Chados
Well-known member
You should quote your references when you copy and paste from other sites and articles. The above is the Anavar profile from steroid.com
Androgenic means sexual characteristics... Please stop referring to it and how it does not translate into more mass. That is because it is not supposed to... Androgenic is sexual characteristics, and also helps with CNS, and fat loss, it does not mean more growth... Will they make you stronger? Absolutely, that is what they are best at... otherwise it is a sexual characteristic measurement... IE hard on the HPTA and prostate, or not...
You keep bringing it up like it is going to suddenly stop meaning the sexual side and have to do with the anabolic effects. The anabolic part of the ratio is muscle growth... if the rating is low expect less growth. As far as it's anabolic power showing itself in a cutting cycle, not sure what that means, other than the fact many people can still grow while in a deficit using it. Further showing it's growth potential. Imagine that on a high caloric surplus...
Just mentioning cutting, Tren being higher in androgenic effects is going to actually be better for cutting, it burns fat aggressively due to the effect it has on the AR in fat cells. Then again we get back on the which one has more sides thing...
Cgkone - good deal on deciding to run a high dose high surplus cycle to test this. Please link me up when you do it. I definitely want to watch and follow along. I think you will be pleasantly surprised with the results if you feed it like you are bulking you are going to grow a lot but still be drier and have that dense muscle look after. That is what 560mg a week so you could run it for 12 weeks and compare to what you would have gotten off of a 5-600mg test run, or even tren if you have a somewhat solo cycle of tren to compare it too. Either way, when it comes to test, other than water weight gain that will fall off post cycle I bet you grow more actual LBM on the Var cycle. Will be fun to watch either way.
If I am wrong that is cool too because then I learned something as well. Me personally I respond better to Var, and grow more with it on a mg per mg basis while keeping a cleaner look and benefiting my joints and connective tissue.
I know it was copied. The fact is that I've used anavar , anadrol, tren etc and it's not the same. I also don't know if you mean that androgenic ratio has nothing to do with growth cause that's just not true. Any compound with androgenic sides will create more mass and tren is a proof to that. I mean if you run them both and you see the difference do you then believe this one guy saying the opposite? I dare anyone to find a legit source showing that anavar is this strong. We have a study on rats? Actually find one person that used everything out there that will agree to this.
I don't mean to sound like an ******* but with your experience using aas I find it strange that you (potentially?) Buy in to this.
Var 50mg / day = 350, I ran that for 6 weeks and to be honest no oral will give that much more from week 4-6 and anavar didn't. I ran tren at 300 which is 50mg less, I got leaner and I gained 15 pounds more than with var. I also used var before the tren. I used anadrol at 50mg, I got leaner and bigger than with var, both also crushed the strength I got from var. Now you're telling me to buy this?