Yeah, then I would say there’s a valid argument to be made for the baker. I am not exactly aware of all the nuances and intricacies of the case either, so I guess I can just speak on the general scenario we seem to be discussing and assuming to be the case. I try to be consistent you know. Freedoms I grant to others are given to me, and what I take from others is taken from me, in a broad, general, theoretical sense.
If you know me, you’ll know I am VERY critical of the Nation of Islam, for example, given my Jewish heritage, and dislike of racists and antisemites in general. I would NOT complain if anything relating to NoI was banned from social media and if they were classified as a hate group, as they’re INSANELY hateful and spew bigotry and racism.
My point about social media platforms is that they ALL censor in hypocritical ways. Left leaning ones censor right sentiments more, and right leaning ones ban left sentiments more. That is pretty “logical” when we think about how polarized American politics have become. It’s just that there are less right-leaning social media sites, so it seems like the left censors more, when it’s really just them having more opportunities and platforms to censor on. Both sides do it equally as often when given equal opportunity to do so.