Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

There are only 2 genders prove me wrong

DemonDevster

Member
How do people even consider the thought that there are even more than 2 genders (excluding hermaphrodite which are legit mistakes in the gentic code). Seriously though do these people loose contact with even the most basic levels of biology. Is it jist me does the concept of people claiming they are neither male or female seem beyond moronic and the fact people try to support these people. This just has me questioning how badly damaged have we become as a society that this level of pire retardation is allowed to flourish and is encouraged as normal behavour. They have started allowing kids to have hormone blockers so they can pick there own genders as well that is completely f***ed do you agree with this leftiest obomination practice.

What are your opions on this subject and if you are against the fact that there is only 2 genders (exempt hermaphrodites) what actual biological science do you have to back this up?
 
I see it this way too. WHY the hell should the majority change their language (pronouns) and bathrooms, to please a minority who decided to have a different gender than that whats showing in their pants? This will lead us to total chaos, because along comes a dude who claims to be a bird, now we have to install bathrooms in trees too?
 
Invalid Link Removed

I'm a bird. I demand bathrooms in trees!
 
DemonDevster said:
I feel like vader when i say leftiest scum must be eradicated (only the real extremeists aka the cancer cells)
Click to expand...


The whole "gender mess" was put in place by social media, where minorities could interact and gain momentum, why label them "left"?
I mean left means "being socialist" (where I come from) -and being "gender-fluid" does not go obviously the same direction. To me such movement cant be conservative either. I call for a new party, like the "twisted unicorn assembly", just to make it more clear.
 
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
 
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
 
hairygrandpa said:
The whole "gender mess" was put in place by social media, where minorities could interact and gain momentum, why label them "left"?
I mean left means "being socialist" (where I come from) -and being "gender-fluid" does not go obviously the same direction. To me such movement cant be conservative either. I call for a new party, like the "twisted unicorn assembly", just to make it more clear.
Click to expand...
If you are standing far to the right, then everyone else appears to "left".
 
DemonDevster said:
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
Click to expand...
The weirdest thing about this comment is you have just stated that an entire group of people need to be eradicated.

Who is having toddler style tantrums?
 
BennyMagoo79 said:
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
Click to expand...

That does not bother me the slightest either.
OP is talking about the others, who claim to have NO particular gender, demanding even own pronouns and bathrooms for identifying as neither male or female. They go as far as to call it an "assault" if you don't use the correct pronoun, like one has telepathic powers to know it beforehand.
 
hairygrandpa said:
That does not bother me the slightest either.
OP is talking about the others, who claim to have NO particular gender, demanding even own pronouns and bathrooms for identifying as neither male or female. They go as far as to call it an "assault" if you don't use the correct pronoun, like one has telepathic powers to know it beforehand.
Click to expand...
Oh, I failed to comprehend the OP.

Yeah, there is no condition that exists beyond male, female, both, or none. Its a binary concept.
 
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men


So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
 
EasyEJL said:
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men


So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
Click to expand...
^this
 
BennyMagoo79 said:
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
Click to expand...
Im not saying anything bad against trannies i mean the people who claim to identify as neither male or female e.g gender fluid. Transexuals are just going from one to another male to female or female to make so still fall under one of 2 gender.
 
BennyMagoo79 said:
The weirdest thing about this comment is you have just stated that an entire group of people need to be eradicated.

Who is having toddler style tantrums?
Click to expand...
Its just their sheer stupidity is dangerous for this world its not mu having a tantrum its just me stating what i believe has to be done in order to redeem these people from this dilutional dream they are living in.
 
DemonDevster said:
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
Click to expand...

English is not abstract art.

I feel like vader when i say leftiest scum must be eradicated (only the real extremeists aka the cancer cells)
Click to expand...

However, you appear to be a child with a magnifying glass searching for something to kill in order to get your undeveloped rocks off.

Its just their sheer stupidity is dangerous for this world its not mu having a tantrum its just me stating what i believe has to be done in order to redeem these people from this dilutional dream they are living in.
Click to expand...

How is it 'dangerous'? How would you 'redeem' these people?
Don't bother answering those questions. There's something wrong with you.

I think the appropriate thing to say is everyday we stray further from god. (im not religious)
Click to expand...

No. You're an imbecile-provocateur who wants to be justified in his hatred for something.
 
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
 
Young Gotti said:
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
Click to expand...
Also this^ pretty much how I feel.. except for my thoughts on labels.. because I like classification and rules to define things.. order from chaos.. but that's just me cuz I have black and white thinking..
 
EasyEJL said:
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men


So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
Click to expand...

This is right in line with what I have noticed about a lot of the "accepting" elite who are better than anyone who might try to stick with tradition. A lot of their claims against bias are based in bias.

For instance, Roseanne calls a woman an ape and it is racist. But people on the "non-racist" side have called Trump the offspring of an orangutan and that was OK. Why? Because Trump is white. The differentiation of the two comments being right or wrong is ONLY based on the color of the subject's skin. Isn't the idea that skin color doesn't matter? If that is the standard than how is it OK to say something about a white person and not a black person? The color of your skin should be no different than the color of your hairs or eyes, and nobody ever says, "Oh you can't say that - his eyes are blue!!"

Not to turn this into a race comment - but I think you are applying similar logic that I agree with - it is ironic someone would choose to identify as something, and then expect to be treated differently, and then be upset they are being treated differently in another area.

And yes - people were born that way, or created, or whatever, but they can't accept it might be a "disease".

Biological success is the ability to produce viable off spring. Gender is obviously a huge factor in this. Any issues with this means you are non-functioning. If you have a low sperm count, lack eggs, are gay, transgender, etc. - you have functional issues. A lot of people will take offense with this, and I understand that, but it's no different than having cancer, or depression or whatever other number of diseases. You have an impaired function. And...lots of people do, not just one subgroup. Plenty of straight people have impaired biological functions and can't reproduce either. So live your life.

Young Gotti said:
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
Click to expand...

This is so true. I think it gets back to personal responsibility. People want to make choices but not live with the outcomes of their decisions. I want to be "different" and I want to identify as that when it is to my psychological benefit, but I don't want anything negative to come with it. It has to be all sunshine and roses, no weeds.

And it's not just one group - it's most people nowadays. We try to use our issues as swords instead of shields.
 
justhere4comm said:
English is not abstract art.



However, you appear to be a child with a magnifying glass searching for something to kill in order to get your undeveloped rocks off.



How is it 'dangerous'? How would you 'redeem' these people?
Don't bother answering those questions. There's something wrong with you.



No. You're an imbecile-provocateur who wants to be justified in his hatred for something.
Click to expand...
Interesting theory, but you are wrong
 
Young Gotti said:
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
Click to expand...
They are forcing it some states you can get arrested for saying someones pronouns wrong aka cali
 
DemonDevster said:
Interesting theory, but you are wrong
Click to expand...

I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


Invalid Link Removed

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
Invalid Link Removed​
 
it's the damn media and millennials that allows and propagates this bull****. And ****, i have to move back to California where now they don't allow straws...wtf? Country is going downhill fast
 
justhere4comm said:
Your personality likes to enlist others in your simplistic hatred of 'something'. It makes you feel big. I'm right.
Scientifically there are 63 genders, and as such you have been proven wrong.

Invalid Link Removed​
Click to expand...
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
 
DemonDevster said:
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
Click to expand...

You can be born with a penis and vagina. Biologically speaking, of course.
 
DemonDevster said:
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
Click to expand...

What? lol. I did prove you wrong, scientifically.

Profane Language. NSFW.
Invalid Link Removed
 
justhere4comm said:
I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


Invalid Link Removed

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
Invalid Link Removed​
Click to expand...

that chart is far from "scientific"...I never saw that before and started looking up some of those labels....wow that's hilarious stuff, it's all based on interpretation based on "culture" well someone can look at a culture one and way and another looks at it another way......who put that mess together?
 
Obviously excluding those with both genitals

I still only see 2 genders lol ;)


But hey! Its 2018!!!
 
DemonDevster said:
I did mention excluding intersex
Click to expand...

I don't even necessarily disagree, but I do see humor in the statement/inquiry: "Do you guys agree that if you exclude X number of genders, there are only 2 genders?"

Kind of like, "If you exclude the senses of taste, smell, touch and sound - there is only one sensory input?"
 
I feel like I should be able to sexually identify as an supra-masculine alpha male and receive hrt to be able to hormonally achieve how I see myself on the inside
 
DemonDevster said:
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
Click to expand...

Please don't claim something is basic biology when you get basic biology wrong in the first ****ing post. There are two sexes; there are many genders. Biological sex (i.e. male and female) is not the same as gender.

Now comrade, прекратить действовать как тролль!
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Please don't claim something is basic biology when you get basic biology wrong in the first ****ing post. There are two sexes; there are many genders. Biological sex (i.e. male and female) is not the same as gender.

Now comrade, прекратить действовать как тролль!
Click to expand...

gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
noun: gender; plural noun: genders
1.
the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).


Oh S***...
 
HIT4ME said:
This is right in line with what I have noticed about a lot of the "accepting" elite who are better than anyone who might try to stick with tradition. A lot of their claims against bias are based in bias.

For instance, Roseanne calls a woman an ape and it is racist. But people on the "non-racist" side have called Trump the offspring of an orangutan and that was OK. Why? Because Trump is white. The differentiation of the two comments being right or wrong is ONLY based on the color of the subject's skin. Isn't the idea that skin color doesn't matter? If that is the standard than how is it OK to say something about a white person and not a black person? The color of your skin should be no different than the color of your hairs or eyes, and nobody ever says, "Oh you can't say that - his eyes are blue!!"

Not to turn this into a race comment - but I think you are applying similar logic that I agree with - it is ironic someone would choose to identify as something, and then expect to be treated differently, and then be upset they are being treated differently in another area.

And yes - people were born that way, or created, or whatever, but they can't accept it might be a "disease".

Biological success is the ability to produce viable off spring. Gender is obviously a huge factor in this. Any issues with this means you are non-functioning. If you have a low sperm count, lack eggs, are gay, transgender, etc. - you have functional issues. A lot of people will take offense with this, and I understand that, but it's no different than having cancer, or depression or whatever other number of diseases. You have an impaired function. And...lots of people do, not just one subgroup. Plenty of straight people have impaired biological functions and can't reproduce either. So live your life.



This is so true. I think it gets back to personal responsibility. People want to make choices but not live with the outcomes of their decisions. I want to be "different" and I want to identify as that when it is to my psychological benefit, but I don't want anything negative to come with it. It has to be all sunshine and roses, no weeds.

And it's not just one group - it's most people nowadays. We try to use our issues as swords instead of shields.
Click to expand...
WORD
 
Whey said:
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
noun: gender; plural noun: genders
1.
the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).


Oh S***...
Click to expand...

Yes, assigning somebody the designation male or female based on social/cultural criteria NOT biological. That is why genders can be more than two. Biologically there is male and female and the correct term is sex. Over the years, due to misuse, gender and sex have been used interchangeably, but that isn't correct.
 
justhere4comm said:
I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


Invalid Link Removed

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
Invalid Link Removed​
Click to expand...
Common bro. You take a sample from somebody the chromosomes are male or female ,right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top