Gutterpump
Banned
"Sugar and spice and all things nice, That's what little girls are made of"
Invalid Link Removed
Ironic of a conservative to preach about morality when their own nominee is an immoral POS.
"Sugar and spice and all things nice, That's what little girls are made of"
Invalid Link Removed
I just find it ironic when conservatives hate him for this but their own leaders have done far worse in terms of war crimes in the past, but they would never say they hate their own. The Great Conservative Hypocrisy.
I think it's insulting to holocaust survivors, families of survivors and people involved in the world wars, when Hitler's name is thrown around so loosely. I'm guilty of it once or twice in the past but I've changed my stance.
Nobody is insulting Holocaust survivors here.
By throwing around the comparison to Hitler so loosely, you sure are
You said "I don't believe in these wars but I don't hold the president responsible for collateral damage."
So a conservative is wrong when they blame Obama and support Bush, but then you are right to put down Bush and Cheney, but not to blame Obama's war mongering interventionist policies?
One unjustification doesnt make your unjustification correct. They are the same unjustification. The Great Gutterpump Hypocrisy![]()
Conservatives are largely hypocrites, but so are liberals. It goes both ways; plenty of liberals slam Bush (rightfully so) for his wars, but defend Obama when he does it. Most PEOPLE are hypocrites.I just find it ironic when conservatives hate him for this but their own leaders have done far worse in terms of war crimes in the past, but they would never say they hate their own. The Great Conservative Hypocrisy.
what irony? I did no such preaching, I'm a sexist. i have not nominated anyone, the GOP did.Ironic of a conservative to preach about morality when their own nominee is an immoral POS.
I don't hate any of our past presidents, so there is no hypocrisy here. They have tough jobs, and I don't necessarily agree with all of their decisions or policies, but hate isn't a word I throw around loosely.
I do hate Trump however.
what irony? I did no such preaching, I'm a sexist. i have not nominated anyone, the GOP did.
Conservatives are largely hypocrites, but so are liberals. It goes both ways; plenty of liberals slam Bush (rightfully so) for his wars, but defend Obama when he does it. Most PEOPLE are hypocrites.
apology acceptedIf you're voting for Trump, that's the irony.
If not, my apologies![]()
Conservatives are largely hypocrites, but so are liberals. It goes both ways; plenty of liberals slam Bush (rightfully so) for his wars, but defend Obama when he does it. Most PEOPLE are hypocrites.
Is called Godwin's LawI think it's insulting to holocaust survivors, families of survivors and people involved in the world wars, when Hitler's name is thrown around so loosely. I'm guilty of it once or twice in the past but I've changed my stance.
Oh yea definitely, I always mention to conservatives that Obama and Ronald Reagan are practically the same economically, on immigration, and one other thing I cant remember now.I just find it ironic when conservatives hate him for this but their own leaders have done far worse in terms of war crimes in the past, but they would never say they hate their own. The Great Conservative Hypocrisy.
Invalid Link Removed
Trumpism 101... smfh
what irony? I did no such preaching, I'm a sexist. i have not nominated anyone, the GOP did.
Here's the irony:
Invalid Link Removed
must you always use extreme and irrelevant and out of context examples to make a case? Maybe your trying to appeal to my barbaric nature.Do you also think rape victims should be blamed because of how they dress?
Eh, I'm not saying it's great or something you want to teach your daughters, but Beyoncé (autocorrect really adds the é?) has done pretty well for herself, and I don't think she has any sex tapes/scandals, or even nude pics around. So she does a little provocative stuff and gets paid millions (that's an understatement) for it. I'm NOT saying that's she's a role model, but she's not doing anything that bad really, assuming that's the "worst" thing she's done.must you always use irrelevant and out of context examples to make s case?
Lascivious behavior is not a positive female character trait and not a model for young females.
Will they be as good as Obama's; so good you HAVE to buy it. ;PInvalid Link Removed
Trumpism 101... smfh
context. you have a daughter?Eh, I'm not saying it's great or something you want to teach your daughters,...
....Im NOT saying that's she's a role model.
Haha, no, and I'm not looking to have kids any time soon.you have a daughter?
Invalid Link Removed
Trumpism 101... smfh
HAHAHA. Yeah, I know. So damn vague. I guess it's the same rationale on how he says he will defeat ISIS.
Bragging about sexually assaulting women =/= women dressing provocatively at a concert
Do you also think rape victims should be blamed because of how they dress?
And Hitlery who was there from the beginning who made the big mess in the Middle East the first place now has the solutions ROFL!
That's a pretty extreme example you used, I'm matching your example.must you always use extreme and irrelevant and out of context examples to make a case? Maybe your trying to appeal to my barbaric nature.
Relevant and in context - Lascivious behavior is not a positive or virtuous female character trait and not a model for young females.
What what? Hillary is responsible for the whole mess in the middle east - IN THE FIRST PLACE you say? LOL
So you're accusing her of being responsible for initiating British colonialism and US interventionism? Uh yeaaaaaaahhhhh......
More extreme projections. You are now making false claims that I want to control woman and tell them how to act and dress.That's a pretty extreme example you used, I'm matching your example.
Sexual assault is rape, which is what Donald Trump bragged about doing.
Why do you want to control women and how they present themselves? You're pro-life, and you want to presume to tell women how to act and dress so that it meets your standards.
Just because you can't handle the way I present things doesn't mean I'm wrong.
I think he is saying that it's hypocritical of her to say he can solve the issues in the Middle East when she was apart of the problem in the first place. Not that is wasn't going to happen without her approval but she did want policies that allowed said problems in the Middle East to grow.
What what? Hillary is responsible for the whole mess in the middle east - IN THE FIRST PLACE you say? LOL
So you're accusing her of being responsible for initiating British colonialism and US interventionism? Uh yeaaaaaaahhhhh......
Yes she has both supported and expanded everything from being a senetor to Secretary of State.
She IS the problem. The truth is in her votes and policies.

I think he is saying that it's hypocritical of her to say he can solve the issues in the Middle East when she was apart of the problem in the first place. Not that is wasn't going to happen without her approval but she did want policies that allowed said problems in the Middle East to grow.
No wait, I wanna hear how she started the mess in the Middle East as this is what you actually said![]()
Nope he actually said "she's been there from the beginning" and that "she's responsible for the whole mess in the middle east in the first place" lol
Some things, Iraq war, Syria, Ukraine, Lybia....ISIS. She played a role in creating all of that.
Hillary didn't come up with these ideas/policies, but she did support and continue to use them. She isn't solely responsible, to say that any one person is responsible for it all makes no sense, but she does deserve criticism over it, and has perpetuated it, as have many politicians in both parties.Take some history lessons. British colonialism started all of our problems over there.
Hillary also did not invent American interventionism, which we initiated once those problems arose.
Hillary didn't come up with these ideas/policies, but she did support and continue to use them. She isn't solely responsible, to say that any one person is responsible for it all makes no sense, but she does deserve criticism over it, and has perpetuated it, as have many politicians in both parties.
Take some history lessons. British colonialism started all of our problems over there.
Hillary also did not invent American interventionism, which we initiated once those problems arose.
I agree that we need to end interventionism though. This is what fuels terrorism and hate, and drains us of money and soldiers.
I'm clearly not arguing what she supports
David Dunn Is there a way of running a poll in here to see how this thread will be voting? I'm not sure if it's possible to set that up in here.
You have been defending her and even would vote for her.
I've only argued that she didn't start all the problems in the middle east lol... I'm not sure where you've been tonight, but that's all I've been saying, because this was your over the top claim. Can we move on now? Of course I don't support any policies regarding interventionism, we also went over that when we spoke about the libertarians. I don't want to keep going in circles here. Yes I personally would vote Hillary if it meant keeping Trump out, but I can't vote here.![]()
context. you have a daughter?