Is that all you have, just knock on my intelligence as your way of winning a debate?
I show you military admitting they are helping the locals grow poppy and you want to knock everything as some crazy "wikipedia" or "youtube" evidence.
Now, Geneva convention...you support it yet you dont believe or dont know it because you dont think Bin Laden should have a right to a fair trial.
Again...
Geneva Conventions
Grave breaches
"willfully depriving someone of the right to a fair trial"
Now address the issue here instead of hiding behind a rock by trying to insult my intelligence.
More breaches:
"willful killing, torture or inhumane treatment, including biological experiments"
(Military assassinations of un-armed enemies, torture of multiple enemies held in prisons, using plutonium waste as base tips of some ammunition)
"willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health"
(Military's torture on enemies and innocent civilians, slaughtering innocent people, etc...)
"willfully depriving someone of the right to a fair trial"
(Felt like throwing this in for a 3rd time)
"extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly"
(The Afgan war was started on a false flag attack on America, Iraq was based of lies of WMD's, Lybia wasnt even a threat, on and on....)
"unlawful deportation, transfer, or confinement."
(Guantanamo base, I can get many examples)
Now, I can start showing supporting evidence for all of the above of the governments criminal activities for the past 50 years to start violating multiple policies...I have all day.