Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Jim: Performance is King Log.

Also, because we're asking questions today. At what age would YOU start cycling AAS (even just DS/PH) if your goal was to be competitive at a national level in strength athletics (be it BB, PL, or Strongman)?

21? 25? Even earlier?

What follows is only my opinion, but when you're looking at a national/world level athlete (untested), you're going to see a lot of guys exceeding safe recommendations to reach the top. Be it when they start or how much they use, the recommendations tend to be looked at, respected, and then respectfully exceeded. Or scoffed at.

I remember seeing in youtube comments how Eric Lilliebridge was using PHs in high school. He was already moving poundages that each member of this board still has on their wish list, but that's when he got his start.

There's longevity to be considered, as well. Adding too much size or too much strength before your connective tissues are ready could leave you broken well before you have a chance to reach the top.

If you said your goal was to be the best 231lb strongman in the state or nation, I'd say hold off. But since you want it all, you're going to have to strongly consider taking the plunge and getting closer to the top in a hurry.

Max deadlift event in the 2013 WSM finals went from opening weight (I'm guessing over 800), straight to 400kg, then up in increments to Shaw and Savickas hitting 950+ lbs. That's a lot of kilograms.

The preceding was only my opinion and does not reflect the views of anyone except me. The dude abides.
 
Well Jim, I think ph and ds will be fine now for you with proper therapies and such. For aas I think waiting until you hit a huge wall. You've made huge strides in natty training and have reached your believed natty max potential, or near it.

Just my input. I think starting aas for you don't be for years

I'm not even talking about for me, specifically. I'm just wondering what people's beliefs about it are assuming goals (or plans, more accurately) of competing at a national level in sports where drug testing is not done.


But, in regards to your comments about DS/PH vs AAS. Typically, legit AAS would be much safer to run than most DS on the market IMO.
 
I'm not even talking about for me, specifically. I'm just wondering what people's beliefs about it are assuming goals (or plans, more accurately) of competing at a national level in sports where drug testing is not done.

But, in regards to your comments about DS/PH vs AAS. Typically, legit AAS would be much safer to run than most DS on the market IMO.

I agree, with that. There are some no methyl ph you can run and less strong ones I guess you'd say that night be safer. But if I had a choice, id rather aas.
 
What follows is only my opinion, but when you're looking at a national/world level athlete (untested), you're going to see a lot of guys exceeding safe recommendations to reach the top. Be it when they start or how much they use, the recommendations tend to be looked at, respected, and then respectfully exceeded. Or scoffed at.
That's what I've noticed as well, I was talking to Marshall (White, pro SHW Strongman) and he said kaz once told him he was on 10g of AAS a week (I proceeded to argue about how theres no way, but that's what he said)
I remember seeing in youtube comments how Eric Lilliebridge was using PHs in high school. He was already moving poundages that each member of this board still has on their wish list, but that's when he got his start.

There's longevity to be considered, as well. Adding too much size or too much strength before your connective tissues are ready could leave you broken well before you have a chance to reach the top.

Did not know that about Lilliebridge. That's definitely a good point to consider as well, one I wouldn't have thought of.
If you said your goal was to be the best 231lb strongman in the state or nation, I'd say hold off. But since you want it all, you're going to have to strongly consider taking the plunge and getting closer to the top in a hurry.
I had always said that I would wait until I was a respectable 210 to start cycling, but as I get closer to that weight I find myself putting it off, even though my goal (and long-time dream) is to compete in WSM.
Max deadlift event in the 2013 WSM finals went from opening weight (I'm guessing over 800), straight to 400kg, then up in increments to Shaw and Savickas hitting 950+ lbs. That's a lot of kilograms.

The preceding was only my opinion and does not reflect the views of anyone except me. The dude abides.

Thanks for the insight, I figured you would have a lot of good information to share.
 
Not to get off topic and all, but the birds lookin good man. Playoff bound! It's been too long
 
It depends upon if you care about your long term health.....talking fifty and sixty here.....

If you don't care about that then you should have started a few years ago when you decided you wanted to be world class. Your "natural" potential will be reached quicker with aas. If you dive into aas then at some point your "natural" potential will be relevant to whatever you put into your body.

I am on TRT so that's my "natural" fuel I guess you could say. I've done plenty of DS but I've stayed away from aas besides my TRT for the wife and family's sake. If I were single.....I would be on anything you could imagine to be totally honest.
 
Also I wouldn't tell this to any random ole person.

As everyone in this log is very dedicated, mature(about life lol) as well as smart to boot is the only reason I would even post that.
 
It depends upon if you care about your long term health.....talking fifty and sixty here.....

If you don't care about that then you should have started a few years ago when you decided you wanted to be world class. Your "natural" potential will be reached quicker with aas. If you dive into aas then at some point your "natural" potential will be relevant to whatever you put into your body.

I am on TRT so that's my "natural" fuel I guess you could say. I've done plenty of DS but I've stayed away from aas besides my TRT for the wife and family's sake. If I were single.....I would be on anything you could imagine to be totally honest.

Thanks for the response man!
 
Also I wouldn't tell this to any random ole person.

As everyone in this log is very dedicated, mature(about life lol) as well as smart to boot is the only reason I would even post that.

Lol, not everyone, I mean Dave does follow this (although, it's hard to remember since he never posts lol).
 
Also I wouldn't tell this to any random ole person.

As everyone in this log is very dedicated, mature(about life lol) as well as smart to boot is the only reason I would even post that.

This post times the inverse of the current budget deficit. If I were called on what I said in this thread by a noob or random person, I would deny it even if the print were shown to my face.
 
I started too, but there wasn't really much I could think to add to it. It literally left me speechless, not a single intelligent response came to mind lol.

Rofl. I guess I'll take that as a compliment? I'm confused now. Time to pin my TRT for clarity.
 
How much do you weigh now?
195.

I'm coasting until the meet (because I don't wanna compete in 220).

I'm sure herder will tear me apart for caring about being a 198 lol.
This post times the inverse of the current budget deficit. If I were called on what I said in this thread by a noob or random person, I would deny it even if the print were shown to my face.

I laughed. Especially about the last part.
 
195.

I'm coasting until the meet (because I don't wanna compete in 220).

I'm sure herder will tear me apart for caring about being a 198 lol.

I laughed. Especially about the last part.

Lol. As much as I love not caring about weight classes and stuff, there's actually one thing ingrained deeper that that in my brain, from wrestling. Being close to a weight class and not making weight. Say or do that to a lifelong wrestler and you'll probably see them break something. When a guy on my team missed weight at the weigh-ins, they kept going until they made weight, even though they weren't allowed to compete.

So if you were like 205, I'd ridicule you until you made 198! I'm sounding contradictory, emphasis on d1ck, but it's just who I am.
 
Lol. As much as I love not caring about weight classes and stuff, there's actually one thing ingrained deeper that that in my brain, from wrestling. Being close to a weight class and not making weight. Say or do that to a lifelong wrestler and you'll probably see them break something. When a guy on my team missed weight at the weigh-ins, they kept going until they made weight, even though they weren't allowed to compete.

So if you were like 205, I'd ridicule you until you made 198! I'm sounding contradictory, emphasis on d1ck, but it's just who I am.

This fella shoots straight
 
I say start AAS now but be reasonable and train your form so in 3-5 years you have made slow steady gains that have added up to you being reliably strong and healthy enough to compete with enough experience to put it to use. You have a lot of good years left man no reason to rush it but if you wana be top level start now. Just not stupid. Too strong too fast is just a waste.
 
I say start AAS now but be reasonable and train your form so in 3-5 years you have made slow steady gains that have added up to you being reliably strong and healthy enough to compete with enough experience to put it to use. You have a lot of good years left man no reason to rush it but if you wana be top level start now. Just not stupid. Too strong too fast is just a waste.

On that note, what's considered reasonable?

Probably not a gram of tren a week, but where do you draw the line for that?
 
I'm not the guy to ask that by any means. I would start pretty basic to find out how your body handles/responds, and bump up the dose from there. Don't wana dive right in.
 
On that note, what's considered reasonable?

Probably not a gram of tren a week, but where do you draw the line for that?

Gettin deep now! Reasonable is definitely different for everyone. I know a guy who's been on you name it, SD, Tren, etc. And he said to me when I was getting started "Whatever you do, don't touch H-Drol, that stuff's poison. I've never been so sick in my life." Different strokes...

Rodja talks a lot about growing into your dosages. Seek him and ask him to expand upon that premise and you'll learn a lot.
 
Gettin deep now! Reasonable is definitely different for everyone. I know a guy who's been on you name it, SD, Tren, etc. And he said to me when I was getting started "Whatever you do, don't touch H-Drol, that stuff's poison. I've never been so sick in my life." Different strokes...

Rodja talks a lot about growing into your dosages. Seek him and ask him to expand upon that premise and you'll learn a lot.

That's a good idea, too bad Rodja never comes to my log anymore. Dick.
 
It depends upon if you care about your long term health.....talking fifty and sixty here.....

If you don't care about that then you should have started a few years ago when you decided you wanted to be world class. Your "natural" potential will be reached quicker with aas. If you dive into aas then at some point your "natural" potential will be relevant to whatever you put into your body.

I am on TRT so that's my "natural" fuel I guess you could say. I've done plenty of DS but I've stayed away from aas besides my TRT for the wife and family's sake. If I were single.....I would be on anything you could imagine to be totally honest.

I haven't been around here long enough to parse words, and I think this is very good advice. However, I will say that I think there is a middle ground in terms of early AAS use. I am talking judicious use of some test and the like. Indeed, I don't even think it needs to be judicious without it seriously compromising long-term health (way past 60), assuming a lack of predisposition re illness/health conditions and that things like BP are aggressively managed, as they should be in any case. Same for things like nandrolone decanoate and its successors. But I would be judicious with things like tren, more than anything because of the threats to psyche. This stuff is all a helluva lot safer than methylated orals, IMO. DISCLAIMER FN: I don't mess with any of this except RX test cyp, and am on a modest dose of it that puts me mid range as discussed in my log.

But as a general matter, I dole at the same advice generally. Train hard as hell and push yourself as far as your genes will allow, until you start hitting meaningful plateaus. Sure, you may have been able to open your window at a younger age, but this kind of pushing builds hunger, discipline and character, things that count big time for any champion or warrior.

So, in sum, we are totally on the same page, even if for somewhat disparate reasons. But I fully endorse the advice, know that much. Just one jackass' opinion, referring to my own.
 
A lot of good responses here. I've been dabbling with the idea of going to the dark side for a while now. The thought of being on TRT the rest of my life is the only limiting factor.
 
A lot of good responses here. I've been dabbling with the idea of going to the dark side for a while now. The thought of being on TRT the rest of my life is the only limiting factor.

That's where being judicious and responsible use and planning (i.e. PCT) come into play, particularly if you wish to sire some or more some day. hCG and Clomid are your friends.
 
jimbuick said:
Yeah, that doesn't limit me.

Hell, I'll do my doc a favor and start the TRT now lol.

Lol, I couldn't even afford it right now.

I stand the chance of being proclaimed a potato, but what would be worse on your natural test production: test or PH's? Since test cycles are longer would it make a difference?

I'm asking because if I theoretically wanted to get off I would like to know if my natural production would be shot. Even with proper cycle protocols. I'm the think of every situation/over analyze type.
 
jinxie said:
That's where being judicious and responsible use and planning (i.e. PCT) come into play, particularly if you wish to sire some or more some day. hCG and Clomid are your friends.

Nice man.

Seen some of your posts, you're a good addition over here.
 
I'm the think of every situation/over analyze type.

That can serve you quite well, that quality. But high-dosage AAS could also turn that into full-blown neuroticism. Not entirely kidding. High doses can intensify everything. A little compulsiveness can turn into frank OCD-like behavior.

I was on hCG monotherapy for years, and would be glad to talk about my experiences with some of ya'll. TT up to 1500, a low supraphysiological range, definitely anabolic, though nothing like pushing 250 mgs+ of test per week.

Anyway, sorry for the digressions on this log. I enjoy this topic. I used to dwell in the HRT section of this board. Indeed, my hCG mono log is here, I believe. Though I think I removed my progress pics and I don't think there is much in the way of my strength progression. Logging in that regard began later for me, regretfully.
 
Nice man.

Seen some of your posts, you're a good addition over here.

Thanks mate. Always glad to try and help and support the endeavors of others. Yeah, it's the Internets, but there can still be a sense of community as there appears to be with this little cadre.

Goodnight.
 
A lot of good responses here. I've been dabbling with the idea of going to the dark side for a while now. The thought of being on TRT the rest of my life is the only limiting factor.

I'm just curious to how damaging it is to test production post cycle, if proper ct and pct is followed for someone at a young age.

I would assume it varies, but maybe there's like a bell curve ala rodja.
 
Honest reply-probably the second someone saw real potential. I know guys who have given them to their HS sons (yes, really) in hopes of sending them to a D1 school to play football.

The successful PL & strongmen I know started in late teens, early 20's.
 
Honest reply-probably the second someone saw real potential. I know guys who have given them to their HS sons (yes, really) in hopes of sending them to a D1 school to play football. The successful PL & strongmen I know started in late teens, early 20's.

This is why I kind of brought up my question. I agree with Napalm and yourself, BUT, isn't Jim's dream goal to be a professional strongman?
 
This is why I kind of brought up my question. I agree with Napalm and yourself, BUT, isn't Jim's dream goal to be a professional strongman?

He can still have that as a goal and wait a bit. I think that's the responsible thing to do. Mrs jimbo might want to have kids, blah blah.

Not trying to sound like an old fuddy duddy, but that's how I feel. He's still got lots of time, 3-5 yrs before he has to worry about that stuff.

And when he does make the decision, I hope it's test, and not the designer crap you don't really know what it is.
 
He can still have that as a goal and wait a bit. I think that's the responsible thing to do. Mrs jimbo might want to have kids, blah blah. Not trying to sound like an old fuddy duddy, but that's how I feel. He's still got lots of time, 3-5 yrs before he has to worry about that stuff. And when he does make the decision, I hope it's test, and not the designer crap you don't really know what it is.

Good points. I was just bringing it up from a different angle.
 
Honest reply-probably the second someone saw real potential. I know guys who have given them to their HS sons (yes, really) in hopes of sending them to a D1 school to play football.

The successful PL & strongmen I know started in late teens, early 20's.

That's pretty messed up to give to hs kids. Especially parents giving them.
 
This is why I kind of brought up my question. I agree with Napalm and yourself, BUT, isn't Jim's dream goal to be a professional strongman?

This is where it becomes a risk vs reward scenario. Will he become a professional and accomplish every dream ever? Will the possibility of another 40 years on TRT be worth being a professional strongman for 10?

That's my only question for everyone; take a look at the long game, then decide "is it worth it"?. Very few in their youthful exuberance will unequivocally say YES! However, there are a handful who wait until the advantage provided by PEDs REALLY matter, and really take you to the next level.

For myself, and even moreso napalm, the PED advantage could be HUGE. I've messed with M1T and 4AD (10 years ago), but I've never really buckled down and hammered a cycle. I would gain an enormous advantage in my age bracket.

Would Jim? If it doesn't catapult you into the conversation of "best", then what's the point?
 
Honest reply-probably the second someone saw real potential. I know guys who have given them to their HS sons (yes, really) in hopes of sending them to a D1 school to play football.

The successful PL & strongmen I know started in late teens, early 20's.

Sean and I know of a guy on another board who has spoken a number of times of his great temptation to place his boys on clomid.

I will say that there is data to support AI use in undersized boys, to promote growth through increased testosterone (albeit not at supraphysiological levels, or at least completely absurd ones) and because the reduction of E2 helps prevent growth-plate fusion. See this:

Abstract
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a class of drugs that prevent conversion of androgens to estrogens, and that are approved in the United States as adjunctive treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Because ultimate fusion of the growth plates is estrogen-dependent in both boys and girls, AI administration may help to slow down epiphysial maturation and allow for greater height potential. Research trials in children with short stature have predominantly been done in Finland and Florida. Despite the apparent efficacy described by these groups, only ˜110 children worldwide have been treated with AIs in research protocols (and usually concomitant with other growth-promoting agents) as of the end of 2008 (and none to final height). That said, many children are being treated with AI’s in the United States outside of research protocols. Furthermore, little is known about the short- and long-term safety of AIs in children. Thus, it is imperative that there be well-designed, long-term studies of efficacy and safety of AI use in pediatric populations.
Invalid Link Removed

I wouldn't have much hesitation in endorsing early, judicious use of an AI or hCG in a young man, with the same caveat I stated before, about first creating real drive and hunger, before relying on such things, as a baby step towards real AAS. But these things are not going to give you near the results. But they can make a meaningful difference, particularly as we observe average male test levels drop over time, which seems ironic to me given that men are getting taller. I suppose a lot of it is environmental factors that build up post maturation.

I have been on AI and hCG monotherapy, after being Dx'd secondary hypo, and would be glad to discuss this matter with ya'll for anyone who is interested.
 
I'm not talking AI, I'm talking dianabol for a 15y/o.

I don't dismiss nor denounce your assertion at all, and the evidence seems to heavily support this practice. I'll read more on it, but on the surface it appears VERY interesting.

10mg dbol tabs for a freshman, however, is fawking nonsense.

Edit: the group taking extremestane produced mind boggling bloods. Wow.
 
I'm not talking AI, I'm talking dianabol for a 15y/o.

I don't dismiss nor denounce your assertion at all, and the evidence seems to heavily support this practice. I'll read more on it, but on the surface it appears VERY interesting.

10mg dbol tabs for a freshman, however, is fawking nonsense.

Oh, understood. I was just sharing, bud. I agree entirely with you. I would be resistant to even the AI course, unless it was medically called for.

That said, I wish my parents had consulted an endo when I was young. I was pegged for 6'1" to 6'3" on the growth charts until age 13. I was such a husky kid, I was cutting weight for football when I was 11. And then, after failing a scoliosis screening in 7th grade, I saw an ortho. Mom, a medical provider herself, queried "So isn't this going to get a lot worse as he grows another 1/2 foot." The doc responded, "his growth plate will soon be fused, he'll be lucky to get another inch or two." And he was right. But at least I grew downstairs, and am now hung like a horse, lol. J/K. I can't say for sure whether there was a hormonal problem back then or not, but I am hypogonadal, secondary, and suspect I may have already had issues with the hypothalmus or pituitary back then, though I was always a strong kid, stronger than most of my wrestling peers.
 
I generally don't support AAS usage by the younger crowd as they usually don't have the base to get much out of it. However, Jim has already created that base and 500mg/week of test would have him (and his wife) very happy.
 
Wow, this thread exploded.

Wait a bit jimbo, you're still kind of young...
No one asked you grandpa! :biglaugh:
Gotta get on board with napalm here. You're really quite strong, and you still have a few good years of natty growth ahead of you.
Well, to be fair, I could have the rest of my life of natty growth if I stayed natty. What's to say that in 3-4 years I still couldn't progress natty, the only issue comes with trying to compete with guys who aren't.
I'm curious when all the pro weight lifters (PL/Strong/Oly) began using PEDs in order to enhance their career.
High School age. I've seen parents give steroids to kids so they could get scholarships.
When they got to WSB.
I laughed.
Honest reply-probably the second someone saw real potential. I know guys who have given them to their HS sons (yes, really) in hopes of sending them to a D1 school to play football.

The successful PL & strongmen I know started in late teens, early 20's.
I've seen it to, and it's a lot of the reason I got beat out on my HS football team is because I wouldn't do it.
This is why I kind of brought up my question. I agree with Napalm and yourself, BUT, isn't Jim's dream goal to be a professional strongman?
Yeah, professional SHW.
He can still have that as a goal and wait a bit. I think that's the responsible thing to do. Mrs jimbo might want to have kids, blah blah.

Not trying to sound like an old fuddy duddy, but that's how I feel. He's still got lots of time, 3-5 yrs before he has to worry about that stuff.

And when he does make the decision, I hope it's test, and not the designer crap you don't really know what it is.
You are an old fuddy duddy.

But, realistically, if I wait 3-5 years natty and let's say I get to a solid (not fat) 230-240 with respectable lifts (let's say 600/350/650). At that point I'm 24-26 years old, and I'm hundreds of pounds (300-400#) shy of the event weights (and 100# short of BW), so then I start cycling (while my competitors are cruising), so lets say it takes a couple of years to get from where I am to that level. We're talking 30 years old before I start competing in that weight class, let alone competing at a national, and then world level in that class.
Good points. I was just bringing it up from a different angle.
I like your angle better.
That's pretty messed up to give to hs kids. Especially parents giving them.
You play sports in high school? It's really common, especially here in Texas.
This is where it becomes a risk vs reward scenario. Will he become a professional and accomplish every dream ever? Will the possibility of another 40 years on TRT be worth being a professional strongman for 10?

That's my only question for everyone; take a look at the long game, then decide "is it worth it"?. Very few in their youthful exuberance will unequivocally say YES! However, there are a handful who wait until the advantage provided by PEDs REALLY matter, and really take you to the next level.

For myself, and even moreso napalm, the PED advantage could be HUGE. I've messed with M1T and 4AD (10 years ago), but I've never really buckled down and hammered a cycle. I would gain an enormous advantage in my age bracket.

Would Jim? If it doesn't catapult you into the conversation of "best", then what's the point?
You named the point, to be catapulted into the conversation of best.

Keep in mind, I'm not talking about starting tomorrow lol.
Sean and I know of a guy on another board who has spoken a number of times of his great temptation to place his boys on clomid.

I will say that there is data to support AI use in undersized boys, to promote growth through increased testosterone (albeit not at supraphysiological levels, or at least completely absurd ones) and because the reduction of E2 helps prevent growth-plate fusion. See this:

I wouldn't have much hesitation in endorsing early, judicious use of an AI or hCG in a young man, with the same caveat I stated before, about first creating real drive and hunger, before relying on such things, as a baby step towards real AAS. But these things are not going to give you near the results. But they can make a meaningful difference, particularly as we observe average male test levels drop over time, which seems ironic to me given that men are getting taller. I suppose a lot of it is environmental factors that build up post maturation.

I have been on AI and hCG monotherapy, after being Dx'd secondary hypo, and would be glad to discuss this matter with ya'll for anyone who is interested.
This I've seen before, I considered doing it when I was 18 (to try to squeeze a few inches out before it was too late), but ultimately decided not to lol.
I generally don't support AAS usage by the younger crowd as they usually don't have the base to get much out of it. However, Jim has already created that base and 500mg/week of test would have him (and his wife) very happy.

Who's this guy? I like him.
 
I played some baseball but shoulder issues along with inability to adapt as a pitcher pretty much ended me. I was a great fielder so I could moved position but I couldn't hit jack sht
 
Back
Top