Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

thebigt said:
with all the shyt going on in yemen only a dimwit fool with half a brain would blame trump for the crazy bullsyht that has been going on in middle east since biblical times.
Click to expand...

Forget the past, he refuses to end involvement, the blood now is on his hands.

Dump could have ended US involvment but he refuses to do so and vetoes bills to end involvement multiple times as he loves worshiping his little Saudi Princess.
 
ax1 said:
Trump Vetoes Measure to Force End to U.S. Involvement in Yemen War

  • April 16, 2019
WASHINGTON — President Trump vetoed a bipartisan resolution on Tuesday that would have forced an end to American military involvement in Saudi Arabia’s civil war in Yemen, rejecting an appeal by lawmakers to his own deeply rooted instincts to withdraw the United States from bloody foreign conflicts.

The veto, only the second time Mr. Trump has used his power to block legislation passed by both houses of Congress, strikes down a resolution that invoked the War Powers Act to distance the United States from a four-year conflict that has killed thousands of civilians and resulted in a widespread famine.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Now let’s see the fluff and pork that was added to the bill so we can really know the reason he vetoed it. If I know the demonrat party, that bill probably barely had anything to do with Yemen.
 
dixonk said:
Now let’s see the fluff and pork that was added to the bill so we can really know the reason he vetoed it. If I know the demonrat party, that bill probably barley had anything to do with Yemen.
Click to expand...

Thats probably a great point, but he could have gone this on his own and ended it.

Knowing the Demican party they probably added banning pellet guns and dangerous polluting camp fires from the Boy Scouts and transgender locker rooms for college sports.
 
ax1 said:
Thats probably a great point, but he could have gone this on his own and ended it.

Knowing the Demican party they probably added banning pellet guns and dangerous polluting camp fires from the Boy Scounts and transgender locker rooms for college sports.
Click to expand...

Believe me there was something in it for the freak perverts of our society.
 
ax1 said:
Thats probably a great point, but he could have gone this on his own and ended it.

Knowing the Demican party they probably added banning pellet guns and dangerous polluting camp fires from the Boy Scounts and transgender locker rooms for college sports.
Click to expand...

Believe me there was something in it for the freak perverts of our society.
 
ax1 said:
Forget the past, he refuses to end involvement, the blood now is on his hands.

Dump could have ended US involvment but he refuses to do so and vetoes bills to end involvement multiple times as he loves worshiping his little Saudi Princess.
Click to expand...
trump is doing everything he can to build alliances to prevent war. the war in yemen is between shiite rebels with ties to iran and the sunni government backed by saudi's...

we have covered this before!!!
 
thebigt said:
trump is doing everything he can to build alliances to prevent war. the war in yemen is between shiite rebels with ties to iran and the sunni government.

we have covered this before!!!
Click to expand...

Yeah and he covered a bunch of pregnant women and children with his biblical love bombs too. We covered it but I dont buy his war mongering bullcrap. Is he a little less war? Sure but just a little, he is not much different from his blood thirsty death demon Groper Joe and Hitlery. Lesser of evils is the same evil.
 
ax1 said:
Yeah and he covered a bunch of pregnant women and children with his biblical love bombs too. We covered it but I dont buy his war mongering bullcrap. Is he a little less war? Sure but just a little, he is not much different from his blood thirsty death demon Groper Joe and Hitlery. Lesser of evils is the same evil.
Click to expand...
stop the bullshyt please...loosen the tinfoil dammit!!! :p
 
ax1 said:
Yeah and he covered a bunch of pregnant women and children with his biblical love bombs too. We covered it but I dont buy his war mongering bullcrap. Is he a little less war? Sure but just a little, he is not much different from his blood thirsty death demon Groper Joe and Hitlery. Lesser of evils is the same evil.
Click to expand...

He is worlds apart from Hillary and joe on war. Not even close.
 
thebigt said:
trump is the 1st president since ronald reagan that hasn't started a new war.
Click to expand...

Reagan is a mass murdering serial killer, did you forget what he did in Central America and other places in the world?
 
thebigt said:
i thought we were talking about trump??????? :unsure:
Click to expand...

Im not sure what you meant by this.

Anyways I aint mad at you guys, but Dump, Groper, Reagan I cant stand any of them sorry. I get worked up thinking about them sometimes.
 
Im 100% certain if Washington, Franklin, Madison and Jefferson along with the rest of the crew were alive today they be way more upset and angry than I am. Im not sure if you guys care about those of the past, but I relate most to their political leanings overall.
 
ax1 said:
Im not sure what you meant by this.

Anyways I aint mad at you guys, but Dump, Groper, Reagan I cant stand any of them sorry. I get worked up thinking about them sometimes.
Click to expand...
i aint mad at you either...i'm a conservative republican who can allow others to have a opposing view--unlike liberal democrats would would have 50-100 people protesting outside your house if you dare to have a differing viewpoint.
 
dixonk said:
The signatures on the constitution didn’t participate in war???
Click to expand...

Of course not! LOL

Some of them especially Jefferson persistently preached not getting involved with foreign entanglements.

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none." -Jefferson
 
ax1 said:
Of course not! LOL

Some of them especially Jefferson persistently preached not getting involved with foreign entanglements.

"Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none." -Jefferson
Click to expand...

So you are enjoying your British nationality?
 
thebigt said:
i aint mad at you either...i'm a conservative republican who can allow others to have a opposing view--unlike liberal democrats would would have 50-100 people protesting outside your house if you dare to have a differing viewpoint.
Click to expand...

Haha so true, thanks for handling my rants....many more to come!!! :)

As far as I know Ive had the most requests ever to be banned from the board for expressing my political views, and as far as I heard it all came from liberals.
 
ax1 said:
Haha so true, thanks for handling my rants....many more to come!!! :)

As far as I know Ive had the most requests ever to be banned from the board for expressing my political views, and as far as I heard it all came from liberals.
Click to expand...
liberals can't handle not agreeing with them...they tend to loot, riot and burn things!!!!

or try to get people banned for having a different opinion.


in my 12 years here i only tried to get 1 person banned and that was because he kept coming into my sponsored logs and calling me a liar....i told admin it was him or me and admin told me to hit the road so i quit AM...i only came back after i was told that the 💩 got himself banned all on his own.
 
despite christine blasie ford once again coming forward to accuse amy coney barrett of raping her in high school ACB will be confirmed to the SCOTUS tonight.
 
dixonk said:
Now let’s jam all the pending 2A cases through!!!
Click to expand...
clarence thomas has good reason to hate biden...i'm sure he is raring to go now that he has a clear majority.

biden pushed that bullshyter anita hill even though he admitted he thought she was lying--yes, biden admitted he thought she was lying.... anita hill was clarence thomas's christine blasie ford, same bullsyht lying democrat, just different name!!!
 
'blumenthal in senate floor speech warns of consequences if amy coney barrett is confirmed'


da nang dick is at it again--good old stolen valor blumenthal. if you didn't go you didn't go, but to not go and say that you did is truly disrespectful to all those who did---it is shameful this pile of 💩 is allowed to serve in the US SENATE.
 
dixonk said:
Still wanting to know what the October surprise is.
Click to expand...
hoping barr is able to make wray come clean about what he knows about those emails...fbi has been in possession for quite awhile now but is sitting on them ala james comey.
 
thebigt said:
hoping barr is able to make wray come clean about what he knows about those emails...fbi has been in possession for quite awhile now but is sitting on them ala james comey.
Click to expand...

I was kind of hoping for Biden in black face with a crack pipe and a 14 year old hooker...oh well.
 
10 things i trust more than a democrat
10.mexican tap water
9.rattlesnake with a pet me sign
8.a fart when i have diarrhea
7.breast milk from bruce jenner
6.taking pills offered by bill cosby
5.an obama nuclear deal with iran
4.a palestinean on a motorcycle
3.gas station sushi
2.taking a laxative and a sleeping pill at same time
1.prayers for peace from al sharpton
 
And she is confirmed.
 
dixonk said:
I think I felt the concussion of millions of libtard heads exploding.
Click to expand...

Basking in the sweet, sweet glow of the fallout.
 
Woody said:
Such a shame. She has no business being on the Court. So many *actual* lawyers/judges got passed over for this chick that’s never argued a single motion.
Click to expand...

I think she was a great choice. Better than the social justice warrior she is replacing.
 
dixonk said:
I think she was a great choice. Better than the social justice warrior she is replacing.
Click to expand...

Why? She isn’t qualified. She’s never practiced law. She’s never represented a client. She has zero idea the practical implication of a decision on evidence/procedure. She has the degree, but she isn’t a lawyer. And a “scholar” shouldn’t make decisions that have real world implications on the actual practice of law that she’s never had the balls to do.
 
Woody said:
Why? She isn’t qualified. She’s never practiced law. She’s never represented a client. She has zero idea the practical implication of a decision on evidence/procedure. She has the degree, but she isn’t a lawyer. And a “scholar” shouldn’t make decisions that have real world implications on the actual practice of law that she’s never had the balls to do.
Click to expand...

Her job is to rule if a law is constitutional or not. Being a judge or a lawyer doesn’t make one a constitutional expert. I would consider her an expert on the constitution and that is the only qualification I would be interested in for that position. Hell not being a lawyer should be a plus. They are, after all, at the same bottom dwelling low level of politicians, we like to call it lower than whale ****.
 
dixonk said:
Her job is to rule if a law is constitutional or not. Being a judge or a lawyer doesn’t make one a constitutional expert. I would consider her an expert on the constitution and that is the only qualification I would be interested in for that position. Hell not being a lawyer should be a plus. They are, after all, at the same bottom dwelling low level of politicians, we like to call it lower than whale ****.
Click to expand...

Her views aligning with yours does not make her qualified for SCOTUS. She’s not going to be limited to answering constitutional questions. She’s going to hear actual, practical questions of law as well. How does someone who’s never practiced law decide a real world law problem?

There were far better conservative judges/lawyers that were passed over for an easy confirmation.
 
Woody said:
Her views aligning with yours does not make her qualified for SCOTUS. She’s not going to be limited to answering constitutional questions. She’s going to hear actual, practical questions of law as well. How does someone who’s never practiced law decide a real world law problem?

There were far better conservative judges/lawyers that were passed over for an easy confirmation.
Click to expand...

I would have picked Judge Judy!
 
Woody said:
Her views aligning with yours does not make her qualified for SCOTUS. She’s not going to be limited to answering constitutional questions. She’s going to hear actual, practical questions of law as well. How does someone who’s never practiced law decide a real world law problem?

There were far better conservative judges/lawyers that were passed over for an easy confirmation.
Click to expand...

My view is follow the constitution. It’s not conservative or liberal. And you say never practiced law yet she is an attorney and circuit judge for 7th court of appeals. So a quick wiki shows she was an attorney since 99 and served 3 years as a judge.
 
dixonk said:
My view is follow the constitution. It’s not conservative or liberal. And you say never practiced law yet she is an attorney and circuit judge for 7th court of appeals. So a quick wiki shows she was an attorney since 99 and served 3 years as a judge.
Click to expand...

She’s a licensed attorney. She’s never practice law. She clerked for Scalia IIRC for two years after graduating and has taught until 2017.
 
dixonk said:
She’s a Bloomberg flunky.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know, thats terrible but she runs one hell of a good shytshow and thats all the un-Supreme Court has been the past century, nothing but a disappointing shytshow. At least she can entertain me!
 
thebigt said:
10 things i trust more than a lawyer
10.mexican tap water
9.rattlesnake with a pet me sign
8.a fart when i have diarrhea
7.breast milk from bruce jenner
6.taking pills offered by bill cosby
5.an obama nuclear deal with iran
4.a palestinean on a motorcycle
3.gas station sushi
2.taking a laxative and a sleeping pill at same time
1.prayers for peace from al sharpton
Click to expand...
amended
 
'poll watcher submits affidavit alleging houston judge and election staff committed voter fraud'

the alleged fraudsters are of course democrats.:cool:
 
Woody said:
She’s a licensed attorney. She’s never practice law. She clerked for Scalia IIRC for two years after graduating and has taught until 2017.
Click to expand...

From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001.[19][21] While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.[22][23]

🤷🏼‍♂️
 
Woody said:
She’s a licensed attorney. She’s never practice law. She clerked for Scalia IIRC for two years after graduating and has taught until 2017.
Click to expand...

From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001.[19][21] While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.[22][23]

🤷🏼‍♂️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top