That's 2,17α-dimethyl-17β-hydroxy-5α-androst-2-eneIs that Mithras?
That's 2,17α-dimethyl-17β-hydroxy-5α-androst-2-eneIs that Mithras?
Its not Superdrol. Its just a DHEAderivatives blendAnyone know if Hi-Tech Pharmaceutical's Superdrol is any good? Is looks like a prop blend... Not sure if it's even superdrol...
Would this be something worth giving a try ?It's an alternative nomenclature for superdrol
Yes, if you are interested in using sd this was one of the original nomenclatures used so if the bottle is correct you should be using sd. Not sure of the age of your sd or even the brand, can only give you info based on the nomenclature.Would this be something worth giving a try ?
Thanks bro appreciate the info, it's from a trusted source for me I just don't know too well how to read the compoundsYes, if you are interested in using sd this was one of the original nomenclatures used so if the bottle is correct you should be using sd. Not sure of the age of your sd or even the brand, can only give you info based on the nomenclature.
Sorry I missed this bro. You spelled the tag wrong and I don't get notifications for this thread anymore for some reason. Sounds like Yatesy had you covered. SD! FTWI tried looking through for like 10 minutes but just can't find it View attachment 138083 jebook you got any idea what this is?
Have been reading the back of these bottles for yearsSad reading the list and just mentally striking through compounds that have gotten banned. Is there a trick for reading chemical formulas? I mean howd Yates know that was SD?
For some its just reading the names often in different nomenclatures, like Yates said.Sad reading the list and just mentally striking through compounds that have gotten banned. Is there a trick for reading chemical formulas? I mean howd Yates know that was SD?
No worries bro !Sorry I missed this bro. You spelled the tag wrong and I don't get notifications for this thread anymore for some reason. Sounds like Yatesy had you covered. SD! FTW
I've used that site before as reference but I don't believe one is allowed to link it according to forum rules. Might wanna consider deleting it before a mod does.
Like Yates said. Years of research and familiarity. Also, the quick and easy way is to type the nomenclature directly into a search engine and it usually will show you the correct associated common name.Sad reading the list and just mentally striking through compounds that have gotten banned. Is there a trick for reading chemical formulas? I mean howd Yates know that was SD?
This is what I'm learning more about everyday. At first it was just repetition and familiarity. Now I'm fascinated by the science. Wish I was this interested in high school chemistry. Lol. All I did was sleep. Anabolics by William Llewelyn and Julius Vida's Anabolics and Androgens are great resources to me for understanding chemical structures and mechanisms of action. Also, I use a host of sites as resources. If anyone ever wants any of this info they can feel free to PM me.For some its just reading the names often in different nomenclatures, like Yates said.
You could however learn the chemical nomenclature and build the structure based on the name and if you now know the structures of the common steroids is you will be able to iddntify most compounds.
It's probably a good thing I don't have more knowledge about chemistry than I do lest my bathroom be turned into my "lab".Anabolics make me want to take college chemistry, but then I think about organic Chem....
Maybe I should drop exercise science and become a chemist for undisclosed reasons.It's probably a good thing I don't have more knowledge about chemistry than I do lest my bathroom be turned into my "lab".
College Chem blew(Wasn't difficult, just boring), you aren't going to learn this kind of stuff or else I would've enjoyed it more! It's just covering basics, no crazy compounds.Anabolics make me want to take college chemistry, but then I think about organic Chem....
It's pretty easy, I mean to understand, producing is on its own level. Rocket science is easier then producing imoI also only have the total basics down. Since you have to take a chemistry course while studying biology.
Well I forgot a big part again, but it really helps me out sometimes
Sign me up! I'd pay 2k in a heart beat for that class no questions askedCollege Chem blew(Wasn't difficult, just boring), you aren't going to learn this kind of stuff or else I would've enjoyed it more! It's just covering basics, no crazy compounds.
Need Steriod Chemistry 101, I would take that in a heart beat!
End year project: Self administered steroids and results lol!
Haven't used it but 100-120 mg is the most common dosage that I usually see.Only had 1 experience with max lmg and it was stacked at a low dose. Wondering how people felt about it at 75-100 mg?
The more the better if you're experienced. It's a non methyl so you can really crank up the dose if you want.Only had 1 experience with max lmg and it was stacked at a low dose. Wondering how people felt about it at 75-100 mg?
I ran IBE Max LMG and was honestly not too stoked with the results. I stacked 100mg per day with epistane. I expected more in the size department but was impressed with th strength gains of that combo and it was very well tolerated.Only had 1 experience with max lmg and it was stacked at a low dose. Wondering how people felt about it at 75-100 mg?
I feel like I'm committing sacrilege to add to Yates, but beware cranking LMG up. It's a progestin, so beware of prolactin-related sides. SNS Inhibit-P is an excellent natural prolactin control, but always keep Prami on hand for flare ups. Better safe than lactating!!The more the better if you're experienced. It's a non methyl so you can really crank up the dose if you want.
Good call, prolactin can definitely be an issue. Usually if estrogen is controlled prolactin will stay in line as well but leaky nips are definitely still a possibility.I feel like I'm committing sacrilege to add to Yates, but beware cranking LMG up. It's a progestin, so beware of prolactin-related sides. SNS Inhibit-P is an excellent natural prolactin control, but always keep Prami on hand for flare ups. Better safe than lactating!!
They are two different monsters.Is there a dosing equivalency between OL THE1 and OL Sup3r-Epi? I noticed the1 is dosed in 25mgs... Would 100mgs be comparable to 1000mgs of Epi? Also, what's the difference between DHT and Stano?
Epiandro actually converts to DHT via a 2 step conversion where the 1 is a DHT derivative, it is methylated and doesn't have a conversion to dht. Both are dry and are feel good compounds but the 1 is going to be a lot stronger.Is there a dosing equivalency between OL THE1 and OL Sup3r-Epi? I noticed the1 is dosed in 25mgs... Would 100mgs be comparable to 1000mgs of Epi? Also, what's the difference between DHT and Stano?
Not injecting frag yet, cut will start after my injury is healed in about 2 weeks.I'd start a threat in it so people can find the information more easily. It will help more people then. Short answer is not the best combo if you're already injecting the frag.
Mk677 works synergistically with peptides from what I've seen. Specifically with cjcNot injecting frag yet, cut will start after my injury is healed in about 2 weeks.
This is what I have on hand to use, the MK must go, have it stashed for almost a year now. Plan is a short drastic cut,
Lyle McDonald style.
The whole cycle would look like this:
1-6 Test-E 500mg (250mg 2x week) IM
1-6 Ostarine 25mg/day
1-6 Fragment 176-191 / 2 x 250mcg per day (one pre workout/cardio / one before bed) SC
1-6 MK-677 (upping to 30mg/day)
1-6 50mg TD Trest pre- workout
1-6 DMAA + Ephedra
1-6 exemestane/adex (when necessary EOD)
Support:
Vitamins
Fish oil
Saw Palmetto
Huperzine-a
My question is not if there are better fat burning stacks out there, lol, I know there are, the question is: Would the use of MK-677 be detrimental to -or would it be synergistic with the peptide? (Besides of the hunger you get when on MK, of course...not ideal in a cut).
Good advise, will consider it for my next cut, don't have said peptides on hand right now.It is absolutely synergistic, but I was saying that there would be other inexpensive things to stack with it which would be more effective for a cut since frag has to be injected anyway. I'd personally stack the frag with both mod GRF 1-29 (essentially short acting CJC. You want pulses of GH in the male body, not a steady increase like the CJC) and ipamorelin for a cut. GHRP2 and 6 affect cortisol and appetite respectively, not ideal for a cut. This avoids the hunger issue with MK for your cut. Then when you bulk, run your MK and mod GRF with some GHRP6 and your appetite will be insane so you can gain mass up more easily.
I'm sure I can make dat happen cap'n.Jebrook it's been a long time since the OP was updated, but I'm seeing 1-testosterone/dihydroboldenone around and there's also some YouTubers talking about it. Therefore, I'd consider it relevant to add this compound as a designer steroid as that's how it was introduced to market. What say you, sir?
I dont know if you have gathered any new information on Methyldiazirinol, but I will be running it soon and would love to see some more info on it. There doesn't seem to be much out there besides low doses (35-45/day) and people rarely report effects that make it stand out. I was advised to run it with my recomp cycle by someone with years of experience both personal and with clients so I am pretty set on my choice but having some more info on what to expect and how to maximize profit would be nice!I'm sure I can make dat happen cap'n.
I should make sure all the new andros are on there as well.
You could update with what's still available in the UK... Thanks!!I'm sure I can make dat happen cap'n.
I should make sure all the new andros are on there as well.
I only ran it stacked with Dimethandrostenol, but I'm sure the Methyldiazirinol was what made my muscles look absolutely full and defined. Ran it up till 80mg and I think without something else there should be the sweet spot. Stacked that was too much however. It's a great compound especially for the look on cycle.I dont know if you have gathered any new information on Methyldiazirinol, but I will be running it soon and would love to see some more info on it. There doesn't seem to be much out there besides low doses (35-45/day) and people rarely report effects that make it stand out. I was advised to run it with my recomp cycle by someone with years of experience both personal and with clients so I am pretty set on my choice but having some more info on what to expect and how to maximize profit would be nice!
Triumph toxicity is very minimal.Did you notice any signs of toxicity? Anything worth mentioning? I will be running it alongside TD test, TD bold and, after assessing the 1rst week, a hefty dose of epiandro (750-1000mg/day which is still relatively mild). I will be running it for 6 weeks and the whole cycle will last 11-12 total.
Thats what I like to hear! I am still running an almost overkill cycle support since im looking at 4 different compounds all at mid to high doses. They are all really mild on the side effects department but 4 is still 4 haha.Triumph toxicity is very minimal.
Both of those are dht based so you could run into some low estrogen issues. Not the best combo imo.Yeah, I would only run 1 methyl at a time unless it was something like methyldiazirinol and epistane, but then again theyd be both low dosage. Well, it seems like I will be one of the first if not the first to log test+bold+triumph+epiandro. Stay tuned for my log if you are interested!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Higher dosing while on trt | Anabolics | 16 | ||
Heavy R-Andro dosing | Anabolics | 32 | ||
Nandrolone Deca dosing protocol | Cycle Logs | 9 | ||
Superdrol dosing | Anabolics | 37 | ||
Official Evomuse Product Dosing Guide | Evomuse | 8 |