What do you guys think? Worth it? Not? Has anyone tried?
i can think of better ways to die bro.What do you guys think? Worth it? Not? Has anyone tried?
Figured I'd get that. It was worth asking. I was just thinking about it at wroklmfao, you're a funny guy.
Nevermind then lol I dont wanna die.i can think of better ways to die bro.
that would be outright dangerous.
I'M SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING LOL. That would explain a lot, huh?What led you to think of such a thing? Curious.
You should know, aren't you watching him? LOL sorry I had too. But in all seriousness you think it would be possible to pin with a pure extract.Not knowing exactly how Jacob gets the active concentrated..it would be very tough to get a pure, aqueous extract clean enough to pin.
Because injections, depending on the compound, can be really painful. Injectable base 1 testosterone is painful.You should know, aren't you watching him? LOL sorry I had too. But in all seriousness you think it would be possible to pin with a pure extract.
To the post above bioman. Why would it hurt any explanation for this?
:goodpost: EXACTLY!That and we don't know the exact pharmacological pathways of the actives per se (although Jacob probably does)..bypassing the gut and liver might be bad.
It'd be nice to find out and I'll run some experiments on some mice or something.That and we don't know the exact pharmacological pathways of the actives per se (although Jacob probably does)..bypassing the gut and liver might be bad.
all due respect but that would be outright cruel, it's not going to work so why even bother but that's just my humble opinion.It'd be nice to find out and I'll run some experiments on some mice or something.
I'm not trying to kill them. How do you think science came to be? Some animals had to die for the sake of human progression.all due respect but that would be outright cruel, it's not going to work so why even bother but that's just my humble opinion.
what next? injectable cissus directly into a sore joint?:think:
i'm not a big fan of invasive animal testing unless it's for important medical reasons such as aids and cancer for example but as far as for cosmetic reasons, i'm not a big fan.I'm not trying to kill them. How do you think science came to be? Some animals had to die for the sake of human progression.
Clearly he should be using horses then.the dude's going to need a massive horse size needle just to get the stuff through, the needle will be bigger than the mouse!
lol, nevermind then like I said. I do not want to kill the animal on purpose. If it is going to kill it then I do not want to do it. My point was in my last post that some animals had to day for our progression as a species.Clearly he should be using horses then.
Prostanozol cypionate is technically not illegal, it could be a valid laboratory item. Unmethylated anavar with ester in oil, same with pheraplex, put an ester on the oral "super tren" analogue that's all the rage these days, those would all be technically OK as laboratory items.Because injections, depending on the compound, can be really painful. Injectable base 1 testosterone is painful.
A 'pure' extract would be probably bad and still dangerous. A pure synthesized active, I think that's the key. The active would need to be synthesized to guarantee purity and quality, and then it could methylated or have an ester added to it or whatever. Edcy cypionate would be interesting.
It's not even the PHs that get me to be honest, it's the lack of push for different, perhaps more effective forms of these compounds that supposedly have potential that's never been exploited of seen outside of some in vitro testing. It's always some wonderful new extract process, this time guaranteed to work. In other words the same old crap, which is why I basically dropped out of using most supplements. I'm sick of this or that new and exciting extract of the same old ineffective nonsense plant.Prostanozol cypionate is technically not illegal, it could be a valid laboratory item. Unmethylated anavar with ester in oil, same with pheraplex, put an ester on the oral "super tren" analogue that's all the rage these days, those would all be technically OK as laboratory items.
It amazes me no one did it yet.
1. Legality!It's not even the PHs that get me to be honest, it's the lack of push for different, perhaps more effective forms of these compounds that supposedly have potential that's never been exploited of seen outside of some in vitro testing. It's always some wonderful new extract process, this time guaranteed to work. In other words the same old crap, which is why I basically dropped out of using most supplements. I'm sick of this or that new and exciting extract of the same old ineffective nonsense plant.
The only compounds that really work are steroids to be blunt. Add peptides in and you've got the run of what's really effective on a dollar per dollar basis. And so long as this or that new plant extract is costing me as much as a basic test cycle, I see no reason to buy them anymore. I can get more bang for my buck with the 'roids. I honestly don't understand why anyone buys anything but a multi and fish oil these days.
Which I understand. But when you consider that:1. Legality!
2. Usage Risks
Those are the biggies for me anyways!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Injecting | Anabolics | 7 | ||
Hit shoulder nerve when injecting? | Anabolics | 38 | ||
SUBQ Injecting Test Enanthate | Anabolics | 53 | ||
Injecting testosterone twice a week? | Male Anti-Aging Medicine | 13 | ||
Injecting testosterone twice a week? | Male Anti-Aging Medicine | 2 |