Best Superdrol Clone

P4D2A022

P4D2A022

Well-known member
Methyl-Drol XT by SNS is top notch right?? I was considering this clone, but is there a better one out??
 
yeah i know bro, i got all the support supps and everything, i was wondering for the future. i only have tried x-mass. who makes methyl dx-3? pm me bro, i am new to online supplement stores
 
P4D2A022 said:
^^ yeah thats it.. it seems like it could be chillin with NO in there.. anyone ever try it??
Click to expand...


Why, NO does nothing but give you a better pump. On SD that doesn't seem like the best idea.
 
PumpingIron said:
Why, NO does nothing but give you a better pump. On superdrol that doesn't seem like the best idea.
Click to expand...

Yea I think the nitric oxide is kinda pointless to throw in there
 
^^ yeah thats what i figured bro.. ill prob just get methyl drol-xt, or a phera clone.. possibly m-drol.. just came out. decently priced too
 
P4D2A022 said:
Methyl-Drol XT by SNS is top notch right?? I was considering this clone, but is there a better one out??
Click to expand...

Read about this product that Anabolic X just came out this- MAss herd it was some good ****- no joke
 
P4D2A022 said:
m-drol is a superdrol-clone by CEL! just came out, decently priced too bro! less than $30 at 90 caps
Click to expand...

Yea thats a good price and i like 10mg better than 12mg...i hope someone can testify using this because i can never trust new companies
 
PumpingIron said:
Why, NO does nothing but give you a better pump. On superdrol that doesn't seem like the best idea.
Click to expand...

Sounds like painful back pumps to me!
 
P4D2A022 said:
nah dude, i heard mass-fx is totally different and doesnt need a post cycle therapy
Click to expand...

massfx is different...its not a steroid

EVERY steroid needs a post cycle therapy
 
WhatsaRoid? said:
I was going to say this one..man i remember when it was on sale for like 15 bux haha..
Click to expand...

Yeah, I bought enough to last a lifetime!:icon_lol: Probably wont use them all though. Just wanted to get them before the "ban" I got a bunch of the original AX Superdrol as well.
 
P4D2A022 said:
nah dude, i heard mass-fx is totally different and doesnt need a post cycle therapy
Click to expand...

i hetrd they released Mass fx b cuz superdrol got banned
if u do sum research its chemicals r similar
 
superdrol and Mass FX are nothing alike. Mass FX's main ingredients are from things such as plant sterols and lingnans. SD is nothing of the sort. Mass FX and Hyperdrol were released as alternatives to PHs/Designers.
 
Rossi2 said:
and wtf r u??? a specialist in steriods...i think not-
Click to expand...

You don't have to be a specialist to be able to read an ingredient label. Well, maybe you do...
 
I guess superdrol and Mass-FX are similar in that they both contain the basic steroid skeleton. If that's the case, I guess you could say that superdrol, Mass-FX, hydrocortisone, and cholesterol are all similar compounds.
 
This is one "well-informed" thread...I feel smarter just reading it.

Come on guys, Mass FX is a great compound but IS NOT a steroid. Superdrol is another great compound, THAT IS a steroid.

Whoever said it earlier that AX released Hyperdrol and Mass FX in light of the recent ban is correct. That is the only correlation that should be drawn between the two.
 
stxnas said:
superdrol and Mass FX are nothing alike. Mass FX's main ingredients are from things such as plant sterols and lingnans. superdrol is nothing of the sort. Mass FX and Hyperdrol were released as alternatives to PHs/Designers.
Click to expand...

That was me! I can understand people being confused in the way that Mass FX/Hyperdrol are suggested as alternatives to superdrol on various websites...but some quick searching on the ingredients and write ups of these HERBAL products should answer any questions about them.
 
Last edited:
This is just a question. How many people in this thread are or were regulars over at bb.com? I'm just curious.
 
PumpingIron said:
This is one "well-informed" thread...I feel smarter just reading it.

Come on guys, Mass FX is a great compound but IS NOT a steroid. Superdrol is another great compound, THAT IS a steroid.
Click to expand...


I guess it really depends on what nomenclature you're using when you refer to the term "steroids".

Steroids, as in a 17 carbon tetra-ring, can pertain to both.

Steroids, as in 'the juice',would only pertain to superdrol from these two compounds.
 
Steroids as in AAS...I see where I made my mistake...

Three Def's from American Heritage...

Any of a large class of organic compounds having as a basis 17 carbon atoms arranged in four rings fused together. Steroids include many biologically important compounds, including cholesterol and other sterols, the sex hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen), bile acids, adrenal hormones, plant alkaloids, and certain forms of vitamins.

Any of various hormones having the structure of a steroid that are made synthetically, especially for use in medicine.

An anabolic steroid.

...My fault.
 
PumpingIron said:
Steroids as in anabolic steroids...I see where I made my mistake...

Three Def's from American Heritage...

Any of a large class of organic compounds having as a basis 17 carbon atoms arranged in four rings fused together. Steroids include many biologically important compounds, including cholesterol and other sterols, the sex hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen), bile acids, adrenal hormones, plant alkaloids, and certain forms of vitamins.

Any of various hormones having the structure of a steroid that are made synthetically, especially for use in medicine.

An anabolic steroid.

...My fault.
Click to expand...

Hey hey it's cool. It can get confusing sometimes when a scientific term is also somewhat of a slang term as well.
 
Rossi2 said:
i hetrd they released Mass fx b cuz superdrol got banned
if u do sum research its chemicals r similar
Click to expand...

actually these compounds are nothing alike at all! "25R-diol" is an altered version of diosgenin, a plant sterol (dont let that word fool you, diosgenin is inert in the body), which AX claims is
Dr. D said:
Have you seen the Russian study of the 6-keto version, the most abundant metabolite of 25R? Twice as strong as Dbol! It's kind of a pro-form of that.
Click to expand...

meaning that the "25R" gets metabolized into something that is twice as strong as D-bol? fishy?

also Pumping iron wasn't wrong when he said it is not a steroid. It isn't. ALL steroids have a tetracyclic system of fused six carbon rings(3) and a five carbon ring everytime, no more, no less, 25R has another five carbon ring fused to the forth ring (the first five carbon ring). it is not a substituent of the forth ring as this would classify it as a steroid. it is fused at C-16 C-17, placing it in ANOTHER class of chemical componds called SPIROSTANS, which admittedly are steroid DERIVATIVES but definitely not steroids!
 
3PeteNC said:
actually these compounds are nothing alike at all! "25R-diol" is an altered version of diosgenin, a plant sterol (dont let that word fool you, diosgenin is inert in the body), which AX claims is

meaning that the "25R" gets metabolized into something that is twice as strong as D-bol? fishy?

also Pumping iron wasn't wrong when he said it is not a steroid. It isn't. ALL steroids have a tetracyclic system of fused six carbon rings(3) and a five carbon ring everytime, no more, no less, 25R has another five carbon ring fused to the forth ring (the first five carbon ring). it is not a substituent of the forth ring as this would classify it as a steroid. it is fused at C-16 C-17, placing it in ANOTHER class of chemical componds called SPIROSTANS, which admittedly are steroid DERIVATIVES but definitely not steroids!
Click to expand...

I see what your are getting at, but how would this logic explain the additional ring in aldosterone, or the pyrazole ring in Stanozol? I'm pretty sure that, despite the fact that it is classified as a spiro and it's chemical properties will differ greatly from non-spiro compounds, it can also be classed as a steroid.
 
thesinner said:
I see what your are getting at, but how would this logic explain the additional ring in aldosterone, or the pyrazole ring in Stanozol? I'm pretty sure that, despite the fact that it is classified as a spiro and it's chemical properties will differ greatly from non-spiro compounds, it can also be classed as a steroid.
Click to expand...

Yes i see what you mean with the Stanozol, but aldersterone does not contain another fused ring, stanozol does but i believe it is on the first cyclohexane ring and thus makes a difference
 
3PeteNC said:
Yes i see what you mean with the Stanozol, but aldersterone does not contain another fused ring, stanozol does but i believe it is on the first cyclohexane ring and thus makes a difference
Click to expand...

Yeah, I thought there was an oxolane between the #11 and #13 carbons.

Invalid Link Removed


And you may (or may not) be right about your previous statements on the spiro- compounds. I tried looking them up in Brown, Foote, & Iverson 4th ed. , but they don't have a section for Spiro- compounds. For reference, they define steroid in the book as "a plant or animal lipid having the characteristic tetracyclic ring structure of the steroid nucleus, namely three six-membered rings and one five-membered ring."
 
thesinner said:
And you may (or may not) be right about your previous statements on the spiro- compounds. I tried looking them up in Brown, Foote, & Iverson 4th ed. , but they don't have a section for Spiro- compounds. For reference, they define steroid in the book as "a plant or animal lipid having the characteristic tetracyclic ring structure of the steroid nucleus, namely three six-membered rings and one five-membered ring."
Click to expand...


yes i know, as i have previously stated this
 
is S-Drol a good clone? i just kind of assumed that all clones were equal before i made my purchase... hope i didnt make a mistake in getting that one :blink:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top