Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

rtmilburn said:
No not what I said. As I said it goes much deeper but I feel it was improving since bill was in office. Then stagnant if not slightly worse during the Obama administration. Then false blame re-ignited the flame.
Click to expand...

Relations improved with Gorbachev, then went to **** when Putin and George W started disagreeing. Then things started getting better again between Medvedev and Obama. Then Putin came back to power and things went back south. Do you see the pattern here yet?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Relations improved with Gorbachev, then went to **** when Putin and George W started disagreeing. Then things started getting better again between Medvedev and Obama. Then Putin came back to power and things went back south. Do you see the pattern here yet?
Click to expand...
Like I said I've done zero looking into this. You could be 100% right. Especially since well Putin is a dick
 
rtmilburn said:
Nope not all. The roots lie much deeper. Especially since the cold war was lies by the USA imo. All to justify the spending and regain economic dominance. But we can't deny that Putin did see Obama as a puss. His administration isn't the reason why the tension is high. It is the false blame.
Click to expand...

I agree, but there was that visit to the US, when Nikita Khrushchev said: “We’re producing nuclear missiles like sausages.”
That didn't help, lol!
 
Believe it our nuclear stockpile has been on the decline. This trend is worldwide, too.
 
BamBam0319 said:
Believe it our nuclear stockpile has been on the decline. This trend is worldwide, too.
Click to expand...
About time. When weapons like this exist it only will create tension and will lead to something worse being created. Now saying that I do not think we should eliminate are stock pile either. When should have some on the back burner just incase, but should only be used if there is absolutely no other way out the situation.
 
rtmilburn said:
About time. When weapons like this exist it only will create tension and will lead to something worse being created. Now saying that I do not think we should eliminate are stock pile either. When should have some on the back burner just incase, but should only be used if there is absolutely no other way out the situation.
Click to expand...

Yup. Even if a small fraction of the world's stockpile (93% in possession of US and Russia, with Russia having about 200 more) were to be used in war, we would likely experience a nuclear holocaust and end human civilization as we know it.
There is no use for nuclear weaponry anymore except for diplomatic deterrence and who has "the biggest stick." It's a deadly game.
 
BamBam0319 said:
Yup. Even if a small fraction of the world's stockpile (93% in possession of US and Russia, with Russia having about 200 more) were to be used in war, we would likely experience a nuclear holocaust and end human civilization as we know it.
There is no use for nuclear weaponry anymore except for diplomatic deterrence and who has "the biggest stick." It's a deadly game.
Click to expand...

if 93% are in possession of US and Russia...it is the other 7% we have to watch out for.
 
thebigt said:
if 93% are in possession of US and Russia...it is the other 7% we have to watch out for.
Click to expand...
I do also agree with this as much as Putin is a dick and Trump is immature I don't think either are that dumb. Now north Korea and others I can't say the same for
 
thebigt said:
if 93% are in possession of US and Russia...it is the other 7% we have to watch out for.
Click to expand...

There are 9 countries total with nuclear weapons. It's North Korea and Iran we have to watch out for. NK is known to have some, obviously, but less than 20. It is unconfirmed if Iran has any developed at this time.
The others are France (300), Pakistan (130), Israel (80), China (260), UK (215) and India (120).
U.S. has a reported 6,800 and Russia has 7,000.

Invalid Link Removed

Taking a class on nuclear weapons and their effects on health, environment, and society lol if you couldn't tell. Last college class ever.
 
BamBam0319 said:
There are 9 countries total with nuclear weapons. It's North Korea and Iran we have to watch out for. NK is known to have some, obviously, but less than 20. It is unconfirmed if Iran has any developed at this time.
The others are France (300), Pakistan (130), Israel (80), China (260), UK (215) and India (120).
U.S. has a reported 6,800 and Russia has 7,000.

Invalid Link Removed

Taking a class on nuclear weapons and their effects on health, environment, and society lol if you couldn't tell. Last college class ever.
Click to expand...
Nice good for you what degree?
 
rtmilburn said:
Nice good for you what degree?
Click to expand...

Nutrition & exercise physiology, but depending on my opportunities I might just go into sales. My dad's the best in the biz, he's been in tech sales since right before I was born. But he has several other ventures and is a very smart businessman; he's considering retiring from his actual career in the next 5 years and he's 52.
I'm very fortunate to have such an intelligent role model for a father who can teach me the ropes!
My ideal job would be to run a corporate wellness program though. Not the greatest pay but there is a lot of opportunity to move up and elevate your career in that field.
 
BamBam0319 said:
Yup. Even if a small fraction of the world's stockpile (93% in possession of US and Russia, with Russia having about 200 more) were to be used in war, we would likely experience a nuclear holocaust and end human civilization as we know it.
There is no use for nuclear weaponry anymore except for diplomatic deterrence and who has "the biggest stick." It's a deadly game.
Click to expand...

I'd be shocked if we didn't already have more advanced and catastrophic weapons than old nukes.
 
rtmilburn said:
Like I said I've done zero looking into this. You could be 100% right. Especially since well Putin is a dick
Click to expand...

Why is Putin a Dick? And what level of dickness does he sit at compared to our previous 5 presidents or our current leaders considered our allies?
 
ax1 said:
Why is Putin a Dick? And what level of dickness does he sit at compared to our previous 5 presidents or our current leaders considered our allies?
Click to expand...
Put it this way almost ever national leader in the owrld is a dick with some exception. Although Putin took over Ukraine talks down to other national leaders but...
 
rtmilburn said:
Put it this way almost ever national leader in the owrld is a dick with some exception. Although Putin took over Ukraine talks down to other national leaders but...
Click to expand...

The west overthrew the elected president of the Ukraine. What if Russia had overthrown the President of Canada, what would the US do?

Your right they all azzwipes!!
 
ax1 said:
I'd be shocked if we didn't already have more advanced and catastrophic weapons than old nukes.
Click to expand...

We do. We have hydrogen bombs now, which are also considered nuclear weapons. Plus whatever biological and chemical weapons we have.
 
BamBam0319 said:
We do. We have hydrogen bombs now, which are also considered nuclear weapons. Plus whatever biological and chemical weapons we have.
Click to expand...

I'm talking death ray/particle beam tech that the FBI confiscated two truckloads of private property in '43 from Nikolai Tesla that he had already claimed he invented originally for the war dept. and is associated with a lot of assasinations in the scientific community. FBI's own declassified documents revealed their purpose of the siege specifically for this advanced war tech and I'm 99.9% convinced we have come a long way past hydrogen bombs at this point.
 
ax1 said:
I'm talking death ray/particle beam tech that the FBI confiscated two truckloads of private property in '43 from Nikolai Tesla that he had already claimed he invented originally for the war dept. and is associated with a lot of assasinations in the scientific community. FBI's own declassified documents revealed their purpose of the siege specifically for this advanced war tech and I'm 99.9% convinced we have come a long way past hydrogen bombs at this point.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm sure! Probably stuff that doesn't condemn the entire human race when used in war lol
 
Canadian sniper kills isis thug with just one shot-from 2 miles away....damn!!!!
 
At that distance, earths rotation becomes a big factor in the calculation (along with the normal wind, barometric pressure, etc.) That sniper is good but his spotter is even more impressive in my mind.
 
mexico is now the 2nd most dangerous country on earth-behind only Syria.
 
So Trump supporters who said Russia didn't attempt to hack the election, now that Trump admits they did, are you still claiming they didn't? Must be difficult when your leader can't keep the lie straight.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
So Trump supporters who said Russia didn't attempt to hack the election, now that Trump admits they did, are you still claiming they didn't? Must be difficult when your leader can't keep the lie straight.
Click to expand...

Im just still pissed of Russia couldnt help Gayry win.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
So Trump supporters who said Russia didn't attempt to hack the election, now that Trump admits they did, are you still claiming they didn't? Must be difficult when your leader can't keep the lie straight.
Click to expand...

Attempting to hack the election equipment, and successfully changing election results are not the same thing. Intelligence officials have said for months now that there were attempts to get into different state's election networks, or systems. But there has been zero evidence that they successfully changed any election results.
 
youngandfree said:
Attempting to hack the election equipment, and successfully changing election results are not the same thing. Intelligence officials have said for months now that there were attempts to get into different state's election networks, or systems. But there has been zero evidence that they successfully changed any election results.
Click to expand...

Never said they were the same thing. Trump has continually said that Russia was not behind the hacking, but now wants to blame Obama for having known about Russia hacking.
 
youngandfree said:
He said Russia hacked the DNC and that Obama knew about that and didn't do anything about it.
Click to expand...

And amazingly they always just simply redirect the issue of corruption and criminality of the DNC to Russia, Russia, Russia and thats why this issue is pushed over and over imo. Nobody is prosecuting the DiksN'Cons for rigging the election themselves and pushing that "jew" away from winning along with other screwed up crap and filth these disgusting inhumane people spew behind the scenes.
 
ax1 said:
And amazingly they always just simply redirect the issue of corruption and criminality of the DNC to Russia, Russia, Russia and thats why this issue is pushed over and over imo. Nobody is prosecuting the DiksN'Cons for rigging the election themselves and pushing that "jew" away from winning along with other screwed up crap and filth these disgusting inhumane people spew behind the scenes.
Click to expand...

Everybody just wants to pass the blame. And now it looks like Bernie has his own university legal issues to answer for.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Never said they were the same thing. Trump has continually said that Russia was not behind the hacking, but now wants to blame Obama for having known about Russia hacking.
Click to expand...

...except that that is what happened. Lol. Just gonna deny that Obama knew about it? How is that Trump's fault?
I'm not saying Trump hasn't changed his story, but I still don't get how that suddenly makes it his fault that Russia hacked the DNC.
Not to mention, there's still no evidence of hacking...
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Everybody just wants to pass the blame. And now it looks like Bernie has his own university legal issues to answer for.
Click to expand...

He bought a 3rd Vermont vacation home post election after he flip flopped on how he was going to fight until the convention for a "1%er" price of $575,000. He is a load of hypocrisy, it certainly seems that everybody has a price.
 
BamBam0319 said:
...except that that is what happened. Lol. Just gonna deny that Obama knew about it? How is that Trump's fault?
I'm not saying Trump hasn't changed his story, but I still don't get how that suddenly makes it his fault that Russia hacked the DNC.
Not to mention, there's still no evidence of hacking...
Click to expand...

Nope, when have I denied that or said I supported Obama. Also, didn't say it was Trump's fault that Obama knew about it and did nothing. It's Trump fault that he has been hampering an investigation that needs to take place by making false claims with zero evidence to back it up. It's Trump's fault that his claims contradict his additional claims. I'm asking a simple question since there are people in this thread that have claimed that Russia has had no hand in hacking based on what Trump has said and now where they stand since he has changed his tune.
 
ax1 said:
He bought a 3rd Vermont vacation home post election after he flip flopped on how he was going to fight until the convention for a "1%er" price of $575,000. He is a load of hypocrisy, it certainly seems that everybody has a price.
Click to expand...

The hypocrisy is what drives me nuts. If people really believed in "draining the swamp", there wouldn't be parties.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Everybody just wants to pass the blame. And now it looks like Bernie has his own university legal issues to answer for.
Click to expand...

I googled Bernie and found the article about the bern and jane....here is a comment I found about the article.


'it must suck to be Bernie. first, he get's the primaries stolen from him. then he get's hush money which he uses to buy a new house. then he doesn't hush and Hillary's friend McCabe puts him and his wife under investigation. he just can't win'.
 
thebigt said:
I googled Bernie and found the article about the bern and jane....here is a comment I found about the article.


'it must suck to be Bernie. first, he get's the primaries stolen from him. then he get's hush money which he uses to buy a new house. then he doesn't hush and Hillary's friend McCabe puts him and his wife under investigation. he just can't win'.
Click to expand...

No pity here. If you're going to be a criminal, be good at it. We'll see what comes out of this investigation, but all the Bernie supporters who blasted Trump for his own university legal issues best start coming up with excuses.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
No pity here. If you're going to be a criminal, be good at it. We'll see what comes out of this investigation, but all the Bernie supporters who blasted Trump for his own university legal issues best start coming up with excuses.
Click to expand...

if you ask me ALL politicians live in glass houses...i'm not a big fan of democratic politicians, but adam shiff is particularly irritating to me, lol.
 
thebigt said:
if you ask me ALL politicians live in glass houses...i'm not a big fan of democratic politicians, but adam shiff is particularly irritating to me, lol.
Click to expand...

I really dont know much about politics in US but I know one thing for sure:
The best thing politicians do is to lie most possible in shortest possible time
 
Danes said:
I really dont know much about politics in US but I know one thing for sure:
The best thing politicians do is to lie most possible in shortest possible time
Click to expand...

looks like you know a lot about politics in U.S.
 
Danes said:
I really dont know much about politics in US but I know one thing for sure:
The best thing politicians do is to lie most possible in shortest possible time
Click to expand...

There are three things I dont believe in and thats politics and math.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top