My state just got shut the rest of the way down. No businesses other than grocery and banks.
no unnecessary travel.. but don't worry take out food is ok. WTF sense does any of this make?
Why are the Dems after they obstructed the Senate relief bill not the once, but twice packing their economic relief bill with unrelated things to serve as a political opportunity for their left wing agenda at a time when Americans are in desperate need of relief? READ BELOW
“The bill proposed by Pelosi, D-Calif., additionally seeks to eliminate debt held by the U.S. Postal Service, require same-day voter registration, pay off $10,000 in student debt per person, mandate that airlines reduce their overall carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2050, and force federal agencies to explain to Congress how they are increasing their usage of "minority banks."
And, the legislation would provide for the automatic extension of nonimmigrant visas and restrict colleges from providing information about citizenship status.”
Invalid Link Removed
so its ok to bail out the middle class but not the corporations that employ them? Im just pointing out the blarring problem with this statement. or did I miss your point?.. besides the fact that the "bail out" as your calling it, is meant to be targeted at small and med sized businesses.. but i guess everyone missed that.Well, I’m about as big a fan of the stuff the Dems snuck in there as I am the corporate bailout stuff. And the income tiers and restrictions make no sense. I don’t really care how much somebody was making(within reason), if they’re out of work because of this shut down, they deserve as much help as anyone. This whole bill was a disaster.
Something about a mutation, my wife was talking about. Yeah, scary stuff.
so its ok to bail out the middle class but not the corporations that employ them? Im just pointing out the blarring problem with this statement. or did I miss your point?.. besides the fact that the "bail out" as your calling it, is meant to be targeted at small and med sized businesses.. but i guess everyone missed that.
~well you certainly bring up a lot of liberal talking points. all of which im sure you either learned in college or on CNN.
#Coronatron
well you certainly bring up a lot of liberal talking points. all of which im sure you either learned in college or on CNN.
#Coronatron
Wait, students cannot get bailed out from their student loans because it's their responsibility and they signed the loans..
Ok, how about LOANS instead of bailouts for large corporations? They have to pay them back. I'd be on board.
Forget the students.
They don't need to eat or pay rent during this crisis and being out of work, but let them pay those overblown predatory loans down a fraction. That's what's important.
As far as the Green New Deal, that's not a response to my post is it?
How did they worker and customer do on those bailouts?... Prices went up, workers got fractional if any money.ou
The last I was in college was 2004.
I don't watch CNN.
What is it he stated did not happen? I was here. It did, they did. Workers were not helped, nor were customers.
We need to insist when a company is bailed out, they do the right thing with the money, or at least don't reward poor performance with bonuses and profit taking for the stockholders... that's wrong. (Stock buybacks)
If you run your company down, and are bailed out by the government, isn't that socialism?
Also, what the heck is it when they do it because they aren't prepared for emergencies?
I am only saying, the people now need to be bailed out from this economic stall do to a disease, not large companies.
What's wrong with that?
Cant stress the bolded part enough. How can you be anti socialism(which I am), yet be all for hand outs for corporations? It makes no sense.
I'm logical. Everyone has a crisis now and then and deserve to be helped by society.
I'm not a socialist maybe?
It's not a handout I would support, but loans that require repayment with interest.
I also think churches should pay taxes.
Edit:
Just imagine what a kick start the economy would get if all student loans were forgiven.
Those people would spend when all was open again, and business would be on a cycle to success.
![]()
Again the relief package is aimed at medium and small business. You are forgetting this is capitalism and you have no reason to harbor any hate on Corps. Your life and mine are positively impacted and will continue to be so, now and forever thanks to corporations. Last I heard both GM and Chrysler have paid back the principle on their bail out loans.. further you throw a blind eye to all the BS regulations the airline industry had to succumb to after 911.. of course they had to get creative to offset costs.. have you or do you run a business? I have so I understand it at an intimate level. the regulations placed on companies are more of an issue than you seem to care to admit. the picture you paint is a black and white one that leaves out the entire pallet of business related dealings that cause some of the issues you mention.funny you should say that, as I’m really the furthest thing from a liberal. I just fail to see why tax payers should fund corporations who then bail on the people that funded them. Explain the logic in that.
Eh, I’m not on the student loan forgiveness train. That said, something needs to be done about the escalating cost of higher ed, the predatory loans, and this thing we’ve created where everyone “needs” to go to college just to get a job. I made it without a degree, and have a real hard time with the idea of putting the cost of everyone else’s education on people like myself.
when you reference bs regulations and the airlines after 911... what are you referencing? And exactly what is bs about it? I get a paycheck, and in exchange for it I sometimes have to do things and abide by rules I don’t really agree with. It’s part of the deal. Need a loan? You have to agree to might not be convenient for you. Same thing. If a corporation takes government money, there’s strings attached just like for the rest of us. Why should it be any different? Really have that big of a problem with it, then don’t take the money. Seems you’ve been completely brainwashed by the corporate lobby.Again the relief package is aimed at medium and small business. You are forgetting this is capitalism and you have no reason to harbor any hate on Corps. Your life and mine are positively impacted and will continue to be so, now and forever thanks to corporations. Last I heard both GM and Chrysler have paid back the principle on their bail out loans.. further you throw a blind eye to all the BS regulations the airline industry had to succumb to after 911.. of course they had to get creative to offset costs.. have you or do you run a business? I have so I understand it at an intimate level. the regulations placed on companies are more of an issue than you seem to care to admit. the picture you paint is a black and white one that leaves out the entire pallet of business related dealings that cause some of the issues you mention.
fair enough.. you didn't say that but your words paint that picture.. perhaps you should choose your words more careful like this: "hey jrock go fist yourself!! " see what i did there?when you reference bs regulations and the airlines after 911... what are you referencing? And exactly what is bs about it? I get a paycheck, and in exchange for it I sometimes have to do things and abide by rules I don’t really agree with. It’s part of the deal. Need a loan? You have to agree to might not be convenient for you. Same thing. If a corporation takes government money, there’s strings attached just like for the rest of us. Why should it be any different? Really have that big of a problem with it, then don’t take the money. Seems you’ve been completely brainwashed by the corporate lobby.
I actually do run a business... a multimillion dollar a year foodservice operation. Save your lectures for somebody else.
And for the record, I never said I hate corporations. Care to find where I said that? You can’t. Now stfu.
Look at us. Arguing as if we have a choice in the matter of this lock down pandemic.
It sure does bring tempers and opinion to bare on one another.
We can at least agree we are of one mind when it comes to this forum and what we all seek to do.
Thoughts of novel solutions to our various personal issues with government be damned for all I care.
It's a thought to scavenge for some kind of magic bullet to solve issues, but truly when the greed and weakness of man is at the core of most discussions relative to the state of politics; one can never be certain. I'll not lose sleep if in my life none of it is solved to any satisfaction; any more than the last 200 years.
Excellent point...I had what I thought was a terrible flu in February, but now i wonder if I had the Corona Virus...Keep in mind a lot of places just started testing. And you can't just walk in and get tested, you gotta go through a process. At least where I live. A lot of these new cases her not really new, they're just being discovered because they just started testing. In Connecticut we went from 50 to 500. but then again there's also probably way more people who have it because not everyone's getting tested
They arent running themselves down...they were forced to shut downCant stress the bolded part enough. How can you be anti socialism(which I am), yet be all for hand outs for corporations? It makes no sense.
They arent running themselves down...they were forced to shut down
^watched that on Saturday. I love the reproductive ratio and series interval talk comparing covid and flu. Also explains the pathophys of how pulmonary fibrosis coule develop...super educational video. Was gonna share but didnt think people would take the time to watch it lol.
higher education is great if going towards a advanced degree which in turn will equate to higher earnings...the great hoax is pushing even average or below high school students to think they HAVE to have a college degree. to go deeply into debt getting a liberal arts degree is insane. imo!!!I can tell you that I earned more without a college degree.
I feel democrats are pushing trump farther down the hole than he wants to go...fortunately trump is a business man and is resisting democrats who want to crush the economy.This is my theory. Tell me If I am wrong. I feel that we are basically testing how long the worldwide economy can hold out in this quarantine. After that time ends, and I have no clue how long that is, the disease will blow up again. I don't believe the spread of this disease can be stopped and I don't think anybody else does either. It seems to me to be common sense that the curve can be flattened only so long as people can stay home, which clearly isn't forever.
The question I am struggling with right now is, will the disease blow up exactly like it would have after the curfews end? Care to comment? If the answer is yes, then I am worried the quarantine will do more bad than good. Like I said previously, in this case, the only merit of the quarantine would have been additional time provided for more makeshift medical facilities, which is ongoing across the world. That would be cool. So I guess that does justify the quarantine. Maybe we will end up having cyclical shut downs- start up, disease blows up, shut down, repeat. That's probably extremely impractical.
To be honest with you right now, I am more afraid of an economic collapse than the disease. That's not just because I am young. Some young people have died from the disease as well, I am not invincible. It's just, I don't want to frickin starve.
Also, If you are worried about some loved one, isolate them, for such a time when the quarantine ends.
higher education is great if going towards a advanced degree which in turn will equate to higher earnings...the great hoax is pushing even average or below high school students to think they HAVE to have a college degree. to go deeply into debt getting a liberal arts degree is insane. imo!!!
lol....I don't know what you are talking about. Bagging a million dollars in debt for a smashing women's studies degree is one of the best investments out there right now.
contrary to what partisan democrats have been saying....a johns Hopkins study shows the US was more prepared for pandemic than any other country.
contrary to what partisan democrats have been saying....a johns Hopkins study shows the US was more prepared for pandemic than any other country.
This is my theory. Tell me If I am wrong. I feel that we are basically testing how long the worldwide economy can hold out in this quarantine. After that time ends, and I have no clue how long that is, the disease will blow up again. I don't believe the spread of this disease can be stopped and I don't think anybody else does either. It seems to me to be common sense that the curve can be flattened only so long as people can stay home, which clearly isn't forever.
The question I am struggling with right now is, will the disease blow up exactly like it would have after the curfews end? Care to comment? If the answer is yes, then I am worried the quarantine will do more bad than good. Like I said previously, in this case, the only merit of the quarantine would have been additional time provided for more makeshift medical facilities, which is ongoing across the world. That would be cool. So I guess that does justify the quarantine. Maybe we will end up having cyclical shut downs- start up, disease blows up, shut down, repeat. That's probably extremely impractical.
To be honest with you right now, I am more afraid of an economic collapse than the disease. That's not just because I am young. Some young people have died from the disease as well, I am not invincible. It's just, I don't want to frickin starve.
Also, If you are worried about some loved one, isolate them, for such a time when the quarantine ends.
I am always for questioning assumptions and this post does that. It is good to question common accepted thoughts.
I think you COULD be right. But a few things could happen. With social distancing that need to be accounted for:
1. I believe the following is possible: this is a novel virus. It needs to replicate in a living organism in order to "survive". If it is not allowed to infect anything, it could die off and be gone. This is unlikely since it would mean we would have to reach a point where no living humans at all are infected and any other animals it could potentially infect.
2. The warm weather could effect it and it could die off (again wishful thinking)
3. We could discover improved treatment for the disease - vaccines, protections, treatments that reduce mortality rates. This is the most likely solution, IMO. If we get a vaccine, this becomes a MUCH less impactful issue. If we reduce the mortality rate, rates if infection, etc. - this becomes much less if an issue.
All of these outcomes require time, and the lack of social distancing will reduce time and increase deaths immediately. We have run multiple tests now to prove this. China was locked down. Italy, less so and the results were far more devastating. The US is following a similar curve...less adherence and rapidly increasing effects.
But, questioning where the line is, is intelligent. Trump said it himself I believe - the cure cannot be worse than the disease. Short term, I think this makes sense. And we may have to go into cycles of work and quarantine until we figure out a better treatment.
As far as questioning norms - it seems appropriate here to mention Ignaz Samelweiss during this time. He questioned norms and was ridiculed heavily for it. And all we hear during this epidemic is the advice he pioneered.