then shouldnt you be making your statements with the words "possibly, maybe, could be, etc" instead of making definitive statements?
You dont know me well enough, and I dont expect you to since we are just on the internetz here. My philosophy in life is not to attach to conclusions, I feel that it warps critical thinking. Dont get me wrong, there is an extremity to that, I do and will lean towards a particular set belief and/or information especially when it appears to be 1+1=2 material. I feel its important to keep the mind flexible by not attaching to definitive statements and information in most cases.
When I make statements sound definitive, thats just my personality when I express one of those pieces of information I lean towards believing. I do not believe everything I even post, some is out there to open dialogue and to stimulate further investigation, nothing to me is overly taboo.
so if I work at chik fil a I am against marriage equality? But I made it all the way to regional manager so I must be.. Right?
Point is you said he killed not that he was affiliated with an organization that has been accused of whatever.
My main problem with your postings is you are incapable of being objective. They are biased and you post ideas as if they are definitive facts despite the lack of evidence. As ling as it fits your narrative and your preconceived view of the worked then it must be true. Saying this man was responsible fore the deaths of thousands with the only connection was he was employed by an organization hardly qualities as proof that he was responsible for anything.
Your example there is a little confusing, Im not sure what that means but Ill try to respond to it. If your a chick and against marriage equality and you make it to regional manager it has nothing to do with your ability to be a manager outside of possible discriminatory actions you choose to partake in or not.
Now, imo if Lolo Seotoro supported the coup, the political party that launched the coup, rose in rankings in that political party that caused genocide ...even without firing a single bullet in my personal opinion he is guilty of mass murder, especially in this case and this particular event. But this was earlier on, Ill explain 1975 briefly later on. We do know his position of power.
Now, with your last statement, have you asked yourself who Lolo Seotoro is and spent any time investigating his past history? He is our presidents step father. If he interests you or not is up to you, but I find him particularly interesting. Its suspicious to me that Obama's priority as soon as he stepped into office is to sign Excecutive Order #13489 which seals his personal records, Its natural for one to think what he is hiding in his past after legally barring his past.
Yes, its my personal opinion that Lolo Soetoro is a mass murderer with his affiliation of his organization even if he did not directly kill anybody. You are more guilty if your in a position of power and influence than actual troops on the ground doing the killing since they are just doing what is told and ordered. Lolo was Colonel in 1975 under Suharto during the bloody invasion of East Timor, so yes he has been in a position of power historically at times of war and genocide so yes he is a mass murderer.
They even acknowledge that Lolo Soetoro was Colonel of the Indonesian army on Obama's 2012 campaign website, this is a well established fact but most people dont know who Obama's stepfathers background even is, or even heard his name. Most people just think Obama was son of a goat herder and end of story.
Invalid Link Removed
Stepfather: Lolo Soetoro Mangundikardjo (1935 – 1987)
Geographer, Colonel with the Indonesian Army and Oil Company Executive