is it possible she can get pregnant?...

I'd be a hell of a lot more concerned with potential STD trasmission when not using a condom than getting a girl on "The pill" pregnant. The only method of truly preventing a potential pregnancy is abstinence. No method of contraception is 100%, but birth control pills are pretty effective if SHE continues to take them as prescribed every month!
 
The correct answer is to make sure none gets in her vag by making sure she swallows it all.

I call it the only true oral contraceptive.
 
Caferacer said:
The correct answer is to make sure none gets in her vag by making sure she swallows it all.

I call it the only true oral contraceptive.
Click to expand...

or finish in her butt

no problemo
 
man u gizz in her! if she has bc cuz its our mainly right as test holders :) anabolic sperm though might be strong enough to break the bc thing lollll..... its our victory knwoing after sex she has got to get up and clean.... and WE dont haha
 
Birth control [considering both oral and injectable] is a more effective contraceptive than condoms, when used properly, by far.

Even when used as directed, in every sexual intercourse circumstance, a condom may not be effective 3% [theoretical, averaging the estimates below] of the time; a more typical circumstance is it failing 14% [actual, averaging the estimates below] of the time. Putting on a condom whilst having sex with a woman on birth-control [assuming she is using it properly] is like wearing a flak jacket behind a completely impenetrable wall: it may psychologically reassure you, but it serves almost no purpose whatsoever.

To address the OP's question, pulling out is almost as effective as a condom in preventing unwanted births [some estimates say condoms are 10% more effective, some only 5%]. Condoms are often represented as the most effective birth-control method, though this is not the case by any means. I feel they are usually represented as such because they [and other tangible barriers] are the only means through which sexually transmitted diseases are prevented; by default, they are represented as the pinnacle of both contraceptive and preventative measures. They are not.

Here is the skinny in summation:

a) Oral and injectable birth-control methods are by far and away the most successful birth-control prevention techniques. Ensure she is using it properly.

b) Condoms, though notorious as being the 'most successful contraceptive', are not very successful at preventing birth. They are, however, the most successful preventative method for STDs.

c) You do not need to wear a condom and use birth-control. If your sexual partner uses her pill within 4h< of her scheduled time, your chances of procreation are approximately one-tenth of one percent; if she extends that period tp >4h, the chances jump to a whopping .25-.5%; if she fails to use the product >24h from her scheduled dosing period, the chances jump to 1-3%.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed [full text: http://www.psrh.org/pubs/journals/3105699.pdf]
 
I call them rebel sperm (pre cum) and yes they can get a girl pregnant. However, if she is on the pill, though the pill is not 100% effective, she probably won't.
 
Mulletsoldier said:
Birth control [considering both oral and injectable] is a more effective contraceptive than condoms, when used properly, by far.

Even when used as directed, in every sexual intercourse circumstance, a condom may not be effective 3% [theoretical, averaging the estimates below] of the time; a more typical circumstance is it failing 14% [actual, averaging the estimates below] of the time. Putting on a condom whilst having sex with a woman on birth-control [assuming she is using it properly] is like wearing a flak jacket behind a completely impenetrable wall: it may psychologically reassure you, but it serves almost no purpose whatsoever.

To address the OP's question, pulling out is almost as effective as a condom in preventing unwanted births [some estimates say condoms are 10% more effective, some only 5%]. Condoms are often represented as the most effective birth-control method, though this is not the case by any means. I feel they are usually represented as such because they [and other tangible barriers] are the only means through which sexually transmitted diseases are prevented; by default, they are represented as the pinnacle of both contraceptive and preventative measures. They are not.

Here is the skinny in summation:

a) Oral and injectable birth-control methods are by far and away the most successful birth-control prevention techniques. Ensure she is using it properly.

b) Condoms, though notorious as being the 'most successful contraceptive', are not very successful at preventing birth. They are, however, the most successful preventative method for STDs.

c) You do not need to wear a condom and use birth-control. If your sexual partner uses her pill within 4h< of her scheduled time, your chances of procreation are approximately one-tenth of one percent; if she extends that period tp >4h, the chances jump to a whopping .25-.5%; if she fails to use the product >24h from her scheduled dosing period, the chances jump to 1-3%.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed [full text: http://www.psrh.org/pubs/journals/3105699.pdf]
Click to expand...

It's called the most effective contraceptive because a girl cannot pick up birth control from a 7-11.
 
Caferacer said:
Lmao, I wasn't offended. I was just saying it's less of an excuse for kids if it's available. Thats why it's pushed in schools.
Click to expand...

It is pushed in schools because the education system is biologically-retarded [see: delayed, not idiotic] in regards to the information it propagates. I was told explicitly in several classes during high school that it was not only possible, but probable, that a woman may become pregnant when using oral and/or injectable contraceptives.
 
Moral of the Story:

Pills are to ensure no horrid little duplicates of you are produced; the Iron Sheath is to ensure that you don't end up seeing Mother Theresa's face in an abscess on your pee-pee.
 
CopyCat said:
99.99% has been working for my wife and I
Click to expand...

I always, shall we say, "hose the beast from within" and I have had no issues in regards to child-scares. Now, the PMS my Fiancee experiences from Alesse is an entirely different matter!

It is more like:

:sad6:

"No, no, seriously"

:sad6:

.....

:numbered:

.......

:run:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top