Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

and you read that where?
because i could throw fox news quote sall day at you that say hanity walks on water

Which part? If you google "Hannity" it's all over the place. The part about him denying knowledge of it, but also wanting credit for it comes directly from his twitter.
 
Which part? If you google "Hannity" it's all over the place. The part about him denying knowledge of it, but also wanting credit for it comes directly from his twitter.

obviously the part where he uses HUD money inappropriately.
if he owns hundreds of homes that are low income housing big deal?
you said hes denying that he knew where the money is going...what did you read that convinced you hes doing something you may consider immoral.
fox fired oriely very quickly when he allegedly called a woman hot chocolate.
but fox says they've looked into the matter and are standing by hanity.
i dont think we know anything yet.
i think rival media anchors blow up allegations against the competition.
 
obviously the part where he uses HUD money inappropriately.
if he owns hundreds of homes that are low income housing big deal?
you said hes denying that he knew where the money is going...what did you read that convinced you hes doing something you may consider immoral.
fox fired oriely very quickly when he allegedly called a woman hot chocolate.
but fox says they've looked into the matter and are standing by hanity.
i dont think we know anything yet.
i think rival media anchors blow up allegations against the competition.

as I said in the original post, "I'm still waiting for all of the information to come out." I never said it was immoral; I said it was hypocritical.
 
Lets go Dump, launch dem Missiles over there at the Saudi Princess and flex dem muscles, he is a mass murderer of women and children and we must do something about it....America is Great!!! Get R' Dunn!!!


Saudi Princess airstrikes kill more than 30 at Yemen wedding
Sunday night, at least 33 people were killed and 41 wounded after airstrikes hit a wedding party in northwest Yemen.
Two missiles hit the celebration in the town of Hajja several minutes apart, eyewitnesses and officials told CNN. At least 17 women and children were killed in the strikes, according to official sources.

Invalid Link Removed

Never mind, no chlorine or Tide, not even fabric softener was used, nothing to see here folks...chemicals are bad, bombs are great!!!!!

Dear Saudi Princess.....keep buying our weapons, give us dealz on oil and Make America GGGRrrRrrreaaatttt!!!!!!

Invalid Link Removed
 
Lets go Dump, launch dem Missiles over there at the Saudi Princess and flex dem muscles, he is a mass murderer of women and children and we must do something about it....America is Great!!! Get R' Dunn!!!


Saudi Princess airstrikes kill more than 30 at Yemen wedding
Sunday night, at least 33 people were killed and 41 wounded after airstrikes hit a wedding party in northwest Yemen.
Two missiles hit the celebration in the town of Hajja several minutes apart, eyewitnesses and officials told CNN. At least 17 women and children were killed in the strikes, according to official sources.

Invalid Link Removed

Never mind, no chlorine or Tide, not even fabric softener was used, nothing to see here folks...chemicals are bad, bombs are great!!!!!

Dear Saudi Princess.....keep buying our weapons, give us dealz on oil and Make America GGGRrrRrrreaaatttt!!!!!!

Invalid Link Removed
I agree, your allowed to rape shoot burn hang behead just don't you dare use chlorine, pretty ridiculous
 
We are all in a "Back to the Future / Twilight Zone / Tales from the Crypt" episode.

That would actually be cool to see, but not live.
Gotta wake up from this..
 
Ha. The ranting of a disbarred liar who helped free a murderer. Surprised he's not the AG

lol....didnt know who the quote was from, should have checked. Stossel tweeted that on his twitter. Quote is very accurate though.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Anyone see the video of the NK leader crossing the DMZ to meet for the summit between the 2 Koreas? Kim may still be bat**** crazy, but this is a pretty historical first step.
 
Why is his success at his job being used to denigrate him?

Because I ****ing can. Because it's a ****ing bodybuilding website where more than half the crap posted in this section isn't actually true, but for some reason only my words hurt you. Because a piece of **** who exploits the legal system for a living has the balls to comment on the existing legal system. Did I already say because I ****ing can? How many you want?
 
Ok. Only one more question.

Why does a simple question on a "****ing bodybuilding website" get you so wound up?

It's funny how you would claim that your words hurt me before launching into a profanity laced rant about a question. Projecting, much?
 
Ok. Only one more question.

Why does a simple question on a "****ing bodybuilding website" get you so wound up?

It's funny how you would claim that your words hurt me before launching into a profanity laced rant about a question. Projecting, much?

I didn't go out of my way (repeatedly) to comment on anything you've done. I'm not at all wound up. Why do you assume I am? Because of "profanity"?

What did you want my answer to be to your question?
 
I didn't go out of my way (repeatedly) to comment on anything you've done. I'm not at all wound up. Why do you assume I am? Because of "profanity"?

What did you want my answer to be to your question?
How is responding to a comment in a thread I am subscribed to "going out of my way"?

I don't assume you are anything. It is apparent to anyone who reads your last rant.


I didn't want your answer to be anything specific. I just wanted you to defend your position. Is that how you feel about all defense attorneys, or only the good ones? Should we just forget that whole fair trial nonsense, or is that only for murder suspects?

Just trying to understand the animosity (pointed both at me and the lawyer in question).
 
How is responding to a comment in a thread I am subscribed to "going out of my way"?

I don't assume you are anything. It is apparent to anyone who reads your last rant.


I didn't want your answer to be anything specific. I just wanted you to defend your position. Is that how you feel about all defense attorneys, or only the good ones? Should we just forget that whole fair trial nonsense, or is that only for murder suspects?

Just trying to understand the animosity (pointed both at me and the lawyer in question).

My animosity toward you is because you're accusing me of being in a specific emotional state based on text. If you have a specific question, then ask it. Until then I'm going to ignore the idiotic and loaded ones.
 
You guys ever go back and look at the first post.
The idea that trump could never do it.
Every body , including Obama said he couldn't do it.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Anyone see the video of the NK leader crossing the DMZ to meet for the summit between the 2 Koreas? Kim may still be bat**** crazy, but this is a pretty historical first step.

If we end all the sanctions and let Korea grow its economy the people wouldnt have to starve and suffer so much.

So far this is a good mark on Dump's resume. If only Dump can cross the border and randomly hug Mexicans, RROOOFFFLLL!!!!!!!
 
You guys ever go back and look at the first post.
The idea that trump could never do it.
Every body , including Obama said he couldn't do it.

Whats REEAAALLLYYY scary is that he just opened up the possibility for Oprah to be the next President. When that happens Im moving to North Korea.
 
My animosity toward you is because you're accusing me of being in a specific emotional state based on text. If you have a specific question, then ask it. Until then I'm going to ignore the idiotic and loaded ones.
Your animosity towards me came from before I asked why you were so wound up. You specifically attacked me in your rant because I asked you a specific question. No need to pretend it didn't happen, the post is there for everyone to see.
 
Your animosity towards me came from before I asked why you were so wound up. You specifically attacked me in your rant because I asked you a specific question. No need to pretend it didn't happen, the post is there for everyone to see.

It was a loaded and idiotic question. You didn't like my answer and like a good little soldier choose to try and paint me as the aggressor to make yourself feel better.
 
Why is his success at his job being used to denigrate him?
Question.
Because I ****ing can. Because it's a ****ing bodybuilding website where more than half the crap posted in this section isn't actually true, but for some reason only my words hurt you. Because a piece of **** who exploits the legal system for a living has the balls to comment on the existing legal system. Did I already say because I ****ing can? How many you want?
Response.

Sure, all you did was answer it. Definitely no animosity there.
 
Ya’ll think I’m playing? I’m loaded, Oprah prez = my departure to DPRK! That Bilderberger is a pure wolf hiding in sheep's skin.

Invalid Link Removed

I think you're safe and you might want to wait and see just what exactly comes of this new north and south friendship.
 
Today is the 25th anniversary of Waco Texas, the day the US Government and its unconstitutional Federal Agents used chemical weapons (deadly combination of CS gas and methyl chloride especially when used indoors) on its own citizens including children.

It is not an atrocity if the U.S. government does it.

Invalid Link Removed
Regarding the methylene chloride that the FBI inserted into the compound, former ATF fire expert Rick Sherrow testified, “The Dow Chemical Corporation Materials Safety Data Sheet specifically states that this chemical forms flammable vapor air mixturesand in confined or poorly ventilated areas, vapors can readily accumulate and cause unconsciousness and death.”‘

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed
This reminded me of a scene in manhunt: unabomber where Reno references Waco. If you haven't checked it out do yourself a favor and add it to your weekend binge list on Netflix. The profiler who jumped on that case when it reopened was incredibly intelligent and without him Ted may have never been caught. One of the most accurate based on true events shows I've ever watched.

Your welcome in advance.
 
Nvmd, that post had to go, not sure if Im supposed to have that, lol!
 
This reminded me of a scene in manhunt: unabomber where Reno references Waco. If you haven't checked it out do yourself a favor and add it to your weekend binge list on Netflix. The profiler who jumped on that case when it reopened was incredibly intelligent and without him Ted may have never been caught. One of the most accurate based on true events shows I've ever watched.

Your welcome in advance.

Ill have to try to look into that, I dont have netflix but a friend of mine does. Sounds like my kinda show. Thanks!
 
I'll just quote the responses in order and point a few things out for you.

Ha. The ranting of a disbarred liar who helped free a murderer. Surprised he's not the AG

Your initial comment.

Why is his success at his job being used to denigrate him?

I ask a specific question about part of your comment.

Because I ****ing can. Because it's a ****ing bodybuilding website where more than half the crap posted in this section isn't actually true, but for some reason only my words hurt you. Because a piece of **** who exploits the legal system for a living has the balls to comment on the existing legal system. Did I already say because I ****ing can? How many you want?

You launch into profanity laced rant. Attack me. Accuse me of being hurt by your initial comment.

Ok. Only one more question.

Why does a simple question on a "****ing bodybuilding website" get you so wound up?

It's funny how you would claim that your words hurt me before launching into a profanity laced rant about a question. Projecting, much?

My response to your rant.

I didn't go out of my way (repeatedly) to comment on anything you've done. I'm not at all wound up. Why do you assume I am? Because of "profanity"?

What did you want my answer to be to your question?

Your response.

How is responding to a comment in a thread I am subscribed to "going out of my way"?

I don't assume you are anything. It is apparent to anyone who reads your last rant.


I didn't want your answer to be anything specific. I just wanted you to defend your position. Is that how you feel about all defense attorneys, or only the good ones? Should we just forget that whole fair trial nonsense, or is that only for murder suspects?

Just trying to understand the animosity (pointed both at me and the lawyer in question).

Mine. Bolded the important part for emphasis.

My animosity toward you is because you're accusing me of being in a specific emotional state based on text. If you have a specific question, then ask it. Until then I'm going to ignore the idiotic and loaded ones.

You claim your animosity came from my reaction to your accusatory rant. Which is odd, since your animosity was expressed by the rant.

Your animosity towards me came from before I asked why you were so wound up. You specifically attacked me in your rant because I asked you a specific question. No need to pretend it didn't happen, the post is there for everyone to see.

I point that out.


It was a loaded and idiotic question. You didn't like my answer and like a good little soldier choose to try and paint me as the aggressor to make yourself feel better.

You try to paint this like I am doing the exact thing that you are doing.

Hopefully that helps some.
 
I'll just quote the responses in order and point a few things out for you.



Your initial comment.



I ask a specific question about part of your comment.



You launch into profanity laced rant. Attack me. Accuse me of being hurt by your initial comment.



My response to your rant.



Your response.



Mine. Bolded the important part for emphasis.



You claim your animosity came from my reaction to your accusatory rant. Which is odd, since your animosity was expressed by the rant.



I point that out.




You try to paint this like I am doing the exact thing that you are doing.

Hopefully that helps some.
Lol jim
 
Ill have to try to look into that, I dont have netflix but a friend of mine does. Sounds like my kinda show. Thanks!
Im all about those true stories but the detective shows really intrigue me. Even the first season of true detective reeled me in and hooked me quick although it isn't a true story. But manhunt unabomber was 8 episodes about an hour a piece. My wife and I started watching it on a Saturday at 6pm and had finished by Sunday at noon.
 
Ok. Now what exactly is it you want to happen?
2 things, I suppose. The former being more important than the latter.

1st, I'd like to know why you used his success as a defense attorney as an insult, like I had originally asked.

2nd, I'd like you to quit accusing me of all of the things that you are doing.
 
2 things, I suppose. The former being more important than the latter.

1st, I'd like to know why you used his success as a defense attorney as an insult, like I had originally asked.

2nd, I'd like you to quit accusing me of all of the things that you are doing.

1) Why? Because I ****ing can! That was my first ****ing response and you got sand in your ***** about it
2) You can just go **** yourself with your fragile little whiny bitch feelings. That's not animosity; just pure pity
 
I see the humpfest never died down in here. Lol

So is Trump for sure winning the peace prize now?
 
2 things, I suppose. The former being more important than the latter.

1st, I'd like to know why you used his success as a defense attorney as an insult, like I had originally asked.

2nd, I'd like you to quit accusing me of all of the things that you are doing.

I can see why someone would attack him due to lack of ethical integrity defending a murderer and acting as if a moral Constitutional scholar. That would be more true for someone like Hitlery who openly defended a brutal child rapist and pretends to be the fighter of woman's rights. However, unlike Hitlery, we dont have on record OJ's lawyer Bailey assumed his client was guilty at the time he was defending him. I think we would all like to assume he was smart enough to know OJ was guilty, but thats solely based on our own judgment in the first place. I wonder what Lee Bailey thought when he saw (if he did?) that lost "hypothetical" confession OJ made 10 years ago that aired a couple months ago detailing how he murdered her?
 
I see the humpfest never died down in here. Lol

So is Trump for sure winning the peace prize now?

If Dump gets better at murdering people and plotting more mass genocides such as his former counterpart, Im sure he would be very deserving to win that Nobel Peace of Crap Prize award.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Back
Top