Buffgammaman
Member
How do each of these compare to one another in terms of muscle gains, how fast it takes to get the gains (IE how long it takes to kick in and really work), fat loss and the qulity of the gains and how much you'll keep after pct?
Have you run both?No comparison.
Anavar is the real deal
Have you run both?
Is it really worth the huge difference in price?
h-drol is def a cheaper substitute. Less anabolic and more androgenic though.
Feedback is that it's around 30/100 from what I have heard.I didn't think hdrol had hardly any androgenic propertys do to it being a 4 cloral
Feedback is that it's around 30/100 from what I have heard.
No thats 30 out of 100 androgenic rating. So its a 3 out of 10. Ballpark.that's 30 androgen and 100 anaboplic right? how does anaver rank on this scale?
Yea someone from A.I was saying its higher than superdrol. I think it may be tainted or something?wow....really?
Yea someone from A.I was saying its higher than superdrol. I think it may be tainted or something?
I think halodrol is a 45/100 in terms of anabolic activity. Feel free to search some steroid websites to see info on anavar.so 3 out of 10 for androgen that's not to bad but what's it's rating from an anabolic stand poind and where does anavar fit into this rating system?
I think halodrol is a 45/100 in terms of anabolic activity. Feel free to search some steroid websites to see info on anavar.
It's not t-bol. It's similar.this 45/30 seems wrong for tbol because dbol is 90-150/55-60
and tbol is supose to have better ratio of anabolic to androgenic then d-bol.
if tbol androgenic rating really is 30 it should have at a bare minimum a rating of 60 for anabolic.