Biden: Paying Higher Taxes is Patriotic

RobInKuwait

RobInKuwait

Registered User
Invalid Link Removed

Anyone know how government taking hard earned money from Americans by the point of a gun is Patriotic?
 
What an idiot.

Let me rephrase.


What a f u c k i n g idiot.
 
Yeah, that is a f*cking idiot......Democrats want more government, more socialism, more taxes, no guns for citizens.....hmmm...
 
Omen said:
Yeah, that is a f*cking idiot......Democrats want more government, more socialism, more taxes, no guns for citizens.....hmmm...
Click to expand...

...and we already established that you love guns!

EDIT: the only things Liberals are good for are porn, lowering age of consent, and legalizing drugs.
 
raginfcktard said:
...and we already established that you love guns!

EDIT: the only things Liberals are good for are porn, lowering age of consent, and legalizing drugs.
Click to expand...

Yes....yes....yes....I love guns....very much....New Israeli Galil style side folder AK 47 7.62 X39.....gonna buy it next month....no 3 day wait...I have my CWP! 6 30 round magazines....3000 rounds of ammo.......Sig 220 month after when I sell my P226 and 500 rounds free btw...:D.....

So I like lead propelling devices.....what's wrong with that???!!!! :fool2:

So we elect a liberal then hire someone to aim a lead propelling device at them after they lower the age of consent, legalize drugs and ugh...produce more porn?

Then we elect a Republican right? and not aim a lead propelling device at him this time!

Does that sound right?:woohoo:
 
very foolish comment, he could have gone about this better. The only good thing for him right now is that the Palin bubble has burst, and is deflating rapidly as the investigation of her and the "first dude" is getting more scrutinized
 
Reaper329 said:
very foolish comment, he could have gone about this better. The only good thing for him right now is that the Palin bubble has burst, and is deflating rapidly as the investigation of her and the "first dude" is getting more scrutinized
Click to expand...

I wish they'd just LOOK at Obama...they haven't even addressed Ayers that I know of.
 
Reaper329 said:
very foolish comment, he could have gone about this better. The only good thing for him right now is that the Palin bubble has burst, and is deflating rapidly as the investigation of her and the "first dude" is getting more scrutinized
Click to expand...


I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
 
J. Peterman said:
I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
Click to expand...

I was watching CNN yesterday (my gym had it on, no choice).

They're we're showing this BHO speech on the economy for like 20 minutes. The whole time, in one corner they had the closing dow showing +410.03 and in the bottom corner they had these happy traders.

Any guess what the CNN subliminal message in that segment was?
 
J. Peterman said:
I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
Click to expand...
Between this and the small business tax hike (again, as you said - if true) prospects for this election are dismal...the idea of voting that nut-tess so close to power is terrifying.
 
dsade said:
Between this and the small business tax hike (again, as you said - if true) prospects for this election are dismal...the idea of voting that nut-tess so close to power is terrifying.
Click to expand...

The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.
 
RobInKuwait said:
The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.
Click to expand...
I dont know if I necessarily agree. Considering the state of affairs in the economy at the moment.

Also, as we all know there are going to be a lot of good and bad days regardless of who is in office
 
J. Peterman said:
I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
Click to expand...
I think the numbers are agreeing with me at the moment. Her rating (approval or however it is termed) has dropped 8% points in one week. Obviously, that can and will change, but I am curious how trooper gate will affect her
 
Reaper329 said:
I think the numbers are agreeing with me at the moment. Her rating (approval or however it is termed) has dropped 8% points in one week. Obviously, that can and will change, but I am curious how trooper gate will affect her
Click to expand...


Actually, national polls as you agreed in the past, mean nothing. State polls do and at the moment they are closer than ever at any point in this election.
 
J. Peterman said:
Actually, national polls as you agreed in the past, mean nothing. State polls do and at the moment they are closer than ever at any point in this election.
Click to expand...
I agree, teh national polls mean nothing, but this was not an election poll per se. It was more of an approval poll. I believe there is a slight difference, although I could be wrong.

Also, in terms of state polls, they are very close in typical red states, which is not good for McCain.

North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio amongst others and also depending on source, florida.
Will they change again, most certainly. The debates will tell a lot
 
Peterman, I believe you predicted Biden would say all sorts of stupid stuff this election.

I have to concur... What a f u c k i n g idiot.
 
Reaper329 said:
I agree, teh national polls mean nothing, but this was not an election poll per se. It was more of an approval poll. I believe there is a slight difference, although I could be wrong.
Click to expand...

Which actually means even less in terms of who people will elect. Its basically asking, do you like them as a person.



Also, in terms of state polls, they are very close in typical red states, which is not good for McCain.

North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio amongst others and also depending on source, florida.
Will they change again, most certainly. The debates will tell a lot
Click to expand...

Actually, it is a positive as he was down in many of those swing states pre and post convention. He has closed the gap and basically made this race a dead heat which in this political environment, is a small miracle. Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.
 
J. Peterman said:
Which actually means even less in terms of who people will elect. Its basically asking, do you like them as a person.
Click to expand...
Sadly this worked in 2004 with Bush, many of those polled voted for him b/c they liked him. It is like Junior High all over again

J. Peterman said:
Actually, it is a positive as he was down in many of those swing states pre and post convention. He has closed the gap and basically made this race a dead heat which in this political environment, is a small miracle. Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.
Click to expand...
while I agree to an extent, if he (McCain) loses 1 of those states, he is done for. I still cant see him winning this. Although I do agree, if he does win, the dems heads will explode, but it will be their own fault
 
Reaper329 said:
Sadly this worked in 2004 with Bush, many of those polled voted for him b/c they liked him. It is like Junior High all over again
Click to expand...


I don't think Bush got elected in 2004 because of his approval rating...I think it had to do with John Kerry being a complete idiot.

The "security mom" didn't vote for him because they like him.

while I agree to an extent, if he (McCain) loses 1 of those states, he is done for. I still cant see him winning this. Although I do agree, if he does win, the dems heads will explode, but it will be their own fault
Click to expand...

Its the same for Obama.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Omen said:
Yes....yes....yes....I love guns....very much....New Israeli Galil style side folder AK 47 7.62 X39.....gonna buy it next month....no 3 day wait...I have my CWP! 6 30 round magazines....3000 rounds of ammo.......Sig 220 month after when I sell my P226 and 500 rounds free btw...:D.....

So I like lead propelling devices.....what's wrong with that???!!!! :fool2:

So we elect a liberal then hire someone to aim a lead propelling device at them after they lower the age of consent, legalize drugs and ugh...produce more porn?

Then we elect a Republican right? and not aim a lead propelling device at him this time!

Does that sound right?:woohoo:
Click to expand...

No, sorry - that does NOT sound right: or is the Constitution just an archaic inconvenience? I know Dennis Miller & I parted company over this issue nearly a decade ago.
 
J. Peterman said:
I don't think Bush got elected in 2004 because of his approval rating...I think it had to do with John Kerry being a complete idiot.

The "security mom" didn't vote for him because they like him.

Its the same for Obama.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

I think 2004 had little to do w/ Kerry (about whom I have little positive to say...zero positive on tap: I'd have to go search for something).

I think a there's a tiny bit of history at play here: I can recall NO occasion in US history when a Commander-in-Chief was replaced while troops were (arguably) under fire, no matter HOW unpopular he was. The American people have an old tradition of rallying around even the most distasteful POTUS when there's a war on.

Even if Kerry had been and EXCEPTIONAL candidate, he would have had little-to-no chance in '04.
 
BodyWizard said:
I think 2004 had little to do w/ Kerry (about whom I have little positive to say...zero positive on tap: I'd have to go search for something).

I think a there's a tiny bit of history at play here: I can recall NO occasion in US history when a Commander-in-Chief was replaced while troops were (arguably) under fire, no matter HOW unpopular he was. The American people have an old tradition of rallying around even the most distasteful POTUS when there's a war on.

Even if Kerry had been and EXCEPTIONAL candidate, he would have had little-to-no chance in '04.
Click to expand...

Vietnam. They even voted in someone from another party.
 
J. Peterman said:
Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.
Click to expand...

Completely agree: then, too, I suspect that if Obama wins, the Republican Party will likewise destruct (if only by becoming self-marginalized as the 'right-wing religious nut-job' party)
 
BodyWizard said:
I think a there's a tiny bit of history at play here: I can recall NO occasion in US history when a Commander-in-Chief was replaced while troops were (arguably) under fire, no matter HOW unpopular he was.


The American people have an old tradition of rallying around even the most distasteful POTUS when there's a war on.
Click to expand...

Lyndon Johnson was replaced with Nixon.
 
RobInKuwait said:
Vietnam. They even voted in someone from another party.
Click to expand...
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
 
BodyWizard said:
Completely agree: then, too, I suspect that if Obama wins, the Republican Party will likewise destruct (if only by becoming self-marginalized as the 'right-wing religious nut-job' party)
Click to expand...


Actually I think its the opposite. Republicans were supposed to lose. Most understood that and expected that.
 
BodyWizard said:
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
Click to expand...


Huh?

Please explain this because I think I"m reading this wrong.
 
BodyWizard said:
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
Click to expand...


Forget it. I got you now.
 
J. Peterman said:
Huh?

Please explain this because I think I"m reading this wrong.
Click to expand...
In '68, Johnson would not run for re-election. The Dems selected Humphrey (of all people!) as their candidate after a very fractious primary season (in which both Eugene McCarthy & George Wallace competed) during the famous Chicago convention.

Nixon defeated HUMPHREY. Not Johnson. Johnson wasn't on the ballot.
 
Last edited:
J. Peterman said:
Actually, national polls as you agreed in the past, mean nothing. State polls do and at the moment they are closer than ever at any point in this election.
Click to expand...
Gawd, I love smart people!

Yes, national polls are meaningless *in terms of the competition between candidates.

And yes, they are well within the margin of error at the moment:
everybody's waiting for the debates.

Reality TV at its finest!
(stock up on the beer & popcorn now!)
 
BodyWizard said:
In '68, Johnson would not run for re-election. The Dems selected Humphrey (of all people!) as their candidate after a very fractious primary season (in which both Eugene McCarthy & George Wallace competed) during the famous Chicago convention.

Nixon defeated HUMPHREY. Not Johnson. Johnson wasn't on the ballot.
Click to expand...


Really?

:D
 
RobInKuwait said:
The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.
Click to expand...

Interesting! This is indirectly admitting that a McCain-Palin administration will maintain the status quo - continue where Mr. Bush stopped! It is interesting how you always recklessly go after Obama's throat, without bothering to cover your logical tracks in the process!

It is interesting that any perceived error or slip in the Democratic campaign earns a new thread here within hours. Yet, it is conveniently forgotten that Mr. McCain, with his famed foreign-policy credentials, in an interview with a Spanish journalist earlier in the week, did not seem to know that Mr. Zapatero is the "President"/Prime Minister of Spain, a staunch NATO ally! Wish him luck!
 
BodyWizard said:
No, sorry - that does NOT sound right: or is the Constitution just an archaic inconvenience? I know Dennis Miller & I parted company over this issue nearly a decade ago.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the people who's job it is to defend who instead treat it like toilet paper.

I love my country, but my government can suck a **** as far as I'm concerned, I don't give a sh*t about those fat greedy rats!:smite:
 
strategicmove said:
Interesting! This is indirectly admitting that a McCain-Palin administration will maintain the status quo - continue where Mr. Bush stopped! It is interesting how you always recklessly go after Obama's throat, without bothering to cover your logical tracks in the process!
Click to expand...

I understand your reasoning, however, you misunderstand my meaning.

I see a good administration having low taxes and leaving me alone. Regulate stuff as needed, preferably the less the better. An overly active administration can be a scary thing and have lead to scary programs with even scarier results.

strategicmove said:
It is interesting that any perceived error or slip in the Democratic campaign earns a new thread here within hours. Yet, it is conveniently forgotten that Mr. McCain, with his famed foreign-policy credentials, in an interview with a Spanish journalist earlier in the week, did not seem to know that Mr. Zapatero is the "President"/Prime Minister of Spain, a staunch NATO ally! Wish him luck!
Click to expand...

Ok and Obama said he's been to 57 states so far. Its a long campaign trail...I think McCain may know the President of Spain.
 
I'm sure there is one for McCain, but here is one for Obama :)

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap2Cg_FDRy4"]YouTube - Barack Obama - Gaffe Mania I - Dumber than Dumb[/ame]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top