HIT4ME
Well-known member
lol...you ever hear of a little oil organisation called opec?
opec was founded in 1960, you don't think todays phamaceutical giants haven't learned a thing or two, lol.
if a bunch of arab countries that hated each other could come together, you don't think phamaceutical companies could?
c'mom, man
Your example is THE example I would use as a real world argument against you. The members of OPEC cheat ALL THE TIME. If they all abide by the rules, they all benefit. But if one of them cheats, the cheater wins and the rest get screwed - so cheating happens quite a bit.
In your example, as I illustrated above, not bringing your product to market and gaining patent rights, etc. is extremely risky unless you can get a guarantee no other company is going to bring their product to the market in the meantime, and trying to gain that guarantee weakens your position even further if a company decides to cheat; because you've revealed the information that you won't be bringing it to market for a time period. If I know I have 6 months to figure something out, my approach will be very different than if I have no idea how long I have, because you could beat me to the punch tomorrow.
If I was a pharma company, it would be in my best interest to get everyone to agree not to release a cure for 6 months, so that I could cheat and be the only one to market while I catch everyone with their pants down.
I hate to break it to you, but 99.9% of politicians today, on both sides, are in favor of big government. They just want to control you in different ways.
Democrats want to tax the hell out of you, and have more control of the economy, and want to ban most/all guns, but want less social laws/rules, less illegal drugs.
Republicans want less taxes and control over the economy, and less gun-control laws, but want more restrictive social laws, things that make/keep a ton of drugs illegal, that prevent abortions (often even in the case of rape and incest), and often that prevent gay couples from having the same rights under the law as straight couples. Now, I'm ALL for allowing a given religion to accept and refuse whatever they want, but the GOVERNMENT should grant a CIVIL UNION to any two consenting, mentally sound adults, and their religion of choice can accept or deny their "marriage" as they see fit.
And then BOTH parties seem to love spying on people, whether it's Bush and the Patriot Act, or Obama and the NSA Spying.
NEITHER party is "small government" in 2020. Just big in different ways.
You aren't breaking anything to me
If a person's career depends on a government position - they are incented to protect that position by growing government and making more and more people rely on that position. i.e. - If I am a career politician who calls himself a republican...I'm still going to grow government to protect my position.
In other words, they aren't republicans anymore. They aren't for individual freedoms and the responsibilities that go with it. Dems and Republicans both want you to rely on gov't.