It's strange that you call me out for making an assumption, yet the majority of the information you post is literally assumption based and erroneous.You bet? What's next, you 'assume'? Oh right, youre already there. You're also wrong there.
The people I know first hand that had bad experiences, including hospitalization, were ecstatic to get the vax, so again, you miss the mark. No one around me in my line of work is being forced to vax.
I'm sure you're also aware VAERS reports were sky high before the vax was mandated anywhere. Right? Why do you feel the need to minimize any negative aspects of the vax, which are proven to exist?
Of course there are negative aspects to the vax, hence the side effects.
But it is you who is posting twitter feeds of verifiable false and misleading info in an attempt to fear mongering in a public platform.
Most of the claims I called you out on you haven't even come back to back up. It's almost like you don't care that the info you post is wrong as long as you think someone might fall for it.
If the claims could be back, then it could make for discussion but instead people who attempt to highlight the flaws of using 2 data points and the drawing of erroneous conclusions between them (you can find correlation between any dataset if you try hard enough) are accused of being closed minded or pro-mandate which is not even close to the truth.
People can absolutely be anti mandate but pro vaccination. Those are 2 separate discussion points. I can be pro education but anti mandating everyone go to college. And so on and so forth.
Last edited: