Ziquor
Well-known member
ah see I have come across early stuff![]()
Damn you Easy! You have hordes of all the best stuff. Good thing your not in the Pitt, PA area your house may have been raided by now...
ah see I have come across early stuff![]()
Damn you Easy! You have hordes of all the best stuff. Good thing your not in the Pitt, PA area your house may have been raided by now...![]()
Almost any pill / medication you take whether it's otc, prescription, steroid, whatever is going to cause some sorta stress on the liver though methyls usually cause more.
Doesn't matter what you've used & how much multiple methyls can be dangerous. In some cases harsh methyls had no adverse effects during a cycle or after for that matter but then have caused hard spots on the liver which turned into fatal cancer years down the road. Doesn't matter on your experience it matters how healthy you (or specifically your liver) are.
Damn you Easy! You have hordes of all the best stuff. Good thing your not in the Pitt, PA area your house may have been raided by now...![]()
Some ppl are ridiculous about the 20yr old on AAS thing. Its funny b/c as soon as they see you're "21", its okay. I'm not condoning AAS use at 20 21, 40, 80, whatever, just felt like stating that its funny how people get bent out of shape over that 1 yr, or less, difference.I have a Serm, Iv done cycles in the past and il do more.. Bottom line. Just never have had itchy nipps before.. I know im only 20, Iv done my homework.. You guys were my age once. Some of you can understand.
Well, 17a methyl groups on steroids cause more. Not just methyl groups in general. The liver likes to oxidize the 17b hydroxyl group into a ketone, but putting the 17a methyl group there protects the steroid from the oxidation and makes the livery go nutty.Almost any pill / medication you take whether it's otc, prescription, steroid, whatever is going to cause some sorta stress on the liver though methyls usually cause more.
Well, 17a methyl groups on steroids cause more. Not just methyl groups in general. The liver likes to oxidize the 17b hydroxyl group into a ketone, but putting the 17a methyl group there protects the steroid from the oxidation and makes the livery go nutty.
Lots of things have methyl groups on them, and, there isn't some direct link between methylation "in general" and harshness on the liver. But, again, there are liver issues associated with adding a methyl group to the 17a position on a steroid. If a methyl were added to any other carbon on the entire hormone, it would not have the same effect. I can't predict the effect it would have, if any, but it wouldn't be the same. There are two other methyl groups on all these hormones people are taking, do a google image search, but they're there on all the different AAS and aren't what causes the liver toxicity of the 17a methyls, which everyone just refers to as "methyls".
ZIQUOR: YOU GOT SOME GOOD INFO BEEN ON THIS SITE SINCE I HAVE BEEN IN IRAQ. I AM ALSO FROM PITT, PA. KEEP PUTTING OUT GOOD INFO. WE BE BACK IN THE STATES IN JULY FOR R/R. I'LL BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE(PROABALY JACKS). GO PENS.
Good observations. Tons of medications in general, besides steroids, have different methyl groups as well. However when there's a conversation in regards to hepatic toxicity and steroids I typically shortcut the conversation with the generic 'methyl' term assuming most understand the relevance of the 17a position.
To my limited knowledge of how steroids are metabolised in the liver, it's not the methy group that determines the toxicity but the enduring effect the steroid has upon repeated passes of the liver upon cholesterol and bile synthesis.
Repeated passes of methylated steroids affect cholestasis and gradually the cells of the liver become engorged with bile and unable to metabolise cholesterol.
This would explain why steroids with noted toxicity such as M-1T and superdrol adversely affect cholesterol to the extent that LDL is significantly increased and HDL is practically non-existent.
why would someone run 10 of each? I think it would be as 20 of phera hasn't been shown to be as toxic (from past blood works) as 20 mg of ss.Just a quick opinion on stacking methyls...
I don't think it's any more liver-toxic to stack 10mg Super + 10mg Phera than it is to just run 20mg Super.
If Phera is, in fact, less "toxic" than Super, then it would actually be safer to stack the 2 methyls @ 10mg each than to just run 20mg Super. So, basically, you're making my argument for me. Thanks.why would someone run 10 of each? I think it would be as 20 of phera hasn't been shown to be as toxic (from past blood works) as 20 mg of ss.
If Phera is, in fact, less "toxic" than Super, then it would actually be safer to stack the 2 methyls @ 10mg each than to just run 20mg Super. So, basically, you're making my argument for me. Thanks.
But I guess a better way to state my argument would be:
Assuming methylA is equal in toxicity to methlyB, stacking 10mg methlyA + 10mg methylB is no more or less toxic than running a solo cycle of 20mg of either methyl.
but whos to say phera toxity doesn't elevate when mixed with s-drol know what I mean. Not saying your not right but it's like with alchol you might like two shots of cognac or two shots of vodka but one shot of cognac and one shot of vodka can produce a totally different outcome.
That's basically what I was saying.but whos to say phera toxity doesn't elevate when mixed with s-drol know what I mean. Not saying your not right but it's like with alchol you might like two shots of cognac or two shots of vodka but one shot of cognac and one shot of vodka can produce a totally different outcome.
Well I tend to defer to Trauma1 on these type issues -- he's certainly more knowledgeable than me.
But I've definitely stacked methyls (these 2 methyls, in fact -- Super+Phera), with no horrible interactions. That's the reason (and the only reason) I'm unafraid of stacking methyls. Not exactly scientific reasoning, I understand.
I've actually been pretty good about running in to Kaiser to get semi-regular bloodwork. And even after stacking these 2 methyls (pulsed, which I think is important), my cholesterol levels have returned to baseline levels without difficulty. And my liver values have also been very resilient (remarkable, considering I'm very Irish and very fond of my whiskey -- even occasionally on-cycle, though in careful moderation).Without studies to back it, there really is no way to be certain for sure. I know you've been doing this for a bit now, so i'm interested to see the results.
Good luck bro, and i definitely encourage some follow-up bloodwork just to be safe.![]()
I've actually been pretty good about running in to Kaiser to get semi-regular bloodwork. And even after stacking these 2 methyls (pulsed, which I think is important), my cholesterol levels have returned to baseline levels without difficulty. And my liver values have also been very resilient (remarkable, considering I'm very Irish and very fond of my whiskey -- even occasionally on-cycle, though in careful moderation).
So far, it seems to work for me. But I can't guarantee (or recommend) this for everyone. Just be careful and observant, and get occasional bloodwork done.
sounds like you're getting through this nicely without much trouble. has your strength been any different stacking the two vs just doing a run of either or?I've actually been pretty good about running in to Kaiser to get semi-regular bloodwork. And even after stacking these 2 methyls (pulsed, which I think is important), my cholesterol levels have returned to baseline levels without difficulty. And my liver values have also been very resilient (remarkable, considering I'm very Irish and very fond of my whiskey -- even occasionally on-cycle, though in careful moderation).
So far, it seems to work for me. But I can't guarantee (or recommend) this for everyone. Just be careful and observant, and get occasional bloodwork done.
Straight SD is actually better for my strength than SD+PP. In fact, I've gone from solo SD to SD+PP (bridging to solo PP), and seen an immediate (though slight) drop in strength. But I do like the increased (though somewhat wet/smooth) mass that comes with PP.sounds like you're getting through this nicely without much trouble. has your strength been any different stacking the two vs just doing a run of either or?