Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Aquafina Source Is Same as for Tap

Jayhawkk

Legend
Invalid Link Removed

NEW YORK (AP) - So you thought that water in your Aquafina bottle came from some far-away spring bubbling deep in a glen? Try the same place as the water in your tap.

PepsiCo Inc. is the latest company to offer some clarity about the source of its top-selling bottled water as it announced on Friday it would change the label on Aquafina water bottles to spell out that the drink comes from the same source as tap water.

A group called Corporate Accountability International has been pressuring bottled water sellers to curb what it calls misleading marketing practices. The group has criticized PepsiCo over its blue Aquafina label with a mountain logo as perpetuating the misconception that the water comes from spring sources.

Aquafina is the single biggest bottled water brand, and its bottles are now labeled "P.W.S." The new labels will spell out "public water source."

"If this helps clarify the fact that the water originates from public sources, then it's a reasonable thing to do," PepsiCo spokeswoman Michelle Naughton said Friday. Aquafina water is taken from public sources then purified in a seven-step process.

The corporate accountability group is also pressing for similar concessions from The Coca-Cola Co., which owns the Dasani water brand, and Nestle Waters North America, seller of Nestle Pure Life purified drinking water, which gets some of its water from municipal sources.

Dasani's Web site says that Dasani comes from local water supplies, is filtered using a process called reverse osmosis and enhanced with minerals.

"We don't believe that consumers are confused about the source of Dasani water," Coca-Cola spokeswoman Diana Garza Ciarlante said. "The label clearly states that it is purified water."

Sales of bottled water has been a growing source of revenue for companies such as PepsiCo, based in Purchase, N.Y., and Atlanta-based Coca-Cola as they lessen their dependence on sales of traditional carbonated sodas, as consumer concern over health issues has weakened demand.

Nestle said Friday it has been printing new labels for its Pure Life water that say whether the water comes from municipal supplies or ground water, and the labels will begin showing up later this year. Pure Life is the only Nestle bottled water that uses public water sources and the company did not have an estimate for how much of its supply originates from public sources.

Wholesale sales of bottled water grew to $11 billion in 2006, according to the Beverage Marketing Corp., and the industry is expected to maintain growth rates of about 10 percent. The fastest growing segment of the industry is sales of bottles of less than 1.5 liters, which includes the individual serving sizes sold in many convenience and grocery stores.

The decisions by Nestle and PepsiCo come as criticism grows over environmental concerns about the industry's use of local water sources as well as consumption of resin and energy to package and ship the bottles.

Last month alone, a barrage of news hit the industry: San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom banned city-funded purchases of bottled water; New York City launched an ad campaign called "Get Your Fill" to promote the benefits of tap water; and the U.S. Conference of Mayors adopted a resolution to bring attention to the importance of public water systems and the negative impact of bottled water.

"I think it's unfortunate we have gotten into this tap water vs. bottled water debate," the CEO of the International Bottled Water Association, Joe Doss, said. "I do not think consumers are uniformly replacing tap water with bottled water."

PepsiCo shares fell $1.18, or 1.8 percent, to $65.66 Friday amid a broad market pullback.


(Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
 
Another reason on why you have to have these watchdog groups even if they are nuts a majority of the time they do provide a use eventually. I'll admit I buy bottled water for the ease of hydration instead of carrying around a gallon jug with me all the time but I know plenty of people who buy it to avoid their tap water :)
 
At least it's purified in a 7 step process I guess:eek:

That makes me wonder, not about the bigger brands, but about all the discount no-name brands like "deer park", heh. 24 bottles for $3.00 makes you think how 'pure' it really must be. Aquafina is a big name!
 
ummm anyone who has read the label has already known this......the label on aquafina has always had its source printed on it. it says whatever town its bottled in, x "municipal water supply" aka tap water.
 
You guys need to look at where the water source is. One time I bought a jug of water and it said 'Kansas Municiple Water'. Wow, they pulled a fast one on me. This kind of stuff is NOT surprising. Why ?

The FDA regulates bottled water consumption and since they cannot regulate dietary supplements there's a good chance they won't make their rounds on bottled water.

The EPA which has more strict standards regulates tap water more heavily.
 
I don't think "watchdog groups" are crazy at all. Sure they've been branded by the corporate media that way, but that's what the corporate media does to the rabble. It's not very convienent to have these groups pointing out that you have cancerous casuing chemicals in product being sold by a corporation that pays you the big bucks. Calling someone crazy is just namecalling propaganda really.
 
Yes, but EPA cannot be everywhere. Here in AZ we have thousands of private well operators. In phoenix alone, there are about 300-400 of them who are in perpetual violation of EPA and state standards. When I worked for the health department in PHX, we had a case where a swimming pool tested out with something like 10-20 ppm Chlorine (range should be 1-3 ppm)..but the owner swore he hadn't had the chance to add any pool tabs yet. So we tested the tap water from the hose he used...10 pmm Chlorine flowing out of the tap. That could hospitalize someone.

I always knew that AquaFina was tap water but a company like Pepsi is going to have some pretty nice filtration going on. Reverse Osmosis being one of those steps more than likely.
 
Dude, all the soda companies that also sell bottled water do the same exact thing (and I know this for a fact). They take the water used to make Coke, Pepsi, etc. before it is carbonated, and bottle that.

Bottled water is a f*cking goldmine for major beverage suppliers because they've already got the water, they can skip all the proceding steps to make it into Coke or Pepsi and sell it for the same price. It would be stupid for them not to sell bottled water, providing this method.

thesinner has spoken.
 
I hear ya..wish I were in the bottled water biz. Reeeedickulous profit margins!

To be honest, I don't quite understand why this would/should cause any commotion.


The fact of the matter is two hydrogens bonded to one oxygen is and always will be water, regardless of it's source of origin.

Whether it comes my piss, the exhaust fumes of your car, the sink, or the magic springs of mount Hugivesa****, it's still two hydrogensns bonded to one oxygen, and therefore water.

You remove impurities through reverse osmosis and distillation, and regardless of where it came from, it's still water.
 
haha bottled water is such a scam, through and through.

the corporate media playted it beautifully by making people scared of their tap water.....bottled some tap water....and then sold it to people that were scared of tap water!

unbelievable.

btw for everyone reading bio's posts...chlorine is actually bleach.



oh and i have a private well. the water coming out of my tap is friggin awesome. tastes better than any tap or bottled water ive ever tasted.
 
so which is better reverse osmosis or distillation ?

Too many factors to say straight up. It would depend on the 'crud' in the water you need to get out.

Reverse osmosis works with the same concept as 'trying to get the square peg through the round hole'. If the partcle size is bigger than water, then it won't pass through the semipermiable membrane.

Distillation is the separation of components by boiling points, to put it simply. This works great for separating out solids. As long as nothing in your dirty water would form an azeotrope (point where both components would boil at the same temperature) a good distillation could suffice.

But then we look at the other side of the picture: Costs.

With that being said, I would not be surprised if both methods are implemented in an attempt to keep operating costs down.
 
Back
Top