credentialed technical professionals. The NIST analysis has not undergone the rigors of scientific peer review – the typical pathway for validating significant scientific theories. Chris Sarns’ research appears in Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book titled Invalid Link Removed."

The studies below represent years of work by Chris in unraveling some of the most glaring inconsistencies and outright frauds in the NIST report on World Trade Center 7. He demonstrates that the NIST’s theory of the fire-induced collapse of Building 7 is faulty and misleading.

The destruction of this skyscraper on September 11 was truly unprecedented in the history of high-rise buildings. More than 1,900 architects and engineers at Invalid Link Removed are demanding a new investigation.

Chris has also been deeply involved in the work of Invalid Link Removed, where he provides his expertise on WTC 7.

During the next five months, we will be presenting five articles written by Chris Sarns that address the alleged fire-induced collapse of World Trade Center 7 at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001.

Quotes from the NIST WTC 7 report are shown in "brown"

---

1. BURNED-OUT FIRE

The timing of the fire on floor 12 exposes NIST's false claim that fire led to the collapse.

The images shown below on the left are Sarns' approximations using the photogrpahs as a guide of where and at what times the fire existed on floor 12. On the right is the NIST ANSYS computer model for the same times.

"Note that only window glass breaking times were prescribed in the fire model. The observed fire activity gleaned from the photographs and video were not a model input" NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2 p. 378 [pdf p. 40]

NIST will not release the input data because doing so might "Invalid Link Removed"

Invalid Link Removed
Quotes and photographs from the NIST reports on the collapse of WTC 7

Fire spread:

"On those floors that were mostly subdivided into offices (such as Floors 11 and 12), the fire would have grown within a single office, reaching flashover within several minutes. After about 5 to 15 min, the ceiling tile system would have failed from the heat, and the hot air would have flowed over the office wall. Soon the hot air would fail the ceiling of an adjacent office, and eventually the thermal radiation would ignite the contents in this office. Fire spread would have been similar for offices separated by a corridor, although this would have taken longer, since the hot air would have to travel further and would be cooling along the way." NCSTAR 1A p. 19 [pdf p. 61]

"The mass of the furnishings per office was not known" NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1 p. 60 [pdf p.104]

"the average combustible fuel load on the 11th and 12th floors was estimated as 32 kg/m2" NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2 p. 376 [pdf p.38]

All things being equal, the fire would have spread consistently. But the NIST ANSYS computer model (above) inexplicably bypassed the offices to the southwest of column 79, burns around column 79 on the east side and then burned the offices to the southwest of column 79 two hours later.

"Fires on Floors 11 to 13 persisted in any given location for approximately 20 min to 30 min." NCSTAR 1A p. 47 [pdf p. 89]

Photos showing progression of fire:

"From 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Looking from southeast corner to the south face.

Fire on floor 12;[1] area above covered with smoke

Fire on floors 11-12[1] moved to east face and progressed to the north

[1] fires reported on floor 14, but photographs showed east face fires on floor 12." Part IIC p. 21

[TABLE="width: 533, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: left"]Invalid Link Removed

Figure 5-114. Oblique view of the east face of WTC 7, taken at 2:08:28 p.m. +/- 1s​

[/TD]
[TD="align: left"] Fire was first seen on the 12th floor at 2:08 p.m. toward the south end of the east face. Further south on this face, the window glass was still intact, indicating that this fire had burned in the building interior as it turned the southeast corner." NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1 p. 245 [pdf p. 289]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: left"] Invalid Link RemovedFigure 5-117. Photograph showing fires on the east face at 2:28:43 p.m. +/- 1s [34, 37 and 40 are column numbers][/TD]
[TD="align: left"] "By around 2:30 p.m., the visible flames had diminished, but the fire had spread both south into the southeast corner and north, reaching two-thirds of the way to the northeast corner." NCSTAR IA, p. 20 [pdf p. 62][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Fire first appears on the north face of floor 12 about 80 feet from the north-east corner:

"By 3:00 p.m., the fire had spread internally past the northeast corner and onto the north face." NCSTAR 1A p. 20 [pdf p.62]

The fire spread internally through the offices around column 79 and under the beams which allegedly underwent enough thermal expanion to push a girder off its seat and initiate the "global collapse" at 5:20 p.m.

Invalid Link Removed

Figure 5-119. Photograph showing the north face of WTC 7 taken from a helicopter around 2:57 p.m. +/- 5 min


​

Invalid Link Removed

Figure 5-121. Cropped photograph of the north face of WTC 7, taken from a helicopter around 3:05 p.m. +/- 5 min


​

“In less than 15 min, the fire simultaneously spread rapidly to the east to engulf the northeast corner of the floor and more slowly westward about one-third of the way across the north face.” NCSTAR 1a P. 20 [PDF P.62]

Invalid Link Removed

Figure 5-135. Cropped photograph showing the east edge of the north face and an oblique view of the east face. It was likely taken between 3:20 p.m. and 3:40 p.m.

​

"The fire continued spreading westward in starts and stops, approaching the northwest corner of the floor around 3:45 p.m." NCSTAR 1A p. 20 [pdf p. 62]

Invalid Link Removed

Figure 5-136. Frame taken from a video shot from near the corner of Greenwich Street and Park Place showing the north face of WTC 7 between 3:49 p.m. and 3:54 p.m.


​

The photographs reveal that the fire on floor 12 had progressed from the south side of the building to the north side by 3:00 p.m. – and had engulfed the northeast corner by about 3:15 p.m. This means that the fire in the area in question (around column 79 and under the beams and girder in the northeast corner) had burned out at about 3:50, because as noted above, the fires burned for only about 20 to 30 minutes in any given location.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

References:
Invalid Link Removed

NCSTAR 1A
Invalid Link Removed

NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1 and 2
Invalid Link Removed

Part IIC
Invalid Link Removed

Next month we will examine what Chris Sarns has described as "MAGICAL THERMAL EXPANSION" because NIST used numerous unscientific methods and fraudulent inputs to get the key girder that allegedly initiated the total collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 to fail in its computer simulation. Be sure to check back next month for the continuation of this exceptional analysis.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Original Post: Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

**Ron Paul's Urgent Message**

Have your voices heard now!
Say No To National ID Card



Invalid Link Removed
Dear Anabolic Minds Board Members ,

President Obama's bipartisan "Gang of 8" is eager to ram through the statists' National ID card under the guise of "immigration reform."

You should be worried. I sure am!

So much so that I prepared an urgent video about the dangers of a National ID card - with specific details on what you can do to help defeat it.

I hope you won't let the statists get away with their attempt to implement the WORST National ID scheme we've seen to date.

View video message for detail's above.

Invalid Link Removed.

In Liberty,
Invalid Link Removed
Ron Paul
Chairman

No National ID Petition to:
My U.S. Representative and Senators
​

Whereas: Privacy from government is a chief cornerstone of our liberties, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

​

Whereas: In the past, many Members of Congress, instead of taking steps to end illegal immigration, have chosen instead to use the issue to dramatically expand government intrusion into our lives; and

​

Whereas: The so-called "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" proposal being touted by Senators Chuck Schumer and John McCain includes a de facto National ID card that would be required for all U.S. citizens in order to hold a job legally; and

​

Whereas: A National Database with biometric information would also be created, allowing government bureaucrats to track an American’s every move.


​

Therefore: I urge you to oppose any legislation requiring U.S. citizens to obtain a National ID system just to get a job - or any other bill that would establish a National ID card that includes biometric scanning or tracking devices.

Invalid Link Removed.
​

​

 

[ax1]

Military Says No Presidential Authorization Needed To Quell “Civil Disturbances”

DoD “instruction” seeks to abolish Posse Comitatus, grease skids for military coup

Paul Joseph Watson
May 17, 2013

A recent Department of Defense instruction alters the US code applying to the military’s involvement in domestic law enforcement by allowing US troops to quell “civil disturbances” domestically without any Presidential authorization, greasing the skids for a de facto military coup in America along with the wholesale abolition of Posse Comitatus.

​

Invalid Link Removed
Image: Wikimedia Commons

The instruction (embedded at the end of this article), which was originally released in February yet has only come to light this week, outlines DoD policy regarding, “DoD support to Federal, State, tribal, and local civilian law enforcement agencies, including responses to civil disturbances within the United States.”

​

On page 16 of the document (Invalid Link Removed), we find the following amendment (emphasis mine);


​

(3) When permitted under emergency authority in accordance with Reference (c), Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances because:

​

(a) Such activities are necessary to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order; or,

​

(b) When duly constituted Federal, State, or local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for Federal property or Federal governmental functions. Federal action, including the use of Federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect Federal property or functions.


​

On page 17 of the document, a number of different scenarios are listed under which the military is forbidden involvement, although the broader power of quelling domestic disturbances without presidential or congressional authorization is claimed.

​

In essence, this policy change seeks to supersede Invalid Link Removed, the 1878 law which forbids the military from being involved in domestic law enforcement “except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.”

​

Under the Invalid Link Removed, the President may deploy armed forces domestically under extreme circumstances but Congress has to review the action every 14 days.

​

Under the Invalid Link Removed, the President cannot commit troops to an armed conflict for a period longer than 60 days without an authorization from Congress of the use of military force or a declaration of war.

​

Under no circumstances in current US law is it legal for the military to deploy itself domestically without authorization from either the President, Congress or both.

​

In claiming this power, the Pentagon is effectively opening the door to a potential future military coup.

​

Invalid Link Removed

​

“It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control,” Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, Invalid Link Removed, adding that the rule change represents “a wanton power grab by the military.”

​

Afran pulled no punches in comparing the move to what happened in Nazi Germany under similar decrees, noting that it hands, “emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

​

Afran also cautioned that the term “temporarily” was a misnomer.

​

“Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” he stated. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

​

The new DoD “instruction” follows numerous other examples of how the military is clearly gearing up for civil unrest and confrontation with American citizens on U.S. soil.

​

Invalid Link Removed for “Civil Disturbance Operations” leaked in July last year outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.

​

The document outlines how military assets will be used to “help local and state authorities to restore and maintain law and order” in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.

​

The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under the guidance of U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which Invalid Link Removed, outlines how internees would be “re-educated” into developing an “appreciation of U.S. policies” while detained in prison camps inside the United States.

​

On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”

​

Preparations for civil unrest inside the United States have accelerated over the past five years.

​

Back in 2008, U.S. troops returning from Iraq were Invalid Link Removed with one of their roles including helping with “civil unrest and crowd control”.

​

In December 2008, the Invalid Link Removed on plans to station 20,000 more U.S. troops inside America for purposes of “domestic security” from September 2011 onwards, an expansion of Northcom’s militarization of the country in preparation for potential civil unrest following a total economic collapse or a mass terror attack.

​

A report produced that same year by the Invalid Link Removed warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest in the wake of a series of crises which it termed “strategic shock.”

​

“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” Invalid Link Removed, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful domestic resistance”.

​

Invalid Link Removed, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border.

​

During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments,
and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”

​

Read the full DoD document below.
​

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

The IRS’s Job Is To Violate Our Liberties


Ron Paul
May 20, 2013

(note: Skip to youtube video if you prefer to listen)

“What do you expect when you target the President?” This is what an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent allegedly said to the head of a conservative organization that was being audited after calling for the impeachment of then-President Clinton. Recent revelations that IRS agents gave “special scrutiny” to organizations opposed to the current administration’s policies suggest that many in the IRS still believe harassing the President’s opponents is part of their job.

As troubling as these recent reports are, it would be a grave mistake to think that IRS harassment of opponents of the incumbent President is a modern, or a partisan, phenomenon. As scholar Burton Folsom pointed out in his book New Deal or Raw Deal, IRS agents in the 1930s where essentially “hit squads” against opponents of the New Deal. It is well-known that the administrations of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson used the IRS to silence their critics. One of the articles of impeachment drawn up against Richard Nixon dealt with his use of the IRS to harass his political enemies. Allegations of IRS abuses were common during the Clinton administration, and just this week some of the current administration’s defenders recalled that antiwar and progressive groups alleged harassment by the IRS during the Bush presidency.

The bipartisan tradition of using the IRS as a tool to harass political opponents suggests that the problem is deeper than just a few “rogue” IRS agents—or even corruption within one, two, three or many administrations. Instead, the problem lays in the extraordinary power the tax system grants the IRS.

The IRS routinely obtains information about how we earn a living, what investments we make, what we spend on ourselves and our families, and even what charitable and religious organizations we support. Starting next year, the IRS will be collecting personally identifiable health insurance information in order to ensure we are complying with Obamacare’s mandates.

The current tax laws even give the IRS power to marginalize any educational, political, or even religious organizations whose goals, beliefs, and values are not favored by the current regime by denying those organizations “tax-free” status. This is the root of the latest scandal involving the IRS.

Considering the type of power the IRS excises over the American people, and the propensity of those who hold power to violate liberty, it is surprising we do not hear about more cases of politically-motivated IRS harassment. As the first US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall said, “The power to tax is the power to destroy” — and who better to destroy than one’s political enemies?

The US flourished for over 120 years without an income tax, and our liberty and prosperity will only benefit from getting rid of the current tax system. The federal government will get along just fine without its immoral claim on the fruits of our labor, particularly if the elimination of federal income taxes are accompanied by serious reduction in all areas of spending, starting with the military spending beloved by so many who claim to be opponents of high taxes and big government.

While it is important for Congress to investigate the most recent scandal and ensure all involved are held accountable, we cannot pretend that the problem is a few bad actors. The very purpose of the IRS is to transfer wealth from one group to another while violating our liberties in the process, thus the only way Congress can protect our freedoms is to repeal the income tax and shutter the doors of the IRS once and for all.

Former Congressman Ron Paul’s article first appeared at Invalid Link Removed, the temporary home for his weekly column until his personal web page is up and running.



==================================================================================================


Obama-Backed FSA Rebels Name Their Brigade “Osama Bin Laden”

White House openly seeking to arm terrorists in Syria


Paul Joseph Watson
May 20, 2013

Underlining once again how the White House is openly seeking to arm terrorists in Syria, video has emerged of one of the FSA rebel groups referring to their unit as the “Osama Bin Laden” brigade.



The clip shows one of the militants proclaim how he is part of “The Osama bin Laden brigade of the Souqour Dimashq (Hawks of Damascus) Battalion…..Allahu Akbar!” as the insurgents prepare to attack a Syrian Army checkpoint.

“Western countries have been claiming that the FSA is comprised of somewhat “secular” people and that jihadists have only joined the fight but they are not part of the FSA. Well, you cannot get more al-Qaeda’ish than calling a brigade “Osama bin Laden,” states the description accompanying the video.

​

Indeed, while the media narrative has attempted to frame the presence of Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria under the banner of Jabhat Al-Nusra as a separate entity to FSA fighters, whom the White House is now preparing to arm with heavy weaponry, Invalid Link Removedwhich was responsible for Invalid Link Removed, immediately after the group was declared a terrorist organization by the State Department back in December.

​

Invalid Link Removed noted how Jabhat al-Nusra is “emerging as the best-equipped, financed and motivated force fighting Bashar al-Assad’s regime,” and how droves of FSA fighters are now joining its ranks.

​

This is by no means the first time western-backed FSA rebels have proudly proclaimed their affinity with Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.

​

Invalid Link Removed, video footage emerged showing Syrian rebels singing songs in praise of Osama Bin Laden while celebrating the “sweet memory” of the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.

​

“They (Twin Towers) have gone with the blink of an eye, oh how sweet is the memory,” the crowd sings in Arabic. “Our leader Osama Bin Laden, America’s worst nightmare,” the song continues as the crowd cheers, “If they call me a terrorist I will consider it an honor, our terror is blessed, a divine call, Allah is our goal we strive to reach him.”

​

FSA fighters have also displayed the black Al-Qaeda flag on innumerable occasions, including recently Invalid Link Removed.

​

A Syrian rebel Invalid Link Removed last year was overheard to remark, “When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!”

Other militants have appeared in You Tube videos speaking of their desire to Invalid Link Removed and impose Sharia law once the rebels are victorious across the region.

​

Rebels have also been caught on camera Invalid Link Removed.

​

The fact that Syrian opposition fighters are increasingly being exposed as sectarian jihadists loyal to Al-Qaeda, in addition to their innumerable atrocities, has derailed the now flimsy narrative that the FSA is comprised of freedom fighters who merely want to topple the dictatorship of Bashar Al-Assad to restore liberty in Syria.

​

With the Invalid Link Removed and reclaiming key areas of the country, the White House and other NATO powers are rapidly running out of time in their bid to oversee a repeat of what happened in Libya, where Invalid Link Removed as part of the effort to depose Colonel Gaddafi, a process that led to the country being overtaken by brutal warlords and terrorist gangs who later Invalid Link Removed last September.

​

Despite the fact that FSA rebels are Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed by Al-Qaeda militants, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs panel Invalid Link Removed urging the Obama administration to send $150 million in “lethal and non-lethal security assistance” to the insurgents. Earlier this month, Invalid Link Removed that the Obama administration was “rethinking” its opposition to arming the rebels.

​

However, Invalid Link Removed, the CIA has already been involved in “a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad” since early 2012.

​

Watch a video clip of western-backed rebels singing the praises of Osama bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11 attacks below.


​

 

[ax1]

Repost: (Note from Ax1....This is an important post, and like to re-post on occasion. There were 1,400 toasted cars on 9/11, and as far out as the FDR drive. Metal parts of cars toasted with perfectly intact vinyl/rubber. It appears they used the aid of some type of microwave technology from the Star Wars program (that was developed pre-70's pre-Reagan as far as I know). Its kind of like when you put a piece of chicken on a paper plate, the chicken will cook but the paper plate wont. Or, to make more sense if you put a piece of metal and rubber in a microwave you would get a the metal producing a heavy reaction, while the rubber nothing.)

Part 1

The Star Wars Beam Weapons
and
Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)
(A focus of the Star Wars Program)

[SIZE=+2]Toasted Cars[/SIZE]

At the time this article was being developed, many people expressed disbelief that energy weapons existed outside of science fiction until they were reminded of the Star Wars Program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)*. The name of this article was chosen as a reminder that energy weapons do exist and have been developed over 100 years. Most of this technology is classified information. It can also be assumed that such technology exists in multiple countries. The purpose of this article was to begin to identify the evidence of what happened on 9/11/01 that must be accounted for. In doing so, the evidence ruled out a Kinetic Energy Device (bombs, missiles, etc.) as the method of destruction as well as a gravity-driven "collapse." *SDI was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983.[SUP]1[/SUP] It is thought that SDI may have been first dubbed "Star Wars" by opponent Dr. Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun. However, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article published March 24, 1983, the day after the Star Wars speech, which quoted Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy describing the proposal as "reckless Star Wars schemes."[SUP]2 [/SUP]Before it was named the "Star Wars Program (SDI) in 1983, it was the Advanced Space Programs Development.[SUP]3[/SUP][SIZE=-1] [/SIZE]​

[SIZE=+1]Introduction [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. [Invalid Link Removed] These vehicles had peculiar patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did not.​

[TD="colspan: 2"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 64. Peculiar wilting of car doors and deformed window surrounds on FDR Drive.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 65. Map of lower Manhattan shows the WTC and FDR Drive a half mile or more apart. [/SIZE][SIZE=+1]Arial view of lower Manhattan. [/SIZE][SIZE=-2](mouse over to remove arrows and labels) [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed​	[SIZE=+1]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Figure 65a. Notice the dust-covered car in front of the toasted police car. There is also debris on the pavement away from the main part of the road. They probably couldn't clean it very well because the toasted cars were there.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]

[TD="width: 50%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 65b. Notice the dust-covered car behind the toasted police car. There is also debris on the pavement away from the main part of the road. So, it appears the roadway has been washed already. [/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]

Invalid Link Removed​

[SIZE=+1]Figure 65c. Notice the two dust-covered cars under the bridge. How did the dust fall there? Obviosly there were strong enough air currents to put it there. It's interesting how the drying pavement looks like it does after its been treated for snow and ice. (This is thought to be the entrance ramp to the Brooklyn Bridge from southbound FDR Drive.)[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]

​

Invalid Link Removed​	[SIZE=+1]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​
[SIZE=+1]Figure 66. Toasted cars in a lot near the WTC[/SIZE][SIZE=-1].[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Source:[/SIZE]

[TD="width: 50%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 67. Blistered car on FDR Drive with unburned upholstery and unburned plastic window molding.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"]

[SIZE=+1]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"]

[SIZE=+1]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 50%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 68. Front half of a car burned with a shiny, unburned rear end.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]

Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]
[TD="width: 50%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 69. What burned and dragged these cars and mangled the left rear wheel? Where are the door handles?[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed [/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"] [SIZE=+1]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE] [/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 70. What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van? What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right? In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan. Are we looking at the front or the back end? It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing. We can see daylight through the wheel well. [/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]

 

[ax1]

Part 2 of Toasted Cars on 9/11 read previous post for part 1

[SIZE=+1]Peeling Appearance [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]
[/SIZE]

Many vehicles had their outer surface peeled away like a sardine can. In some instances, clearly there is more than peeling paint was involved. It appears that the sheet metal delaminated as though something caused the material to melt or disintegrate at a certain depth. In some cases it appears that there was more heat damage inside than outside and vice versa.

​

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed
[SIZE=+1]Figure 71. What happened to the axles, wheels, and tires? On the doors, it appears that a heavy layer of paint peeled down from the top, yet the paint on the lower part of the doors has not been peeled away. Wow did the wheel get under the rear suspension?[/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Source:[/SIZE]​

[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 72. The car with the flat tire appears to have "wilted" from heat, from the top down, leaving a peeling appearance on the back end. The SUV on its right is missing all its window glass except for the windshield. The vehicle on the far right has no trace of tires, no door handles, no tail lights, and no windows. Why?[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 73. The peeling on the side door appears to be delaminated. Sheet metal is not laminated, so why would it do this? [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]

Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 74. Why does this ambulance have melted inside doors? The inside looks to have suffered more heat damage than the outside. What would cause that?[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 75. Oddly enough, there were also toasted cars at the Pentagon on 9/11.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 76. This is the same vehicle shown in the previous figure after the fires were extinguished. Why is the passenger door burned? Note how the hood is curled up.[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

​

• [SIZE=+1]Other Anomalies [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

The pictures below document a wide variety of damage to vehicles, including total incineration of vehicles, toasted and disappeared engine blocks, steel-belted tires with no rubber and only steel belts, deformed wheels, missing grills, broken and missing vehicle windows and mirrors, no door handles, wilted doors, and unburned paper next to burning cars.

​

[SIZE=+1]Figure firetruck. A badly damaged fire truck. Where did its engine go? The bottom of the tire has turned to goo below a distinct horizontal line in the tire. [/SIZE][SIZE=-1] Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[TD="align: center"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="align: center"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure hazmat. A FDMY Hazmat truck in front of WTC6 on West Street[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]. The remaining upper part of the truck has been peeled and evaporated in areas. The upper part of the cab is gone and the engine block seems to have disappeared. The photo was taken on 9/11 after WTC1 disappeared but before WTC7 collapsed[/SIZE][SIZE=-1].[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
(9/11/01) Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%, align: center"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%, align: center"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(e). Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(h). Is there something attractive about engine blocks? Why not gasoline fuel tanks?[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

​

​

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

[SIZE=+1]Figure 77. The mail truck parked on the left side of the street looks burnt. Why? (Click on photo for enlarged view.) The building on the left is the USPS Federal Building and on the right is WTC7. WTC5 is on fire at the end of the street. Why? If this area is hot enough for spontaneous combustion, why isn't the paper on fire? The cars on the right side of the street are also toasted. [/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure flip. Why is this car upside down? A burned out SUV with missing windows and toasted front end is parked in front of WFC2 on West Street but will not be moving under its own power.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/12/01) Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

​

• [SIZE=+1]Lower Manhattan [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

Invalid Link Removed​

[SIZE=+1]Figure Map. Arial view of lower Manhattan.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-2](mouse over to remove arrows and labels) [/SIZE] Invalid Link Removed

​

• [SIZE=+1]FDR Drive [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed
[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(a). Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC. Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]

[TD="width: 52%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 66(b). Wheels appear to have steel-belts from the tires still on them.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Source :[/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 66(c). Did one car run under the other during the event or were they stacked after the event? The marks in the pavement suggest they were pushed to the side of the road.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Source :[/SIZE][/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 66(d). The remains of a steel-belted tire without the rubber. [/SIZE] [SIZE=+1]This is a close-up of the figure above.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Source :[/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(j). The front end of this FDNY car is toasted and mildly deformed, while the door appears undamaged and the window glass is intact. The debris on this car suggests it was near the WTC.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(f). While the bodies of these toasted vehicles still exist, they've been incinerated. All of the softer materials inside and out have disappeared. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(k). This[/SIZE][SIZE=+1] Toasted Interior [/SIZE][SIZE=+1] was consumed except for the fire extinguisher.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:
[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(l). The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back. Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(m). What happened to the top half of car 1250? The doors are crinkled up, but the rear tire looks OK.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66. There is extensive damage to the front of car 2723, including no door handle on the driver's door. There is an unusual, unburned circular area on the rear door.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

​

 

[ax1]

Part 3 of Toasted Cars

• [SIZE=+1]Towed? [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

In the debate over toasted cars ignited by this article, some have argued that the wrecked vehicles on FDR drive were damaged at the WTC and were loaded up and Invalid Link Removed and dumped on FDR drive for storage. First, there is no evidence that this was done. Second, it makes no sense to load up wrecks, transport them, only to dump them in a busy thoroughfare for storage. These wrecks would have had to be picked up yet again and transported again. If vehicles were truly moved from the WTC to FDR Drive, we wonder why WTC steel beams were not stacked up on FDR drive, as well, if it was such a good storage area. Third, governments may be stupid, but we doubt they could be this inefficient. If reported, it would have been a minor scandal. Fourth, we might be wrong about the facts here, but it looks like the motive for this speculation about shifting wrecks around lower Manhattan is to protect the official story or thermite story or other pet theories. We fail to see any other explanation for such a "forced" interpretation for these photographs. Fifth, marks on the roadway suggest that some of these vehicles were pushed to the side of the roadway until they could be removed. For example, see this Invalid Link Removed. This is a more natural explanation for why some of the cars appear to have been moved from where they were damaged rather than all the way from the WTC.


​

• [SIZE=+1]Burning Cars [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

Invalid Link Removed​	Invalid Link Removed​

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(g). This fire seems to be very selective. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(i). A minivan is consumed by flames. The fire rages inside the vehicle, contained by the remaining windows. The fire appears more intense at the front where the engine is.[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure onfire1. The tires and even the pavement under the car are on fire. The windows appear to be intact with no visible interior fire. There is line of fire along the trunk lid. The right front fender is deformed and has turned white.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed [/SIZE][/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure onfire2. A fire rages, apparently on Vesey Street, sending up thick black smoke. These may be the vehicles that eyewitness Invalid Link Removed described as she ran past WTC6 during the destruction of WTC2.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]
Invalid Link Removed [/SIZE][/TD]

• [SIZE=+1]Missing Windows [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

​

Invalid Link Removed​	Invalid Link Removed​

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?[/SIZE]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(p). No window? What happened to the rear-view mirror?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(q). Why is the rubber window gasket hanging outward?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(r). Sans windows. (But nice tire!)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(s). Why is the paper shredded but nothing else apparently disturbed?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(t). What blew out the windows without damaging the rest of the fire truck?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(u). The window gasket is on the outside. What blew out the windows? What dislodged the front grill?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(v). It didn't blow out just the middle portion of the windows; it blew out the windows all the way back to the frame where it was mounted.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 66(w). Hosing down the windowless fire truck.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Source :[/SIZE][/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 66(x). Final cleaning of the windowless fire truck. Notice its grill is missing.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Source :[/SIZE][/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66. What could have caused such extensive damage to this car? Has the passenger side shoulder harness survived? Where's the steering wheel?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 66(z). Why is this fire truck burnt? It is missing its front grill, headlights, and related front end bright-work. Where are the tires?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

​

Most of the 1400 toasted cars had some, if not all, windows missing. What would cause this? Figure yy, below, shows a silver convertible with its top apparently intact but missing some of its window glass. If the windows were blown out from pressure inside, we would expect the convertible top to have been torn or blown off. This suggests that the windows were not blown out by internal pressure, but may have been shattered by some other mechanism.

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure yy. The cars parked in the back suffered extensive damage. The car on the left and on the far right look like they have had their engines eaten. The cars in the foreground experienced less damage, but many windows are missing, however partial and whole windows also remain.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/12/01) Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure 78. Why is this windshield crumpled up? Curiously, the interior of the car does not appear to contain anything that crashed through the windshield. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Source:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

 

[ax1]

Final Part 4

[SIZE=+1]Toasted Parking Lot [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast1. afterWTC2 was destroyed there don't appear to be any fires. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast2a. The cloud from the destruction of WTC1 rolls toward the parking lot. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast2b. Just after WTC1 is destroyed, fires start to burn the vehicles in the large lot, but not the paper. Why? [/SIZE] [SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast3. The vehicle fires increase in strength as sunling begins to emerge through the clearing dust cloud.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast4.The air upwind of the WTC has visably become clearer. The vehicle fires continue increasing and flames can be seen.
[/SIZE][SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed

[SIZE=+1]Figure 5. The air has cleared after the destruction of WTC1. This area would be first to clear as it is upwind of the WTC. The fire in the toasted lot has increased in strength, consistent with it having just been started.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast6. Sunlight begins streaming through the intersection. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast7 The intersection and the grasssy lot are covered with paper and dust that did not burn. So, what caused the vehicles to suddenly catch fire?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast8. How did these cars
catch on fire? [/SIZE][SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

[SIZE=+1]Figure street9(a). Gone with the Wind[/SIZE] [SIZE=+1]At the corner of West and Vesey, looking south toward the WTC complex. WTC1 was just destroyed and the people are cautiously emerging from their hiding places and slowly approaching the site with puzzled looks on their faces. "Where'd it go?" This appears to be about the same time as that of the previous three figures. [/SIZE][SIZE=+1] [/SIZE][SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[SIZE=+1]Figure street9(b). Gone with the Wind[/SIZE] [SIZE=+1]A view west along Vesey street across the West St. intersection. The toasted parking lot is on the right in the distance. This is after WTC1 was destroyed. Sunlight is visible on WFC3 (on left). Paper in the foreground is not on fire. Why are vehicles in the parking lot on fire at some distance away?[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1](9/11/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

Invalid Link Removed​	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast10. Toasted cars in the lot northwest of the WTC complex. There is little visible rust, so the photo was probably within a day or two of 9/11/01.[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][SIZE=-1](9/?/01) [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]Source: (WRH)[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast11. Not much visible rust, yet.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/?/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast12. The rust is noticeable[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1](9/23/01) Source: (JW cut down from NOAA)[/SIZE]​

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast13. A lot more rust[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/?/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast14. Towing finally begins.
[/SIZE][SIZE=-1](9/?/01) Invalid Link Removed: [/SIZE]​

[/TD]

Invalid Link Removed	Invalid Link Removed

[TD="width: 48%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast15. Presumably these cars are finally being towed away from that lot. Those wheels look fairly good which means they probably aren't steel.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/?/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 52%"]

[SIZE=+1]Figure toast16. The background is near the WTC
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](9/?/01) Invalid Link Removed:[/SIZE]​

[/TD]

See also Invalid Link Removed
(on a page not yet in this series).

---

​

[SIZE=+1]Jet Fuel (Kerosene) [/SIZE][SIZE=-2]Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE]

​

[TD="align: center"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 256, align: center"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 336"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 64. Peculiar wilting of car doors and deformed window surrounds on FDR Drive. Kerosene fires cannot do this.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1] Invalid Link Removed :[/SIZE][/TD]
[TD="width: 226"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 67. These fires do not melt or significantly weaken steel.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Source: Century wood stoves[/SIZE] [/TD]
[TD="width: 256"] [SIZE=+1]Figure 67k. Kerosene fires do not melt or significantly weaken steel.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Invalid Link Removed: Dyna-Glo kerosene heater: Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE] [/TD]

[TD="width: 336"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 226"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]
[TD="width: 256"]

Invalid Link Removed​

[/TD]

[TD="width: 336"] [SIZE=-1]Invalid Link Removed: Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE] [/TD]
[TD="width: 226"] [SIZE=-1]Invalid Link Removed: Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE] [/TD]
[TD="width: 256"] [SIZE=-1]Source: Invalid Link Removed[/SIZE] [/TD]

 

[ax1]

Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers

Psychologists help out the conspiracy theorists that won't let go of the official conspiracy theory



Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

How convinient, one "former" suspect was found dead in a river several weeks ago, and another one in custody by the FBI gets shot by the FBI.
Man with ties to Boston bombing suspect admits role in 2011 murders; shot during FBI questioning

Invalid Link Removed

========================================================================================

Former IRS Head: “I Can’t Recite the Constitution, Sir”

“You went to law school. Did you study the Constitution?”

“I believe I took Constitutional law, but I’m not prepared to take an exam at this time,” Shulman said with a chuckle. “Meaning I’ll answer any of your question but I can’t promise that I’m an expert.”



================================================================================

New Precedent: Armed Domestic Drone Strikes Will Soon Be Reality

Anthony Gucciardi
May 23, 2013

A new precedent has been set. Despite extensive denial that drone strikes would endanger Americans, Attorney General Eric Holder Invalid Link Removed openly admitted that four US citizens were killed through overseas drone strikes since 2009.

While not on United States soil, the deaths of the US citizens in nations like Yemen and Pakistan highlight the new precedent being set by US government heads who wish to use drones as a form of lethal enforcement on US soil. With Holder admitting that Americans have already died via drone strikes following his statements that Obama can alreadyinitiate drone strikes on US soil, we are now seeing the way paved to go ahead and announce armed drones to fight terrorism here in the US.

We all remember the initial rhetoric that drones were ‘no real threat’, and that they were simply unarmed scouting machines used to save lives overseas.

Then, we saw them rapidly Invalid Link Removed, and we heard the same tired reassurances. We saw them killing innocents overseas with the high powered weaponry being attached to these ‘scouting’ drones, and we see them still doing so today. But, once again, we’re told not to worry. Political talking heads like Eric Holder assure us that domestic drones, for which over 1,400 Invalid Link Removed been issued, are not meant to be used as weapons. Well, that is unless Obama decides to use the drones as a weapon of war on US soil.

ARMED DOMESTIC DRONES IN THE NEAR FUTURE

Despite the message of assurance regarding the promise that domestic drones would never turn into government-controlled war machines, Eric Holder decided to go ahead and announce that it would actually be entirely ‘legal’ for Obama to issue a drone strike on a US citizen on domestic soil. In fact, Invalid Link Removed reports that Holder does not ‘rule out’ the possibility of domestic drone strikes, and that a scenario could occur in the future. And to strike someone with a drone, of course, you would need weaponry. You would need an armed drone.

In other words, Holder is going against the major promise by the FAA official Invalid Link Removed that no armed drones will be flying on domestic soil. But don’t worry, Holder says the government has ‘no intention’ right now of issuing drone strikes on US soil. Just like the government never targeted Constitution and conservative-based groups Invalid Link Removed and would never use domestic drones to spy on you. Quite simply, if any power is given to these individuals in government, be sure of one thing: they will use it.

And knowing the track record of drone strikes overseas and how they greatly affect the innocent, drone strikes on US soil against citizens is an even more serious threat. The 3,000 plus deaths from drone strikes overseas in Pakistan alone, which vastly affect the innocent and non-threatening, have even prompted Google employees and big firms alike to develop charts and interactive maps to detail the deaths in a manner that portrays the reality of the situation. One design firm known as Pitch recently went and created Invalid Link Removed that, along with detailing how less than 2% of strike victims are high priority targets, documents the drone strike deaths throughout recent years.

We continue to hear these major announcements from Holder regarding drone strikes, and each time it pushes the precedent further. Each time, he warps the ‘law’ to justify what is being done with drone attacks, and each time we come closer to the announcement that we ‘need’ to use armed drones against domestic terrorists. Just wait for the next terrorist hunt in the US for a high profile crime case to hear more from Holder and the gang on why we need armed domestic drones to keep us safe. It already happened with Dorner and others.

This post originally appeared at Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

More War, “Kill Courts” at Home. The Real Meaning of Obama’s National Security Speeches

By Invalid Link Removed
May 28, 2013
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the “enabling act” principle.

The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

​

He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal.

The president warns of the threats of the new al-Qaeda affiliates that have sprung up in places like Iraq without explaining that it was the US invasion of Iraq that opened the door to their entry in the first place. There was no al-Qaeda in Iraq before the US overthrow of Saddam Hussein, just as there was little extremism in Libya before the US attack on that country in 2011.

The president claims that “unrest in the Arab world has also allowed extremists to gain a foothold in countries like Libya and Syria.” However, it was the US-led attack on Libya that resulted in extremists gaining power there, with many fighters afterward spreading unrest and destruction by joining the wars against the Syrian and Malian regimes. The extremists brought to de facto power in places like Benghazi were responsible for the murder of the US ambassador, yet the president says nothing about that unintended consequence of his interventionist policies.

He calls for even more interventionism in the future, but he promises that it will be a different kind of interventionism. He wants the US to shape democratic transitions in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya while actively supporting those seeking to overthrow the government in Syria.

​

He wants to take nation-building to a whole new level, urging that the US “help countries modernize economies, upgrade education, and encourage entrepreneurship.” He promises to battle extremism overseas by “training security forces in Libya, maintaining peace agreements between Israel and its neighbors, feeding the hungry in Yemen, building schools in Pakistan, and creating reservoirs of goodwill that marginalize extremists.”

What the president does not seem to understand is that we do not have the money to build schools, upgrade education, modernize economies, and encourage entrepreneurship overseas at a time when our national debt is $16 trillion. And besides, isn’t it a deeply flawed idea that the US government can achieve all of these remarkable results overseas when we know what a disaster these big government undertakings have produced at home? What we reject at home as Soviet-style central planning is fully embraced as effective foreign policy overseas. Should it really be the US government’s role to “modernize economies” or “encourage entrepreneurs” anywhere? Those are activities best left to the private sector, whether here at home or in far off lands.

President Obama’s speech is not at all what it seems. It is a call for more empire and more power to the executive branch. The president promises that “this war, like all wars, must end.” Unfortunately the war on the American taxpayer never seems to end. But end it will, as we are running out of money.
​

 

[ax1]

Kissinger Confronted As “Mass Murderer”

“You coward! You self-serving coward! Get lost!”

Paul Joseph Watson
May 29, 2013

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was confronted and labeled a “mass murderer” by We Are Change’s Luke Rudkowski during an event at which Kissinger was awarded a medal for his role in promoting “freedom and democracy.”

The confrontation took place after Kissinger gave a speech at the “Salute To Freedom” event which took place last week at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in New York.

​

Filming the exchange via a spectacle-mounted camera while Kissinger sat down to dinner, Rudkowski asked Kissinger what he meant by the quote, “The illegal we do immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer,” Invalid Link Removed via a Wikileaks data dump.​

After a garbled response, Kissinger remarked, “What are you doing this for?”

​

Rudkowski then asked, “We want to know what the agenda of the Bilderberg Group meeting’s going to be,” to which Kissinger responded, “Oh come on, get lost please, I said get lost!”

​

Rudkowski continued, “How does it feel winning the freedom award when you’re wanted as a mass murderer and wanted in many countries and butchered millions of people?”

​

“You coward! You self-serving coward – get lost!” Kissinger responded.

​

“You know this freedom award’s a lie and you’re wanted for mass murder in different countries – you know it’s a lie,” remarked Rudkowski.

​

Kissinger’s involvement in war crimes was best documented in Christopher Hitchens’ 2001 book Invalid Link Removed. After examining the evidence of Kissinger’s involvement in directing massacres in Vietnam, Bangladesh and Timor, as well as assassinations in Chile, Cyprus, and Washington, D.C., Hitchens concludes that Kissinger should be prosecuted “for war crimes, for crimes against humanity, and for offenses against common or customary or international law, including conspiracy to commit murder, kidnap, and torture.”

​

Hitchens also asserted that Kissinger is “a stupendous liar with a remarkable memory.”

​

A number of countries in South America and Europe Invalid Link Removed about his actions during the Nixon and Ford administrations and several individuals have also attempted to make a citizens arrest.

​

This is the third time that We Are Change have confronted Henry Kissinger. Watch the first two videos below, including Kissinger’s response to himself being quoted by Bob Woodward as saying, “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”




​

 

[ax1]

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
May 30, 2013

A shocking report from pan-Arab TV station Al-Jadeed reveals America’s Republican Senator, John McCain, visited kidnappers of Lebanese pilgrims.

Elizabeth O’Bagy, political director for the “Syrian Emergency Task Force” and , a U.S.-based nonprofit providing support to the opposition, allegedly organised the visit which brought McCain just half a mile inside Syria on Monday 27 May.

The 76 year-old notoriously hawkish senator is particularly famous for Invalid Link Removed consisting of the words “bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.”

In one meeting inside the Syrian border at the Bab al-Salameh border border crossing, he held talks with Asifat al-Shamal (Northern Storm Brigade), which controls the crossing. Asifat al-Shamal is one of countless militant groups which make up the much reported “Free Syrian Army”, a term which has becoming increasingly redundant as sectarianism, religious extremism and Al-Qaeda ideology become the norm.

In Elizabeth O’Bagy’s own Twitter commentary, she announced that McCain was hosted by the Asifat al-Shamal Brigade and met twenty “commanders” in total.

Invalid Link Removed
Elizabeth O’Bagy announces details of the visit which she claims to have organised

Soon after or during the snap visit, at least three photos surfaced showing McCain posing with various individuals.

In the following images, McCain is posing with senior members of the Asifat al-Shamal Brigade as well as the chief of the “Free Syrian Army”, Salim Idriss.

On May 22, 2012, dozens of Lebanese men and women were travelling on a bus through Syria on their way back to Lebanon from a pilgrimage to religious sites in Iran. After crossing the Turkish border into the Aleppo region, the bus was ambushed in Azzaz by around 30 gunmen, who forced several of the passengers to dismount at gunpoint. The militants instructed one of the passengers to go to the local police station, report the ambush and inform police officers of a desire to swap the hostages for two individuals being held by police.

Following much global media coverage, it was alleged by supporters and apologists of armed groups that the hostages were “members of Hezbollah”, a predictable accusation, echoing countless war crimes in which the victims are accused of being somehow linked to the Syrian government. Usually, the victims are of a minority sect, underlining the overt sectarianism espoused by the thousand or so militant groups operating in Syria. Victims of the ambush say that they were never accused of being members of Hezbollah, but rather, that because they are Shia Muslims, they could be used as leverage to negotiate with the Syrian government. The same militant group, Invalid Link Removed Fidaa Itani in late 2012.

In total, eleven men were kidnapped by the militant groups in Azzaz. The hostages have been regularly referred to as “the Forgotten” as they are still being held in captivity.

Daniel Shoueib, a relative of one of the hostages, who was reading the news of McCain’s surprise and unexpected visit, was shocked to see the photo which showed men he recognised as the kidnappers on May 22, 2012. Daniel went on to criticise American policy, specifically the sponsoring and support of terror groups who are responsible for acts such as sectarian kidnappings. .. points to the sign in the larger version of the photo which among other words printed, says “New Syria”.

Another relative, Hayat Aouali, spoke of the United States with its influence over armed militant groups, challenging its decision-makers to use the influence to bring about the release of the hostages, who are said to be held in circumstances involving maltreatment.

Significantly, Turkey’s support for armed groups in Syria, especially for the organisation with which McCain visited in Syria, paints a bleak picture of regional positions toward Syria. Indeed, it appears to vindicate the Syrian government’s position that the insurgency and violence are a result of foreign intervention.

Reporters from Lebanon’s Al-Jadeed TV met militants from the Asifat al-Shamal Brigade at the Bab al-Salameh border crossing, as did John McCain on Monday. In a screenshot of Al-Jadeed TV’s report, a man identified as Muahmmad Noor can be seen – a member of the militant brigade.

Invalid Link Removed
In the images of McCain’s visit, the same man can be seen.
Invalid Link Removed
The man behind McCain’s right shoulder is Abu Youssef. He stamped the passports of the Al-Jadeed TV staff when they visited Syria through the Bab al-Salameh border crossing. The following images show Abu Youssef in both a screenshot from the Al-Jadeed report and him posing with McCain during his visit.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Abu Youssef to McCain’s behind-right

Invalid Link Removed
Mohammad Noor & Abu Youssef

Invalid Link Removed
The following is the report from Al-Jadeed TV. The clip was translated by Invalid Link Removed.

Abu Youssef is spotted in a Invalid Link Removed on McCain’s visit. Note that the man being interviewed is present in all of the photos of the senators visit – highlighting the mainstream media’s reliance on what it usually refers to as peaceful “activists”, despite there oftentimes active involvement in armed and usually sectarian militant organisations.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Breaking: Official Bilderberg Attendee List Released

Invitees and agenda of talking points released

Invalid Link Removed
June 3, 2013
Here is the official list of attendees for the upcoming Bilderberg meeting at The Grove in Watford, England, as well as the agenda.

Hertfordshire, England 6-9 June 2013

Current list of Participants

Status 3 June 2013

Chairman

FRA
DEU	Ackermann, Josef	Chairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
GBR	Agius, Marcus	Former Chairman, Barclays plc
GBR
USA	Altman, Roger C.	Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners
USA
TUR
GBR	Balls, Edward M.	Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
PRT	Balsemão, Francisco Pinto	Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA
FRA
INT	Barroso, José M. Durão	President, European Commission
FRA	Baverez, Nicolas	Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
FRA
GBR
ITA	Bernabè, Franco	Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
USA	Bezos, Jeff	Founder and CEO, Amazon.com
SWE
SWE
NLD	Boxmeer, Jean François van	Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO, Heineken N.V.
NOR	Brandtzæg, Svein Richard	President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT	Bronner, Oscar	Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
GBR
ESP	Cebrián, Juan Luis	Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
CAN	Clark, W. Edmund	President and CEO, TD Bank Group
GBR	Clarke, Kenneth	Member of Parliament
DNK	Corydon, Bjarne	Minister of Finance
GBR
ITA
BEL	Davignon, Etienne	Minister of State; Former Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
GBR
NLD
TUR
GBR	Dudley, Robert	Group Chief Executive, BP plc
USA	Eberstadt, Nicholas N.
NOR
SWE
DEU	Enders, Thomas	CEO, EADS
Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs & Co.
DNK	Federspiel, Ulrik	Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA	Feldstein, Martin S.	Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBER
FRA	Fillon, François	Former Prime Minister
USA
GBR	Flint, Douglas J.	Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
IRL	Gallagher, Paul	Senior Counsel
USA	Geithner, Timothy F.	Former Secretary of the Treasury
USA	Gfoeller, Michael
USA
DEU	Grillo, Ulrich	CEO, Grillo-Werke AG
ITA	Gruber, Lilli	Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
ESP
GBR
CHE	Gutzwiller, Felix	Member of the Swiss Council of States
NLD	Halberstadt, Victor
FIN
GBR	Henry, Simon	CFO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
FRA
ESP
USA	Jacobs, Kenneth M.	Chairman and CEO, Lazard
USA	Johnson, James A.	Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
CHE	Jordan, Thomas J.	Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National Bank
USA	Jordan, Jr., Vernon E.	Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
USA
USA
GBR	Kerr, John	Independent Member, House of Lords
USA	Kissinger, Henry A.	Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA	Kleinfeld, Klaus	Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
NLD	Knot, Klaas H.W.	President, De Nederlandsche Bank
TUR	Koç, Mustafa V.	Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
DEU	Koch, Roland	CEO, Bilfinger SE
USA	Kravis, Marie-Josée	Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
CHE
GRC	Kyriacopoulos, Ulysses	Chairman, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A.
INT	Lagarde, Christine	Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
DEU
USA
BEL
DEU	Lindner, Christian	Party Leader, Free Democratic Party (FDP NRW)
SWE	Löfven, Stefan	Party Leader, Social Democratic Party (SAP)
DEU	Löscher, Peter	President and CEO, Siemens AG
GBR	Mandelson, Peter	Chairman, Global Counsel; Chairman, Lazard International
USA	Mathews, Jessica T.	President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
CAN	McKenna, Frank	Chair, Brookfield Asset Management
FRA	Montbrial, Thierry de	President, French Institute for International Relations
ITA	Monti, Mario	Former Prime Minister
USA	Mundie, Craig J.	Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation
ITA	Nagel, Alberto	CEO, Mediobanca
NLD
USA
FIN	Ollila, Jorma	Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
GBR	Omand, David	Visiting Professor, King’s College London
GBR	Osborne, George	Chancellor of the Exchequer
USA
TUR
GRC
TUR
FRA
USA	Perle, Richard N.	Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
USA	Petraeus, David H.	General, U.S. Army (Retired)
PRT	Portas, Paulo	Minister of State and Foreign Affairs
CAN	Prichard, J. Robert S.	Chair, Torys LLP
INT
CAN
FRA
POL	Rostowski, Jacek	Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister
NLD
AUT
AUT
PRT
FRA
NOR
IRL
DNK
CHE
SWE

[TD="width: 219"]Castries, Henri de[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, AXA Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]DEU[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Achleitner, Paul M.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Alexander, Helen[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman, UBM plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]FIN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Apunen, Matti[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Athey, Susan[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Professor of Economics, Stanford Graduate School of Business[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Aydıntaşbaş, Aslı[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Columnist, Milliyet Newspaper[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]TUR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Babacan, Ali[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Barré, Nicolas[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Managing Editor, Les Echos[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Bavinchove, Olivier de[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Commander, Eurocorps[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Bell, John[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Bildt, Carl[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Minister for Foreign Affairs[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Borg, Anders[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Minister for Finance[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Carrington, Peter[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Former Honorary Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Cowper-Coles, Sherard[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Business Development Director, International, BAE Systems plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Cucchiani, Enrico Tommaso[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]CEO, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Davis, Ian[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Senior Partner Emeritus, McKinsey & Company[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Dijkgraaf, Robbert H.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Director and Leon Levy Professor, Institute for Advanced Study[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Dinçer, Haluk[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]President, Retail and Insurance Group, Sabancı Holding A.S.[/TD]

[TD="width: 485"]Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise Institute[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Eide, Espen Barth[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Minister of Foreign Affairs[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Ekholm, Börje[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]President and CEO, Investor AB[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Evans, J. Michael[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Fishman, Mark C.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research[/TD]

[TD="width: 485"]Political Consultant[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Graham, Donald E.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Guindos, Luis de[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Minister of Economy and Competitiveness[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Gulliver, Stuart[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Group Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 485"]Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Heinonen, Olli[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Hermelin, Paul[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, Capgemini Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Isla, Pablo[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, Inditex Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Kaplan, Robert D.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chief Geopolitical Analyst, Stratfor[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Karp, Alex[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Founder and CEO, Palantir Technologies[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Kravis, Henry R.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Kudelski, André[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Lauk, Kurt J.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman of the Economic Council to the CDU, Berlin[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Lessig, Lawrence[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School; Director, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Leysen, Thomas[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Micklethwait, John[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Editor-in-Chief, The Economist[/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"]Netherlands, H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of The[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Ng, Andrew Y.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Co-Founder, Coursera[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Ottolenghi, Emanuele[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Özel, Soli[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Senior Lecturer, Kadir Has University; Columnist, Habertürk Newspaper[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Papahelas, Alexis[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Pavey, Şafak[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Member of Parliament (CHP)[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Pécresse, Valérie[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Member of Parliament (UMP)[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Reding, Viviane[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European Commission[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Reisman, Heather M.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Rey, Hélène[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Professor of Economics, London Business School[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Robertson, Simon[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Partner, Robertson Robey Associates LLP; Deputy Chairman, HSBC Holdings[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]ITA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Rocca, Gianfelice[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman,Techint Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Rubin, Robert E.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Rutte, Mark[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Prime Minister[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Schieder, Andreas[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]State Secretary of Finance[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Schmidt, Eric E.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Executive Chairman, Google Inc.[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Scholten, Rudolf[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Seguro, António José[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Secretary General, Socialist Party[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Senard, Jean-Dominique[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]CEO, Michelin Group[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Skogen Lund, Kristin[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Director General, Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Slaughter, Anne-Marie[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Sutherland, Peter D.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman, Goldman Sachs International[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Taylor, Martin[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Former Chairman, Syngenta AG[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]INT[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Thiam, Tidjane[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Group CEO, Prudential plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Thiel, Peter A.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]President, Thiel Capital[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Thompson, Craig B.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Topsøe, Jakob Haldor[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Partner, AMBROX Capital A/S[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]FIN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Urpilainen, Jutta[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Minister of Finance[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Vasella, Daniel L.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Honorary Chairman, Novartis AG[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Voser, Peter R.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]CAN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Wall, Brad[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Premier of Saskatchewan[/TD]

[TD="width: 219"]Wallenberg, Jacob[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman, Investor AB[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Warsh, Kevin[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]CAN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Weston, Galen G.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Williams of Crosby, Shirley[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Member, House of Lords[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Wolf, Martin H.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]USA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Wolfensohn, James D.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Wright, David[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Vice Chairman, Barclays plc[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]INT[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Zoellick, Robert B.[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"][/TD]
[TD="width: 219"][/TD]
[TD="width: 485"][/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]AUT[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Austria[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]INT International[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]BEL[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Belgium[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]IRL Ireland[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]CAN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Canada[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]ITA Italy[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]CHE[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Switzerland[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]NLD Netherlands[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]DEU[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Germany[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]NOR Norway[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]DNK[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Denmark[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]POL Poland[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]ESP[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Spain[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]PRT Portugal[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]FIN[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Finland[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]SWE Sweden[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]FRA[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]France[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]TUR Turkey[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GBR[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Great Britain[/TD]
[TD="width: 485"]USA United States of America[/TD]

[TD="width: 57"]GRC[/TD]
[TD="width: 219"]Greece[/TD]

Bilderberg Agenda

The 61st Bilderberg meeting is set to take place from 6 until 9 June 2013 in Hertfordshire, UK. A total of around 140 participants from 21 European and North American countries have confirmed their attendance. As ever, a diverse group of political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media have been invited. The list of participants is available on Invalid Link Removed

The key topics for discussion this year include:

• Can the US and Europe grow faster and create jobs?
• Jobs, entitlement and debt
• How big data is changing almost everything
• Nationalism and populism
• US foreign policy
• Africa’s challenges
• Cyber warfare and the proliferation of asymmetric threats
• Major trends in medical research
• Online education: promise and impacts
• Politics of the European Union
• Developments in the Middle East
• Current affairs

Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America.
Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields.

The conference has always been a forum for informal, off-the-record discussions about megatrends and the major issues facing the world. Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights.

There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.

 

[ax1]

Its amazing how just a few years ago just mentioning the Bilderberg group you were persecuted as a conspiracy theorist and these meetings didnt exist. How the times are changing and people are becoming informed.

British Bilderberg Participant Decries Group’s Secrecy

Jurriaan Maessen
June 5, 2013

Bilderberg 2013 participant: “I’m honored to have been asked to go. But it’s crazy. They [the organizers] wouldn’t tell us where we were going to stay until a couple of weeks beforehand.”

Invalid Link Removed
Sherard Cowper-Coles

Sherard Cowper-Coles, former diplomat and current director at BAE Invalid Link Removed at the Standard that the organization’s veil of secrecy not only applies to the outside world, but also extends to those invited to participate.

The Standard reported yesterday that “even those inside the perimeter are victims of Bilderberg’s steel ring of secrecy.” Journalist Joy Lo Dico quotes the influential BAE director as saying:

“I’m honored to have been asked to go,” he told me last night in London. “But it’s crazy. They [the organizers] wouldn’t tell us where we were going to stay until a couple of weeks beforehand,” adding with a smirk: “Some people had to book their private jets in advance.”

Cowper-Coles, who as former Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan has Invalid Link Removed guarding British interests in the Middle-East, is not the first Bilderberg participant to openly criticize the way the group’s Steering Committee upholds the veil of secrecy that has shrouded any insight into the annual confab for the last 59 years.

As Infowars Invalid Link Removed, there are obvious signs that some Bilderberg participants are now ventilating their discomfort with the Group’s unaccountable way of doing business, even contemplating a press-conference to appease protestors.

Paul Joseph Watson reported that “a source close to the security operation for the 2013 Bilderberg Group conference has told Infowars that numerous members of the secretive organization are aggrieved at the way it is being operated with scant regard for transparency and are lobbying for Bilderberg steering committee members to allow them to address protesters this week.”

According to Infowars’ source there are “a number” of participants involved in the meeting from tomorrow onward have criticized the meetings, even suggesting that a small delegation of Bilderberg members may come out and speak to the protesters and media set to assemble from June 6-9 at the Grove Hotel grounds. As Infowars relates today it’s very likely that the criticism is originating from the “Libertarian camp” within the group, most notably Peter Thiel- who is set to attend this year’s conference. Alex Jones, who has had contact with two separate contacts in the US Senate in the previous months, confirms that there is a discussion waging within Bilderberg about the issue of transparency.

The latest words by this year’s participant Sherard Cowper-Coles underlines the fact that there appears to be a division within the Group, which makes it likely that the core Group may dissolve the annual meetings and retreat into other, lesser known meetings in the future.

Jurriaan Maessen’s article first appeared at Invalid Link Removed.

===========================================================================

Bilderberg Ring of Steel


A ring of steel is being erected around the Grove, site of Bilderberg 2013.



No Fly-Zone Enacted Over Bilderberg Meeting

Police to use anti-terror laws and no-fly zone to secure Bilderberg Group conference at The Grove hotel, Watford

Watford Observer
Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

New World Order Secrecy: Who will be Attending the Bilderberg Meeting? What Will be Discussed Behind Closed Doors?

Invalid Link Removed

By Invalid Link Removed

Global Research, June 06, 2013

Each year, the Bilderberg venue brings together leading members of the financial and corporate elite, politicians, handpicked scholars, journalists and scientists.

It is An Anglo-Western European-North American Venue with participants from 21 Western countries (i.e Western Europe, US and Canada). With the exception of British born Polish Minister of Finance, Jacek Rostowski, there are no participants from Eastern Europe, the Balkans, Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East (with the exception of Turkey). There are 14 women out of 140 participants.

The Invalid Link Removed describes the venue as “a forum for informal, off-the-record discussions about megatrends and the major issues facing the world.”

Semi-secrecy prevails: While crucial negotiations are undertaken leading to far-reaching decisions, Prime Ministers and Finance Ministers in attendance are participating in their personal capacity; they are required not to report to Cabinet or to the Legislature.

This year’s 61st meeting is scheduled to be held at the Grove Hotel near Watford, Hertfordshire, U.K., June 6-9, 2013.

Various dimensions of the New World Order including the global economic crisis, the wars in the Middle East, biotechnology, cyber-warfare and Homeland security will be discussed behind closed doors.

“Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights.

There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.” Invalid Link Removed


​

The Venue will regroup some 140 participants including George Osborne, UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, Henry Kissinger, Timothy Geithner, former Secretary of the Treasury, Gen. David Petraeous, former head of the CIA, Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the IMF, Richard N. Perle, prominent adviser to the Bush Junior administration, Jeff Bezos, Founder and CEO of Amazon.com, Eric Schmidt of Google, two former presidents of the World Bank, James D. Wolfensohn and Robert B. Zoellick, among others.

Invalid Link Removed

Prominent members of the Anglo-American financial establishment include David Wright, Vice Chairman of Barclays, J. Michael Evans, Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs, Douglas J. Flint, Group Chairman of HSBC, Kenneth M. Jacobs, Chairman and CEO of Lazard, Peter D. Sutherland, chairman of Goldman Sachs International, Edmund Clark, President and CEO of Canada’s TD Bank Group. The Swiss banking establishment which overseas billions of dollars in undeclared “numbered bank accounts” is represented by Dr. Thomas Jakob Ulrich Jordan, the recently appointed Chairman of the Governing Board of the Schweizerische Nationalbank (Swiss National Bank).

A handful of establishment journalists (Washington Post, Financial Times, Economist), economics professors, representatives from corporate thinks tanks including the American Enterprise Institute, Carnegie and the Council on Foreign Relations will also be in attendance.

From the oil industry Simon Henry, CFO of Royal Dutch Shell and Robert Dudley, BP Group Chief Executive are on the list of participants.

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall will also be attending. Canada is the World’s second largest producer of uranium with most of the mining in Saskatchewan. Uranium is an important input into the production of nuclear warheads.

Major trends in medical research are also on the agenda. Prominent leaders of the pharmaceutical industry include Mark C. Fishman, President of Novartis Institutes for Invalid Link RemovedBioMedical Research, together with Dr. John Bell (left), Professor of Medicine at Oxford, who is a leading authority in biotechnology, working closely with Big Pharma.

Bilderberg has confirmed that global data banks pertaining to Homeland Security will be discussed under the heading of “big data” and that Eric Schmidt of Google will be addressing the topic.

The official list is not complete. In all likelihood, the names of several prominent delegates are not made public.

An earlier report by Infowars.com quoting “inside sources” stated that the Middle East war discussions would focus on “prolonging war on Syria by arming anti-Assad elements” as well as destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities within a three year period.

According to the Bilderberg website, the following vaguely defined topics will be discussed: (note from ax1: this is only the "official" list of topics)

• Can the US and Europe grow faster and create jobs?
• Jobs, entitlement and debt
• How big data is changing almost everything
• Nationalism and populism
• US foreign policy
• Africa’s challenges
• Cyber warfare and the proliferation of asymmetric threats
• Major trends in medical research
• Online education: promise and impacts
• Politics of the European Union
• Developments in the Middle East
• Current affairs
–

Continued on next post......

 

[ax1]

.......Continued from previous post

( (note from ax1: this is only the "official" guest list.)

Bilderberg Group meeting, June 6-9, 2013 – Full List of Participants

Chairman: Henri de Castries, Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
Paul M. Achleitner, Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
Marcus Agius, Former Chairman, Barclays plc
Helen Alexander, Chairman, UBM plc
Roger C. Altman, Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners
Matti Apunen, Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
Susan Athey, Professor of Economics, Stanford Graduate School of Business
Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, Columnist, Milliyet Newspaper
Ali Babacan, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs
Ed Balls, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
Francisco Pinto Balsemão, Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA
Nicolas Barré, Managing Editor, Les Echos
José Manuel Barroso, President, European Commission
Nicolas Baverez, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Olivier de Bavinchove, Commander, Eurocorps
John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford
Franco Bernabè, Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
Jeff Bezos, Founder and CEO, Amazon.com
Carl Bildt, Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs
Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance
Jean François van Boxmeer, CEO, Heineken
Svein Richard Brandtzæg, President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
Oscar Bronner, Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
Peter Carrington, Former Honorary Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
Juan Luis Cebrián, Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
Edmund Clark, President and CEO, TD Bank Group
Kenneth Clarke, Cabinet Minister
Bjarne Corydon, Danish Minister of Finance
Sherard Cowper-Coles, Business Development Director, International, BAE Systems plc
Enrico Cucchiani, CEO, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
Etienne Davignon, Belgian Minister of State; Former Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
Ian Davis, Senior Partner Emeritus, McKinsey & Company
Robbert H. Dijkgraaf, Director and Leon Levy Professor, Institute for Advanced Study
Haluk Dinçer, President, Retail and Insurance Group, Sabancı Holding A.S.
Robert Dudley, Group Chief Executive, BP plc
Nicholas N. Eberstadt, Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise Institute
Espen Barth Eide, Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs
Börje Ekholm, President and CEO, Investor AB
Thomas Enders, CEO, EADS
J. Michael Evans, Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs & Co.
Ulrik Federspiel, Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
Martin S.Feldstein, Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBER
François Fillon, Former French Prime Minister
Mark C. Fishman, President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
Douglas J. Flint, Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
Paul Gallagher, Senior Counsel
Timothy F Geithner, Former Secretary of the Treasury
Michael Gfoeller, US Political Consultant
Donald E. Graham, Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
Ulrich Grillo, CEO, Grillo-Werke AG
Lilli Gruber, Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
Luis de Guindos, Spanish Minister of Economy and Competitiveness
Stuart Gulliver, Group Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings plc
Felix Gutzwiller, Member of the Swiss Council of States
Victor Halberstadt, Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
Olli Heinonen, Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
Simon Henry, CFO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
Paul Hermelin, Chairman and CEO, Capgemini Group
Pablo Isla, Chairman and CEO, Inditex Group
Kenneth M. Jacobs, Chairman and CEO, Lazard
James A. Johnson, Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
Thomas J. Jordan, Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National Bank
Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
Robert D. Kaplan, Chief Geopolitical Analyst, Stratfor
Alex Karp, Founder and CEO, Palantir Technologies
John Kerr, Independent Member, House of Lords
Henry A. Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
Klaus Kleinfeld, Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
Klaas H.W. Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank
Mustafa V Koç,. Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
Roland Koch, CEO, Bilfinger SE
Henry R. Kravis, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
Marie-Josée Kravis, Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
André Kudelski, Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
Ulysses Kyriacopoulos, Chairman, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A.
Christine Lagarde, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
J. Kurt Lauk, Chairman of the Economic Council to the CDU, Berlin
Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School
Thomas Leysen, Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
Christian Lindner, Party Leader, Free Democratic Party (FDP NRW)
Stefan Löfven, Party Leader, Social Democratic Party (SAP)
Peter Löscher, President and CEO, Siemens AG
Peter Mandelson, Chairman, Global Counsel; Chairman, Lazard International
Jessica T. Mathews, President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Frank McKenna, Chair, Brookfield Asset Management
John Micklethwait, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Thierry de Montbrial, President, French Institute for International Relations
Mario Monti, Former Italian Prime Minister
Craig J. Mundie, Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation
Alberto Nagel, CEO, Mediobanca
H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of The Netherlands
Andrew Y.Ng, Co-Founder, Coursera
Jorma Ollila, Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
David Omand, Visiting Professor, King’s College London
George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer
Emanuele Ottolenghi, Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Soli Özel, Senior Lecturer, Kadir Has University; Columnist, Habertürk Newspaper
Alexis Papahelas, Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper
Şafak Pavey, Turkish MP
Valérie Pécresse, French MP
Richard N. Perle, Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
David H. Petraeus, General, U.S. Army (Retired)
Paulo Portas, Portugal Minister of State and Foreign Affairs
J. Robert S Prichard, Chair, Torys LLP
Viviane Reding, Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European Commission
Heather M. Reisman, CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
Hélène Rey, Professor of Economics, London Business School
Simon Robertson, Partner, Robertson Robey Associates LLP; Deputy Chairman, HSBC Holdings
Gianfelice Rocca, Chairman,Techint Group
Jacek Rostowski, Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister
Robert E. Rubin, Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
Mark Rutte, Dutch Prime Minister
Andreas Schieder, Austrian State Secretary of Finance
Eric E. Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
Rudolf Scholten, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
António José Seguro, Secretary General, Portuguese Socialist Party
Jean-Dominique Senard, CEO, Michelin Group
Kristin Skogen Lund, Director General, Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise
Anne-Marie Slaughter, Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University
Peter D. Sutherland, Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
Martin Taylor, Former Chairman, Syngenta AG
Tidjane Thiam, Group CEO, Prudential plc
Peter A. Thiel, President, Thiel Capital
Craig B. Thompson, President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Jakob Haldor Topsøe, Partner, AMBROX Capital A/S
Jutta Urpilainen, Finnish Minister of Finance
Daniel L. Vasella, Honorary Chairman, Novartis AG
Peter R. Voser, CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
Brad Wall, Premier of Saskatchewan Province, Canada
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman, Investor AB
Kevin Warsh, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Galen G.Weston, Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited
Baroness Williams of Crosby, Member, House of Lords
Martin H. Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
James D. Wolfensohn, Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
David Wright, Vice Chairman, Barclays plc
Robert B. Zoellick, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

–
The Bilderberg Chairman is
Henri de Castries, Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
–
The Members of the Bilderberg Steering committee are:
–
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]DEU[/TD]
[TD]Ackermann, Josef[/TD]
[TD] Chairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]GBR[/TD]
[TD]Agius, Marcus[/TD]
[TD]Former Chairman, Barclays plc[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Altman, Roger C.[/TD]
[TD]Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]PRT[/TD]
[TD]Balsemão, Francisco P.[/TD]
[TD]Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FRA[/TD]
[TD]Baverez, Nicolas[/TD]
[TD]Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]ITA[/TD]
[TD]Bernabè, Franco[/TD]
[TD]Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NOR[/TD]
[TD]Brandtzæg, Svein R.[/TD]
[TD]President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]ESP[/TD]
[TD]Cebrián, Juan Luis[/TD]
[TD]Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]CAN[/TD]
[TD]Clark, W. Edmund[/TD]
[TD]President and CEO, TD Bank Group[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]GBR[/TD]
[TD]Clarke, Kenneth[/TD]
[TD]Member of Parliament[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]BEL[/TD]
[TD]Davignon, Etienne[/TD]
[TD]Minister of State[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]DEU[/TD]
[TD]Enders, Thomas[/TD]
[TD]CEO, EADS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]DNK[/TD]
[TD]Federspiel, Ulrik[/TD]
[TD]Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NLD[/TD]
[TD]Halberstadt, Victor[/TD]
[TD]Professor of Public Economics, Leiden University[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Jacobs, Kenneth M.[/TD]
[TD]Chairman and CEO, Lazard[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Johnson, James A.[/TD]
[TD]Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]GBR[/TD]
[TD]Kerr, John[/TD]
[TD]Independent Member, House of Lords[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Kleinfeld, Klaus[/TD]
[TD]Chairman and CEO, Alcoa[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]TUR[/TD]
[TD]Koç, Mustafa V.[/TD]
[TD]Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Kravis, Marie-Josée[/TD]
[TD]Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Mathews, Jessica T.[/TD]
[TD]President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Mundie, Craig J.[/TD]
[TD]Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FIN[/TD]
[TD]Ollila, Jorma[/TD]
[TD]Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Perle, Richard N.[/TD]
[TD]Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]CAN[/TD]
[TD]Reisman, Heather M.[/TD]
[TD]CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]AUT[/TD]
[TD]Scholten, Rudolf[/TD]
[TD]Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]IRL[/TD]
[TD]Sutherland, Peter D.[/TD]
[TD]Chairman, Goldman Sachs International[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Thiel, Peter A.[/TD]
[TD]President, Thiel Capital[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]INT[/TD]
[TD]Trichet, Jean-Claude[/TD]
[TD]Honorary Governor, Banque de France; Former President, European Central Bank[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]GRC[/TD]
[TD]Tsoukalis, Loukas[/TD]
[TD]President, ELIAMEP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]CHE[/TD]
[TD]Vasella, Daniel L.[/TD]
[TD]Honorary Chairman, Novartis AG[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SWE[/TD]
[TD]Wallenberg, Jacob[/TD]
[TD]Chairman, Investor AB[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA[/TD]
[TD]Warsh, Kevin[/TD]
[TD]Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

David Rockefeller is a member of the Advisory Group

Invalid Link Removed

 

[carpee]

wonder if Obama will stop by

 

[ax1]

wonder if Obama will stop by

Barry Soetoro is in Cali right now holding meetings with our prosperous ally of compassion and great holder of significance, China along with President Xi Jinping. But perhaps the two lovebirds have time to stop over at the Bilderberg's vacation home, the Bohemian Grove and hire male hookers and have orgies under that giant owl.

 

[ax1]

Obama: “Nobody is listening to your phone calls” But What About Your Dishwasher?

Daniel Taylor
Invalid Link Removed
June 8, 2013

In response to “revelations” that the National Security Agency is Invalid Link Removed from Verizon customers, Obama told the press that “Nobody is listening to your phone calls.”



Whew. We can all take a deep breath of relief now. Obama says no one is watching. Or are they?

The fact is, a much wider system of surveillance is being built. It goes well beyond monitoring phone calls and e-mails. The computer you are reading this on, your washing machine, coffee maker, and other devices will be “wired” in the near future. They will be transmitting data to the “internet of things.” AInvalid Link Removed these technologies will have a monumental impact on “clandestine tradecraft.”

Consumer appliances are now becoming activated and “smart.” RFID chips and wireless internet connections enable devices like televisions, refrigerators, printers, and computers to communicate with each other and generally make life easier for us. This comes at a price, however. Your privacy is eliminated.

With this surveillance grid in place, Invalid Link Removed that “Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters — all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing…”

South Korea has served as a testing ground for this type of technology. The city of New Songdo was used because, Invalid Link Removed, “There is an historical expectation of less privacy.” If you want to unplug from this grid, the United Kingdom’s Invalid Link Removedeventually, “Even amongst those who make an explicit life-style choice to remain detached, choosing to be disconnected may be considered suspicious behaviour.”

Daniel Taylor’s post first appeared on Invalid Link Removed.

======================================================================================

Kerry’s Secret Gift to Egypt

Last month John Kerry quietly approved huge arms shipments to Egypt—despite Cairo’s ongoing violation of human rights. Josh Rogin reports.

Josh Rogin
Invalid Link Removed
June 7, 2013


While employees of American NGOs sat in Egyptian prisons, Secretary of State John Kerry quietly waived the law that would prevent the U.S. from sending the Egyptian military $1.3 billion worth of weapons this year.

Congress erupted in anger June 4, when Egyptian courts sentenced 43 NGO workers, including 16 Americans, to jail terms of up to five years for working in NGOs not registered with the government. Only one of those Americans, the National Democratic Institute’s Robert Becker, actually stayed in Egypt to await the verdict. He was given two years in prison. The other American organizations targeted included the International Republican Institute and Freedom House. All of those organizations had been operating in the open in Egypt for several years before the government raided their offices and forced them to flee the country in December 2011.

But what most in Congress didn’t know was that on May 10, Kerry had waived the restrictions lawmakers had put in place to make sure that U.S. military aid to Egypt wouldn’t continue unless Egypt made progress on its path to democracy, rule of law, and human rights. The State Department’s notification of Kerry’s move, which was never released to the public, was obtained by The Daily Beast.

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Im pleasantly surprised how mainstream te Bilderberg group has gotten, it was just a few years ago its mention would classify one as a tin foiled conspiracy theorist and how non of this existed. Thanks to the work of independent reporting and alternative media, Bilderberg is finally being forced into mainstream.

Bilderberg Secrecy Exposed During Parliamentary Debate

Unprecedented insight opens up conflict of interest charges

Paul Joseph Watson
June 10, 2013

The secrecy of the Bilderberg Group was blown wide open during a Parliamentary debate in the House of Commons today when Ken Clarke was forced to defend himself against potentially damaging evidence of a conflict of interest surrounding his role as a steering committee member of the clandestine organization.

MP's Discuss Bilderberg in the House of Commons

MP Michael Meacher asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, an attendee to the confab, to make a statement regarding Bilderberg.

​

However, the question was answered by Bilderberg steering committee member Ken Clarke, who was forced to embarrassingly claim he had “forgotten” that the organization’s meetings were paid for by funds raised by the Bilderberg Association.

​

Despite acknowledging he had been on the steering committee for 10 years at the start of his response, Clarke later claimed he had “forgotten” that he was trustee of the British steering group and was now, “checking with the aid of my constituency secretary, whether I put that in.”

​

Sensationally, an article by the Telegraph documenting Clarke’s conflict of interest was deleted within one hour of it being published – once again illustrating how Bilderberg holds sway over a compliant mainstream media.

​

Clarke’s failure to declare his his trusteeship of the body that funds the organization is a clear conflict of interest and is set to cause even more spotlight to be thrown on Bilderberg following an Invalid Link Removed.

​

Although it appears the Telegraph misquoted Clarke, which is probably why the article was pulled, the main thrust of the piece was to point out Clarke’s failure to declare his position as a trustee.

​

The majority of the House of Commons debate was a juvenile affair that gave Clarke and fellow Bilderberg member Ed Balls the opportunity to whitewash the organization as a mere talking shop, despite innumerable examples of Bilderberg Invalid Link Removed.

​

The original Telegraph article that was pulled appears below.

​

Invalid Link Removed​

Invalid Link Removed​

 

[purebred]

Can't believe this guy is being considered a traitor...

[video=youtube;_Z99qFwsDmU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z99qFwsDmU[/video]

 

[ax1]

Can't believe this guy is being considered a traitor...

There is a war between our goverment and journalists/whistle-blowers that has been underway for some time.

The fact is Obama has issued more subpenas to journalists and whistle-blowers more so than any other president combined in history since the 1917 espionage act.

If this guy is a traitor, all those who support what he did to defend our human rights is a traitor (to our big bro anyhow.)

 

[ax1]

Ron Paul praises Edward Snowden

By Invalid Link Removed, Published: June 10, 2013
Washington Post

Edward Snowden, who appears to have donated to Ron Paul’s presidential campaign in 2012, has gotten some support from the former Texas congressman.

“We should be thankful for individuals like Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald who see injustice being carried out by their own government and speak out, despite the risk,” said Paul in a statement on the Web site of Campaign for Liberty, his nonprofit. “They have done a great service to the American people by exposing the truth about what our government is doing in secret.” Glenn Greenwald is a reporter for the Guardian, which first published the story revealing the scope of the U.S. government’s surveillance programs.

Snowden Invalid Link Removed as the leaker of top-secret documents from the National Security Agency. Campaign finance records show that an “Edward Snowden” who Invalid Link Removed contributed $250 to Paul’s presidential campaign twice in 2012.

In his statement, Paul condemned the secret collection of phone and Internet data that was exposed by Snowden’s leak. “The government does not need to know more about what we are doing,” he said. “We need to know more about what the government is doing.”

Paul’s son Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has also Invalid Link Removed and says he plans to launch a class-action lawsuit against the NSA.
Invalid Link Removed
=================================================================================================
Ron Paul: ‘When you have a dictatorship… truth becomes treasonous’

“Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.”

Adan Salazar
June 11, 2013

Former Congressman Ron Paul offered up a heaping portion of Constitutional liberty on CNN’s Piers Morgan Live yesterday when he addressed the recent NSA spy grid scandal, which has linked several high tech giants, including Facebook, Microsoft and Skype, to a secret program in which the government agency was allowed access to those companies’ servers.



Asked if he considered NSA contractor turned whistleblower Edward Snowden a hero, Paul answered, “Well… he’s done a great service because he’s telling the truth and this is what we are starved for. The American people are starved for the truth.”

Snowden’s actions, first reported by the Invalid Link Removed and next the Invalid Link Removed, have come under fierce scrutiny by members on both sides of the political divide, leading several politicians to label him a Invalid Link Removed and his leak of government secrets Invalid Link Removed

According to Paul, these are the tell-tale signs of a dictatorial government: “And when you have a dictatorship or an authoritarian government, truth becomes treasonous. And this is what they do if you are a whistleblower, or if you are trying to tell the American people that our country is destroying our rule of law and destroying our Constitution, they turn it around and say, ‘You’re committing treason…’”

The former Texas rep and three-time presidential candidate also spoke of the NSA’s scandal in terms of violating the Fourth Amendment, saying, “So essentially there is no Fourth Amendment anymore, and for somebody to tell the American people the truth is a heroic effort, and [Snowden] knows that it’s very risky. He knows he’s committing civil disobedience and he knows that he could get punished, but he believes… that what our government is doing to us is so serious that somebody has to speak out.”

Eliciting snickers from Morgan, Paul also joked that President Obama should actually thank Snowden for forcing him to fulfill a campaign promise, stating “Matter of fact, I think the president ought to send him a thank you letter, because the president ran on transparency and we’re getting a lot of transparency now. So finally we’re getting the president to fulfill his promise about transparency, so that’s pretty exciting for me.”

Meanwhile, Morgan’s in-studio guest, Robert James Woolsey, Jr., a former CIA boss, found it difficult to answer whether what the NSA is doing violates the Fourth Amendment.

Invalid Link Removed
R. James Woolsey, Jr.

Morgan: I just don’t see how you can say what is going on here in complete secrecy from 99 percent of the people it is being done to lives up to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is palpably a breach isn’t it?

Woolsey: Well, it depends on whether or not you want to preserve the country’s ability to operate in a world of terrorism in which a lot of terrorists are very technically sophisticated. If you want to defend the country you’re going to have to defend it.

Morgan: Right, I understand that…but that wasn’t the question.

Woolsey: It is the question. It is the question. That balance between security and liberty is the question.

Congressman Paul later retorted, “What he’s doing is repealing the Magna Carta. You can’t just do these kind of things. And this one is not only repealing the principles of liberty, but it’s destroying the Constitution.”

Continuing, Paul questioned what should be done with Constitutional traitors. “So my question should be to all of you who defend this nonsense is, ‘What should the penalty be for the people who destroy the constitution?’ They’re always worried about how they’re going to destroy the American citizens who tell the truth to let us know what’s going on, but we ask the question, ‘What is the penalty for the people who deliberately destroy the Constitution and rationalize and say, “Well, we have to do it for security”?’ Well, you know what Franklin said about that,” recalling Founding Father Benjamin Franklin’s famous quote, paraphrased, “Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.”

Woolsey is an establishment fixture often trotted out to disseminate the fabled threat of terrorism, and is the same person who warned in Feb. 2012 that the Invalid Link Removed for Iranian terrorists hellbent on retaliating against the U.S. for shutting down their nuclear program.

When confronted by We Are Change’s Luke Rudkowski in March 2011, Woolsey Invalid Link Removed former CIA director William Colby’s charge that the CIA owns “everyone of any significance in the major media.” He is also blamed for a Invalid Link Removed placed on 9/11 first responders forbidding them to speak about inside knowledge of the events of that day.

 

[ax1]

Ron Paul: I’m worried that the government might kill Edward Snowden with a drone

Charlie Spiering
Invalid Link Removed
June 12, 2013



During an interview with FOX Business, former Rep. Ron Paul explained that he was concerned about the well-being of National Security Agency whistle-blower Edward Snowden.

“I’m worried about somebody in our government might kill him with a cruise missile or a drone missile,” Paul explained. “I mean we live in a bad time where American citizens don’t even have rights and that they can be killed, but the gentlemen is trying to tell the truth about what’s going on.”

Paul added that there were no signs of Snowden defecting to a foreign country, which meant that he was not really a threat.

“It’s a shame that we are in an age where people who tell the truth about what the government is doing gets into trouble,” he concluded.

Invalid Link Removed

===============================================================================================

Ron Paul: Why Are Republicans Defending Obama Over NSA Spying?

RINO’s line up to support big government

Paul Joseph Watson
June 12, 2013

During an appearance on MSNBC’s Daily Rundown, former Congressman Ron Paul questioned why Republicans are coming to the defense of big government and the Obama administration by calling for NSA whistleblower Ed Snowden to be arrested.

Challenging the demonization of Snowden by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who have accused the whistleblower of committing treason, Paul lambasted Republicans such as John Boehner for siding with Obama.

​

“The political foolishness of Republicans running to rescue Obama – the American people are sick and tired of all this snooping, prying and surveillance, so the Republicans run to the rescue of Obama and say ‘we passed those laws, they’re good laws, we want to preserve those laws’ – so it doesn’t even make political sense,” said Paul.

​

In the aftermath of the scandal, numerous Republicans have called for Snowden to be arrested rather than defending him as a patriot who gave up his life to warn that Constitutional rights are being eviscerated by the National Security Agency.

​

- New York Republican Peter King called for “extradition proceedings at the earliest date” and for Snowden to be prosecuted.

​

- The Republican head of the House intelligence committee, Mike Rogers, said Snowden had “released just enough information to literally be dangerous.”

​

- South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham described Snowden’s actions as, “not as one of patriotism but potentially a felony.”

​

- House Speaker John Boehner went further, labeling Snowden a “traitor” who should be dealt with as an enemy of the state.

​

Ron Paul acknowledged that what Snowden did was technically illegal, but warned that the far bigger threat came from big government. “It is probably illegal, there are laws against this, but what about people who are breaking the law, violating the Constitution….which one has the higher order – the Constitution, the written law, or the authority of the executive branch who controls the enforcement of laws?” asked Paul, adding that the bigger the government grew, the greater the threat.

​

Paul labeled Snowden a “hero” for taking a risk in telling the truth and said that people in authority should be questioned for breaking the law.​

The former Congressman noted that Snowden was forced to go public because going to the FBI and other government agencies “doesn’t seem to pan out very well.”

​

Paul questioned why the NSA needed to vacuum up all telephone data in order to catch a minority of bad guys, remarking, “If they’re looking for ten people why do they have to look at 300 million people’s activities – it makes no sense whatsoever – it’s such a blatant violation of the language of the Constitution, the 4th amendment.”

​

Ron Paul echoed the sentiments of his son Rand in advocating that the Supreme Court be used to decide the constitutionality of NSA spying, but added that educating people about their liberties and the threat posed by big government was equally important.

​

“When you have big government, you have this kind of abuse….abuse comes from big government and the natural tendency of individuals who hold this power to abuse it….if we expect the government to be the nanny state it’ll be big, it’ll be abusive,” said Paul.

==================================================================================================
Rep. Steve Stockman Says Obama Uses NSA On Tea Party, Protects Terrorists

Donna Anderson
June 12, 2013

“Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
― Benjamin Franklin


​

In response to media concerns over reports that the NSA has been spying on communications between millions of law-abiding American citizens, President Obama said, “You can’t have 100-percent security and also have 100-percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society.” But is the promise of security really worth sacrificing our freedoms?

​

During an appearance on the Alex Jones show, Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) said the NSA (National Security Agency) spying scandal was par for the course. “It follows with Obama’s intent to focus on the citizens as the criminal and the terrorists are not to be investigated. The Tea Party and average citizens have become the target. It’s alarming that we do live in an Orwellian world where good is bad and bad is good, and it’s now targeting American citizens over the terrorists.”

Stockman also said he didn’t understand why more Americans weren’t outraged. “What I don’t understand is, people outside of your listeners, you interview them or talk to them, it’s puzzling to me at what degree they’re willing to give up their individual freedoms for the perception of security, and we both know that when you give up your individual liberties you soon have neither.”

In a series of Tweets sent after the announcement of the NSA spy scandal, Stockman reminded followers, “The Democrats defending IRS abuses and illegal spying programs are the same ones who insist they would never abuse a gun registry data base.”

But he also gave folks on Twitter a chuckle: “No. Honest to God. I really did call, just ask Obama!”

Obama isn’t the first president to spy on American citizens. The Bush administration ordered the NSA to engage in warrantless surveillance of U.S. citizen’s phone calls and emails in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In 2008, legislation was passed that permitted the NSA to seek a generalized warrant from the court to allow surveillance on anyone the agency “reasonably” believed to be involved in terrorism, whether they were a U.S. citizen or not.

In 2009, Invalid Link Removed set forth in 2008 and engaged in “overcollection” of communications belonging to U.S. citizens without any connection to terrorism at all.

So Obama isn’t the first, he’s merely the president who plans to put the icing on the cake.

In 2010, under Obama, the F.B.I. proposed expanding the 1994 Invalid Link Removed, a law that requires phone and network carriers to build interception capabilities into their systems. Under the existing law, the F.B.I. must have a search warrant and currently, judges simply ask the service providers to comply with law enforcement. The provider can always use the excuse that he doesn’t have the capability to comply.

Just last month, buried under the news of the AP and IRS scandals, Obama moved closer to endorsing legislation that will make it even easier to put a tap on anyone he wants. Under the new law, judges will no longer request, they’ll order providers to comply, and if they don’t they’ll face fines starting at $25,000 per day.

The new plan will also require Internet giants like Facebook and Google to build backdoors into their systems that will enable government surveillance at-will.

By criminalizing those Americans who disagree with him and classifying anyone who speaks against his plans for takeover as an “extremist,” Obama and his administration have convinced Americans that he’s only looking out for their best interests and the safety of our country.

But Stockman reminds us that we need to look beyond the smoke and mirrors. “The NSA can keep tabs on anyone including federal judges, senators and average citizens. This is massive abuse. These are the same guys who want you to register your guns. They can’t keep this data private so how can they keep gun registrations private?”

 

[EasyEJL]

its all just part of the Verizon share everything plan.... I thought you might appreciate this AX1, found on a wall in old San Juan in Puerto Rico this week. Probably a 200 year old building too Invalid Link Removed maybe older its so hard to tell with those, considering some are into the 400+ years old.

 

[ax1]

its all just part of the Verizon share everything plan.... I thought you might appreciate this AX1, found on a wall in old San Juan in Puerto Rico this week. Probably a 200 year old building too Invalid Link Removed maybe older its so hard to tell with those, considering some are into the 400+ years old.

lol...thats great!! Feel kinda bad about the building, but hey anything to get the message out, lol

 

[ax1]

Arrest Obama Under NDAA For Supporting Terrorists in Syria

President has violated section 1021 of act he signed into law

Paul Joseph Watson
June 14, 2013

Under the terms of the National Defense Authorization Act that he personally signed into law, President Barack Obama should immediately be arrested and indefinitely detained for providing support to Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria.

​

Invalid Link Removed
President Barack Obama

Invalid Link Removed of the NDAA law allows for the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to groups engaged in hostilities against the U.S. such as al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

​

The indefinite detention provision also applies to Americans who have given “substantial support” to terrorists or other “associated groups”.

​

Although the administration has attempted to differentiate between FSA militants and Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria, the two groups have become one and the same. Even if you make a distinction between the FSA and Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists in Syria, the FSA is still clearly an “associated group” under the terms of the NDAA.

​

By announcing that his administration will arm the Syrian rebels in anticipation of a no fly zone being imposed over areas of the country, President Barack Obama is giving direct support, aid and comfort to terrorists. Obama and his top administration officials clearly represent a national security threat to the interests of the United States and should immediately be arrested and detained under the NDAA.

​

The evidence that FSA militants in Syria are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists and are carrying out terrorist atrocities is overwhelming.

​

- Jabhat al-Nusra is now the Invalid Link Removed and is commanding the other rebel groups.

​

- In April, the Invalid Link Removed to al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri.

​

- FSA rebels are Invalid Link Removed in droves.

​

- Jabhat al-Nusra Invalid Link Removed.

​

- Immediately after the State Department declared Jabhat al-Nusra a terrorist organization, Invalid Link Removed to the Al-Qaeda group.

​

- FSA rebels have Invalid Link Removed once they finish with Bashar Al-Assad.

​

- FSA rebels have been filmed Invalid Link Removed on more than one occasion.

​

- FSA rebels have been filmed Invalid Link Removed and the 9/11 attacks.

​

- One FSA group even calls its fighting unit Invalid Link Removed.

​

- Another video shows FSA rebels chanting, Invalid Link Removed
​

- FSA rebels have voiced their desire to Invalid Link Removed once the rebels are victorious across the region.

​

- FSA rebels have been filmed Invalid Link Removed while chanting “Allahu Akbar”.

​

- FSA rebels have been Invalid Link Removed over the course of the conflict, chanting “Allahu Akbar” as they decapitate their victims.

​

- FSA rebels have committed innumerable sectarian murders, including Invalid Link Removed and feeding him to the dogs.

​

- FSA rebels have also Invalid Link Removed and carry out other atrocities.

​

- FSA rebels have Invalid Link Removed.

​

- FSA rebels have Invalid Link Removed.

​

- Earlier this week, FSA rebels Invalid Link Removed for supposedly insulting Mohammed.

​

- FSA rebels have murdered numerous journalists in targeted killings, including Invalid Link Removed and most recently Invalid Link Removed.

​

- FSA rebels have been pictured numerous times Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed.

​

- FSA rebels have been caught on camera Invalid Link Removed.

​

- In March, UN human rights investigator Carla del Ponte said Invalid Link Removed.

​

- FSA rebels have Invalid Link Removed.

​

- According to eyewitnesses on the ground, at least Invalid Link Removed and are foreign jihadists sent by the likes of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

​

In announcing that his administration will provide arms to Al-Qaeda terrorists and associated groups like the FSA, Obama has violated his oath to protect and defend America against its enemies and should at the very least be subject to immediate impeachment proceedings, if not detained under the NDAA which clearly outlines the illegality of providing support to terrorist organizations.
​

 

[purebred]

Fat chance the prez is getting arrested--even if he came out and admitted all his crimes himself lol. The sheep want to be led to the slaughter too badly.

 

[ax1]

Fat chance the prez is getting arrested--even if he came out and admitted all his crimes himself lol. The sheep want to be led to the slaughter too badly.

I dont see it either, not this time frame of the world.

Of course if he admitted to committing unconstitutional crimes and treason, he would either retire, or be impeached then Joe Biden will simply pardon him and continue the crime waves.

 

[ax1]

Barrack Obama is on your AT&T iPhone, and there is no way to stop him from sexting to you!

AT&T issues Wireless Emergency Alerts update to iPhone 4S, 5

By Invalid Link Removed posted Jun 15th, 2013
engadget

---

Invalid Link Removed

AT&T has begun rolling out Invalid Link Removed updates for iPhone 4S and 5, so you won't be the last folks to know if the entire northern hemisphere is about to be covered in ice à la Day After Tomorrow. You'll receive a notification from the carrier when your update is ready, but only if you're using Invalid Link Removed or higher. Once installed, AMBER and Emergency alerts are automatically sent to your phone unless you switch them off via Settings. However, should you be tired of Obama, just know that there's no way to switch off Presidential alerts. WEA messages are always free of charge, so you don't have to worry about going over your texting limit when notified that you need to get the hell out of dodge.

Source: Invalid Link Removed