Serm + low dose ai for pct

Olears20

New member
Well i was just wondering what your opinions were on running a pct using a serm tapered to a low dose ai. From everything i have read it seems like it would work real well especially in combating the delayed gyno. Anyways i wanted to hear some of your opinions on using a serm such as nolva for 4-5 weeks than using a low dose ai such as aromasin or arimidex for 1-2 weeks after the serm is done. So a possible pct would look like the following...

Week 1-4 = Nolva 40/40/20/20
Week 5-6 = aromasin .25/.25

Anyways that would just be a rough pct but any changes or diff serm or ai or even if you think this theory sucks lol say it i just want to hear some opinions.
 
CryingEmo said:
Why the aromasin??
Click to expand...

Why not aromasin? Its the only AI that wouldnt interfere with any of the serms...

The only thing I could suggest is using relox instead of nolva...
Not neccessarily better, just builds bone density at the same time.

But im taking Nolva and aro-sin right now acctually.
 
PolishMan said:
Why not aromasin? Its the only AI that wouldnt interfere with any of the serms...

The only thing I could suggest is using relox instead of nolva...
Not neccessarily better, just builds bone density at the same time.

But im taking Nolva and aro-sin right now acctually.
Click to expand...

I would use an OTC product like Novedex-XT or Rebound XT instead of aromasin.
 
RenegadeRows said:
I would use an OTC product like Novedex-XT or Rebound XT instead of aromasin.
Click to expand...

What about delaided gyno on Rebound XT (and also as an "ATD" androstadienedione based product some experience libido issues, and if I am not mistaken Novedex has the same active compound)... wouldn't it be better to go with Rebound Reloaded just in case ??
 
Olears20 said:
Well i was just wondering what your opinions were on running a post cycle therapy using a serm tapered to a low dose ai. From everything i have read it seems like it would work real well especially in combating the delayed gyno. Anyways i wanted to hear some of your opinions on using a serm such as nolva for 4-5 weeks than using a low dose ai such as aromasin or arimidex for 1-2 weeks after the serm is done. So a possible post cycle therapy would look like the following...

Week 1-4 = Nolva 40/40/20/20
Week 5-6 = aromasin .25/.25

Anyways that would just be a rough post cycle therapy but any changes or diff serm or ai or even if you think this theory sucks lol say it i just want to hear some opinions.
Click to expand...


Whats the scientific reason for using a SERM and then an AI? could you run them side by side? which should be used first or last during PCT, SERM or AI.. and why?
 
Exemestane (aromasin) is an excellent choice of AI during post cycle therapy, in addition to being better on lipids than adex or letro it is also a weaker sulphatase inhibitor (important during PCT) and has a high affinity for SHBG leading to higher levels of free test (study below);

There was an increase in circulating testosterone concentrations after both 25 mg (60 ± 58%; P = 0.001) and 50 mg (56 ± 48%; P = 0.003) exemestane. Androstenedione concentrations were increased as well after 25 mg (32 ± 36%; P = 0.004) and 50 mg (47 ± 59%; P = 0.052) exemestane, respectively (Fig. 1Go and Table 2Go). SHBG concentrations were decreased by 21 ± 7% (P = 0.0003) and 19 ± 39% (P = 0.18) at 25 and 50 mg exemestane, respectively. Free testosterone concentrations were increased by 117 ± 74% (P = 0.0001) and 154 ± 95% (P < 0.0001) at both doses, due to the decrease in SHBG and the increase in total testosterone. No effect on circulating dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was observed at either dose.
Click to expand...

Invalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top