Obama

ax1 said:
Obama will be elected 100% guaranteed.

My reason is that Romney is his clone and there is no significant difference between the two. Both are funded by the same people. Regardless who wins the same path of war mongering, police state, big bank/corporations evil policies will continue.
Click to expand...
These are my exact thoughts. Totally agree with this
 
have you ever seen occupy wallstreet? Yes. The difference between the two groups is, one group is comprised of protesters, the others is a viable political entity with candidates vying for office.

black panthers? See above.

democratic socialists of America?[/QUOTE] What impact if any do they have politically?
 
Well there IS a member of the New Party in the White House.

Invalid Link Removed


Invalid Link Removed



Invalid Link Removed
 
southpaw23 said:
have you ever seen occupy wallstreet? Yes. The difference between the two groups is, one group is comprised of protesters, the others is a viable political entity with candidates vying for office.

black panthers? See above.

democratic socialists of America?
Click to expand...

Both Occupy and Tea Party are the same. Occupy has been infiltrated by the Republicrats, and the Tea Party has also been infiltrated. End result is the same agenda. Politics is played on multiple fields and platforms, whether its protesting or a political entity.

Any time you have a threatening movement, you become the movement.
 
ax1 said:
What is a legitimate "news" site to you?
Click to expand...

Any news outlet that reports "factual" news, not clearly defined agendas or rumors/innuendo, or blogs written by guys in their underground bunkers, not email forwards that pose as "news." In other words those sources posted above.
 
southpaw23 said:
Anything outlet that reports "factual" news, not clearly defined agendas or innuendo, or blogs written by guys in their underground bunkers, not email forwards that pose as "news." In other words those sources posted above.
Click to expand...

Who reports "factual" news? Who do you consider to tell you the truth?
 
ax1 said:
What is a legitimate "news" site to you?
Click to expand...

It's his way of saying, that when people read between the lines of Obamas bull**** they are incorrect. Most liberals will tend to believe every ounce of rotten bull**** that comes out of Obamas mouth, and to argue with you they will show you what Obama says, and claim your link isn't valid when you link them what Obama does.

Rbooks has stated the race issue and is 100% correct.

As far as people assuming there's no difference between Romney and Obama, there are tons of differences. Romney is not into the whole "green planet" bull****, which means you will be able to find a good paying job without a college degree in the future, and energy costs will be much lower. Romney also has lowered Massachusetts unemployment rate, which America's has only inclined since Obama has been in office.

Not to mention, Obama has spent more than all the other US Presidents combined....but lets just keep cheering him on because he's a smooth talker and as long as he's acting like he's accidentally screwing the country over.

His first lie was that he was going to fix our entire country in his first 4 years and wouldn't run for office a 2nd term if he didn't do so.
 
ax1 said:
Who reports "factual" news? Who do you consider to tell you the truth?
Click to expand...

Whatever news related sites/newspapers that I list will be disregarded anyway. You and I both know that someone will claim some sort of "hidden" agenda. But Breitbart's site reports factual news? I mean the guy who posted those sources, thinks we need to prepare for an underground invasion. You may not like him, or disagree with his policy positions, but he's the president not a Sith Lord.
 
kingk0ng said:
As far as people assuming there's no difference between Romney and Obama, there are tons of differences. Romney is not into the whole "green planet" bull****, which means you will be able to find a good paying job without a college degree in the future, and energy costs will be much lower. Romney also has lowered Massachusetts unemployment rate, which America's has only inclined since Obama has been in office.

Not to mention, Obama has spent more than all the other US Presidents combined....but lets just keep cheering him on because he's a smooth talker and as long as he's acting like he's accidentally screwing the country over.
Click to expand...

Romney supports global carbon tax, so again he is no different than Obama.

His administration bragged about “the first and only state to set CO 2 emissions limits on power plants.”

Look into his policies, and not what he says they are lies.
Invalid Link Removed
 
Here is one of Obama's mentors admitting to hiding his past.


Invalid Link Removed

Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
 
southpaw23 said:
Whatever news related sites/newspapers that I list will be disregarded anyway. You and I both know that someone will claim some sort of "hidden" agenda. But Breitbart's site reports factual news? I mean the guy who posted those sources, thinks we need to prepare for an underground invasion. You may not like him, or disagree with his policy positions, but he's the president not a Sith Lord.
Click to expand...

Can I guess you watch CNN? What makes them any better than Breibart with the countless lies and political propaganda they have unleashed over the years.
 
ax1 said:
Romney supports global carbon tax, so again he is no different than Obama.

His administration bragged about “the first and only state to set CO 2 emissions limits on power plants.”

Look into his policies, and not what he says they are lies.
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

For a minute there I actually thought you were against Obama, and now from my understanding you are for him?

Who exactly are you for?
 
youngandfree said:
Here is one of Obama's mentors admitting to hiding his past.


Invalid Link Removed

Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
Click to expand...

Well hey, not all of us can have an agenda you know? :)
 
youngandfree said:
Here is one of Obama's mentors admitting to hiding his past.

Invalid Link Removed

Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
Click to expand...

I love Theblaze!
 
youngandfree said:
Here is one of Obama's mentors admitting to hiding his past.


Invalid Link Removed

Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
Click to expand...

You dont have to look far to know Obama is hiding his past.

His very fist executive order in office was to hide his past. Look up: Executive Order 13489 of January 21, 2009 Presidential Records.
 
ax1 said:
Can I guess you watch CNN? What makes them any better than Breibart with the countless lies and political propaganda they have unleashed over the years.
Click to expand...

I must be a prophet to have predicted your response. Carry on. Palpatine is amassing an army of clones.
 
southpaw23 said:
Well hey, not all of us can have an agenda you know? :)
Click to expand...

Maybe that guy in the basement running underground independent information resources may be most trustworthy. They guy thats not funded by the megacorporations that you disregard.
 
southpaw23 said:
I must be a prophet to have predicted your response. Carry on. Palpatine is amassing an army of clones.
Click to expand...

You keep referring to "legitimate" news sources, but you keep running away with an answer protecting yourself from being proven wrong.
 
Youcan attack the sources all you want, like you always do, but you can't dispute the facts they are reporting. No one from Obama's camp can or has legitimately disputed the facts posted in those articles. So it doesn't really matter if you don't consider them credible, since your definition is as subjective as mine.
 
southpaw23 said:
I must be a prophet to have predicted your response. Carry on. Palpatine is amassing an army of clones.
Click to expand...

Why doesnt your "legitimate" news sources not even cover this?

If you want, download it directly from the white-house and in a few minutes you can prove to yourself the birth certificate is a phoney home made document.
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
Why doesnt your "legitimate" news sources not even cover this?

If you want, download it directly from the white-house and in a few minutes you can prove to yourself the birth certificate is a phoney.
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Can we be friends?
 
ax1 said:
You keep referring to "legitimate" news sources, but you keep running away with an answer protecting yourself from being proven wrong.
Click to expand...

Protecting myself from what? Tin foil news sources? I'm stating to you and read carefully, I THINK THESE ARE WACKY SITES STRUNG TOGETHER by tinfoil types. My position is clear. Blogs written by unaccredited so called journalists, political activists aren't considered newsworthy sources, the same way someone walking into a hospital and saying I want to perform heart surgery because I saw a video online, wouldn't get me past the door. Anyone can start/create a blog. Glenn Beck is a G.E.D graduate (no offense to anyone), with NO journalistic degree/accreditation, which is why he reports on opinion/innuendo, which makes him a personality, not a journalist.
 
Yes its funny you claim other folks' sources as biased, yet you never post anything to dispute it. And you are right, almost all news sources have some sort of slant or agenda, but that doesn't mean the news or events they are reporting didn't happen or isn't true. So maybe you just get your news from AM, but I doubt it.
 
ax1 said:
Why doesnt your "legitimate" news sources not even cover this?

If you want, download it directly from the white-house and in a few minutes you can prove to yourself the birth certificate is a phoney home made document.
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Lol oooookay.
 
southpaw23 said:
Protecting myself from what? Tin foil news sources? I'm stating to you and read carefully, I THINK THESE ARE WACKY SITES STRUNG TOGETHER by tinfoil types. My position is clear. Blogs written by unaccredited so called journalists, political activists aren't considered newsworthy sources, the same way someone walking into a hospital and saying I want to perform heart surgery because I saw a video online, wouldn't get me past the door. Anyone can start/create a blog. Glenn Beck is a G.E.D graduate (no offense to anyone), with NO journalistic degree/accreditation, which is why he reports on opinion/innuendo, which makes him a personality, not a journalist.
Click to expand...

So your saying that your corporate funded news sources are "legitimate" just because the news is being told be an anchor sitting at a desk all day and has a college degree?
 
southpaw23 said:
Lol oooookay.
Click to expand...

Do me a favor and download it, then take a few seconds to split it apart. Then tell me why mainstream news refuses to even discuss that it possibly may be a home made creation.

I provided you with an official white-house link for you download.

Waiting...
 
carpee said:
southpaw, plain and simple:

please name a legitimate news source.
Click to expand...

Here is the thing...any one he names, I can post it as a youtube video and it automatically make it illegitimate because someone in a basement uploaded it.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

I guess Stanley Kurtz is unqualified?
Click to expand...

Walter Cronkite is garbage because he dropped out of college his junior year, making his reporting of WWII something to burn in a barrel of fire.
 
lol, what ever happened to OP? Did we answer his question yet?
 
on a different note, today Obama showed how dictators work. his new "policy" on immigration.

didn't bother with congress, no debate, no voting, not even an executive order (hah) he's just doing it.

what happened to the republic?
 
Oops! Apparently Matt Layer dropped out of college also. Ohio State awarded him his degree without him actually completing the credits. They gave him credit foe being a non-degreed/accredited journalist for years and said that was good enough.

Invalid Link Removed
 
a couple of things:

There are NO legitimate news sources, at least not in this country. They are all bought and paid for, and the problem becomes people turn to Joe Schmo's blog for news. That is silly and dangerous. Also, Breitbart....really? no agenda there at all :rolleyes:

Obama v. Romney...does anyone think there will be a huge change if Romney wins? If he does win...in 4 years when nothing is done, everyone will be clamoring for Hillary or Cuomo or some other dem. We are such a silly society.....we blame the president when it is more congress than anything else that has caused the dilemma we are in. But lets forget that.....nothing to see here.

Finally, all the conspiracy nuts. You all need to be careful. I hear the illuminati/bankers/nwo/globalists/council of foreign relations/bilderbergers/reptilian shapeshifters are looking at AM as we speak :rolleyes:
 
AE14 said:
a couple of things:

There are NO legitimate news sources, at least not in this country. They are all bought and paid for, and the problem becomes people turn to Joe Schmo's blog for news. That is silly and dangerous. Also, Breitbart....really? no agenda there at all :rolleyes:

Obama v. Romney...does anyone think there will be a huge change if Romney wins? If he does win...in 4 years when nothing is done, everyone will be clamoring for Hillary or Cuomo or some other dem. We are such a silly society.....we blame the president when it is more congress than anything else that has caused the dilemma we are in. But lets forget that.....nothing to see here.

Finally, all the conspiracy nuts. You all need to be careful. I hear the illuminati/bankers/nwo/globalists/council of foreign relations/bilderbergers/reptilian shapeshifters are looking at AM as we speak :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

you're one of them aren't you?

you took time away from AM to go to the bilderberg meeting.
 
To all of the superior academics here, since there is no legitimate news source, where do you get information on current events and how do you rectify that the information is accurate and without agenda? And since no news source could ever report on every single thing every day, just because that sour e you deem worthy doesn't report something, still. Doesn't mean. Said event isn't true.
 
youngandfree said:
To all of the superior academics here, since there is no legitimate news source, where do you get information on current events and how do you rectify that the information is accurate and without agenda? And since no news source could ever report on every single thing every day, just because that sour e you deem worthy doesn't report something, still. Doesn't mean. Said event isn't true.
Click to expand...

I think alternative and underground media is the way to go....there is a reason Hillary Clinton has declared to congress as she stated "we are loosing the information war"

Alot can be revealed by the mainstream media, with some practice and knowledge you can pick out timing of events and certain agenda's taking place right before our eyes.

All I say is...never come to definitive conclusions about anything, always be cautious, think with an open mind and dont stick to any particular beliefs. Be careful because anyone can be either bought out or infiltrated.
 
carpee said:
you're one of them aren't you?

you took time away from AM to go to the bilderberg meeting.
Click to expand...

How did you know?

Funny thing is...in my job I was accused (comically of course) of being in the CIA.
 
ax1 said:
I think alternative and underground media is the way to go....there is a reason Hillary Clinton has declared to congress as she stated "we are loosing the information war"

Alot can be revealed by the mainstream media, with some practice and knowledge you can pick out timing of events and certain agenda's taking place right before our eyes.

All I say is...never come to definitive conclusions about anything, always be cautious, think with an open mind and dont stick to any particular beliefs. Be careful because anyone can be either bought out or infiltrated.
Click to expand...

I think you interpret the first part in a lot of ways. She could easily mean that sources like fox are getting out the anti administration news quicker than other sources are getting out the pro admin news. It is always a conspiracy with you ax. I heard the moon is really a death star and not an orbiting space body. Don't tell anyone.
 
AE14 said:
I think you interpret the first part in a lot of ways. She could easily mean that sources like fox are getting out the anti administration news quicker than other sources are getting out the pro admin news. It is always a conspiracy with you ax. I heard the moon is really a death star and not an orbiting space body. Don't tell anyone.
Click to expand...

I dont like conspiracy theorists, Its so funny when you accuse me of being one, lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top