Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Who takes oral dianabol often???

hove131

Member
I'm wanting to get some more info on this matter and discuss a few things in some PM's that I would rather not bring up on the forum.


Thanks Eric
 
ask it here in the forum. other than sourcing, its all fair game. That way other people who search for dianabol later can get their questions answered too. Thats the point of the forum.
 
I really hope you are kidding...
 
*whew* :D
 
just sayin, there's a lot of crazy sh*t i've been hearing about since my return... some of it just makes me go "wtf" and shake my head in disbelief.

ManBeast
 
Ok ok im looking for a legitimate source. Just coming off epi and want to try some dbol on my next bulk. There I said it :)
 
really? try reading the stickies and #1 in particular for f*ck's sake...
Invalid Link Removed

ManBeast
 
Hey loco that was a vein I hit the other day twice! Haha as u said!my tans wear off abit n i can see more veins n gee there's a heap there ha n where the pin marks r is straight bang on the vein ha ha u wer on it bro!cheers
 
skindog101 said:
Hey loco that was a vein I hit the other day twice! Haha as u said!my tans wear off abit n i can see more veins n gee there's a heap there ha n where the pin marks r is straight bang on the vein ha ha u wer on it bro!cheers

Hahaha!!! Always draw back before plunging,,,, lol
 
ISU152 said:
My 17th birthday is next week and im thinking about starting a 12 week cylce of test cyp. Go big or go home!!!!

:naughty:

Lmao,,, guess you decided you don't want to grow any taller, also that you've given up on your nuts having a future,,, LMAO!!! At your age a high calorie, high protein diet coupled with heavy lifting will get you a hell of a lot farther!! Hate to be you
 
skindog101 said:
Hey loco that was a vein I hit the other day twice! Haha as u said!my tans wear off abit n i can see more veins n gee there's a heap there ha n where the pin marks r is straight bang on the vein ha ha u wer on it bro!cheers

I always pin the outside of my thigh above nut height,, never have a problem
 
skindog101 said:
Really that high?like near just down from ur hip?iv been doing like middle thigh on top?(quad)

Yep,, higher up on the outside of it,,, seems to hurt the least there as well
 
Lmao,,, guess you decided you don't want to grow any taller, also that you've given up on your nuts having a future,,, LMAO!!! At your age a high calorie, high protein diet coupled with heavy lifting will get you a hell of a lot farther!! Hate to be you

I wish you could hear sarcasm over the interweb haha
 
i knew it, man, people have balls, or something, (no shame?) to ask for source info, pm or w/e. i just put in the leg work myself to find a legit source.

it's like a bum asking for money who is perfectly capable of working himself....
 
good post what an idiot coming on here asking for methandrostenolone.
i knew it, man, people have balls, or something, (no shame?) to ask for source info, pm or w/e. i just put in the leg work myself to find a legit source.

it's like a bum asking for money who is perfectly capable of working himself....
 
This tread has run off topic a lil bit. Agreed about pinning higher on outside of quad. Ive never had a painful inject there. Its there or in my *******....Its a fetish! JK
 
You shouldn't even be asking in PMs, this is not a sourcing board.
 
evodrag said:
This tread has run off topic a lil bit. Agreed about pinning higher on outside of quad. Ive never had a painful inject there. Its there or in my *******....Its a fetish! JK

yea, so stay on topic, this isn't the topic^
 
I knew I would get flamed but its all good because I got the help I was looking for. Carry on now ;)
 
the world is full of kind hearted people willing to help out the less intelligent.

statistically, it is less probable that a more intelligent person would need the help of the lesser.

also, i think intelligence is hierarchic, in that it would be rare that two people have exactly the same intelligence, meaning, invariably, your aforementioned phenomenon will ensue .

I always have found it funny that those supposedly believing in evolution, and by extension, darwin's concept of ''survival of the fittest'', are the first ones to push social programs looking after the weak and unintelligent/lazy/etc, and making sure that they survive.

the hypocrisy knows no bound. Or, maybe, it's just plain ol' delusion.
 
uh, okay. (too much waky tobacky?) i was just saying somone who doesn't have the motivation, or ability, w/e to learn for themselves is less intelligent than someone who does. (intelligence: the ability (or capacity) to learn.)
 
Just throwing this out there but I researched for awhile. I found some decent looking sources but I don't like taking chances with my money so I figured what would it hurt to ask around on here without actually coming out and asking. I'm not dumb or ignorant in anyway and I heavily research everything I do. I always have. This sort of thing is hit and miss so i didn't want to risk anything or learn a hard lesson like I'm sure many of you have on here. I do appreciate the help I have received thus far. Thanks again.


Eric
 
uh, okay. (too much waky tobacky?) i was just saying somone who doesn't have the motivation, or ability, w/e to learn for themselves is less intelligent than someone who does. (intelligence: the ability (or capacity) to learn.)

you actually took the time to include such a useless edit as '( too much waky tobacky)'?

thats funny.

not so much the parenthetical phrase,but, the inclusion of the edit,itself. Truthfully, i would love to have access to wacky tobacky,but, due to the fact that i don't like travelling with marijuana, because of it's possible consequences to financial aid, and the ramifications to my study habits, I do not partake.

you understand the tone all wrong,though. I didn't mean that you were a liberal( who knows you might be). It was merely an analysis of the ridiculous social construct I was reminded of by your post.

The first paragraph was actually a joke ( the one about the hierarchy of individual's intelligence). '' Big Bang Theory'' it a favorite show of mine, and I guess it was Sheldoneque for me to include such a critique .
 
statistically, it is less probable that a more intelligent person would need the help of the lesser.

also, i think intelligence is hierarchic, in that it would be rare that two people have exactly the same intelligence, meaning, invariably, your aforementioned phenomenon will ensue .

I always have found it funny that those supposedly believing in evolution, and by extension, darwin's concept of ''survival of the fittest'', are the first ones to push social programs looking after the weak and unintelligent/lazy/etc, and making sure that they survive.

the hypocrisy knows no bound. Or, maybe, it's just plain ol' delusion.

comically, I don't particularly believe in evolution how its portrayed - not because of religious beliefs, but mostly because evolution doesn't answer how life started from non-life even if it is a potential answer for what happened after that. Not like creationism sounds more realistic either (less so if anything) so i'm stuck at not having much belief in the area at all. Sort of like an evolutionary/creationism agnostic :)

At the same time, I don't believe in social welfare programs at all.
 
statistically, it is less probable that a more intelligent person would need the help of the lesser.

also, i think intelligence is hierarchic, in that it would be rare that two people have exactly the same intelligence, meaning, invariably, your aforementioned phenomenon will ensue .

I always have found it funny that those supposedly believing in evolution, and by extension, darwin's concept of ''survival of the fittest'', are the first ones to push social programs looking after the weak and unintelligent/lazy/etc, and making sure that they survive.

the hypocrisy knows no bound. Or, maybe, it's just plain ol' delusion.

:confused:
 
Back
Top