Anavar vs H-drol

Buffgammaman

Active Member
How do each of these compare to one another in terms of muscle gains, how fast it takes to get the gains (IE how long it takes to kick in and really work), fat loss and the qulity of the gains and how much you'll keep after pct?
 
HardTrainer said:
Have you run both?

Is it really worth the huge difference in price?
Click to expand...


Yes I too would like to know this. If anavar is the "real deal" as he says and then by how much more is it effective then h drol because I heard there somewhat similar to one another but anavar has a price tag 3 to 4 times as high.
 
h-drol is def a cheaper substitute. Less anabolic and more androgenic though.
 
Buffgammaman said:
I didn't think hdrol had hardly any androgenic propertys do to it being a 4 cloral
Click to expand...
Feedback is that it's around 30/100 from what I have heard.
 
gains on anavar are very low and it takes very long for the gains to even kick in.
you also have to run it longer than most orals.

i'd go with h-drol.

anavar will give you better quality mass and you will feel better on it overall.

it's a better oral overall and one of the best. but you have to realize what it does. not much.

it's just the price. it's very expensive and not worth it unless you don't mind dishing out the extra cash.

if you don't mind, go with anavar but i would run it for AT LEAST 8 weeks!
 
Buffgammaman said:
that's 30 androgen and 100 anaboplic right? how does anaver rank on this scale?
Click to expand...
No thats 30 out of 100 androgenic rating. So its a 3 out of 10. Ballpark.
 
TripDog said:
Yea someone from A.I was saying its higher than superdrol. I think it may be tainted or something?
Click to expand...

I was actualy responding to the OP.

Anything with a 1,4-diene is going to have a low androgenic rating because it doesn't produce 5-alpha-reduced metabolites at any appreciable rate. I don't think the 4-chloro group is going to make for that much more of a difference. Dianabol has a low androgenic rating as well, but Boldenone and D-bol are both aromatizable, which aids to what might seem as an androgenic effect.
 
so 3 out of 10 for androgen that's not to bad but what's it's rating from an anabolic stand poind and where does anavar fit into this rating system?
 
Buffgammaman said:
so 3 out of 10 for androgen that's not to bad but what's it's rating from an anabolic stand poind and where does anavar fit into this rating system?
Click to expand...
I think halodrol is a 45/100 in terms of anabolic activity. Feel free to search some steroid websites to see info on anavar.
 
TripDog said:
I think halodrol is a 45/100 in terms of anabolic activity. Feel free to search some steroid websites to see info on anavar.
Click to expand...

That sounds about right.

4-chloronation takes out a lot of anabolic activity from the inhibition aromatic metabolites (yes, estrogen is anabolic), so T-bol is less anabolic than D-bol.

And now we're comparing to anavar, which (believe it or not) has a very high anabolic rating. It's sort of developed this reputation as a cutting steroid at low doses, but there's actually no fat-burning capabilities of the compound what-so-ever; it's strictly an insane amount of nutrient repartitioning from its high anabolic activity. That's part of the reason why it kills your appetite (nutrients going to the right spots = need less food = less hungry) and why you might experience the "leth-var-gy" (not enough glycogen in the brain).
 
Var at 90 mg. is really good, but if you don't have 18$ day to spend on an oral, H Drol is definetly a good replacement..
 
anavar will need to be ran for a lot longer to see any decent gains compared to h-drol. i would just opp. for the h-drol and save yourself an easy $100+ in cost it will take to run the anavar at proper dose and length. anavar is not cheap :(
 
this 45/30 seems wrong for tbol because dbol is 90-150/55-60

and tbol is supose to have better ratio of anabolic to androgenic then d-bol.

if tbol androgenic rating really is 30 it should have at a bare minimum a rating of 60 for anabolic.
 
Buffgammaman said:
this 45/30 seems wrong for tbol because dbol is 90-150/55-60

and tbol is supose to have better ratio of anabolic to androgenic then d-bol.

if tbol androgenic rating really is 30 it should have at a bare minimum a rating of 60 for anabolic.
Click to expand...
It's not t-bol. It's similar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top