'poll watcher submits affidavit alleging houston judge and election staff committed voter fraud'
the alleged fraudsters are of course democrats.
the alleged fraudsters are of course democrats.
From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001.[19][21] While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.[22][23]She’s a licensed attorney. She’s never practice law. She clerked for Scalia IIRC for two years after graduating and has taught until 2017.
From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001.[19][21] While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.[22][23]She’s a licensed attorney. She’s never practice law. She clerked for Scalia IIRC for two years after graduating and has taught until 2017.
Oh, I was wrong about never practicing law. She practiced two years and can’t name three cases she worked on. She was a baby lawyer at Baker Botts. She spent two years in a basement reviewing documents for 80 hours a week. She’s still never tried a case to verdict or argued a case to an appellate judge. She’s never litigated in federal court. That’s not a lot of experience. She’s never actually practiced law. Her job is much more than abortion, 2A, and Republicancare. The rules of procedure and evidence come from SCOTUS.
There is a long history of Supreme Court Justices who don't meet your qualifications. FDR's nominations would almost all be invalidated by your requirements.Such a shame. She has no business being on the Court. So many *actual* lawyers/judges got passed over for this chick that’s never argued a single motion.
FDR isn’t exactly the poster boy for best president.There is a long history of Supreme Court Justices who don't meet your qualifications. FDR's nominations would almost all be invalidated by your requirements.
I mean, James Byrnes was basically Joe Biden.
I want to be more clear because I am not saying you are totally wrong. I am just saying it is valid but not cut and dry.FDR isn’t exactly the poster boy for best president.
I guess the liberals up north are different than Texas liberals. Most of them I know dislike FDR and aren’t big on socialism (including corporate socialism) or taking away guns. I am liberal for Texas, but am conservative for the liberals described ITT.I want to be more clear because I am not saying you are totally wrong. I am just saying it is valid but not cut and dry.
FDR is the poster boy for the democrats. Everything they stand on started with him. But we agree, he did damage to this country we still have not recovered from.
But there are president's from both parties that have nominated justices who have never been judges, had limited real world experience, etc. Your point is valid, but not the only factor.
Well that didnt work out well!There is a long history of Supreme Court Justices who don't meet your qualifications. FDR's nominations would almost all be invalidated by your requirements.
I mean, James Byrnes was basically Joe Biden.
I think sometimes you forget that approximately 95% of the global population are mouth breathing mongoloids.how the hell did that moron obama become a two term president...he sounds like jim jone's reincarnated what a snake oil-i mean kool aid salesman. drink up democrats.
The liberals in MA are definitely different than the liberals in TX. Our liberals are more like CA liberals. Insane, crazy, nuts. A woman in a town near me had her car rear ended on purpose and then was assaulted because she had a MAGA bumper sticker. You have to be pretty ballzy to put a Trump sign in your yard around here. And I live in one of the most conservative areas of MA.I guess the liberals up north are different than Texas liberals. Most of them I know dislike FDR and aren’t big on socialism (including corporate socialism) or taking away guns. I am liberal for Texas, but am conservative for the liberals described ITT.
Kavanaugh wasn’t a judge when Bush nominated him for a federal circuit and it counted against him. He was, however, a practicing lawyer. I’m fine with someone who has argued a case and understands procedure and evidence in a real setting being nominated. They may have never written an opinion, but they’ve read a million of them and understand practical application of the law. And they’ve written a million motions and briefs. Trying a case to a jury within the confines of the rules of procedure and evidence is high level chess.
Reading/understanding the rules and applying them are two totally different things. You can’t make an intellectual decision on something if you’ve never had to actually do it. She’s qualified for half of her job - the constitutional issues. But not the other half. And half qualified on a lifetime appointment is a sham.
Why do you have to be SO DARNED negative all the time? I prefer to be much more positive.I think sometimes you forget that approximately 95% of the global population are mouth breathing mongoloids.
You would think by now the little whiny bitches will have figured out that their temper tantrums accomplish nothing. I will thank them in advance for showing their asses though. The normal people will be voting here in a few days.liberals can cry all they want...FACT: amy coney barrett is now sitting justice of SCOTUS!!!
little whiny bitches never learn, they keep repeating same stupid stuff hoping for different result---einsteins definition of a moron.You would think by now the little whiny bitches will have figured out that their temper tantrums accomplish nothing. I will thank them in advance for showing their asses though. The normal people will be voting here in a few days.
I had a few Biden signs. We had them at the range the other day. Let’s just say those signed are now unrecognizable. 12 gauge dumps at close range was pretty cool.my county vigo county indiana is a bellwether county...we have picked the president going all the eay back to eisenhower---guess what demmys trump signs are everywhere, biden not so much, lol....go trump!!!!
Great minds think alike. The constitution is not a complicated document. It’s fairly plain English. Not sure what a career in law would offer to better understand it.I don’t think being a Supreme Court Judge requires much at all. It’s supposed to be a very simple job.
View attachment 199036
what the democrats don't understand is that the scotus is there to interpret the law not make the law.Great minds think alike. The constitution is not a complicated document. It’s fairly plain English. Not sure what a career in law would offer to better understand it.
Amen to that!what the democrats don't understand is that the scotus is there to interpret the law not make the law.
They are desperately trying to turn out judicial into a legislative arm. My only hope is for this court to start undoing as much of the unconstitutional shenanigans as possible.what the democrats don't understand is that the scotus is there to interpret the law not make the law.
wrong...Democrat motto: we have a law for that.
He had a lot longer than 8 years as a policy maker.wrong...
democrat motto-promise everything...deliver nothing!!!
i like how trump asked biden-well joe, you had 8 years why didn't you do any of this stuff then?
Half a century, your slightly off lolwrong...
democrat motto-promise everything...deliver nothing!!!
i like how trump asked biden-well joe, you had 8 years why didn't you do any of this stuff then?
Amen to that!what the democrats don't understand is that the scotus is there to interpret the law not make the law.
just a excuse to loot and run rampant but most of all an excuse to attack police, the only ones standing in the way of their criminal activity.BLM burning down the country again because a criminal got greased?
I guess you missed the memo where being a judge or a lawyer is simple and requires no qualifications.I guess the liberals up north are different than Texas liberals. Most of them I know dislike FDR and aren’t big on socialism (including corporate socialism) or taking away guns. I am liberal for Texas, but am conservative for the liberals described ITT.
Kavanaugh wasn’t a judge when Bush nominated him for a federal circuit and it counted against him. He was, however, a practicing lawyer. I’m fine with someone who has argued a case and understands procedure and evidence in a real setting being nominated. They may have never written an opinion, but they’ve read a million of them and understand practical application of the law. And they’ve written a million motions and briefs. Trying a case to a jury within the confines of the rules of procedure and evidence is high level chess.
Reading/understanding the rules and applying them are two totally different things. You can’t make an intellectual decision on something if you’ve never had to actually do it. She’s qualified for half of her job - the constitutional issues. But not the other half. And half qualified on a lifetime appointment is a sham.
are you saying amy coney barrett has no qualifications?I guess you missed the memo where being a judge or a lawyer is simple and requires no qualifications.
They are saying that she doesn’t meet their agenda and that she poses a threat undoing all their libtarded unconstitutional bullshit that has been rammed down our throat for decades.are you saying amy coney barrett has no qualifications?
No, it was more to do with the comment that anyone could practice law because it is so simple.are you saying amy coney barrett has no qualifications?
Tbh I'm just surprised he nominated someone outside the Trump familyThey are saying that she doesn’t meet their agenda and that she poses a threat undoing all their libtarded unconstitutional bullshit that has been rammed down our throat for decades.
The US Constitution is very straightforward. Any law written after that, if it isnt straightforward should be thrown in the trash.No, it was more to do with the comment that anyone could practice law because it is so simple.
Anyone who deals with any aspect of law knows that every single word/ phrase is disputed in court, and only those who don't deal with law think its straightforward.