kisaj
Legend
This is very similar to a post I made a while back.
In summary, if I wasn't affiliated with PES and they provided testing I would not trust them.
This has been shown time and time again when a company posts blood work. Some forum members appreciate it but more often than not people try and tear it apart.
Some instances have included where the change was drastic and the company gets accused of fiddling the results.
Other instances are where the change was more subtle and people said the effect was worthless.
Other instances are where the report itself gets picked apart regardless of the results depending on who tested it, time of day, if the lab was reputable etc.
Honestly, I would love to see trials for all supplements in a hypothetical world but in terms of reality a company providing testing on their own product very rarely puts people's minds at ease.
So if a company isn't doing testing, which it sounds like both you and Jiigzz are saying, then how is it determined how well the product works before being released with the claims it does? I am genuinely curious how this is possible without any testing, and if there is in fact testing done, then where is this excess cost being talked about?
This is in no way a dig at PES, but rather a genuine question surround this topic.