Obama
- Thread starter Football12
- Start date
southpaw23
Well-known member
have you ever seen occupy wallstreet? Yes. The difference between the two groups is, one group is comprised of protesters, the others is a viable political entity with candidates vying for office.
black panthers? See above.
democratic socialists of America?[/QUOTE] What impact if any do they have politically?
black panthers? See above.
democratic socialists of America?[/QUOTE] What impact if any do they have politically?
youngandfree
Well-known member
Well there IS a member of the New Party in the White House.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
ax1
Legend
Both Occupy and Tea Party are the same. Occupy has been infiltrated by the Republicrats, and the Tea Party has also been infiltrated. End result is the same agenda. Politics is played on multiple fields and platforms, whether its protesting or a political entity.
Any time you have a threatening movement, you become the movement.
southpaw23
Well-known member
ax1
Legend
What is a legitimate "news" site to you?
kingk0ng
Active member
QFT!
southpaw23
Well-known member
youngandfree
Well-known member
Its not my fault your version of legitimate news sources intentionally hide Obama's past and refuse to report it.
ax1
Legend
Who reports "factual" news? Who do you consider to tell you the truth?
southpaw23
Well-known member
Lolol right.
kingk0ng
Active member
It's his way of saying, that when people read between the lines of Obamas bull**** they are incorrect. Most liberals will tend to believe every ounce of rotten bull**** that comes out of Obamas mouth, and to argue with you they will show you what Obama says, and claim your link isn't valid when you link them what Obama does.
Rbooks has stated the race issue and is 100% correct.
As far as people assuming there's no difference between Romney and Obama, there are tons of differences. Romney is not into the whole "green planet" bull****, which means you will be able to find a good paying job without a college degree in the future, and energy costs will be much lower. Romney also has lowered Massachusetts unemployment rate, which America's has only inclined since Obama has been in office.
Not to mention, Obama has spent more than all the other US Presidents combined....but lets just keep cheering him on because he's a smooth talker and as long as he's acting like he's accidentally screwing the country over.
His first lie was that he was going to fix our entire country in his first 4 years and wouldn't run for office a 2nd term if he didn't do so.
kingk0ng
Active member
QFT!
southpaw23
Well-known member
Whatever news related sites/newspapers that I list will be disregarded anyway. You and I both know that someone will claim some sort of "hidden" agenda. But Breitbart's site reports factual news? I mean the guy who posted those sources, thinks we need to prepare for an underground invasion. You may not like him, or disagree with his policy positions, but he's the president not a Sith Lord.
ax1
Legend
Romney supports global carbon tax, so again he is no different than Obama.
His administration bragged about “the first and only state to set CO 2 emissions limits on power plants.”
Look into his policies, and not what he says they are lies.
Invalid Link Removed
youngandfree
Well-known member
Here is one of Obama's mentors admitting to hiding his past.
Invalid Link Removed
Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
Invalid Link Removed
Btw, thanks for being the leading authority on certifying "legitimate" news sources Southpaw. You are very insightful and wise when it comes to finding the truth in the political arena.
ax1
Legend
Can I guess you watch CNN? What makes them any better than Breibart with the countless lies and political propaganda they have unleashed over the years.
southpaw23
Well-known member
demolition
Active member
youngandfree said:
I love Theblaze!
ax1
Legend
You dont have to look far to know Obama is hiding his past.
His very fist executive order in office was to hide his past. Look up: Executive Order 13489 of January 21, 2009 Presidential Records.
southpaw23
Well-known member
ax1
Legend
Well hey, not all of us can have an agenda you know?
Maybe that guy in the basement running underground independent information resources may be most trustworthy. They guy thats not funded by the megacorporations that you disregard.
southpaw23
Well-known member
I love the blaze too, anything that Glenn Beck puts out clearly isn't biased.
ax1
Legend
You keep referring to "legitimate" news sources, but you keep running away with an answer protecting yourself from being proven wrong.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Youcan attack the sources all you want, like you always do, but you can't dispute the facts they are reporting. No one from Obama's camp can or has legitimately disputed the facts posted in those articles. So it doesn't really matter if you don't consider them credible, since your definition is as subjective as mine.
ax1
Legend
Why doesnt your "legitimate" news sources not even cover this?
If you want, download it directly from the white-house and in a few minutes you can prove to yourself the birth certificate is a phoney home made document.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
southpaw23
Well-known member
Protecting myself from what? Tin foil news sources? I'm stating to you and read carefully, I THINK THESE ARE WACKY SITES STRUNG TOGETHER by tinfoil types. My position is clear. Blogs written by unaccredited so called journalists, political activists aren't considered newsworthy sources, the same way someone walking into a hospital and saying I want to perform heart surgery because I saw a video online, wouldn't get me past the door. Anyone can start/create a blog. Glenn Beck is a G.E.D graduate (no offense to anyone), with NO journalistic degree/accreditation, which is why he reports on opinion/innuendo, which makes him a personality, not a journalist.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Yes its funny you claim other folks' sources as biased, yet you never post anything to dispute it. And you are right, almost all news sources have some sort of slant or agenda, but that doesn't mean the news or events they are reporting didn't happen or isn't true. So maybe you just get your news from AM, but I doubt it.
ax1
Legend
Only if you make me a birth certificate proving you were born on an airplane.
southpaw23
Well-known member
ax1
Legend
So your saying that your corporate funded news sources are "legitimate" just because the news is being told be an anchor sitting at a desk all day and has a college degree?
ax1
Legend
Do me a favor and download it, then take a few seconds to split it apart. Then tell me why mainstream news refuses to even discuss that it possibly may be a home made creation.
I provided you with an official white-house link for you download.
Waiting...
ax1
Legend
Here is the thing...any one he names, I can post it as a youtube video and it automatically make it illegitimate because someone in a basement uploaded it.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
I guess Stanley Kurtz is unqualified?
I guess Stanley Kurtz is unqualified?
ax1
Legend
Walter Cronkite is garbage because he dropped out of college his junior year, making his reporting of WWII something to burn in a barrel of fire.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Oops! Apparently Matt Layer dropped out of college also. Ohio State awarded him his degree without him actually completing the credits. They gave him credit foe being a non-degreed/accredited journalist for years and said that was good enough.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
AE14
Board Sponsor
a couple of things:
There are NO legitimate news sources, at least not in this country. They are all bought and paid for, and the problem becomes people turn to Joe Schmo's blog for news. That is silly and dangerous. Also, Breitbart....really? no agenda there at all
Obama v. Romney...does anyone think there will be a huge change if Romney wins? If he does win...in 4 years when nothing is done, everyone will be clamoring for Hillary or Cuomo or some other dem. We are such a silly society.....we blame the president when it is more congress than anything else that has caused the dilemma we are in. But lets forget that.....nothing to see here.
Finally, all the conspiracy nuts. You all need to be careful. I hear the illuminati/bankers/nwo/globalists/council of foreign relations/bilderbergers/reptilian shapeshifters are looking at AM as we speak
There are NO legitimate news sources, at least not in this country. They are all bought and paid for, and the problem becomes people turn to Joe Schmo's blog for news. That is silly and dangerous. Also, Breitbart....really? no agenda there at all
Obama v. Romney...does anyone think there will be a huge change if Romney wins? If he does win...in 4 years when nothing is done, everyone will be clamoring for Hillary or Cuomo or some other dem. We are such a silly society.....we blame the president when it is more congress than anything else that has caused the dilemma we are in. But lets forget that.....nothing to see here.
Finally, all the conspiracy nuts. You all need to be careful. I hear the illuminati/bankers/nwo/globalists/council of foreign relations/bilderbergers/reptilian shapeshifters are looking at AM as we speak
ax1
Legend
carpee
Well-known member
AE14 said:a couple of things:
There are NO legitimate news sources, at least not in this country. They are all bought and paid for, and the problem becomes people turn to Joe Schmo's blog for news. That is silly and dangerous. Also, Breitbart....really? no agenda there at all
Obama v. Romney...does anyone think there will be a huge change if Romney wins? If he does win...in 4 years when nothing is done, everyone will be clamoring for Hillary or Cuomo or some other dem. We are such a silly society.....we blame the president when it is more congress than anything else that has caused the dilemma we are in. But lets forget that.....nothing to see here.
Finally, all the conspiracy nuts. You all need to be careful. I hear the illuminati/bankers/nwo/globalists/council of foreign relations/bilderbergers/reptilian shapeshifters are looking at AM as we speak
you're one of them aren't you?
you took time away from AM to go to the bilderberg meeting.
youngandfree
Well-known member
To all of the superior academics here, since there is no legitimate news source, where do you get information on current events and how do you rectify that the information is accurate and without agenda? And since no news source could ever report on every single thing every day, just because that sour e you deem worthy doesn't report something, still. Doesn't mean. Said event isn't true.
ax1
Legend
I think alternative and underground media is the way to go....there is a reason Hillary Clinton has declared to congress as she stated "we are loosing the information war"
Alot can be revealed by the mainstream media, with some practice and knowledge you can pick out timing of events and certain agenda's taking place right before our eyes.
All I say is...never come to definitive conclusions about anything, always be cautious, think with an open mind and dont stick to any particular beliefs. Be careful because anyone can be either bought out or infiltrated.
AE14
Board Sponsor
ax1 said:
I think you interpret the first part in a lot of ways. She could easily mean that sources like fox are getting out the anti administration news quicker than other sources are getting out the pro admin news. It is always a conspiracy with you ax. I heard the moon is really a death star and not an orbiting space body. Don't tell anyone.
ax1
Legend
I dont like conspiracy theorists, Its so funny when you accuse me of being one, lol