Except it isn't indecisive at all. You saying it is doesn't make it so. I'm willing to bet you haven't read a single paper on the subject. I'd put money on it
I don’t read papers, they are bad for the environment
However, I have read several articles online. The ones I come across more often than not state that we could bend over backwards in efforts to reduce our carbon footprint and it would only be capable of making an insignificant difference at best. Many say it is too late anyway and that the damage has been done. We will continue seeing those repercussions in the decades to come. Maybe I am coming across the wrong sources, or maybe they are the right ones….who knows? I don’t believe there are right or wrong ones.
What I do know is that we all should have been long dead by now based on prior extremist theories on global warming which has now morphed into climate change.
Regardless of what we choose to believe, the fact that China produces infinitely more greenhouse gases than anyone with plans to increase emissions through 2030 is preposterous. On top of that, China only pledged to be carbon neutral by 2060! Do people even realize that? If the situation is so dire that the damage is potentially already done, then why are we accepting of China having these absurdly conflicting timeframe of goals?
It’s kind of like:
A: It’s too late now to reverse the damage, but let’s make everything more challenging and more expensive for everyone except for China until the upcoming generations die anyway.
B: The impact of the Earth’s natural greenhouse effect is potentially greater than human contribution? Maybe major natural events that occurred years ago contribute to the climate change factors that we hear about today. Only to be blamed on human emissions?
C: Maybe it‘s mostly bullsh*t and more of a natural evolution. Potentially we would be better served to acknowledge that the climate is changing/evolving without a doom and gloom outlook as being the only trajectory. Maybe we should take on the approach of changing with the climate rather than making fruitless sacrificial efforts to attempt fighting it?
Ultimately, I believe the Earth is infinitely more powerful and resilient than its inhabitants. We simply aren’t going to make a significant impact on the trajectory of the Earth’s climate no matter how much money we throw around the world.