This thread wreeks of conspiracy, with zero credible substantiation. Here is a legitmate concern - just because something appears on a website, that doesn't make it factually correct.
Im not expert in foreign policy, but I am well versed in training and nutrition things. Specifically, I deal with the whys of each rather than the surface level.
I constantly face unsubstantiated dogma in this field - things that on a surface level appear correct but when you actually delve into it, the lines become blurred and what seems so, rarely is. It is also possible to look too deep into something that you miss the forest for the trees and often see correlations that don't exist.
I'm talking 'credible' websites and people spouting cr*p. I'm talking 'credible' people spouting cr*p. Why? Either they believe it to be themselves, or are simply feeding the biases of those they are talking too.
A lot of people are conformist and do not challenge the status quo, and on the other side some people try so hard to challenge that even the most obvious answer is never taken as correct. To them, it is always conspiracy.
In some cases the conspiracy is blinded by their own hatred of fact that they draw stupid conclusions. See flat earthers or believers in a 5,000 year old earth.
I've seen people make conspiracy or reinforce conspiracy because multiple people use the same phrase whivh coincides with their theory. This aligns with New World Order.
At the end of the day, you should not ever draw fact from one source or one alignment only. Their views can easily be twisted by their desire to challenge everything
. I'm not a dope either
