Bobo, i've been trying to read up as much as i can on igf-1 r3 and your posts have been very helpful. My question to you is what's your personal take on the issue of the increased risk of cancer with the use of igf-1??
The only thing that I was wondering about is that AAS does not have the ability to cause muscle cells to multiply, whereas that is the one of the big benefits from using IGF, it actually causes cell division. Am I total off base with this assumtpion.
Anything that increase hyperplasia will increase the risk of cancer because with the addition of new cells the chance of those cells being cancerous is increased but this is not a direct cause of IGF-1, just an increase in random chance. But IGF-1 doesn''t directly cause cancer in any way and if there is existing cancer cells then increased IGF-1 woud equate to more growth. This is also the case with anything that helps growth as Ray said. So if you have cancer, don't use it. If not, it won't directy cause cancer like tobacco and a host of other things that have a more direct impact.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.