I'm not sure I see this as a bad thing.
What they are saying is they want to target products which make health claims and contain undisclosed ingredients.
The supplement market is huge and it's growth has also allowed naturopath companies who sell supplements under the guise of treating an illness to make outlandish claims. The issue here is that a lot of people are rejecting true medical intervention for these supplements which may have implications for both them and others they are in contact with.
Take the anti vaccine movement for instance; the growth of naturopathic supplements is aiding anti vaxxers by offering natural alternatives that claim to fight off disease/ illness when in reality they don't. The consequence is one of a huge public health threat to all unvaccinated children as a consequence of a misguided belief their parents hold.
The FDA has an obligation to protect the average consumer from companies and people who intentionally deceive to turn a profit.
Unfortunately stricter intervention are required because, quite frankly, the average consumer is about as educated as a brick in the world of medicine and supplements and are too easily swayed by the idea of 'natural'.
I
I remember in one of the earlier bans the FDA passed years ago that supplements could not make medical claims, we don't need a new bill, just enforce what is on the books...
If you’re using the God-gave-man argument, I really hope you don’t wear glasses, take any medications, and especially don’t take any anabolics that would disrupt your God-given hormone balance.I do not vaccinate my family because I know the dangers of IM injections of even minute doses of aluminum, and mercury. Many vaccines also were created through aborted fetal tissue, and I am pro life through and through. I believe God gave man an immune system, that does not need aid from an IM injection of chemicals, heavy metals, and a virus.
I account for "the fall of man". Men degrade. Men can get sick, even healthy men. I just find the immune system to be effective compared to injecting the adjuvant aluminum IM, which is a heavy metal, and since it is combined with polysorbate 80, it is able to cross the blood brain barrier. I am okay taking chances getting the flu, measles, chicken pox, HRV, etc... I believe in the autonomy of man, man has the right for his own body, and his family what gets put inside them.If you’re using the God-gave-man argument, I really hope you don’t wear glasses, take any medications, and especially don’t take any anabolics that would disrupt your God-given hormone balance.
If the God-given immune system is sufficient, why is the God-given eye sight or God given hormone balance not also sufficient? Just say you think the risk/reward balance isn’t there for you; don’t give logically inconsistent theological arguments.I account for "the fall of man". Men degrade. Men can get sick, even healthy men. I just find the immune system to be effective compared to injecting the adjuvant aluminum IM, which is a heavy metal, and since it is combined with polysorbate 80, it is able to cross the blood brain barrier. I am okay taking chances getting the flu, measles, chicken pox, HRV, etc... I believe in the autonomy of man, man has the right for his own body, and his family what gets put inside them.
Generally speaking, the immune system is sufficient. Generally most do not have eye issues, at least younger people. Generally, younger people do not have hormone issues. Generally, even though men are defective, most won't need glasses, extra hormones, if they took care of themselves, at least not until they get older. But I get it, it would be more appropriate to give a risk/reward explanation, over a theological response.If the God-given immune system is sufficient, why is the God-given eye sight or God given hormone balance not also sufficient? Just say you think the risk/reward balance isn’t there for you; don’t give logically inconsistent theological arguments.
I do not vaccinate my family because I know the dangers of IM injections of even minute doses of aluminum, and mercury. Many vaccines also were created through aborted fetal tissue, and I am pro life through and through. I believe God gave man an immune system, that does not need aid from an IM injection of chemicals, heavy metals, and a virus.
Generally speaking, the immune system is sufficient. Generally most do not have eye issues, at least younger people. Generally, younger people do not have hormone issues. Generally, even though men are defective, most won't need glasses, extra hormones, if they took care of themselves, at least not until they get older. But I get it, it would be more appropriate to give a risk/reward explanation, over a theological response.
You see, look at your statements. Illogical, the way you react. You have not done your studying on the risk/reward. You haven't any idea of the vaccine injury compensation program that pays out millions of dollars every year. You have not a clue in how MILD most of the viruses on the vaccine schedule are. This is a business, to make money. You know our parents recieved literally a FEW vaccines, compared to the multiple times that millennials and younger recieved. If you want to vaccinate, and lay at the feet of CDC, go ahead, but don't castigate, and belittle people with differing points of view.Seriously GTFO with your lunacy. And don't send your kids to any of our kid's schools.
I account for "the fall of man". Men degrade. Men can get sick, even healthy men. I just find the immune system to be effective compared to injecting the adjuvant aluminum IM, which is a heavy metal, and since it is combined with polysorbate 80, it is able to cross the blood brain barrier. I am okay taking chances getting the flu, measles, chicken pox, HRV, etc... I believe in the autonomy of man, man has the right for his own body, and his family what gets put inside them.
I’m wearing glasses right now.Generally speaking, the immune system is sufficient. Generally most do not have eye issues, at least younger people. Generally, younger people do not have hormone issues. Generally, even though men are defective, most won't need glasses, extra hormones, if they took care of themselves, at least not until they get older. But I get it, it would be more appropriate to give a risk/reward explanation, over a theological response.
You were right, I went about the discussion/debate, or how I feel the wrong way initially.I’m wearing glasses right now.
Also, we’re on Anabolic Minds, a supplement and anabolic forum. We all use some substances intended to improve some aspect(s) of our God-given abilities. Adaptogens, nootropics, ergogens, they all are designed to augment our natural abilities and qualities. But maybe God gave us these things and the ability to create these things to be used? And gave us wisdom and intelligence to learn, sometimes through trial and error, which ones we should keep using and which ones we shouldn’t. At least you can be consistent with a logical argument, because the theological one not only comes from a place where I can’t objectively debate you, but one where it’s not fully consistent with a myriad of other things you probably do/use daily.
Measles outbreak ...
Good points.I am pretty sure most anti vaxxers would be doing that whether they thought there were supplements to help or not. They are not taking vaccines out of fear, bad information, and or ignorance. It is not a "Hey this supplement can help the immune system, so now there is no need to get vaccines for the kids... " It is more like "There is no way I am giving my kids vaccines, maybe I should look for a supplement for the immune system instead."
I remember in one of the earlier bans the FDA passed years ago that supplements could not make medical claims, we don't need a new bill, just enforce what is on the books...
You are part of the problem at the moment. You don't see it because you are so caught up in it, but if you choose to not vaccinate your children, you are willfully and intentionally using them as a pawn in your game of politics, and that borders on child abuse in my eyes.You see, look at your statements. Illogical, the way you react. You have not done your studying on the risk/reward. You haven't any idea of the vaccine injury compensation program that pays out millions of dollars every year. You have not a clue in how MILD most of the viruses on the vaccine schedule are. This is a business, to make money. You know our parents recieved literally a FEW vaccines, compared to the multiple times that millennials and younger recieved. If you want to vaccinate, and lay at the feet of CDC, go ahead, but don't castigate, and belittle people with differing points of view.
About 10 people per state, out of 10 states... Out of almost 400 million.
This is a good point. Someone in 2019 America can not vaccinate their kid and it’s statistically likely that their kid won’t get something terrible, but the more people that adopt this mindset, the more likely the unvaccinated child is to catch something. If half the people thought this way, the logic and statistics wouldn’t hold up anymore; you’re currently relying on the fact that the vast majority of people are vaccinated. If this were not true, you couldn’t ride the statistical odds on the backs of other people.You are part of the problem at the moment. You don't see it because you are so caught up in it, but if you choose to not vaccinate your children, you are willfully and intentionally using them as a pawn in your game of politics, and that borders on child abuse in my eyes.
You may disagree, but your believes and understandings of vaccinations are on par with your level of understanding of them - which is very low. Especially as you described mercury in vaccines as harmful, despite it being ethylmercury and not methylmercury - the distinction is incredibly important, and even remotely connecting the two is a fallacy anti vaxxers lean on (Invalid Link Removed).
In any case, it is funny you say the immune system is sufficient- tell that to the people who, just over 150+ years ago were only living to about 30 years of age and were often accustomed to having 5+ children because so many were dying at birth.
But hey, because that stuff doesnt happen now, because of vaccines, we no longer need it right? :facepalm:
Do you not realize that if somebody contracts measles naturally, rather than through the vaccine, that their immunity is more permanent, then a vaccine. That would create a better herd immunity.You meant to say roughly three people every day since the beginning of the year has SOMEONE contacted measles (again, so far)
Bye bye herd immunity.
Plenty of people Beyond a hundred years ago that lived over 70 years old.You are part of the problem at the moment. You don't see it because you are so caught up in it, but if you choose to not vaccinate your children, you are willfully and intentionally using them as a pawn in your game of politics, and that borders on child abuse in my eyes.
You may disagree, but your beliefs on vaccinations are on par with your level of understanding of them - which is very low.
Anti vaxxers often lean on the mercury argument in vaccines as harmful, despite it being ethylmercury and not methylmercury - the distinction is incredibly important, and connecting the two is a fallacy anti vaxxers lean on (Invalid Link Removed). These basic misunderstandings are why noone in the anti vaxing community should be out giving health advice.
In any case, it is funny you say the immune system is sufficient- tell that to the people who, just over 150+ years ago were only living to about 30 years of age and were often accustomed to having 5+ children because so many were dying at birth.
But hey, because that stuff doesnt happen now, because of vaccines, we no longer need it right? :facepalm:
Also, I lean more on the aluminum adjuvant issue, more so than the Mercury issue because more vaccines have aluminum as their adjuvant then they do have mercury. Many vaccines also have a DNA from aborted fetal cells, and those of us who are pro-life disagree with the method of obtaining those cells.You are part of the problem at the moment. You don't see it because you are so caught up in it, but if you choose to not vaccinate your children, you are willfully and intentionally using them as a pawn in your game of politics, and that borders on child abuse in my eyes.
You may disagree, but your beliefs on vaccinations are on par with your level of understanding of them - which is very low.
Anti vaxxers often lean on the mercury argument in vaccines as harmful, despite it being ethylmercury and not methylmercury - the distinction is incredibly important, and connecting the two is a fallacy anti vaxxers lean on (Invalid Link Removed). These basic misunderstandings are why noone in the anti vaxing community should be out giving health advice.
In any case, it is funny you say the immune system is sufficient- tell that to the people who, just over 150+ years ago were only living to about 30 years of age and were often accustomed to having 5+ children because so many were dying at birth.
But hey, because that stuff doesnt happen now, because of vaccines, we no longer need it right? :facepalm:
People have ridden the herd immunity for so long, they've never experienced life before vaccines and suddenly see no importance in them.This is a good point. Someone in 2019 America can not vaccinate their kid and it’s statistically likely that their kid won’t get something terrible, but the more people that adopt this mindset, the more likely the unvaccinated child is to catch something. If half the people thought this way, the logic and statistics wouldn’t hold up anymore; you’re currently relying on the fact that the vast majority of people are vaccinated. If this were not true, you couldn’t ride the statistical odds on the backs of other people.
Tell that to the myriad of severely ill or dead children your plan would necessitate to get to that point...Do you not realize that if somebody contracts measles naturally, rather than through the vaccine, that their immunity is more permanent, then a vaccine. That would create a better herd immunity.
Yes, but the odds of making it past a younger age were less.Plenty of people Beyond a hundred years ago that lived over 70 years old.
Pretty sure more people have been harmed through the MMR vaccine than actually Contracting measles.Tell that to the myriad of severely ill or dead children your plan would necessitate to get to that point...
I hope you dont drink tap water or eat food. Both contain aluminum.Also, I lean more on the aluminum adjuvant issue, more so than the Mercury issue because more vaccines have aluminum as their adjuvant then they do have mercury. Many vaccines also have a DNA from aborted fetal cells, and those of us who are pro-life disagree with the method of obtaining those cells.
That’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m saying that you claimed letting measles run its course so people develop natural immunities to it would be preferable to vaccinating against it. The only reason less people are harmed from it is because they’re vaccinated against it. To build up the herd immunity you mentioned would inherently necessitate many, many people contracting it and either building a resistance to it or dying and being weeded out of the gene pool.Pretty sure more people have been harmed through the MMR vaccine than actually Contracting measles.
I have a reverse osmosis unit. And aluminum through food bases through the digestive system, rather than IM injection. But I'm done. I am for your right to vaccinate.I hope you dont drink tap water or eat food. Both contain aluminum.
Look up the average life span of people in the 1800s. 30-50 was the average. It is now 80 in most places.Plenty of people Beyond a hundred years ago that lived over 70 years old.
Some still enters the blood stream.I have a reverse osmosis unit. And aluminum through food bases through the digestive system, rather than IM injection. But I'm done. I am for your right to vaccinate.
I understood what you were saying. Generally, measles is mild, like the chicken pox, which most of us contracted, and most survived.That’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m saying that you claimed letting measles run its course so people develop natural immunities to it would be preferable to vaccinating against it. The only reason less people are harmed from it is because they’re vaccinated against it. To build up the herd immunity you mentioned would inherently necessitate many, many people contracting it and either building a resistance to it or dying and being weeded out of the gene pool.
Plumbing, the knowlege to wash hands with running water rather than sitting water. Proper waste disposal. Better travel, and housing.Look up the average life span of people in the 1800s. 30-50 was the average. It is now 80 in most places.
Why do you think that is?
I am all for opposing views. I enjoy debates, discussions.Before it gets heated and more off topic, we should change it back lol.
Its always a good debate about the FDA and things, and i always find it quite fascinating to hear others opinions on these things
You do know that one of the biggest improvements in water quality has been chlorination, right? A blanket fear of chemicals would, and does, make people afraid when they hear there’s chlorine in your drinking water, but it keeps much, much worse things out of it. So simply saying that you want to avoid chemicals isn’t inherently even a good idea.Plumbing, the knowlege to wash hands with running water rather than sitting water. Proper waste disposal. Better travel, and housing.
Am I an ******* because I feel reading this thread that now some of your other viewpoints suddenly make sense knowing you are an anti-vaxer?��*
��
Mandatory un-vaccination for people who don’t vaccinate their kids? JkI try to not let politics affect my relationships with people, but the second I find out someone is against vaccinations I can't even stand to be near them anymore. If someone is going to just blatantly ignore facts, I want nothing to do with them. Lol
It is a shame these people are already vaccinated, though, and it is their innocent children who suffer.