This is the typical definition of what makes a socialist state: a system where the means of production, distribution and exchange are nationalised or under state ownership, or simply a system in which social values or workers' interests have economic priority.
In a true Communist state, the govt is authoritarian and there is no private ownership of anything.
That obviously does not apply to the US. A lot of people prefer private ownership of things. Most liberals I know believe in the idea of class structure, but where they draw the line at companies, who have literally said increasing wages for their bottom line wouldn't hurt them, but refuse to do so anyway.
The reality is, like I said before, you guys grew up at a time where wages were relatively high and costs of living were relatively low, house prices cost 3-5x your annual salary and that the entry requirements for entry level jobs did not require a degree or more to enter. If wages had stayed in line with when you guys were younger, people wouldn't be complaining so much. Its really not that difficult.
The average income of a family in 1970 is the same as it is now - and that is despite house prices and the cost of living rising exponentially in that time.
Jiiigzz - Funny how I specifically listed socialism, marxism, and communism.... and you only replied with a definition of socialism and communism. Duck, dodge, deny. Spew a wave of new emotional crap. Ignore anything that makes you or your argument or your principles look flawed and foolish.
The part you DELIBERATELY ignored was about MARXISM. The principles of Marxism being - "Opposition to an economic system based on inequality and on the alienation and exploitation of the majority (by means of the system of wage labor), a system whose purpose is to obtain profits for some people rather than satisfying the needs of all."
Here is video showing BLM leaders explaining they are trained organizers, trained Marxists.
And if you look at the definition of Marxism (per Oxford) it is the anticapitalist politicial and economic theories of Karl Marx, advocating socialism and communism. And we come full circle. Ta Da!!
Exactly what you and this new twisted wave of progressive libtard democrats keep preaching. As if the Bernie Sanders movement (roughly half of the modern Democrat party) doesn't specifically advocate for the advancement of socialist ideals.
Here is the current Vice President Chuckles McClown trying to laugh off her radical far left socialist ideology on 60 minutes.
Plus you pulled your typical duck/dodge/deny to my other very specific examples in the prior post you selectively ignored. It was typed clearly in black and white (no pun intended)....
As if BLM leaders don't brag about their Marxist training. As if the autonomous zones illegally created in Portland are not versions of communist/Marxist wet dreams of the left. As if Democrat governors and mayor's aren't deliberately looking the other way to allow it to happen. As if tearing down statues and rewriting history books isn't for this exact purpose, direct from the marxist/communist manifestos.
Not sure who you are trying to con, but your arguments rely on biased liberal fake news and teary-eyed woke emotions. How about you focus on New Zealand and their issue with Chinese economic subjugation before trying to peddle that crap here?!?
inequality.org
