Donald Trump running for president
- Thread starter LiftWithDonuts
- Start date
youngandfree
Well-known member
Socialist Bernie's wife was already being investigated for her dealings with the college she ran.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
thebigt
Legend
unanimous ruling 9-0...shows just what trump was saying about cherry picking liberal courts!!!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Do you a time-traveling newspaper? What ruling? I thought they simply said they would hear the argument and that part of the order could persist while they were reviewing it.
ax1
Legend
Project Veritas has released a video of CNN Producer John Bonifield who was caught on hidden-camera admitting that there is no proof to CNN’s Russia narrative.
“I mean, it’s mostly bull**** right now,” Bonifield says. “Like, we don’t have any giant proof.”
He confirms that the driving factor at CNN is ratings:
“It’s a business, people are like the media has an ethical phssssss… All the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business.”
According to the CNN Producer, business is booming. “Trump is good for business right now,” he concluded.
“Just to give you some context, President Trump pulled out of the climate accords and for a day and a half we covered the climate accords. And the CEO of CNN (Jeff Zucker) said in our internal meeting, he said good job everybody covering the climate accords, but we’re done with that, let’s get back to Russia.”
Bonifield also acknowledged: “I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.” He continues:
“I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging. And so I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun, you have no real proof.”
“I mean, it’s mostly bull**** right now,” Bonifield says. “Like, we don’t have any giant proof.”
He confirms that the driving factor at CNN is ratings:
“It’s a business, people are like the media has an ethical phssssss… All the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business.”
According to the CNN Producer, business is booming. “Trump is good for business right now,” he concluded.
“Just to give you some context, President Trump pulled out of the climate accords and for a day and a half we covered the climate accords. And the CEO of CNN (Jeff Zucker) said in our internal meeting, he said good job everybody covering the climate accords, but we’re done with that, let’s get back to Russia.”
Bonifield also acknowledged: “I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.” He continues:
“I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging. And so I think the President is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun, you have no real proof.”
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Trump tweeted about this video, and the Blue Checkmark Brigade (as per usual) went on the attack, completely disregarding the news about their all-powerful overlord CNN being a load of crap.
What's funny is, whenever a Trump sympathizer responds to these super-liberal Twitter warriors, they claim the trump supporters can do nothing but attack and compare things back to Clinton or Obama. But now this is exactly what these trolls are doing.
Side note, it amazes me that these people have all this time to go to Trump's tweets within seconds of posting and have an entire thread of attacks written out bemoaning how horrible Trump is!
What's funny is, whenever a Trump sympathizer responds to these super-liberal Twitter warriors, they claim the trump supporters can do nothing but attack and compare things back to Clinton or Obama. But now this is exactly what these trolls are doing.
Side note, it amazes me that these people have all this time to go to Trump's tweets within seconds of posting and have an entire thread of attacks written out bemoaning how horrible Trump is!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Everything's influenced by money and personal bias. What's gonna make you the most money? Better question, WHO will make you the most money? Best thing to do IMO is to gather info from many different sources and try to form the most unbiased opinion possible.
youngandfree
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
Did you know Mike Flynn supported an FBI agent that accused Andrew McCabe of sexual discrimination? And somehow McCabe began investigating Flynn, after his wife received campaign money from Clinton ally, VA Gov Terry McCarpetbagger.
Did you know Mike Flynn supported an FBI agent that accused Andrew McCabe of sexual discrimination? And somehow McCabe began investigating Flynn, after his wife received campaign money from Clinton ally, VA Gov Terry McCarpetbagger.
ax1
Legend
Take into account that the CIA by law is allowed to infiltrate propaganda into the media to brainwash the masses of minions starting from Operation Mockingbird in the 50s and put into overdrive under Barry Soetoro's administration last year including giving the ok for the FBI to impersonate journalists and infiltrate any media organization.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Collecting pieces from multiple piles of **** still only leave you with a bigger pile of ****
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Haha ok where do you suggest getting your info from then? The "Donald Trump running for president" thread?
ax1
Legend
Personally if you want my inner most honest opinion, I just think you should just listen to everything I tell you here and take it in as stone
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Currently I stand by my original statement that there are no true, unbiased news companies anymore. It helps to know experts in multiple fields, but beyond that, I question everything and try to get multiple viewpoints whether I initially agree with them or not. Most people aren't driven by logic or even looking for news. They want what is going to reinforce the viewpoints that they already have which are typically based on viewpoints from their peers, their relatives, or who they view as authority figures. I see people everyday getting upset over "news" stories about Trump, that they would be praising if the story was about Obama, and vice versa. Both sides just want to keep us fighting each other and thinking that we won or lost this or any election when in reality we all keep losing while a very small percentage continue to win at our expense.
thebigt
Legend
the more I hear about McCabe the more I think he looks like an attack dog for hire.
isn't McCabe the one going after Bernie and jane also?
thebigt
Legend
politics is like race, everyone is biased to some degree.
thebigt
Legend
anytime you get all 9 scotus judges to agree on anything is akin to saying this is bullsh1t, lol.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
There hasn't been a ruling. Where are you getting that from?
thebigt
Legend
ok, lets call it a decision then since we are parting hairs, lol.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
So you disagreed with my statement and then went and backed up exactly what I said. Lol.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
How do you figure that?
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
I'm not. Where did you get a vote from? It's not a trick question. All I've seen is that there was an unsigned notice that they agreed to hear the arguments.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
See bold. That's pretty much exactly what I said that you disagreed with initially. You do exactly the same as I do. Question everything and form an opinion form multiple viewpoints. So what did I say that you disagree with..?
thebigt
Legend
they reinstated the travel ban until the hearing in October...since the travel ban is only 90 days to start with, in effect it will have already ran it's course by the time of the hearing.....all 9 justices were unanimous in this decision!!!
BamBam0319
Well-known member
I'll be interested to see if it truly only lasts 90 days or if it gets extended and turns into a bigger issue
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Who or what are your sources?
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
And I'm asking yet again where the hell you are getting that they had a vote and were unanimous in this decision!!!
thebigt
Legend
after the 9-0 decision I think trump will push the envelope and have government attorneys argue for reinstatement of the original, much stronger ban.
it should be clear to trump that he has a majority of scotus.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
What? That's not what we're talking about. I'm asking you what particularly you disagree with in my statement, when it seems that you follow the same practice? I'm asking for clarification because you've contradicted yourself.
thebigt
Legend
lol...starting tomorrow the ban will be in effect.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
And I don't want to put words in your mouth, so I am asking what you mean by sources because I think that is where we disagree.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
I don't understand how you can decide you disagree with me on something that wasn't even part of the discussion.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
The discussion is news sources and where you get your information from. What ****ing discussion are you having? Not trusting CNN or any news source currently is the post you jumped in on here. How the **** is that not relevant?!
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Haha alright dick. The discussion, and my statement, was on utilizing MULTIPLE sources in order to elicit an unbiased foundation upon which to make your own opinion. We were NOT discussing the specificity of these sources, which is what you're trying to disagree with me on despite the fact that NEITHER OF US have mentioned any specific sources. Again, how the **** can you disagree with me on something we didn't even discuss?!
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
I did tell you who my sources are and clearly said multiple times that there are no unbiased news companies since they are all ****. You keep avoiding the question and I politely asked rather than putting words in your mouth, but you obviously rely heavily on news outlets. So again, multiple pieces of **** simply make one big steaming pile of it.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Saying "experts in the field" isn't really telling anyone who your sources are. Not once did I say I got all my information from solely news companies or give you a reason to believe as such, and I have not avoided the question. I've questioned your purpose in asking it, because you said you disagreed with me on it despite the fact that we never even talked about specific sources.
I don't feel obligated to answer your question because you already decided you disagreed with me before I made any mention of who or what I get my information from.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
Just so we're clear, are you taking me asking "how do you figure?" as a strong disagreement of what you said rather than a request for clarification? Or are you talking about something else I said, because I don't even get why you're claiming i disagreed with you. I'm not shy. If I disagree, you'll know it lol. More than likely the response will be that's bull**** lol
BamBam0319
Well-known member
See quote.
And before that, when you initially said all news sources are ****, I asked where then you prefer to get your information from. You responded with your long-winded statement that essentially repeated my original assertion about using multiple sources for information. All you had to add was "experts in the field."
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
So you want me to list every single person that I would ever consult on every possible topic that exists? You can defend being spoon-fed crap information all day long and justify it by claiming to get your opinion from multiple sources all you want, I don't care. We're not saying the same thing because my sources are not the biased news that lies to the masses. If that's how you choose to get your info, good for you.
BamBam0319
Well-known member
Once again, you're assuming where I get my information. You have no way of knowing if we're saying the same thing or not.
You want me to list every single person I would ever get my information from for every topic ever?
This argument is ridiculous. All I wanted to know was how you can disagree with me on something I never even said, and then say basically the same thing that I did in the first place. If you have no response other than to insult me with no base, piss off.
youngandfree
Well-known member
rtmilburn
Well-known member
"single payer system"-from the mouths of any and all liberals.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
So what's the answer in your opinion? Note, I'm not in favor of a single payer system.
thebigt
Legend
there is no answer that will be fair to everyone, anyway you cut it there will be winners and losers...if done badly there will be many more losers than winners.
ax1
Legend
You can start by not forcing people into a system against their free will with mandates and income taxation. People (socialists) will complain but not forcing people at gunpoint against their will with an option to opt out of any government mandated program is 100% fair to everybody.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
I'm not asking for the perfect answer, just what people think is the best possible answer in their opinion. Otherwise, it's just finger-pointing and bitching. Saying Obamacare is crap isn't productive unless you can offer a better solution. A lot of Republican senators have done just that and it's why we're currently in this mess of them not even being able to get enough votes from their own party.