You've already shown a fundamental lack of understanding of engineering/construction, yet feel fully confident to talk about what's best and what will happen as if you're an expert. That's why I'm being frank/harsh with you. You state opinion as fact...I do know about economics. Do you? I think you should calm down. I still don't understand your disposition.
Perfect. Honestly, we're wasting our time here at this point. You just succinctly epitomized his logic. I couldn't have said it any better.Since we are dealing in wishes...the cheapest and most effective solution to this problem would be for America to just "build" a vaccine already. How hard can it be? War time effort.
Perfect. Honestly, we're wasting our time here at this point. You just succinctly epitomized his logic. I couldn't have said it any better.
You've already shown a fundamental lack of understanding of engineering/construction, yet feel fully confident to talk about what's best and what will happen as if you're an expert. That's why I'm being frank/harsh with you. You state opinion as fact...
You've already shown a fundamental lack of understanding of engineering/construction, yet feel fully confident to talk about what's best and what will happen as if you're an expert. That's why I'm being frank/harsh with you. You state opinion as fact...
Do not trust them (LA Fitness). Ask for a cancel now and see what happens.
They will not open in April. That's 8 days away.
If you're not an expert, then don't present your uneducated opinions as facts as you have been doing. You said what IS the "wisest" thing to do, and stated as fact what CAN be done in terms of building infrastructure. You were wrong on those fronts. If you had said "I think," that's one thing, but that's not what you did man.All I see is you trying to think of me as some expert. I never said I am an expert, on anything. Just being frank. You asked if I knew economics, And I told you I do. If you don't know that a recession will set in, I assume you are not interested in Economics.
Dems just blocked the economic relief bill in the Senate.
Dems just blocked the economic relief bill in the Senate.
Maybe it wasn't good enough?
Let's not turn this into a discussion of left vs right political ideology. I get it's somewhat inevitable in discussing the government's plan for this pandemic, but we're sort of veering off-topic into overarching political ideology independent of this actual issue IMO.You just contradicted yourself.
It was flawed but it was because they can't beat him... which is it? I thought it was about getting what's right.
- Student Loan Forgiveness
- Better healthcare
- Not corporate bailouts so they rebuy their stock again. They will.
(The cruise and airline industry?) No thanks.
Fix the economy by elevating those with the most stress. The workers.
They can then afford more. Screw trickle down Economics.
It would, but there has to be some limit/logic to it (not suggesting you're suggesting we wipe 100% of all debt, of course). But I have heard I heard somewhere that the current government ideas are $1k (or a bit more) to each adult (and I heard $500 per kid for families IIRC?), and potentially $10k in student loan debt forgiven as part of the pandemic assistance? Staying slightly on topic haha!Kind of off topic but alleviating student debt would go a long way to help those in need of resources.
You just contradicted yourself.
It was flawed but it was because they can't beat him... which is it? I thought it was about getting what's right.
- Student Loan Forgiveness
- Better healthcare
- Not corporate bailouts so they rebuy their stock again. They will.
(The cruise and airline industry?) No thanks.
Fix the economy by elevating those with the most stress. The workers.
They can then afford more. Screw trickle down Economics.
Let's not turn this into a discussion of left vs right political ideology. I get it's somewhat inevitable in discussing the government's plan for this pandemic, but we're sort of veering off-topic into overarching political ideology independent of this actual issue IMO.
It would, but there has to be some limit/logic to it (not suggesting you're suggesting we wipe 100% of all debt, of course). But I have heard I heard somewhere that the current government ideas are $1k (or a bit more) to each adult (and I heard $500 per kid for families IIRC?), and potentially $10k in student loan debt forgiven as part of the pandemic assistance? Staying slightly on topic haha!
And, to ignore my own suggestion to stay on topic, I'm open to the possibility of free community and state colleges, but I don't know if we need free university (state or private). I know it may seem like a silly distinction, but I know some people who racked up insane student loans because they decided to go to universities they didn't get scholarships for instead of other universities or colleges they did. And the issue was even more drastic for people who went to private and/or out-of-state schools they didn't get scholarships to.
Oh, I'm well aware that there's no such thing as "free X." It's "taxpayer-funded X." And I'm not saying I do support just a generic break on student loans, but I wouldn't be opposed to some form of help during a pandemic like this, if that makes any sense.I'm not one for "forgiving" (it isn't forgiving, it is us paying for it) student debt.
1). Students decided to put themselves into debt for a "higher education". I did not.
2). If I decided to put myself into debt for a house, car, clothing .. Or whatever, and others did not, they won't be happy about "forgiving" my debt (paying for my personal items themselves). And they shouldn't be.
Oh, I'm well aware that there's no such thing as "free X." It's "taxpayer-funded X." And I'm not saying I do support just a generic break on student loans, but I wouldn't be opposed to some form of help during a pandemic like this, if that makes any sense.
I'm not opposed to helping people through a really bad time. But I don't see a possible way to justify it for them, but not for others. Again ... Many people are struggling with their own debt, not just student loans.
To single them out, but not others doesn't seem right at all.
And I totally understand that. Now, I may well be wrong, but I've always heard that even bankruptcy can't erase student debt, although I've also read, in a cursory search, that it may not be that simple, or things are changing or have changed to make it not quite that simple. If student loans are harder to get assistance with than other loans, leading to the debts building and building for people more than other debts, then I can see an argument for helping people with them more than other loans. Now, I'm not even saying I inherently think we should help with student loans and not X,Y, or Z other loans; I'm just presenting one point of view for the sake of a discussion.I'm not opposed to helping people through a really bad time. But I don't see a possible way to justify it for them, but not for others. Again ... Many people are struggling with their own debt, not just student loans.
To single them out, but not others doesn't seem right at all.
I am not saying this argument is right, it is just an idea and I am not sure - but education doesn't benefit the person receiving the education - it benefits others.
I had an economics professor who once asked us to ponder what would happen if you took the most highly educated doctor in the world and dropped him into the middle of a village in Africa that had no education. Who would benefit from his education?
Sure, in a society with other educated individuals, such a person could make more money and do well - but the other people have to have something t give if he is going to benefit and that means they need to have skills/education as well.
Not saying it is the entire story, but it is an interesting thought experiment that can possibly justify some aid in educating others and equitably distributing the burden.
Even though you did not choose to get an education - you likely benefit from the people who DID get an education (doctors, lawyers, accountants, physicists, engineers, etc.)
Of course, yeah, you benefit and you pay for it already by paying them for their services.
Totally disagree here, Brother.
I'm in serious debt to these fine individuals who put themselves into debt, out of the goodness of their heart. When they start forgiving the debts others owe them for their services, I'd start CONSIDERING paying for their schooling.
Whether we admit it or not, we all know that if it weren't for a (hopeful) promise of personal gain, almost none of these students would have gone into debt.
What about the dad that saved all is hard earned dollars for his whole life to put his kids through college debt free? Or what about the kids that worked a full time job and went to college full time to not incur student loan debt? It wouldn’t be fair to pay off student loan debt for everyone and the people that worked hard so no student loan debt was incurred gets nothing but higher taxes to pay off the debt of others , would it? I have $15,000 of student loan debt (use to be $25,000) and it was my choice to incur it and I am not asking the government to just pay it off.
Also, President Trump has already offered and enacted a forbearance opportunity of student loan debt to those effected by losing their jobs so they don’t have to make payments in the interim and waived ALL student loan interest during this period so why on earth does $10,000 of student loan debt forgiveness have to be part of the bill?
If you're not an expert, then don't present your uneducated opinions as facts as you have been doing. You said what IS the "wisest" thing to do, and stated as fact what CAN be done in terms of building infrastructure. You were wrong on those fronts. If you had said "I think," that's one thing, but that's not what you did man.
And I never said that quarantines won't result in a recession; I'm saying that if we end up with a double-digit percent of the population sick at the same time, we'll be overwhelmed, the number of deaths will be catastrophic, and we'll have a recession anyway, plus millions of dead people, which isn't very good for the economy.
I agree. After I graduate in May, I’ll have about $104k in student loan debt. It’s mine and I intend to pay it. It’s not the government’s fault that I chose to go to school and take out loans.
If prefaced my comment with “if we end up with a double-digit percent of the population infected.” That’s a minimum of 32,900,000 people infected. That’s almost 100x the total cases so far in the entire world. Is it an opinion that if it gets that bad in a single country that it will overwhelm said country? With even a 0.4% mortality rate (around what it is now IIRC), which it would undoubtedly be higher if literally millions of people have it in one country, that’s 131,600 dead. Italy’s mortality rate appears to be insane, at ~8% (reported to be due to an older population and the medical care system being overwhelmed by the numbers). Apply those numbers to the 32,900,000 number and you have 2.6 million dead. Yeah, I’m sure that’d have absolutely no economic consequences.Now I can be like you and call you out for presenting your opinion there as fact, just because you didn't say it's your opinion, but I won't do that. Rest easy.
EDIT: Trump just tweeted that they can't let the cure be worse than the problem itself. That's all I have been saying. The fact that it isn't clear which way things should go. Based on the data, they will decide I guess.
Colleges use predatory lenders, and that ish will never get paid off.
@puccah8808 What do you suppose your monthly payment will be for those loans?
How long to pay them off?
I hope you get a good paying job, oh I hope so, but those loans.. they will need payment no matter what.
The overblown price of education (inflated) is just as bad as healthcare costs for the uninsured.
I agree, if you can't afford to go to school and pay as you go, don't. It's a mistake. Huge mistake.
Invalid Link Removed
This, combines with the fact that your education doesn't necessarily benefit you directly, is something more people need to consider.
I know the majority if people believe an education benefits them and will get them a better job, but college won't achieve this. The people with the most success very rarely have a college education. Bill Gates, Dell, Buffett were all among the most successful men in the country without a college degree.
And yeah, some people in that group have degrees - but fewer than you would think.
Society seems to think that knowledge is secret and hidden and you need someone to show you/teach you. But all knowledge has been gained without the aid if a teacher. Someone had to uncover it on their own before it could be taught.
With the tools at our disposal today, I agree that colleges are over priced and a poor cost/benefit. But I went to college and I am glad I did, even if it wasn't the greatest investment. And some people I know have done well from their education.
But, yeah, paying off some of these student loans is unbelievable. I am sure Puccah will do it though and I hope she turns out to be one of the people who benefits greatly from it!
Yes, something like that. It’s definitely something I have put in the back of my mind for the last 7 years.
My classmate decided to take the most out, and she’s paying over double for the same degree and with a higher interest rate. I suffered a bit more by paying for some classes out of pocket.
If prefaced my comment with “if we end up with a double-digit percent of the population infected.” That’s a minimum of 32,900,000 people infected. That’s almost 100x the total cases so far in the entire world. Is it an opinion that if it gets that bad in a single country that it will overwhelm said country? With even a 0.4% mortality rate (around what it is now IIRC), which it would undoubtedly be higher if literally millions of people have it in one country, that’s 131,600 dead. Italy’s mortality rate appears to be insane, at ~8% (reported to be due to an older population and the medical care system being overwhelmed by the numbers). Apply those numbers to the 32,900,000 number and you have 2.6 million dead. Yeah, I’m sure that’d have absolutely no economic consequences.
Great post! Thanks brother.Ok so I’m not going to tell my brothers on the USA side of the pond about themselves but I can tell you what the UK side is like and see if you spot the similarities
we are not a compliant nation, we are not adhering to the social distancing (I personally am, I’m not a selfish cunt) as a country, our numbers are going up faster than in Italy.
italy has outstripped China for deaths. Chinese people are incredibly compliant, if the state says jump they ask how high. They’ve handled the situation. Italy, the uk and Spain haven’t.
even China needed full lockdown. Italy have called in the army to enforce it. Let me state again, italy (piss small country in comparison to China) have had more deaths than China. The Chinese complied, italy did not.
comments about this being over in a few weeks are miles off, sorry (I wish this was wrong btw) but this is months, uk government have already said 3 months and social distancing possibly for 12 months or more.
economies and industries will change forever, 3 months is a long time to form new habits. If you didn’t shop online before you will buy the end of this, people will be more used to working out from home and set up to do so, working from home will increase massively after this goes away as companies invest in the tech to do it properly in the short term (and realise it’s feasible long term).
we’ll feel the effects of this for 10 years plus. It’s the biggest event we’ve ever seen. The global nature makes it bigger than either world war.
hunker down brothers, embrace the changes and come out stronger
here is what mayor pete said about free college....American's who have a college degree earn more than those who don't. as a progressive, I have a hard time getting my head around the idea a majority who earn less because they didn't go to college subsidize a minority who earn more because they did.
needless to say mayor pete caught a lot of criticism from the Bernie bros.
I'd say 9/10 college graduates that I know personally have regular jobs like waitress and store managers at the mall or a CVS, other then the few that became lawyers and Dr.s. I'm making more as a union construction worker. There's Soo many college grads that make crap for money.here is what mayor pete said about free college....American's who have a college degree earn more than those who don't. as a progressive, I have a hard time getting my head around the idea a majority who earn less because they didn't go to college subsidize a minority who earn more because they did.
needless to say mayor pete caught a lot of criticism from the Bernie bros.