Follidrone or Redcon1 Halo/MOAB

James496

Member
Hi Guys

Currently building my next bulking stack. There is a few synthetics in there but that is for another section.

I'm a massive fan of follidrone. I've used it for a few years. It works. It's time tested. I love the addition of some ACE inhibiting compounds that Follidrone has. That is one product I feel is a staple not just for mass potential but overall health.

However, how would a combo of Redcon1s Halo & Moab compare to follidrone in your honest opinion?

I like Redcon1 and have heard great things about the Halo/Moab combo. Or am I better off just sticking with folli?

Opinions?
 
I'm pretty sure RedCon products are very surface level stuff...I don't think you'll see the results on that that you would with Follidrone.
 
Hey Man

Follidrone is just one of those one's that work. It is such a good product in all honesty. I suppose I could just do a follidrone/laxo combo.

You could argue why run natty stuff with anything synthetic but Follidrone effects health positivily in so many ways.

I just wondered how epi products compared etc.
 
not a fan of halo .. moab looks nice on a paper, overpriced for sure .. stack it with something else.

or save money and get cel epi-plex 300mg 60 servings
 
I love FD2 as well, been on it almost non stop since release. Look into stacking with inspired nutraceuticals LGND if you want Laxogenin plus some other goodies.
 
Cheers bud

Will look into that stack. I think follidrone has such a profound effect on cardiovascular health. I realize I'm not allowed to discuss anything other than natty stuff here, but lets just say I have very good reason to believe it fits nicely into something of a different class 😊

Big fan.
 
Follidrone> anything redcon
 
James496 said:
Hey Man

Follidrone is just one of those one's that work. It is such a good product in all honesty. I suppose I could just do a follidrone/laxo combo.

You could argue why run natty stuff with anything synthetic but Follidrone effects health positivily in so many ways.

I just wondered how epi products compared etc.
Click to expand...

Red con one is a joke not to mention they emailed me with out my permission since they took my email from bsl data base. Shady people .
 
Yeah Follidrone is a great product. Would certainly stack well with CEL Anabolic Effect. Save your money when it comes to Redcon lol
 
Lol 😂

You guys are too encourageable for your own good. I am LOVING the Follidrone & Anabolic Effect stack idea! Oh wait and BMP! Oh and maybe Cardarine and.....

In all seriousness, these look some solid products. With the exception of Cardarine/SR9009 (which I realize I'm not allowed to mention here) I may drop all synthetics and just stick to the Follidrone & Anabolic effect idea someone mentioned. Mind you BMP looks great......on paper. I'll be the judge of effectiveness for me.
 
James496 said:
Lol 😂

You guys are too encourageable for your own good. I am LOVING the Follidrone & Anabolic Effect stack idea! Oh wait and BMP! Oh and maybe Cardarine and.....

In all seriousness, these look some solid products. With the exception of Cardarine/SR9009 (which I realize I'm not allowed to mention here) I may drop all synthetics and just stick to the Follidrone & Anabolic effect idea someone mentioned. Mind you BMP looks great......on paper. I'll be the judge of effectiveness for me.
Click to expand...


lol stack em all .. jk jk jk jk jk jk

all those are verstile and much better then what u had asked for lol

BMP & Anabolic Effect has been getting great feedback .. AE + Epicathein ( Folli ) would be sick too

8 weeks of BMP ( Start - 1st 8 weeks )
12 weeks of AE ( Start to end )
8 Weeks of folli ( Last 8 weeks .. So youll be ending it with Just AE & Folli
 
Guys I was reading through the BMP writeup, and wondered if there would be any problem running BMP alongside Cardarine or SR?
 
ValiantThor08 said:
I don't see why there would be an issue with that.
Click to expand...

Cheers man.

I do agree with keeping things to a minimum however. Otherwise in all seriousness it just get's unrealistic to sustain on a monthly basis in regards to cost.

These all seem absolutely top notch products though. Follidrone I've used for ages, so for me it falls within a rare catergory of a supplement that actually works and delivers in buckets. I think it should be a staple
 
ValiantThor08 said:
I don't see why there would be an issue with that.
Click to expand...

Cheers man.

I do agree with keeping things to a minimum however. Otherwise in all seriousness it just get's unrealistic to sustain on a monthly basis in regards to cost.

These all seem absolutely top notch products though. Follidrone I've used for ages, so for me it falls within a rare catergory of a supplement that actually works and delivers in buckets. I think it should be a staple
 
Mowglisml said:
As an engineer you should know that this is an inequality not an equation. :) haha just kidding around.
Click to expand...

Very true! Didn't want to confuse non-engineers;)
 
I think your results would be much better from Follidrone. Halo is just a Laxogenin product which I have seen a lot more non results than results reported. Everyone that takes Follidrone loves it, and everyone that takes Follidrone+Vector doesn't even look at other products again.....haha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top