m1,4ADD is back or is it?

[jsp0785]

on nutra it says it's back but after looking around for some info i found original m1,4add was

17a-methyl-1,4-Androstadiene-3,17diol

the ingredient on the one on nutra is

Methyl-1,4 androstenediol

what is the difference here?

 

[rob561]

same thing

 

[bigpapa]

i think sum1 said PA tested it and it came back as an equivalent to DHEA

 

[Skigazzi]

i think sum1 said PA tested it and it came back as an equivalent to DHEA

I think the new bottles tested out OK.

 

[jsp0785]

I think the new bottles tested out OK.

how are they bringing it back. wasnt it banned in the orignial ban a while back?

 

[kjkriston]

nope...and this is a new batch from CEL

 

[mixedup]

how are they bringing it back. wasnt it banned in the orignial ban a while back?

Nope not banned and according to CEL they just obtained a brand new batch of raws that tested good.

 

[bigpapa]

I think the new bottles tested out OK.

interesting...someone log it

 

[jsp0785]

Nope not banned and according to CEL they just obtained a brand new batch of raws that tested good.

this is more of a wet straight bulking compound i take it?

 

[UnrealMachine]

this is more of a wet straight bulking compound i take it?

suppose so. it's supposed to be the prohormone to Dbol

 

[BrMe86]

I'll go ahead & do a log since I started yesterday.

 

[stxnas]

suppose so. it's supposed to be the prohormone to Dbol

Not only that, but like many PHs, the parent hormone has its own intrisic values before it's even converted. I've heard some claim that M14ADD is a better bulking agent than Dbol. I don't recall if this was simply due to bloat, pure lean mass, or a combination of the two.

Has anybody reading this used both and care to compare the two? Ceteris paribus, ideally...