Brodus
Banned
Did that feel good, jah, revealing to the board that you knew nothing that you posted about? I think asking you questions is pointless, since you can't answer them. Maybe if you start thinking in longer sentences and read a few more books, or show up for organic chem we can have a real discussion.
You don't know chemistry, you don't know pharmacology, you really don't know any basic physical science, and you obviously don't know anything that has been posted here on M4OHN.
But...You put me in my place? Is that how it works in your world, you silly little ****? That's pretty funny. I could refute this and give you a five question test that you would instantly fail, or tell you what I've been doing the past three years, while you've been perfecting your masturbation strokes, but that would be self-serving.
I gave you a chance to prove you were arguing from a point of reason and fact, and all you did was puke out the same thing you said before, but in all caps.
Off-topic? Yeah. I guess posting all of the reasons why my logic is correct, along with research backing me up is "off-topic." You never were on the debate team, were you?
And in case you didn't know, there's a huge difference between deductive logic and "guessing."
Guessing is what you do, obviously, since you don't seem to understand what a hyroxyl group is. What I did was make a deductive, rational hypothesis. (Its all part of this little thing called the scientific method, and it drives something called innovation). I even said this on my post.
This all falls on deaf ears, though, as you're intent on digging yourself a hole with your mouth that you can't crawl out of with your brain. If you knew what you were talking about, you would have posted your rationale, you would have explained the molecule, or would have talked about dopamine recpetor down regulation, instead of your pre-pubescent bitch-off.
I would re-hash my argument, the one you can't refute because it's scientifically sound, but what would that do? You don't know what makes a molecule toxic--You don't read the bloodwork--you failed to see the relevancy of the Atkins diet connection--you failed to see the relevancy of my Nolva and Usnic Acid comments, which was an assertion that people responding negatively to my post were guilty of immense bias, based on the logic used to argue other cases.
But, it's pointless, because you're still reading at an eighth grade level.
Go back to bb.com. There's a lot more litle fish you can impress there. If you hang round here much more, people might realize you fucking retarded you are.
You don't know chemistry, you don't know pharmacology, you really don't know any basic physical science, and you obviously don't know anything that has been posted here on M4OHN.
But...You put me in my place? Is that how it works in your world, you silly little ****? That's pretty funny. I could refute this and give you a five question test that you would instantly fail, or tell you what I've been doing the past three years, while you've been perfecting your masturbation strokes, but that would be self-serving.
I gave you a chance to prove you were arguing from a point of reason and fact, and all you did was puke out the same thing you said before, but in all caps.
Off-topic? Yeah. I guess posting all of the reasons why my logic is correct, along with research backing me up is "off-topic." You never were on the debate team, were you?
And in case you didn't know, there's a huge difference between deductive logic and "guessing."
Guessing is what you do, obviously, since you don't seem to understand what a hyroxyl group is. What I did was make a deductive, rational hypothesis. (Its all part of this little thing called the scientific method, and it drives something called innovation). I even said this on my post.
This all falls on deaf ears, though, as you're intent on digging yourself a hole with your mouth that you can't crawl out of with your brain. If you knew what you were talking about, you would have posted your rationale, you would have explained the molecule, or would have talked about dopamine recpetor down regulation, instead of your pre-pubescent bitch-off.
I would re-hash my argument, the one you can't refute because it's scientifically sound, but what would that do? You don't know what makes a molecule toxic--You don't read the bloodwork--you failed to see the relevancy of the Atkins diet connection--you failed to see the relevancy of my Nolva and Usnic Acid comments, which was an assertion that people responding negatively to my post were guilty of immense bias, based on the logic used to argue other cases.
But, it's pointless, because you're still reading at an eighth grade level.
Go back to bb.com. There's a lot more litle fish you can impress there. If you hang round here much more, people might realize you fucking retarded you are.
