Oh, we were taught plenty of dates/names/facts in history/government courses, but rarely any substance (critical thinking, motivation for these events/actions, etc). It does seem like the American Revolution and the Constitution was brushed over relatively quickly, while memorizing a plethora of names/dates/battles in the Civil War was much more important than the context in which our country was founded and the document(s) that are the backbone of our government, for some strange reason. Speaking of college campuses, I've had a few very liberal professors in government/culture/society (general electives) courses, and some of them did inject their own views into the courses, often by presenting only one side of an issue, or giving us half of a picture, or using fallacious logic, etc. I remember one professor saying how bad the US is because of our "high income inequality," even saying how it's greater than some third-world countries on a graph, so I asked to see absolute numbers on wealth, such as how much do the "poor" people make in each country. I told him that if the rich people make $2,500 a year, and the poor people make $2,000 a year, you have almost no income inequality, but if the poor people make $20,000 a year, and the rich people make $200,000 a year, you have huge income inequality, but the "poor" people in the second country still make 10x the poor people in the first country, and likely have a much higher quality of life. Would it be better to have everyone be equal in poverty to eliminate income inequality? Of course, I didn't get a real response.