Donald Trump running for president

Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
You realize there is more to it than sheer numbers, right? The states that are up for grabs lean heavily in the GOP's favor.
Gotta agree here. Anything can happen, but a lot depends on this (what the states are) or even if the Republican running is an incumbent.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Dick Cheney's first term as President was far, far worse than Dump's today (worse of my lifetime, worse than Obomo even.) In 2004 I thought it was completely impossible for him to win re-election and the GOP to stay in power.

Dont be so sure, its not worth it. That term marked the finalization of the complete death of the United States as we know it.
That was a really weird win, but there are people that will vote Democrat or Republican no matter what or how far the candidate sways from what a Democrat or Republican has historically been.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
That was a really weird win, but there are people that will vote Democrat or Republican no matter what or how far the candidate sways from what a Democrat or Republican has historically been.
That election I voted for Smelly and Demohcraps all the way down the board. It was a crushing election, I was in late night History class and they put the TV on and most of the class was shocked as to what was unraveling.

All these years later I feel so naive looking back, I couldnt believe I voted for one who operates shadow government aka "The 7th Floor Group" behind the scenes. And its comical to think people think Dump is the one in power and by eliminating him things will change. And Dump pretends to be a anti-deep state Prezident, does absolutely nothing about anything.
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Anyone in here still support the next messiah... king of Israël? Lol. He cray.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Anyone in here still support the next messiah... king of Israël? Lol. He cray.
Still waiting on campaign promises of having everlasting peace between Isreal and Palestine and uniting them and throwing his sister Hitlery in prison.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Yes Dump, and you will be loyal to all the Jews, as long as they pay their taxes or they will put in a cage and then if they resist they will be killed.

Vote Dump 2020! Where earning money is pick pocketed in exchange for Dump’s loyalty and complying saves your life!!!!
 
Last edited:
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Anyone in here still support the next messiah... king of Israël? Lol. He cray.
Watch The Family on Netflix if you haven't yet. I do think Trump was joking about the chosen one thing, but it's a really scary and odd coincidence to use that phrase.

Also, he can't seem to make up his mind if people should or shouldn't have loyalties to foreign countries.
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
You're the second person to recommend that show. On it.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Trump asks 'Who is our biggest enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?'

That one is easy. That would absolutely be the Federal Reserve. Now stop being such a phony ignoramus and abuse your executive powers for something good for a change and order a complete audit of the Federal Reserve so people know the truth as to how not only are they more dangerous than Prezident Whinny the Pooh of China, but more dangerous than the entire globe's standing armies combined.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Trump asks 'Who is our biggest enemy, Jay Powell or Chairman Xi?'

That one is easy. That would absolutely be the Federal Reserve. Now stop being such a phony ignoramus and abuse your executive powers for something good for a change and order a complete audit of the Federal Reserve so people know the truth as to how not only are they more dangerous than Prezident Whinny the Pooh of China, but more dangerous than the entire globe's standing armies combined.
Trick question since both of those people understand how tariffs work.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Trick question since both of those people understand how tariffs work.
The way its supposed to work is "SECTION 8. Clause 1. The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States."

Unfortunately people these past 102 years (some of the WWI executive powers still used today) vote in a group of unconstitutional bungholes into Congress and they all (Demicans and Repulicrats) have allowed the Dictator expand executive powers and now the voters will get what they deserve...well those barking now that partook for this to happen of course over the last century, and thanks to you dead people that helped make our current craptrap government the way it is.

As I always say, you may love your government today, but you may not love yours tomorrow and by then its too late.
 
Carnivorecon

Carnivorecon

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • Established
  • RockStar
If Trump's the only person in the west who will stand up to China then thank God for him, China and its commy-capitalism system with profit and party above all else are the single biggest threat to freedom and individuality the world has ever known. Their social credit system is an Orwellian nightmare designed to make you disown your own grandmother for the least wrong think. My government in the UK will keep glad-handing the red dragon and taking their money whilst selling off our country bit by bit with a sh#t eating grin until one day they own the shirts on our backs and rent them to us for total unquestioning obedience. Thank god for Trump and the US for having the backbone to stand up to them before they're so overpowered there'll be no chance of resistance
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
If Trump's the only person in the west who will stand up to China then thank God for him, China and its commy-capitalism system with profit and party above all else are the single biggest threat to freedom and individuality the world has ever known. Their social credit system is an Orwellian nightmare designed to make you disown your own grandmother for the least wrong think. My government in the UK will keep glad-handing the red dragon and taking their money whilst selling off our country bit by bit with a sh#t eating grin until one day they own the shirts on our backs and rent them to us for total unquestioning obedience. Thank god for Trump and the US for having the backbone to stand up to them before they're so overpowered there'll be no chance of resistance
Incorrect and overuse of the word "Orwellian" is exactly what Orwell warned against. If Trump actually cared about China and their effect on the US, he would have stopped having products manufactured there, which he still does! This is about Trump's ego, nothing else.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Incorrect and overuse of the word "Orwellian" is exactly what Orwell warned against. If Trump actually cared about China and their effect on the US, he would have stopped having products manufactured there, which he still does! This is about Trump's ego, nothing else.
That hyposhyt bought all those building materials for decades from China when he could have gone domestically, but green is the bottom line with him. Then illegals build his blocks of steel when he could have hired legal Americans. What a dump Prezident hyposhytical Dump is.
 
Last edited:
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
If Trump's the only person in the west who will stand up to China then thank God for him, China and its commy-capitalism system with profit and party above all else are the single biggest threat to freedom and individuality the world has ever known. Their social credit system is an Orwellian nightmare designed to make you disown your own grandmother for the least wrong think. My government in the UK will keep glad-handing the red dragon and taking their money whilst selling off our country bit by bit with a sh#t eating grin until one day they own the shirts on our backs and rent them to us for total unquestioning obedience. Thank god for Trump and the US for having the backbone to stand up to them before they're so overpowered there'll be no chance of resistance
I got a better idea, Dump should stand up to defend the US Constitution, but then he would have to started by telling himself, "Your fired!"
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Their social credit system is an Orwellian nightmare designed to make you disown your own grandmother for the least wrong think.
Im worried about the US's social credit system, forget China. The US is where they send IRS gangsters to harass its political opposition. No not Demicans or Republicrats, but people that actually want to restore the Constitution, the same one our politicians pretend to take oath and swear to protect.

The biggest threat to the United States is the United States.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I got a better idea, Dump should stand up to defend the US Constitution, but then he would have to started by telling himself, "Your fired!"
Pfft. He uses the 2nd amendment for marketing while attacking the 1st. I saw last week that he was looking at bastardizing the 14th.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
So Pocohantes got caught lying about his heritage....well, he is about 0.00049349384938934893438984% Native which is ALOT of numbers...

So he is going to use stolen tax payer money to apologize for his deception to people he refuses to fight to give what really matter which is Native's want their country back from the foreign invaders.

186009

186010
 
Last edited:
BeardedBreast

BeardedBreast

Active member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Given Trump's opposition in 2020, we best all pray he wins. No 3rd party candidate will be able to take it, and the democrat options are absolute horse bukake.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Given Trump's opposition in 2020, we best all pray he wins. No 3rd party candidate will be able to take it, and the democrat options are absolute horse bukake.
I agree that the Demican opposition is atrocious, but Im either voting 3rd party or skipping the Presidential part of next years election and just voting for my local offices.

A little less bukake is still bukake, I want none of it on me, lol

I have to refuse to be an accomplice of Dump's multiple unconstitutional policies.
 
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
So Pocohantes got caught lying about his heritage....well, he is about 0.00049349384938934893438984% which is ALOT of numbers...

So he is going to use stolen tax payer money to apologize for his deception to people he refuses to fight to give what really matter which is Native's want their country back from the foreign invaders.

View attachment 186009
View attachment 186010
Why the misgendering?
 
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
huh? You can’t be serious lol
I was, in fact, being serious. The pocahontas stuff, I get. I think it's making a mountain out of a mole hill but I get it. Is this about putting pronouns on Twitter or something?
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I was, in fact, being serious. The pocahontas stuff, I get. I think it's making a mountain out of a mole hill but I get it. Is this about putting pronouns on Twitter or something?
Im just being a disrespectful immature bunghole to my political enemy as I do with most of them, thats about as accurate as I can state as to why. I think they deserve it but really I try to have fun while trying to convey serious thought and message and get people to think. Im sure what I do in here may be polarizing but I dont present my thoughts like this on my day to day encounters in real life unless we are very close and in private.
 
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Im just being a disrespectful immature bunghole to my political enemy as I do with most of them, thats about as accurate as I can state as to why. I think they deserve it but really I try to have fun while trying to convey serious thought and message and get people to think. Im sure what I do in here may be polarizing but I dont present my thoughts like this on my day to day encounters in real life unless we are very close and in private.
I just think your litmus tests are going to eliminate just about every candidate. I forget the one guy you mentioned earlier but let's say he fits all of your criteria. I don't think he'd make it a year in office before failing one of your purity tests.

Basically, if we draw this philosophy to its logical conclusion, ultimately, everyone's a piece of **** and we're all screwed regardless so nothing really matters because no one has any moral high ground to condemn anything without being a hypocrite no matter how heinous the act.

Do you see how this seems frustratingly unproductive?
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
The ones I pick at are psychopathic serial killers who disobey the United States Constitution and should no longer be roaming the free world. They violate liberties of American Citizens and often commit human rights violations both domestically and internationally.

Nobody needs to exactly fit my criteria, but for the most part not be involved with foreign entanglements, obey the United States Constitution and promote sound responsible economic policy.

Almost every one of them in Washington is currently in fact a piece of **** and its time to clean house up rather than compromise votes out of fear or settle to the way things are just because they appear as normalcy.

so nothing really matters because no one any moral high ground to condemn anything without being a hypocrite no matter how heinous the act.

Do you see how this seems frustratingly unproductive?
Nothing can be further from the truth, your reacting extreme here. There are many solutions to all domestic, foreign, and economic policies that can restore this country and let most of the people prosper far better than it is today. There are a certain type of people that voters should lean towards to get us in that direction.

Not only do I disagree its frustratingly unproductive, but I feel the potential to reach a far more prosperous productive environment is incredibly great.

I just choose to stand up for people and not sell myself out and try to support and vote in people that are more in line with good human values rather than be an accomplice to mass murder and evil.
 
Last edited:
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I just think your litmus tests are going to eliminate just about every candidate. I forget the one guy you mentioned earlier but let's say he fits all of your criteria. I don't think he'd make it a year in office before failing one of your purity tests.
Actually, your far over-complicating it and Im far over-complicating my responses.

Its extremely simple, all you need to do is uphold this and we at least get back on the right track in this country.

Although I would argue that the "god" part shouldn't be a requirement.
 
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Actually, your far over-complicating it and Im far over-complicating my responses.

Its extremely simple, all you need to do is uphold this and we at least get back on the right track in this country.

Although I would argue that the "god" part shouldn't be a requirement.
So, with all of this in mind, who's left to actually vote for?
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
So, with all of this in mind, who's left to actually vote for?
Thats up to you, but Im still looking to see who is running for President next year. Most of the 3rd parties and "I"s dont have the corporate/banking/wall street backing that the R/D have, so they all usually start next year. I have my eyes closest on the Libertarian Candidate but I will have to wait and see, Im a political atheist and not a part of their party so its not mandatory for me at all to support them.

Last election I voted for Gary Johnson but he is incredibly un-charismatic, lol I was considering compromising for Jill Stein even though she is a heavy socialist simply because she was most hardcore against all the global mass murder (Gary was anti-war as well, Jill took it up a few notches,) and to me human ethics and peoples lives is a big one. I can sacrafice a bit to gain alot, and eliminating mass murder is the core of all human ethical integrity.

The election prior I skipped the President and filled out the rest. Prior to that I voted for Obama in 08 and he changed me politically and I will never let them fool me again.

There currently is not a single person in Washington that I voted for and Im pretty happy about that. Not happy my guys lost but that my hands are clean from this disgusting group of hooligans.
 
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar
Thats up to you, but Im still looking to see who is running for President next year. Most of the 3rd parties and "I"s dont have the corporate/banking/wall street backing that the R/D have, so they all usually start next year. I have my eyes closest on the Libertarian Candidate but I will have to wait and see, Im a political atheist and not a part of their party so its not mandatory for me at all to support them.

Last election I voted for Gary Johnson but he is incredibly un-charismatic, lol I would considering compromising for Jill Stein even though she is a heavy socialist simply because she was most hardcore agaisnt all the global mass murder, and to me human ethics and peoples lives is a big one.

The election prior I skipped the President and filled out the rest. Prior to that I voted for Obama in 08 and he changed me politically and I will never let them fool me again.

There currently is not a single person in Washington that I voted for and Im pretty happy about that. Not happy my guys lost but that my hands are clean from this disgusting group of hooligans.
Ok, so the options are the giant douche, the **** sandwich, or throw away your vote?
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I do have to say if there was a Republicrat or Demican that I would consider voting for at this time that would be Rand Paul, but I would have to look a little more closely at his voting history and see how I feel at that time.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
it'll be interesting to see how long Joe Walsh lasts running against Trump. They seem pretty similar on most things, including political views and wanting to be in the social media spotlight.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I do have to say if there was a Republicrat or Demican that I would consider voting for at this time that would be Rand Paul, but I would have to look a little more closely at his voting history and see how I feel at that time.
Rand Paul today isn't who he was a few years ago and I'm not sure he'll ever go back. He proven several times that he'll sacrifice his ideals to keep Trump happy. He might have gotten my vote had he run in the last election, but not now.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Rand Paul today isn't who he was a few years ago and I'm not sure he'll ever go back. He proven several times that he'll sacrifice his ideals to keep Trump happy. He might have gotten my vote had he run in the last election, but not now.
Ill look into that, doesnt sound good. I never even thought he was 1/4 good as his father was. His father was very consistent since the 70s all the way up until retirement...for the most part at least. I wouldnt want Ron to run, he is just too old now.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
it'll be interesting to see how long Joe Walsh lasts running against Trump. They seem pretty similar on most things, including political views and wanting to be in the social media spotlight.
The RNC can just tell Dump to go stick it at the convention....am I right about that? Im unsure of the process, save me a google search lol
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
The RNC can just tell Dump to go stick it at the convention....am I right about that? Im unsure of the process, save me a google search lol
I actually don't know what the rules are on that, but I'm curious now. The whole thing is just theater anyway.
 
jackedviking

jackedviking

Active member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
The RNC can just tell Dump to go stick it at the convention....am I right about that? Im unsure of the process, save me a google search lol
They can, but they won’t. Too hard to spin someone new up in time for the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
nostrum420

nostrum420

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
  • RockStar

Neither this quotation nor any of its variant forms has been found in the writings of Thomas Jefferson. Its first known appearance in print was in 1953, although it is most likely older. It appeared frequently in newspapers in the 1950s (usually unattributed), and was even used in political cartoons. It was copyrighted in 1957 by the General Features Corporation, as part of a syndicated newspaper feature called "Today's Chuckle." It later became a popular saying among Republican politicians. Governor Harold W. Handley of Indiana used it in his annual message to the Indiana General Assembly in 1961;3 Barry Goldwater was quoted using it in his 1964 run for president;4 and Gerald Ford is on record using it in an address to a joint session of Congress on August 12, 1974.5 It was attributed to Ford as early as 1954, however,6 and Ford's assistant, Robert Hartmann, said that Ford claimed to have heard the quotation "early in his political career" from Harvard McClain at the Economic Club of Chicago.7

This quotation was not attributed to Jefferson until relatively recently. It is sometimes followed by, "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases," which is most likely a misquotation of Jefferson's comment, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yeild, and government to gain ground."8


https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/government-big-enough-give-you-everything-you-wantspurious-quotation
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Neither this quotation nor any of its variant forms has been found in the writings of Thomas Jefferson. Its first known appearance in print was in 1953, although it is most likely older. It appeared frequently in newspapers in the 1950s (usually unattributed), and was even used in political cartoons. It was copyrighted in 1957 by the General Features Corporation, as part of a syndicated newspaper feature called "Today's Chuckle." It later became a popular saying among Republican politicians. Governor Harold W. Handley of Indiana used it in his annual message to the Indiana General Assembly in 1961;3 Barry Goldwater was quoted using it in his 1964 run for president;4 and Gerald Ford is on record using it in an address to a joint session of Congress on August 12, 1974.5 It was attributed to Ford as early as 1954, however,6 and Ford's assistant, Robert Hartmann, said that Ford claimed to have heard the quotation "early in his political career" from Harvard McClain at the Economic Club of Chicago.7

This quotation was not attributed to Jefferson until relatively recently. It is sometimes followed by, "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases," which is most likely a misquotation of Jefferson's comment, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yeild, and government to gain ground."8


https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/government-big-enough-give-you-everything-you-wantspurious-quotation
I didnt quote anybody, do you see """s? I simply posted a statement along with a cool selfi Jefferson took of himself which was taken somewhere between 1743-1826.

Really, I had no idea lol kinda embarrising :) Ran into that today and felt like bringing this thread back to life.
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I didnt quote anybody, do you see """s? I simply posted a statement along with a cool selfi Jefferson took of himself which was taken somewhere between 1743-1826.

Really, I had no idea lol kinda embarrising :) Ran into that today and felt like bringing this thread back to life.
And do people not know how to crop images lol. Glad you got things going again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ax1
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
And someday it will be used to keep us in instead, and we paid to get trapped!

The CIA will just fly all the important bad violent ones over, or bring them by boat if they are too lazy to dig a hole under the wall so they can keep flipping Washington's drugs.
 
ax1

ax1

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Wait wut???? Isnt this county already in a 22 trillion dollar deficit and this crazy nut unveils a 10 trillion dollar climate plan?

(CiaNN)-Sen. Kamala Harris is leaning in on her record as a California prosecutor who sought to punish polluters in her new $10 trillion climate plan, which aims for a carbon-neutral US economy by 2045.

Should we tax middle class families 90% saving enough room to tax 9% for universal health care and 1% to pay your accountant to file for these taxes?
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Wait wut???? Isnt this county already in a 22 trillion dollar deficit and this crazy nut unveils a 10 trillion dollar climate plan?

(CiaNN)-Sen. Kamala Harris is leaning in on her record as a California prosecutor who sought to punish polluters in her new $10 trillion climate plan, which aims for a carbon-neutral US economy by 2045.

Should we tax middle class families 90% saving enough room to tax 9% for universal health care and 1% to pay your accountant to file for these taxes?
I'd rather spend that on cleaning up air, land, and water than bombs for killing kids. But screw paper straws!!!
 

Top