I just got cancelled, I thought that was a Libtard thing, lol
Invalid Link Removed
That's what they want you to believe lol.
In reality though, they cancel just as much as anyone when they disagree.
Dont be like Nostrum. (I still love yo Nostrum, but Come on Man! Lets go AMC!)
May 13 of 2020 vvv
And lastly, LLLMMMFFFFAAAOOOO!!!!! @vvv Knock Knock, who's there? My bun buns from the future!
Invalid Link Removed
Are you fearmongering about wheelbarrow currency again? I can still buy milk and bread, you?
australian swimmer withdraws from olympic trials because man looked at her...geez.
Sounds accurate.
Thanks for sticking for what you believe in and still communicating with me after all we went through the past couple of years. Thats all I want really, continued discussion, being open to talk no matter how much our disagreements![]()
We don't agree on a lot, but we are discussing highly controversial and divisive topics.
If we discussed normal interests, we'd probably have more in common than we realise.
Heck, I don't agree with the views of some of my closest friends but we are still friends.
democrat policies are causing mistrust in military.sen cotton challenges defense secy on military's anti-american indoctrination.
cotton says he has received hundreds of whistleblower complaints.
plummeting morale, and mistrust among races where none existed before---sounds just like things were before the great divider obama.
democrat policies are causing mistrust in military.
Like WMDs in Iraq? What party was that under? LMFAO
Who’s definition of WMD are we going by? Are you trying to say Saddam did not possess weapons capable of causing mass destruction and death?
Yeah sure, the US gave him the chemical weapons in the 80s when they were financing both sides of their war with Iran, and who are we to tell him what he can or can’t have? They had nothing to do with 9/11 and we shared similar enemies. Why not nuke China? They are far more dangerous than Saddam shythead and his Chicago thug army lol
Who’s definition of WMD are we going by? Are you trying to say Saddam did not possess weapons capable of causing mass destruction and death?
Yeah sure, the US gave him the chemical weapons in the 80s when they were financing both sides of their war with Iran, and who are we to tell him what he can or can’t have? They had nothing to do with 9/11 and we shared similar enemies. Why not nuke China? They are far more dangerous than Saddam shythead and his Chicago thug army lol
You’re moving goal posts. The question wasn’t who gave him WMDs. The question was do you not believe he was in possession of them. We went after him because he not only possessed them but actually used them on his own people. Right, wrong, or indifferent. Now the Iraqi army can’t project any power not only on their own people but on other people as well.
You’re moving goal posts. The question wasn’t who gave him WMDs. The question was do you not believe he was in possession of them. We went after him because he not only possessed them but actually used them on his own people. Right, wrong, or indifferent. Now the Iraqi army can’t project any power not only on their own people but on other people as well.
You’re moving goal posts. The question wasn’t who gave him WMDs. The question was do you not believe he was in possession of them. We went after him because he not only possessed them but actually used them on his own people. Right, wrong, or indifferent. Now the Iraqi army can’t project any power not only on their own people but on other people as well.
We went after Iraq because Saudi’s supposedly took us out on 9/11, so we took out Iraq and sold Saudi’s more weapons to cause mass genocide in Yemen.
It’s all a load a crap,
and Republicrats are far more terroristic than Saddam ever was. If anything we need to take out the ability of both Demicans and Repunlicrats ability to project power.
Philosophically speaking, are you suggesting a independent country with a history of foreign invasions and wars need not have a powerful and viable military capabilities?
Republicans gassed over 100k fellow citizens and commuter genocide on their own constituents? When did that happen?
And as long as said country doesn’t endorse a religion or idea that calls for the destruction of non believers or western nationals.
And as long as said country doesn’t endorse a religion or idea that calls for the destruction of non believers or western nationals.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
George Orwell
Edit - This excerpt from Orwell's classic book “1984” reflects what we are currently seeing across our nation. Although this was written/published in 1949, the book is an accurate picture of the mindset of leftest bent on destroying our history.
Republicrat (and Demican) policies have caused the deaths of over a million Iraqi’s, so not sure how relevant the method is, gas, bombs, nuclear waste, sanctions and starvation, as Hitlery would say what different does it make.
You don’t solve a Holocaust with a Holocaust. You try to modernize them like China. They murdered 70-100 million people and in 73 Nixon reached out to them and although they still are an evil dictatorship, it’s a hell of a lot better there.
I’m straight tinfoil, all those middle eastern wars are 100% corrupt military industrial complex profit taking, Halliburton, oil and other resources. I can pick out a dozen more countries that have worse problems but they don’t have the resources for us to steal in profit for us to intervene. I’d bet cancer on myself if I was wrong, I’m that confident.
Glad to see Jiigzz is still here. Switching back and forth from raw numbers to percentages as it suited peoples' arguments broke my brain.
100% corrupt military is a stretch. You’re on to something in parts of what you said. To say we are out there solely to feed the military industrial complex or for oil is incorrect. The military takes part in counter piracy, anti human trafficking, surveillance, and assists in training of foreign militaries to better snuff out problems in their own countries. Our civil affairs presence in developing countries is huge and unfortunately gets little to no attention as compared to us dropping warheads on foreheads.
Which is a shame (but expected). Militaries play key roles in more than just warfare but get no attention whatsoever
And as long as said country doesn’t endorse a religion or idea that calls for the destruction of non believers or western nationals.
I get that, but Islam is billions strong. Only a very, very small minority take certain texts at that extreme.
Most religions have a sect that is violent or extremist, but you don't punish the whole for the part, that's how you end up fostering resentment among everyone, even those who were not your enemy initially. Violence only breeds resentment and retribution when the target feels it is unjust.
100% corrupt military is a stretch. You’re on to something in parts of what you said. To say we are out there solely to feed the military industrial complex or for oil is incorrect. The military takes part in counter piracy, anti human trafficking, surveillance, and assists in training of foreign militaries to better snuff out problems in their own countries. Our civil affairs presence in developing countries is huge and unfortunately gets little to no attention as compared to us dropping warheads on foreheads.

What is the Estimate for radical Islamic views at nowadays? 10%? That’s what 100 million nutcases that are wishing for the destruction of non Muslims? It is also the only major religion that has not gone through reformation. As of right now I will err on the side of caution and treat it like the cult I know it to be.
The worlds most populated Muslim country is Indonesia. I mean the only Muslim terrorist born there alive today I know of is Bareback Hussein Obobo hahaha
If you are going to name a terrorist you may as well name the king of them all. And by the way Indonesia is slam full of terrorists as well. Look at the spillover with the abu sayaf and MILF in the Sulu region of PI and the foreign fighters crossing over from Indonesia. No Islamic country can with a straight face say they are free from radical Islamic terrorists in some form or fashion.
I think an even more radical cult than Isam are the Communist CCP.
They are borderline as bad as the Nazi's. Instead of throwing a group of people in ovens, they found a way to make tons of cash off of humans. First they put them to labor and when the organ orders come in they put the matching donor on life support first, then they give them a shot to kill them so the organs stay nice and fresh.
But they are our trading buddies and morality is thrown out the door.
I would gladly support the war effort with China when someone gets the nuts to hit them. I need a change of scenery.
What is the Estimate for radical Islamic views at nowadays? 10%? That’s what 100 million nutcases that are wishing for the destruction of non Muslims? It is also the only major religion that has not gone through reformation. As of right now I will err on the side of caution and treat it like the cult I know it to be.
Much, much less. Probably closer to 0.01% by a number of estimates.
I've heard the 100M number being circulated before but haven't actually seen an accurate source for that other than someone saying intelligence agencies estimate that.
A good analogy is that if you put red ants and black ants in a container, they will walk idly by each other. If you then shake the container, the red and black ants will fight, because they each believe the other to be responsible for the disturbance. But who is the one actually shaking the container?
If people are pitted against each other, both sides further the divide because they can each pursue their agendas. If people are kept scared of radicalism, then they are much more likely to endorse more military conquest in those areas. The US found out what happens when you lose the faith of the public the hard way, and they won't like to repeat those mistakes
bet he voted for diben....damned cat shagger.Check out this winner! He’s just one of the gifts our nation has to look forward to..
Invalid Link Removed