Sarm + Serm cycle; I highly recommend; wondering if this would work on sme prohormones

DREADLORD said:
While it's true that the person rightly named "Furious" started with the ad hominems, there is no denying that the condescension began with you, sir. While doing a 130kg bench press might be child's play for you, deriding the sense of achievement someone might have when doing it for the first time is a tad rude, imo. nevertheless, I did find your take on the use of enclomiphene while taking test quite belligerent. I mean, if one were to believe the numbers shown by Furious, how can we deny that Enclomiphene did prevent the total shutdown of endogenous Test production?

Given the terrible risk of long-term, even permanent loss of production, is it really that terrible an idea to use Enclomiphene along with the Test? Especially since this is enclo and not clomid? That said, I'm totally with you on the SARM usage.
Click to expand...
I wasn’t condescending, I just told him that 130kg is not that heavy and he can do that natty. Also, Enclo/Clomid is actually good by itself, but they won’t prevent shutdown on a cycle. OP’s “study” was done over 4 weeks and the sarm/oral steroid already affected the Test level negatively, another 4 weeks would shown even more decline in Test level. Lastly, OP never did Enclo with Test.
 
Last edited:
BBiceps said:
I wasn’t condescending, I just told him that 130kg is not that heavy and he can do that natty. Also, Enclo/Clomid is actually good by itself, but they won’t prevent shutdown on a cycle. OP’s “study” was done over 4 weeks and the sarm/oral steroid already affected the Test level negatively, another 4 weeks would shown even more decline in Test level. Lastly, OP never did Enclo with Test.
Click to expand...
Once again, 130kg may not be that heavy for someone but as mentioned by the OP, he was elated by the quick increase in strength. Why must his progression be natty for a longer period of time? Btw comparing Enclo and Clomi as equally good is something I cannot agree with. The zuclo is a disaster. I agree that the SARM did reduce Test and continued use would lead to further declines. I don't comprehend the relevance though. The OP did not use Test and wanted to use SARM. About not preventing a shutdown, that would depend on the amount of gear and duration, don't you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top