MrBrightside
Active member
I got all excited, and it turned out to be hormonal.
uch:
I got all excited, and it turned out to be hormonal.
uch:
Hang in there with us....This is one of several we plan on launching this year....We try to appease every pallet!
If you have any questions, ask away....
Is your product the same as :
Androsta-1,5-dien-3-one, 17b-hydroxy-17-methyl
thnx
i cant see the nomenclature.... :squint:
making some pretty big claims to say it is the most potent ever. I hope its not like another superdrolNG :rofl:
Probably several threads- we have some surprises coming up with this oneExcited to hear the launch day. Will you be posting details in this thread or do I need to expect a new thread?
nope- this molecule has never been commercially released- completely novelIs your product the same as :
Androsta-1,5-dien-3-one, 17b-hydroxy-17-methyl
thnx
17a-methyl-etioallocholan-17b-ol-3-hydroxyiminei cant see the nomenclature.... :squint:
making some pretty big claims to say it is the most potent ever. I hope its not like another.....edited: i shouldnt say names :rofl:
Crowne I would definately say you should wait! Not that all of your fears would come true, but if you are a late bloomer, be patient and allow the natural "bloom" to occur! You may find that at a later date you choose not to use any hormonal products. I say this not because I am against hormonal products (not a chance, I love them) but because you should wait to see what you can relaly acheive natuarally, where your weak spots may be, after you have reached your full natural potential! Be safe.
Mr.50
How long did you run the TNT? I ran it as a tester and it is effective. IMHO it just started getting good right at the 3 week mark, right about when I ran out of product. If I were to run it again I would go for 6 to 8 weeks. With a dialed in training routine and diet you could see significant results.the TNT stack. In other words, I've used pretty much every natural test booster that has been praised hah.
How long did you run the TNT? I ran it as a tester and it is effective. IMHO it just started getting good right at the 3 week mark, right about when I ran out of product. If I were to run it again I would go for 6 to 8 weeks. With a dialed in training routine and diet you could see significant results.
my theories on prostate cancer.
your a man if you live long enough we are all gonna get it my grandpa is also in remission from it
as far as growth plates ive always been told 18-20 range is when we really stop growing
im not an endocrinologist so i cannot say in terms of growth plates i really dont see it happening
....and keep in mind that there are ways to minimize potential issues regarding any compound by being proactive- keep in mind that there are a list of recommendations on the write-up for The One concerning training, nutrition, rest, and supplementation. While I can't say that following the recommendations perfectly will result in a genuinely perfect product experience (mainly b/c I think that this is impossible)- they will greatly maximize your chances of getting some genuinely special results from The One, if you catch my drift:cheers:We all take risks if we pursue 'chemical' assistance in our training. I suppose you just need to weigh up the likely pros and cons.
those are really 2 different questions. There is no particular health danger that i know of related to the growth plates closing "early" (as by 21 almost everyone's growth plates have closed), but yes like any exogenous hormone it could affect the natural cycle of growth. Thats the entire purpose of exogenous hormones - to cause more muscle growth than you naturally would get. Might you not reach your maximum height? Sure thats possible if your growth plates haven't already closed.so could this product actually be deemed dangerous if the user has growth plates which haven't fully fused yet? In other words, could the use of this product negatively affect the natural cycle of growth in a person.
Mozilla/5.0 (Danger hiptop 4.6; U; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920
most people are done growing by the time they are 21-22....those are really 2 different questions. There is no particular health danger that i know of related to the growth plates closing "early" (as by 21 almost everyone's growth plates have closed), but yes like any exogenous hormone it could affect the natural cycle of growth. Thats the entire purpose of exogenous hormones - to cause more muscle growth than you naturally would get. Might you not reach your maximum height? Sure thats possible if your growth plates haven't already closed.
We all take risks if we pursue 'chemical' assistance in our training. I suppose you just need to weigh up the likely pros and cons.
Absolutely 100% agree w/ you- that is why I included as much detailed info as I could in the write-up.....rms80 ... Don't get me wrong I wasn't saying THE ONE was any worse than any other product, just generally speaking, the individual needs to take some responsibility and ensure that they are properly informed before undertaking an hormonal cycle.
I have looked at the most recent research on epiphyseal closure- and it seems to be more estrogen-related than anything- a lot of the latest clinical trials are using aromatase inhibitors like arimidex in conjunction with GH to stop this occurrence in shorter stature children- I found one study where the arimidex plus GH group grew 5.1 cm taller than the placebo group over a period of a couple years.....I'm getting an xray this week to see if my growth plates have fused. If they have fused and I follow everything to the t, I don't see how this could be harmful for me. Being only 22, I can still reap the same benefits that the older crowd will gain, correct? I'm really hoping this will kickstart my current bulking schedule. My target weight is still another 17lbs away.
Mozilla/5.0 (Danger hiptop 4.6; U; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920
you more than likely will not continue to grow taller after you are 22, how long have you been at your current height?
I have looked at the most recent research on epiphyseal closure- and it seems to be more estrogen-related than anything- a lot of the latest clinical trials are using aromatase inhibitors like arimidex in conjunction with GH to stop this occurrence in shorter stature children- I found one study where the arimidex plus GH group grew 5.1 cm taller than the placebo group over a period of a couple years.....
once they are closed, they are closed, unfortunately....however- limiting estrogen or completely suppressing it apparently can delay the closing of the epiphyses- GH actually has a feedback loop that allows it to convert to estrogen in small amounts......So in other words, increased estrogen seems to be the culprit responsible for closing growth plates over increased test/dht? I'm assuming arimidex suppresses estrogen and GH would open the plates back up?.. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't claim to be an expert, just a younger dude making sure he's not making any 'dire' mistakes, hah.
once they are closed, they are closed, unfortunately....however- limiting estrogen or completely suppressing it apparently can delay the closing of the epiphyses- GH actually has a feedback loop that allows it to convert to estrogen in small amounts......
rms,
Not that I question you.....but I am just wondering how can gh (a peptide) convert to estrogen (a steroid)? I know a bit but I dont know everything and I am just trying to figure out how this could be possible?
Mr.50
Conversion is probably a bad choice of nomenclature- you are right, one can't convert to another- co-regulate is probably a much better choice of words....
the connection has more to do with receptor expression, co-regulation, and signalling between GH and estrogen- estrogen and GH can co-regulate (by having a feedback loop) one another, and estrogen has been shown to inhibit JAK/STAT signalling by growth hormone, which can in turn allow for extra-nuclear signalling (and the eventual signalling) of DNA
yeah- sorry for the confusion- my brain is a little fuzzed today- too much paperworkAh yes....very interesting! Thanks for the info!
Mr.50
with correct diet, you can quite possibly hit that in 1 cycle
if you keep all variables constant- with proper PCT, rest, training, etc. you may keep roughly 70-80% after the first 6 weeks of post cycle, and then 60-70% over the next 6 weeks (up to week 12)....those are pretty reasonable numbers from data I have seen17lbs of lean mass gain is really possible from a single cycle, assuming solid fundamentals (diet, exercise, sleep)?
That's hard to believe!
What percentage of that newly gained mass should one expect to keep after going off cycle (assuming of course, proper PCT and continued training with natural substances thereafter).
Thanks in advance. I've never considered trying anything hormonal before but this has me interested.
if you keep all variables constant- with proper PCT, rest, training, etc. you may keep roughly 70-80% after the first 6 weeks of post cycle, and then 60-70% over the next 6 weeks (up to week 12)....those are pretty reasonable numbers from data I have seen