Yes they should be counted.
Interestingly, BCAAs have more calories per gram than almost any other amino acid (~6 kcals)
this would play a huge role in people who cut and mega dose bcaas...
It's all about consistency. If you are losing weight without counting BCAAs, then continue not counting them, and when you make a dietary adjustment due to weight stalling, continue not to count the BCAAs. My post was merely so that people understand that the reality of the matter is BCAAs contain ~6 kcals per gram.
simple: if im aiming for 200g of pro and use 20g of bcaa's does it mean i can eat 180g of whole food and still meet my macro goals?
this would play a huge role in people who cut and mega dose bcaas...
I don't count them and last I checked Layne doesn't either. If you're stressing over 100 kcals of aminos that are spiking MPS you're not focused on the big picture.
if youre talking about my original question it was hypethetical, im confused on the bolded phrase above....
Interestingly, BCAAs have more calories per gram than almost any other amino acid (~6 kcals)
He means Layne Norton.
And to the poster above, if they count calorically, they also count as a protein source.
Well, BCAA can be considered incomplete protein, so i'm not sure we should count them in our protein intake,
also don't they have less calories x gr than whole protein?
Of course this is just to chat about it because personally I like to keep things simple, I count macros only, meaning
I don't count the protein traces in my fats, as well as I don't count fat traces in my protein sources, etc..
it makes easier to count and keep tracks of things and most important easier to adjust things in the diet if something's wrong.
?
Incomplete protein vs complete is irrelevant in the context of a high protein diet rich in complete protein sources. ALL protein sources count; however, as I said before, consistency is the key. If you weren't counting them before, don't start now, as your approach is clearly working.
So just because the FDA says you cant count the calories from them they are marketed as calorie free....thats complete bull****...but im not surprised.
If you want the calorie breakdown to nearly any amino acid, go here and select the amino acid of choice: Invalid Link Removed
Australia puts it on the nutrition label. I realize this is another shop...but i cant really see many people on this board importing from Australia- nutra is cheaper. This was more for informational purposes.
So just because the FDA says you cant count the calories from them they are marketed as calorie free....thats complete bull****...but im not surprised.
If you want the calorie breakdown to nearly any amino acid, go here: Invalid Link Removed
Australia puts it on the nutrition label.
i know the reference, just wondering since layne doesnt count them means nobody should?
?
Incomplete protein vs complete is irrelevant in the context of a high protein diet rich in complete protein sources. ALL protein sources count; however, as I said before, consistency is the key. If you weren't counting them before, don't start now, as your approach is clearly working.
Protein is protein thats protein. All of it gets broken down into amino acids and distributed as needed. I can roll with that, dont fix whats not broken.
I'm not saying nobody should amigo, just saying its really not a necessity. I know a lot of forum bros don't and they maintain great physiques but I was just giving an example of someone who knows their stuff and still doesn't count them so all of us who don't count have a more legitimate argument than just saying 'bro relax, they're BCAAs'. Get what I'm saying lol
Makes sense![]()
I never counted them, mine was just curiosity
I eat the same things everyday, I counted macros and calories once,
and that was it