Trauma1
Legend
Hey man I like your style. "Have a good day as well". lol. very cooth and Christ-like. Two thumbs up for you.
Thank you.
Hey man I like your style. "Have a good day as well". lol. very cooth and Christ-like. Two thumbs up for you.
According to someone with the initials PA (im sure we all know who that is)....when asked directly...if you could minimally raise test levels and minimally lower cortisol levels would it have ANY direct benefit to the BB community (graphs presented shown - which were deemed meaningless since levels are represented by unknown constants) . Totally ignoring the GH claims - because ANYONE knows the oral route for GH is a total bust and useless. His answer re: ANY benefit - " NO appreciable benefit whatsoever that i can see" . Who would you believe ? Why would he lie? I think his opinion is pretty well respected...dont you ? I rest my case.
Oh and btw Trauma - as far as an intelligent conversation - you lowered yourself to insults and neg 9000 points - all that BS....not me. You tired to take this to a lower place IMO ....i refused to go there. My opinion ..pretty clear - i would not use this product. People can make their own decision (hell if the want to ignore my words ind input - thats one thing- if they want to ignore one of the most respected scientific minds in the supplement industry ever ...hmm that may not be prudent)
Have a good day gentlemen.
Your delusional proclamations and self-righteousness is getting really tired. If you really want to get into the science here, i have plenty of experienc in science/medicine/research myself (Certified Emeregency Nurse of 10 years), u?
Lets just say i have a few letters after my name and while i respect your nursing experience ..it doesnt compare to my education nor my occupation as far as science , research , and also pharmaceutical product development - so if u want to cross prverbial swords re: science...do so at your own peril ....and do so without personal insults ...something you have yet been able to do. Also be prepared to be made to look foolish when trying to defend indefensible positions.
For what it's worth, i met PA at the olympia last year. He is a nice guy, or at least it thought so. I do respect PA for what he does, but i certainly don't always agree with him either. He's one man with his opinion. We all know that science isn't based on one mans views/research/theories.
If we know science (you say you do but perhaps not)....true science..its based on fact....not opinion ...your products may be based on biased opinion and trumped up theory ...but in real science its all about facts ...and real studies and proof....testing, trials ...etc.... However certain peoples opinions definitely resonate as pioneers and industry leaders ..PA is one of them the fact that people here have the audacity to compare their own opinions to his is laughable!
You have your opinions, so be it; i can respect that, but to come in here and think that your arguements have been substantiated in anyway is surely an oversight. I see alot of hearsay and speculation myself.
Have a good day as well.
Show me proof ? Show me labwork ? Explain the mechanism of action as to how this slight increase in test and slight lowering or cortisol will make one damn bit of difference ....SHOW me? NOT BS studies ....show me real world applicable studies that suit our purposes. Real levels (not trumped up numbers that are meaningless..just to show a constatnt wtf is that?) ...that make a difference ...Not trumped up logs and BS biased claims by those with vested interests ...you know the mods here *L* Fact is you cant..if you could you would..but you cant....bottom line....
What you can do its try to take this study and that study and infer that it means this product will work when the fact is control groups parameters ...etc are so diff it is meaningless...... and the product IMO is worthless....
Lets just say i have a few letters after my name and while i respect your nursing experience ..it doesnt compare to my education nor my occupation as far as science , research , and also pharmaceutical product development - so if u want to cross prverbial swords re: science...do so at your own peril ....and do so without personal insults ...something you have yet been able to do. Also be prepared to be made to look foolish when trying to defend indefensible positions.
If you are talking about (PA) Patrick Arnold then no his opinion is not well respected and yes, he does have reason to skew the truth. He is a competitor who thrives off debate and tearing things down… and personally, I think he has a man crush on me >
Yeah uh ok ...not respected...right *L* lets try to sell that one ...... As far as man crush etc ..i'll leave the homosexual references to you OK ?
Invalid Link Removed
Besides, he is wrong. Alpha-GPC does have a proven effect on GH levels, and it shows a benefit after a single oral dose in the studies I posted. And improving the cortisol:testosterone ratio will reduce muscle soreness, improve recovery and ultimately allow you to make gains faster in the gym.
Take that Tim Ziegenfuss BS and try to peddle it elsewhere. For how long are these supposed increases? And isnt it true that increases are noted primarily in those over 65? (pubmed 1992 - not some biases in the supp companies back pocket sell out like Ziegenfuss.)
-Eric
I love the indirect sarcasm, yet i'm the one with insults, right? I ASK LEGIT QUESTIONS....IF YOU INRTERPRTET SARCASM PERHAPS ITS BECAUSE YOU CAN NOT OR WILL NOT ANSWER THEM ...YOU ON THE OTHER HAND...JUST RESORT TO INSULTS...NICE..SAYS A LOT IN MY OPINION ..ABOUT YOU ..AND YOUR PRODUCTSo - what are these supposed "letters" after your name? If your demonstrated english skills are any indication of you education level, this should be pretty entertaining. *l*
Oh my more insults....so whatever you awnt ..the facts are as i stated...im refraining from insulting someone in your profession at the moment re: scientific knowledge...you see i will not stoop to your level :usa1:
This is freakin' priceless!
In all seriousness, you're one delusional individual. :wave2:
Yeah but how about answering the questions? *L*
Originally Posted by Trauma1
I love the indirect sarcasm, yet i'm the one with insults, right?
I ASK LEGIT QUESTIONS....IF YOU INRTERPRTET SARCASM PERHAPS ITS BECAUSE YOU CAN NOT OR WILL NOT ANSWER THEM ...YOU ON THE OTHER HAND...JUST RESORT TO INSULTS...NICE..SAYS A LOT IN MY OPINION ..ABOUT YOU ..AND YOUR PRODUCT
So - what are these supposed "letters" after your name? If your demonstrated english skills are any indication of you education level, this should be pretty entertaining. *l*
Oh my more insults....so whatever you awnt ..the facts are as i stated...im refraining from insulting someone in your profession at the moment re: scientific knowledge...you see i will not stoop to your level
Show me proof ? Show me labwork ? Explain the mechanism of action as to how this slight increase in test and slight lowering or cortisol will make one damn bit of difference ....SHOW me? NOT BS studies ....show me real world applicable studies that suit our purposes. Real levels (not trumped up numbers that are meaningless..just to show a constatnt wtf is that?) ...that make a difference ...Not trumped up logs and BS biased claims by those with vested interests ...you know the mods here *L* Fact is you cant..if you could you would..but you cant....bottom line....
What you can do its try to take this study and that study and infer that it means this product will work when the fact is control groups parameters ...etc are so diff it is meaningless...... and the product IMO is worthless....
Only 3 more days to take part in our Invalid Link Removed
sale, gentlemen! Make sure to use the coupon code: MAXRECOVERY when purchasing to get it for only $86.95.
EndoAmp Max is part of this stack, so it's never been a better time to try it! If you have any questions, i'm here to assist.
Proof? Labwork?
^^^ *L* more zigenfuss BS (already stated whos pocket he's in ) - of course here we go with the bogus non applicable studies : potentially if we over train ...or are marathon runners of all things , or golfers . How about comparison on muscle recovery to those that didnt supplement with it..not studies that state potentially it may help. Why dont you commission studies ? Serious honest studies..that show true levels of test increase and cortisol decrease (god knows why you want to mess with that imo anyway) and then compare to control group then actually show a benefit..not take non specific general studies..that do NOT directly apply ...distort them ...counting on people buying into them because they either want too or cannot correctly interpret them ... and misrepresent these claims u make as factual ...its BS..it wrong .....its a legal scam....and you should be ashamed.....
PS oh then lets factor in some of the best minds in the industry saying it would be useless..... i mean surely he doesnt wan tto make people in the industry look like a total sham? right? i mean that wouldnt be smart.... The reason he has lost some repect from manufacturers etc..is because he speks the truth..jujst like in this case...and it hurtsa their sales of their rip off products
Could I take extra alpha GPC in the morning. I have bulk alpha GPC comming in the mail than post workout take endoamp than have my post workout shake 15 minutes later.
Yeah. I don’t see why not.
-Eric
I did that once with my peptides and made my hand swollen. I think the effect of the alpha gpc amplified the effects of my peptides. Do you know any thing about that? ALso I am taking soy lecthine morning and night.
Yawn - i reiterate...why would you mess with this hormone?
Cortisol is very important for keeping humans alive. Cortisol is responsible for maintaining our ability to process sugars, maintain our blood pressure and react to stress and illness. Cortisol helps the body respond to stress. During times of stress, cortisol levels
increase and accelerate the breakdown of proteins to provide the fuel to maintain body functions. It acts as a physiological antagonist to insulin by promoting breakdown of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins and so mobilizing energy reserves. In addition, immune and inflammatory cells have their responses to stress attenuated by cortisol. Cortisol is known to stimulate gluconeogenesis (creation of glucose) to ensure an adequate fuel supply. It also makes fatty acids available for metabolic use. It increases mobilization of free fatty acids, making them a more available energy source, and decreases glucose utilization, sparing it for the brain. Cortisol also acts as an anti-inflamatory agent. It depresses immune reactions, and increases the vasoconstriction caused by epinephrine.
BTW - if you read the above carefully most of the benfits of cortisol are essetail for our purposes...essential... the body will easily keep cortisol below catabolic levels for any harmful length of time... regardless of stress applied as long as the nutrient i talked about above are present.
Oh and if these "manufacturers" are going to say its lower but still within theraputic levels...lets hear what those levels are...lets see the lab work proving that. How about it guys? BTW what EXACTLY is therapeutic levels of a hormone that our body regularly fluxates levels of to create homeostasis and protect our own well being in fact potentially save our lives!! (not an exaggeration) Just wondering?????
That short spike in cortisol and reduction in testosterone was just from a single moderately intense bicycle ride after a week of rest… which is probably much less exercise than the average weight trainer or athlete is doing.*L* and the 20 mins of elevated coritsol in detrimental to us? Are you serious?
*L* and the 20 mins of elevated coritsol in detrimental to us? Are you serious? hell thats PROBABLY when your blood pressure needs regulating the most....which as you know...cortisol also plays an essential role in. Eric....im sorry - it really isnt personal. At least you handle yourself with a modicum of respect ...but the product for all intensive purposes..is useless IMO ...i have pointed out every reason for that. The levels you indicate will not make one damn bit of difference...you may even know that but just cant say it...i understand that. My opinion is a shared one....people will do what they are going to do....why not direct your efforts to more promising areas of R&D ..areas that will yield legitimate results and true benefits? They do still exist and are unexplored. Do it right...do appropriate testing...disassociate yourself from supp whore scientists and their studies. Be nice to see a supp company take the high road..so few do.....
I'm very interested to hear where you're getting 20 minutes from? Did you even look at the graph? :dunno:
If you'd truly like to get into the hemodynamic factors of blood pressure regulation, i'll gladly pull up some factual info dealing with the quite dynamic physiology for you. You'll quickly learn that cortisol is ONE of MANY factors that contribute to its regulation. I'll gladly get into how our body provides many different compensatory mechanisms for any given situation it can be put into when dealing with both exogenous and endogenous factors. Shall we drag some pathophysiology in here while we're at it as well? Why you keep bringing this up like you're making some type of novel or substantial point to verify your claims is beyond me.
The intents and purposes of many of these studies is to demonstrate the effects of cortisol s/p resistance training. Prolonged or frequent erratic spikes in cortisol are NOT desireable or conducive to muscle gains (in which the pathway has already been outlined many times). We're not trying to advocate the mitigation of cortisol levels outside the normal range. THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF ANY OF THESE STUDIES! We're looking to demonstrate the CONTROL of erratic cortisol fluctuations which can and will help to build a hormonal environment more suitable for an effective recovery period and muscle retention. I'm seriously convinced based on your demonstrated delusional logic that you don't have a clue as to the physiology, pathophysiology, or effects of cortisol to begin with.
Oh and for future reference......it's "For all intents and purposes", not as it's frequently corrupted: "For all intensive purposes".![]()
The point isnt blood pressure - thats just one example where cortisol exerts it ESSENTIAL effects. . The point is cortisol and the effects it exerts that are necessary for proper bodily function. I get 20 mins b/c as you pointed out int is the "spike" you are (unnecessarily) concerned with..im sure u can read the graph ..in the placebo that spike lasts 20 mins! To suggest eliminating that is beneficial , considering all the vital factors cortisol exerts on the body is laughable. Here - perhaps you should have read this the first 2 times i posted it :
Cortisol is very important for keeping humans alive. Cortisol is responsible for maintaining our ability to process sugars, maintain our blood pressure and react to stress and illness. Cortisol helps the body respond to stress. During times of stress, cortisol levels
increase and accelerate the breakdown of proteins to provide the fuel to maintain body functions. It acts as a physiological antagonist to insulin by promoting breakdown of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins and so mobilizing energy reserves. In addition, immune and inflammatory cells have their responses to stress attenuated by cortisol. Cortisol is known to stimulate gluconeogenesis (creation of glucose) to ensure an adequate fuel supply. It also makes fatty acids available for metabolic use. It increases mobilization of free fatty acids, making them a more available energy source, and decreases glucose utilization, sparing it for the brain. Cortisol also acts as an anti-inflamatory agent. It depresses immune reactions, and increases the vasoconstriction caused by epinephrine.
BTW - if you read the above carefully most of the benefits of cortisol are essential for our purposes...essential... the body will easily keep cortisol below catabolic levels for any harmful length of time... regardless of stress applied as long as the nutrient i talked about above are present.
And again ill ask ..how do you determine therapeutic levels of a hormone our body releases levels of based uopn it needs to control vital bodily functions? Can either one of you PLEASE give a straight answer to a direct question????? Apparently not ... Then again you cant defend an indefensible position....
The point isnt blood pressure - thats just one example where cortisol exerts it ESSENTIAL effects. . The point is cortisol and the effects it exerts that are necessary for proper bodily function. I get 20 mins b/c as you pointed out int is the "spike" you are (unnecessarily) concerned with..im sure u can read the graph ..in the placebo that spike lasts 20 mins! To suggest eliminating that is beneficial , considering all the vital factors cortisol exerts on the body is laughable. Here - perhaps you should have read this the first 2 times i posted it
Cortisol is very important for keeping humans alive. Cortisol is responsible for maintaining our ability to process sugars, maintain our blood pressure and react to stress and illness. Cortisol helps the body respond to stress. During times of stress, cortisol levels
increase and accelerate the breakdown of proteins to provide the fuel to maintain body functions. It acts as a physiological antagonist to insulin by promoting breakdown of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins and so mobilizing energy reserves. In addition, immune and inflammatory cells have their responses to stress attenuated by cortisol. Cortisol is known to stimulate gluconeogenesis (creation of glucose) to ensure an adequate fuel supply. It also makes fatty acids available for metabolic use. It increases mobilization of free fatty acids, making them a more available energy source, and decreases glucose utilization, sparing it for the brain. Cortisol also acts as an anti-inflamatory agent. It depresses immune reactions, and increases the vasoconstriction caused by epinephrine.
BTW - if you read the above carefully most of the benefits of cortisol are essential for our purposes...essential... the body will easily keep cortisol below catabolic levels for any harmful length of time... regardless of stress applied as long as the nutrient i talked about above are present.
And again ill ask ..how do you determine therapeutic levels of a hormone our body releases levels of based uopn it needs to control vital bodily functions? Can either one of you PLEASE give a straight answer to a direct question?????
20-30 ug/dl would be considered the lower level of a healthy range of cortisol (enough for glucose management and anti-inflammatory effects), while 80-90 ug/dl would be indicative of high cortisol from excessive physical or mental stress or insufficient nutrition.
Then again you cant defend an indefensible position....
I am skeptical as well. I haven't looked through the references in detail but as a gut reaction I think this is heavy over-sell.
What you've got is an choligenic (I can never spell that would correctly) agent and modified serine. GPC is a well know choligenic agent.
Both GPC and serine are nootropic agents really. GPC looks cool nootropic stuff; in terms of getting neurones whizzing that should do it. Phosphatidylserine has never really been linked to nootropic effects but is suspected.
To go on to say that'll (GPC) shift HG production is a big claim. I am not going to advocate using HGH directly - but that would sure increase HG!
In terms of phosphatidylserine shifting cortisol ... I really doubt that. In terms of supporting testosterone well perhaps but so do a lot of things.
If you really want to discuss this scientifically okay.... but you'll need to know your facts and not just waft references about.
^^^ oh where to begin. Well blood pressure was brought up as an example because as ive said it is something cortisol is essential in regulating during times of stress. In addition to ALL the other factors its essential to ive pointed out in my posts. I can read the graph ...perhaps you and eric should get on the same page peddling your product..i mean HE said its the spike in cortisoil levels we need be concerned with..and that "spike" lasts a whopping 20 mins. Baseline cortisol levels are elevated during times of stress FOR A REASON - and many effects of this are beneficial to us ...not detrimental ..as anyone who read my post re: effects of cortisol could understand. You can come at me with statements of not understanding anatomy and physiology etc. Which is laughable...my understanding of these topics and all others associated with this conversation dwarf yours with your nursing (and again i respect the profession - i do - no sarcasm there) and internet knowledge - thats for sure. As for your obvious ridiculous statement of cortisol constantly fluctuating ... no kidding ...it does so again FOR A REASON. The bottom line is ....your product, all factors equal , adequate diet rest and training ...is useless. Also it will in no way make up for a lack of any one of these 3 essential componnents. I know you cant say it..i know you need to defend it to the end. I even understand your need to get the last post in and try to create a positive spin for your ineffective product. Your condescending attitude makes me laugh a bit...and your innuendo and insults do as well. Also the "nursing knowledge" and BS study interpretations and "we can talk science" statements are laughable as well. We could talk TRUE science if you had any real studies ...on your product...done correctly....but you dont. Slight test increase for people who are not under therapeutic test levels (less than 1% of people on this board im sure - if that) = useless. External cortisol control attempts for same demographic(people here living this lifestyle) = useless and IMO not prudent(a shared opinion by many - some highly respected in this industry for their scientific minds and cutting edge innovation) . GH increase - well as stated = laughable - not nearly high enough of long enough in duration to do a damn thing. All in all your product fails on all three main claims AND to try and claim any synergistic benefits of these 3 minor changes ...well surely even you wouldnt try to go there. Why the hell would someone waste their money on a product that will not yield results ? Its senseless and a shame you guys wasted your time on this one. Hell all the effort & money could have been direct to a truly beneficial supplement and PROPER product R&D and TESTING that would yield RESULTS!
All in all your product fails on all three main claims AND to try and claim any synergistic benefits of these 3 minor changes ...well surely even you wouldnt try to go there. Why the hell would someone waste their money on a product that will not yield results ? Its senseless and a shame you guys wasted your time on this one. Hell all the effort & money could have been direct to a truly beneficial supplement and PROPER product R&D and TESTING that would yield RESULTS!
All in all your product fails on all three main claims AND to try and claim any synergistic benefits of these 3 minor changes ...well surely even you wouldnt try to go there.
Its senseless and a shame you guys wasted your time on this one.
You should look at the references in detail. There are almost a dozen human studies that have confirmed that PS mitigates the rise in cortisol from physical or mental stress. (I reference them in the ....EndoAmp Max write up[/URL])
The Alpha-GPC has research supporting its GH boosting effects, and a recent study that showed a 14% increase in bench press force after a single oral dose… possibly related to the GH boosting effects, possibly not. (The same 600mg dose included in EndoAmp Max)
-Eric
Effects of soy lecithin phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine complex (PAS) on the endocrine and psychological responses to mental stress.
Hellhammer J, Fries E, Buss C, Engert V, Tuch A, Rutenberg D, Hellhammer D.
Neuropattern, Trier, Germany. email address deleted.
Phosphatidylserine, derived from cow brains, has been shown previously to dampen the ACTH and cortisol response to physical stress. Further research investigated the influence of soy lecithin phosphatidylserine supplementation on mood and heart rate when faced with an acute stressor. In this study, we investigated the effects of soy lecithin phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine complex (PAS) supplementation on pituitary adrenal reactivity (ACTH, cortisol) and on the psychological response (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory stress subscale) to a mental and emotional stressor. Four groups of 20 subjects were treated for three weeks with daily dosages of either 400 mg PAS, 600 mg PAS, 800 mg PAS, or placebo before exposure to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Treatment with 400 mg PAS resulted in a pronounced blunting of both serum ACTH and cortisol, and salivary cortisol responses to the TSST, but did not affect heart rate. The effect was not seen with larger doses of PAS. With regard to the psychological response, 400 mg PAS seemed to exert a specific positive effect on emotional responses to the TSST. While the placebo group showed the expected increase in distress after the test, the group treated with 400 mg PAS showed decreased distress. These data provide initial evidence for a selective stress dampening effect of PAS on the pituitary-adrenal axis, suggesting the potential of PAS in the treatment of stress related disorders.
Okay I'll take this one as a benchmark...
Stress. 2004;7:119–126
Okay here is the full abstract:
First thing to note is that the effect is not dose dependent. 400mg is as effective as 800mg.
Second thing to note... it is not statistically significant!
"Pronounced" does not mean statistically significant. Thus basically the sample size is too small to draw any significant conclusions.
What they are saying is that cortisol levels are controlled relating to a greater ability to tolerate "stress". The stress they were subjected to was the "Trier Social Stress Test" whatever that is - doesn't appear to be related to physical activity.
As a prelimenary trial it is interesting, as a cast-iron it is a long way from that. Of course statistical valid study - it isn't. If it was the abstract would say so.
I've not read the full paper - its just too much hassle going and collecting but I bet their stats are out. The other thing I don't like is their failure to reveal what the shift in cortisol is in the abstract - thats a bit weird. It should be stated.
So its interesting but nothing brilliant.
The produce itself 66grams for $55 - correct me if I'm wrong here. Its about 120 caps of PAS. That is more or less what I pay in the UK. Obviously it ain't just PAS but GPLC as well but it doesn't seem amazing value.
Really I don't have time to go through all the references but if you'd like to put up your strongest reference for PAS and for GPLC then I'd be happy to look at them.
PAS alone alot has been linked to it but nothing from my understanding seems to strongly stick. Again prove me wrong, put your best two references forward please.
Thats not a response... I only have time to go through 2 papers in detail. If the paper is good enough I'll get it and read it then send an objective opinion back. I'm not wading through 30 references - thats okay for your guys but this isn't my field.
Price EndoAmp Max okay I'll check the price. So it is $55 for 66g. So around $1 per g.
It would be useful if you could let me know exactly how much PAS and Alpha-GPC there is in the mix. Are there any bulking agents in it? There is a big issue about so called "bio-active" PAS and thats not cheap - thats what I use. I dunno what that really means though.
Okay I've read it. I don't have any problems give that this is a developing area of research.
The stats are okay, the ANOVA analysis really needed an Rmax calculation to check it was valid. Otherwise no complaints.
The sample size is SMALL. The basic conclusion is looks good, but it would need repeating with a bigger sample size.
Basically PAS is capping the cortisol response under INTENSIVE training (to exhaustion). So if thats your gym routine PAS is a good supplement. The paper is pretty well written and easy to read.
The proposed mechanism:
"PS plays a significant role in the maintenance of neuronal excitability and message transfer potentially resulting in a reduced need for adrenergic stimulation at moderate intensity exercise levels"
The increase in testo seemed okay but one of the stats wasn't significant. There was no significant increase in HGH.
Thanks do you have any similar paper on GPC?
As a quick read... the result do look significant for cortisol and testo. Not however for HGH.
Okay I read it. Small paper. The sample size was too small to be significant. Pity.
The PAS - cortisol link is strong and it looks (pretty much) like there is a link with testosterone. However these associations are for excercise till exhaustion. "bioactive" it must be though.
A-GPC as a cholinergenic agent should be good. As a means of increasing HGH - certainly the paper above was inconclusive. There could be better studies - the problem again was that there were not enough people in the study - actually if my memory serves me it was rats. I know nothing about rats but they seemed really old rats.
The price of the product has slightly decreased I think its now $52. My conclusion is for those 1 or 2wice a week work till you drop sessions - this looks good.
Okay I read it. Small paper. The sample size was too small to be significant. Pity.
The PAS - cortisol link is strong and it looks (pretty much) like there is a link with testosterone. However these associations are for excercise till exhaustion. "bioactive" it must be though.
A-GPC as a cholinergenic agent should be good. As a means of increasing HGH - certainly the paper above was inconclusive. There could be better studies - the problem again was that there were not enough people in the study - actually if my memory serves me it was rats. I know nothing about rats but they seemed really old rats.
The price of the product has slightly decreased I think its now $52. My conclusion is for those 1 or 2wice a week work till you drop sessions - this looks good.
The study was with humans.
As i said there isnt any single study that will "prove" anything, but a compilation of research that shows a strong corelation between PS/Alpha-GPC supporting GH & testosterone while keeping cortisol in check.
I know ChemiNutra has more studies planned for these nutrients. Heck, they just filed a patent on PS for its effects on testosterone...
-Eric
Funny.... indeed. I read so many papers I was getting them confused...
Getting humans confused with lab rats.... I wonder why?
Okay the result wasn't significant. Sample size was 7 ... low.
I disagree on the one study doesn't "prove" anything. The previous study here on PAS was statistically significant. There was no question that was a real result and it was pretty real even for testosterone as well. The question on that one study was to independently repeat it. Given all these studies use low sample sizes it was striking how significant the results were. It was pretty stunning actually.
A-GPC at a guess I'd say the effect is more marginal.