@stevesns Is there any research on this compound as I can’t see any? Good feedback on this thread but placebo effect is a real thing too.
Did you read the thread?
The reason I'm asking is that the answers to basically everything you've asked has already been answered.
Here is a copy and paste of one of my posts:
I have said since day 1 that people started asking us to offer this ingredient that there aren't hardly any studies on it, so if we brought it back and offered it, it would be based on consumer demand and the write up wouldn't be very detailed or scientific like many of our write ups are, because there just isn't that much information to go off of.
Even in terms of how it works, there is limited information on the methods of action - we made zero claims, zero hype, and there are ways that I'm even fairly certain that it works through that I didn't include in the write up bc I can't say for sure.
The feedback on Prime XT is from people that wanted us to release it and that love the ingredient; many of which have used it for a long period of time in the past when it was available.
Not hating here but sns normally have science behind their products and this looks the opposite. I discount any user feedback/testimonials as there are countless studies showing how placebo actions work. I want to know if this is just hoping for the best/capitalising off what usp labs did or if you’re privy to some secret research/lab work I can’t find?
There are people here comparing this stuff to mild prohormones and anyone who’s been around those knows that is total BS. When I see people talk about any natural muscle builder/test booster type in that way (or for that matter say their 1-DHEA/4-dhea based products are like OG prohormones) I call BS.
Unless they are actually contaminated with some androgen no product in that class would do that. I know you aren’t claiming that yourself cos let’s face it, your OG CEL PH’s were the bomb, lol Tribulus aquatics type stuff certainly wasn’t needed back then!
I love how you say 'not hating' and then go on to make like 4 backhanded comments and insults in the same post.
You do realize that this isn't a new product right?
It's been out almost a year so there's a lot of feedback.
USP Prime/Precision Primal is one of the most popular sports nutrition products that there's ever been and we've had people ask us for years to bring those back and do a product like that. I've said the whole time exactly what I said above, that there aren't a lot of studies on it, so if we were to, it would be because we were being asked so much to and we listen, and want to give people what they want.
You said:
I discount any user feedback/testimonials as there are countless studies showing how placebo actions work.
It's 100% up to you what you choose to take, but it seems kind of silly to dismiss real world feedback and especially to insult people that like something, especially when you haven't even taken it yourself.
But - if you dismiss real world feedback, how does that line up with your activity in the Excelsior thread and comparing notes on which batch numbers of which spiked products feel the best?
You said:
There are people here comparing this stuff to mild prohormones and anyone who’s been around those knows that is total BS.
A lot of very reputable and very helpful members have given feedback on Prime XT, and some of them were some of the ones that had asked us to please bring the ingredient back because they liked it.
They're entitled to leave whatever feedback that they want to. You're not in the gym with them or following them around in day to day life to know how well something helps them or works for them.
If you don't believe feedback, cool; but don't insult people that try to help others by providing it.
You said:
I want to know if this is just hoping for the best/capitalising off what usp labs did
There was over a decade of feedback on the ingredient before we ever offered it, so no, that wasn't hoping for the best because there was plenty of feedback to go off of.
And no, offering people a product that they asked us for when the ingredient/product wasn't currently available isn't capitalizing off of anything - its listening to our customers and giving them what they asked for.
That’s the thing. If there’s no data why would you take something at all? I mean look at how many people complain about ingredients where the data isn’t deemed good enough (in vitro, animal studies only etc) but then nobody bats an eyelid at ingredients with zero evidence of working, where there isn’t even a mechanism of action proposed.
USP Labs Prime and Precision Research Primal were both extremely popular products.
People asked us to offer one, we did - Prime XT.
We offer a wide variety of products - and most of them have very deep science on them. For Prime XT, there may be a lack of science, but there's a ton of real world feedback and results on the ingredient going back a decade before we ever offered it - which is why so many people asked us to please bring it back.
If someone wants products backed by super in depth science, cool, we have dozens of them.
Science is awesome, studies are great, but what the average person cares about is results.