Being derisive doesn't make the case better. Nor does it make it any worse. Your case is utterly stupid, and indefensible. I didn't put you in that corner.
So, Ford is a bad business man for going bankrupt?
Bezos is a bad businessman because he had connections? Most people would see that as an important part of being a good businessman.
Now, being corrupt is a different argument with a different set of criteria, which we could debate.
But if you think most good businessmen are good because they lack failures, you are just foolish. And you are ignoring a bunch of wins and only focusing on failures.
I would place a high value in someone who has had big failures and was persistent and got some wins too. I thought the argument is always how Trump had everything handed to him, now he lost everything and that is bad. Yet, here he is again. A billionaire. Was it handed to him twice?
Being a good businessman, like being a good leader or athlete or musician or anything- isn't something you are born with. You learn and grow into it - through failure. Unless you value being lucky over being persistent, but then you are showing your true values and beliefs in equality.
If you are going to bash someone just because you have an unfounded hatred, at least pick a side and be consistent and show some logical thought. Not being derisive, said it from the beginning, the Trump is a bad businessman because he had failures argument is 100% moronic.